As you may have read over the past few days, there's a new sheriff in town when it comes to webOS at HP. Stephen DeWitt, a man formerly responsible for the company's Personal Systems Group, has stepped into the role of senior VP overseeing the "webOS Global Business Unit." Jon Rubinstein, on the other hand, has moved into the less specific job of "product innovation" inside the PSG, meaning less direct input and control of the Palm group and webOS.
But executive title swaps don't tell you much about what's really going on at a company that has 300k employees, and we thought there was deeper information to dig out here. For instance, how will these changes affect products like the TouchPad and Pre 3? Does it signal another change of direction for the company? And what about the licensing chatter surrounding webOS?
Luckily, we had a chance to sit down with both Stephen DeWitt and Jon Rubinstein to hear their take on this shuffle, and fill us in on what's in store for HP and webOS. We were surprised by not only some of the answers, but by how candid both execs were. We think you'll feel the same, so read on after the break for a full transcript of the conversation.
This is my next: Explain what this new structure is? Jon, how does your role change? Stephen, what is your role going to be? Are you stepping into what Jon has been doing, or are there two new jobs here.
Stephen: As you know, it's been a year since the merger. The team here has been laser focused on building the greatest products, as you see, that we've just come to market with. During that time we've done everything we can to make sure that the Palm team is as empowered as they need to be to get these products done, and they've done that. During that year we very consciously avoided — and I don't mind saying avoided — some of the distractions that go with mergers. And now that we're in the market, it's time to expand. So, the new webOS GBU incorporates what was the Palm team, all of the organization that was under Jon... it also includes all of our ISV and developer teams. As you know, this is a critical part of the success moving forward around webOS... the passion that we can build in the developer community. So all of that group is in there. This group will also see and provide oversight to the development of all our mobile services capabilities. As you know, HP is a big company, HP has very intimate relationships with customers from very big ones to very small ones. And this customer base is clamoring quite loudly for assistance in moving their core enterprise apps to connected devices, to leveraging tools like what we've built with the TouchPad or smartphones... to integrate them into their strategy. How do they automate their field, how do they bring their knowledge base inside the enterprise, out to connected devices...
TIMN: You're talking purely enterprise here...
Stephen: Well, and commercial — let's just talk from small business customers up to big customers. So the webOS GBU will be pioneering the development of that, and we'll provide governance and oversight to the development of those programs as they're rolled out globally. And that's really the final act to the new webOS GBU — and that is the global aspect of what we're doing. We've launched or are in the process of launching in a number of countries now — US, Canada, France, Germany for example. Over the next handful of quarters, we'll take what we have now, we'll begin to expand the reach of webOS — we'll do that in a very well orchestrated order, and that will be a key area of focus for the new team.
TIMN: So would you say that the purview of webOS — how it will play with the rest of what HP is doing — has the purview been expanded? So part of you stepping in here is that you're expanding the way webOS will reach into other pieces of the company, and you'll oversee that?
Stephen: Correct.
TIMN: So Jon, what does this mean to you? What is your new role, both in webOS and Palm, and with HP as a whole.
Jon: So, roll back a bit. I started brainstorming with Todd Bradley quite a few months ago about, you know 'once we deliver the first generation product and platform', what was the right org structure to take it forward. We spent a lot of time thinking about that and talking about it. My recommendation to him was to get someone who really understood how HP operated, who's had access and understanding of the resources that HP has globally, and who could bring to bear those resources in really making webOS successful around the world. And that was kind of the thinking behind it. It was not something that I really wanted to do going forward. I've spent a bunch of years getting webOS in place... so I'd rather focus my time on where webOS goes in the future... and Todd asked me if I'd be willing to help him on the PC side as well, and we have to work that out, him and me — we haven't figured that all out yet. Whatever insight I can give to add innovation, across all PSG... but my primary goal is to help Stephen, and to really make sure that we continue the kind of innovation that we've been doing in the past going forward.
TIMN: In terms of webOS products and the OS itself — Jon, are you still leading that? Is that something Stephen is leading? Or is the rest of the company ingesting bits of webOS here and there? Are we still talking about tablets and smartphones and a mobile operating system? And if so, who is leading that development?
Jon: So the development of webOS is being driven by Ari (Jaaksi). Ari has been driving it for the last seven months, and he continues to drive it. Ari will be working for Stephen... and I'm going to kibbitz. Alright? But Ari's the guy... I mean, he's doing an awesome job. If anything, throughout all this he's getting more resources across HP to help.
Stephen: Yeah I really want to stress that. We're excited as heck about the opportunities around webOS, and so are our 300k employees, our 110k commercial VARs and integrators, our 13k retail partners... we got a lot of people excited about the potential of webOS, but we also know we have a lot of work to do. So to the question you asked: our goal in this was to centralize the responsibility around webOS, in this new GBU, so that as the rest of HP extends and adds value and takes it into the multiple channels that HP operates in... they're going to do that in a well orchestrated, compelling manner, as opposed to having that responsibility to distribute it across many geographies and many lines of businesses, we made the decisions to centralize it under webOS. Also realize that we make a lot of different connected devices; smartphones, tablets, we're also the largest PC company in the world, and you know... there's a lot of... I guess we're... you see as much as everybody the massive transformation that's happening in the PC world. For years this was an industry characterized by its binary baggage and plodding moore's law type evolution. That isn't going to define the pace of evolution moving forward — it's going to move much more quickly. These devices are becoming more clientized, it's about the applications and the experiences, the usability, the context of the nature of these devices, and really when you boil it down, the elegance of these devices. One of the things we were very conscious about in this transformation is we wanted to leverage Jon's expertise, and that is something that transcends everything that we build in PSG. Because this is a relationship game now, this isn't about how you eek out gross margin on the transaction — this is about how you form meaningful relationships with end customers, because the end customer becomes the design center. We're not building products for chipsets, we're not building products for the next generation of fill-in-the-blank legacy OS... we're building products for you now. And the nature of the relationship that we have with you is going to define our success or failure more than anything.
TIMN: So that's related to something I wanted to ask — you mention building relationships with customers. Compaq is a sub-brand of HP, you've retained that. Palm, the brand, has a lot of cachet and recognition with consumers — at least on the phone and tablet side. Obviously you're not going to make Palm printers, but it's clear that the Palm moniker is going away. Is it going away completely? What was the decision behind not retaining that?
Stephen: You know, I wouldn't get too hung up on that. We're very passionate about the Palm base and the Palm brand and the Palm history. You know, all of us were fanatics about Palm brands long before HP was in the equation. We're very loyal to that base and always will be. How we ultimately leverage the Palm brand going forward... I think that's a story that's yet to be written. I mean, if you look for example at what we've done with Compaq — Compaq is used in different geographies around the globe to represent a set of products that are targeted to a particular segment of customers. While we're not going to comment today on anything specifically that we're going to do with the Palm brand, its identity is out there, and we'll leverage it appropriately.
TIMN: So you're not putting it to bed completely?
Stephen: All focus is on webOS because that is the crown jewel. It is the crown jewel that brings the magic to these devices, and it will be the crown jewel that we leverage as we go forward. So putting the webOS name in a prominent place is just indicitave of the passion and the focus we have on building that platform.
TIMN: So it's safe to say that Palm as a brand is not necessarily going away?
Stephen: The Palm brand will continue to evolve. Let us do the magic that we do... you already see it in the actions that we've taken. We're very passionate about the Palm community and we always will be.
TIMN: Shifting gears — the TouchPad launch wasn't perfect. You've gotten some bad reviews. Does this reshuffle have anything at all to do with that?
Stephen: Josh I know where you're going and let me nip that completely in the bud. This has absolutely nothing to do with the first eleven days when we haven't actually even officially launched it in retail. It has been available in retail since the first of july in some retail locations, but our on-ad date — the date that everything is circled around — is the 17th of july. If you walk into a Best Buy this weekend or you walk into a Staples or you walk into any of our retailers, you will see a changed retail experience.
You're going to see a massive amount of labor in the stores. You're going to see the butler service that we're so proud of here really be extended by our retail partners. You're also going to see our retail partners start to market like crazy. You're also going to see the media... some of our ads that are out there, but the weight on our ads is really a teaser. Starting around July 17th and beyond and all the way back to school, you will see the kind of weight that a company launching something special like this is going to put. So, this has absolutely nothing to do with that, Jon said this is something we've been discussing for some time because we knew this date was coming. We also have a number of things we're working on above and beyond webOS and above and beyond the tablets and phones that we're working on broadly across PSG, and you'll hear about that in the next few weeks.
TIMN: So if this has been a long time coming, is it the case that the Palm team has basically been in a vacuum? The plan was to let them get their heads down and get the TouchPad out, and then open it up?
Stephen: I know you know a lot of products and how they're built. How many products do you know — and you've reviewed this product — that have been built literally from the ground up in less than a year?
TIMN: Well okay — so if all this labor went into it and you have this big splash happening on the 17th of July... why not just hold the release until then?
Stephen: Yeah, that's a good question. In hindsight everything is clear. We had very compressed schedules in the 11th hour, and we had a very passionate base of people that we wanted to show the product to. If you look at the negatives that are out there, I think there are a few things that we clearly didn't communicate right. When you see a review that says 'fantastic OS, elegant... clumsy hardware,' you know, I've got to love the fact that this is referred to as clumsy and fat. There's nothing clumsy or fat about this. The fact that we're a few millimeters bigger than a second generation product is because we made a conscious decision to add capabilities inside the touchpad that we feel are desirable to an end user, like inductive charging. So to not be sitting there, wires all over the place... which frustrates people... and we know that.
TIMN: But it does seem premature the way you rolled this out... now you're saying 'the 17th is the real launch.'
Stephen: You know, you're right. I don't think anybody is going to push back. If you look at comments around a handful of the apps or certain elements of the product... the overwhelming majority of these will be fixed in that OTA update that we have planned for the end of the month. I will tell you, for HP broadly, this is a new mantra — if you will — of having a tethered relationship with an end consumer, and delivering innovation literally on a daily basis. My apologies from the get-go if we somewhat stumble and bumble early on in this process. It's one of the reason we've got the butler service out there. To make those first 90 days as exceptional as we can. And we're going to have a very high touch, intimate relationship with all of our customers. But we're going to have to get used to how we communicate that this innovation is coming every day. These products will have more capabilities, more stuff. And the developer community will take this product and do the magic that they do.
Jon: One more thing, don't forget that we have our OTA update coming soon. As we discussed, it's been under development for three, nearly four months, and it's terrific. We want to be sure you get a unit with that on it and take a second look.
TIMN: Will that be available by the 17th?
Jon: No.
Stephen: Some elements will be available, improvements to our movie store, the Kindle app... but the OTA is planned for the end of the month. And we'll use this as an opportunity to go back to the reviewer community... you also saw probably the announcement that we have our 4G tablet in the pipeline with AT&T, and we're working on that. There's going to be plenty of stuff to talk about. If we end up turning around those reviews, and people say 'hey HP fixed that stuff'... that's going to be the case you should expect. But you don't just whip these up; there's a full engineering effort behind them.
TIMN: I'm glad you brought up the TouchPad 4G. The PR says this device has a faster CPU than the TouchPad you just released to consumers. Can you explain why there would be a difference between this new product, and the one that was released about two weeks ago? Why the spec difference?
Jon: Because we can.
TIMN: Well, if I went out and bought the TouchPad, and then 14 days later I hear there's a new one with a faster CPU, I would feel a little burned by HP.
Jon: C'mon Josh, recognize first of all that it's not available 14 days later.
TIMN: Well I'm saying, if I bought an iPad and then the next day I heard there was going to be an iPad Plus, I would feel a little burned by it.
Jon: Well, it's a 4G version. It's a different product. And you know what? It shows you how fast we're going to innovate moving forward. You should expect a steady stream of interesting products coming out of here. We've been working on them the past year, and we're going to keep driving them going forward. This is something you should expect, and we're going to keep giving customers a choice of what they want to get, and you know, keep adding value to the product line.
We're not just going to sit back. You guys complain 'Oh we don't like this hardware' well you know what? We have a lot of stuff in the pipeline you are gonna like. Furthermore, there's going to be more than just one product. As of today we have 16GB and 32GB, you'll have 4G, you'll have faster processors. There'll be a variety of configs at different price points that bring different values to different customers. It's all a matter of what you want.
TIMN: Well, from my perspective, this does seem a little odd. Why bump the CPU? I get the storage capacity, but why a CPU difference? It seems like you'd want both of these guys clocked as hot as possible — they're not just in the same family... they're the same product. What is the reasoning behind it?
Jon: It's the same CPU. You know this stuff...
TIMN: Okay, so will you clock the current TouchPad to 1.5GHz?
Jon: It's not a software issue. It's a processor yield issue.
TIMN: I'm confused... are they internally the same?
Jon: They are binned at different speeds.
TIMN: So people who went out July 1st and bought the TouchPad, they won't get the same performance as the TouchPad 4G?
Jon: No, that's a 1.2GHz version.
TIMN: Well, that strikes me as extremely unusual.
Stephen: Well let's not lose sight of the fact that this is a higher end product... it does have the 4G connectivity... it does have... unique capabilities, and a higher price point.
TIMN: Okay, let's move on. You have a new smartphone coming, I know you have printers and other stuff, but you've got the Pre 3 coming. It's running a different version of webOS than the tablet. There are pretty major differences between those OSs. You're encouraging people to develop for webOS 3. Is this going to hurt the Pre 3? A device running an older version of the OS? Do you expect to get them to parity quickly? What is the phone outlook?
Jon: I wouldn't say it's an older OS. It's certainly a different OS. We didn't want to do a tablet where we just took the phone OS and scaled it up. We talked about this before. We went back to the drawing board and said 'how do we take webOS and deliver that elegant experience but optimize for the larger form factor,' and because of that we had to split the effort. You can assume that sometime in the future will converge again, but not anytime soon. So you're right, the Pre 3 has a different version of the OS. It runs phone optimized applications, it's not going to run the tablet apps. That's how it works on every other phone that's out there.
TIMN: But you're still encouraging developers to code apps for the Pre 3's OS?
Jon: Absolutely, and we'll do something in the future that will make that easier for developers, but we're not going to talk about that now.
TIMN: Will they hit parity soon though? Before the end of the year?
Jon: We're not giving any timeline on that.
TIMN: But it will happen?
Jon: No, I haven't even said it's going to happen. I chose my words very carefully. Sometime in the future we will re-converge these, but right now that's not the plan.
TIMN: Okay, let's change subjects. You said you want to be #2 in tablets. Can you still get there?
Stephen: Oh yeah Josh. Look, we're committed to working super hard at this. We've got a lot of passion for this business, we've got a great engineering team, I think we've taken a lot of steps to make sure the resourcing and the alignment around the company is all there. Our hearts and minds are into it. We're going to work extremely hard to win that position in the market. We've got a lot of work to do. We've got that. But look, you're already seeing it. Our App Catalog is looking awesome, day over day, we've got great products in the market... we have a lot of work to do. But we're going to do this in a way that is both expected from our customer base... we work with some pretty sophisticated customers around the globe... and launching into the world of connected devices to the degree that we have now is a commitment that we've made to our customers that we're in this for the long haul. I believe very passionately that by the end of this decade that the number of devices tethered to the cloud is going to be measured in billions. So the opportunity is in the earliest stages. The whole concept of personal computing is on an entirely new trajectory, and that's going to get played out over the next handful of year. The beauty of all this is that in this new world order, the big beneficiary is you. The consumer, your personal life, your professional life, everything that matters to you, will be accessible in a very seamless, context aware manner, that we think is going to change the human experience. And we're all in. We're going to be all in today, we're going to be all in at the end of the year, we're gonna be all in five years from now.
TIMN: Let's talk about licensing. You obviously have some strategy here. Based on what Leo has said, what Jon and I have talked about — there are clearly strategies forming or formed around the concept of licensing webOS to a partner or partners.
Stephen: HP deals with a lot of customers. We're not a newbie on the block. We've worked with a lot of end customers, tech partners, ODMs, other OS manufacturers. We're part of a community. And in that community a lot of discussions happen. The fact that there is so much excitement around webOS is good, and it's something we encourage. We're going to have lots and lots of conversations, but right now I want to be outrageously clear: our focus is on what we're building, and what we're going to mature the webOS platform. To bring the kind of cool and meaningful innovations that matter going forward — that differentiate us from the rest of the world. That's our biggest priority. We will address licensing and everything along that ilk, the same way we've looked at other licensing options in the past. We'll be very prudent — we're not seeking to empower competition, but we're seeking to empower or expand the presence. There's no doubt our partner base and our customers will take the TouchPad and webOS into places we haven't even envisioned yet. And we will do everything we can to inspire that.
TIMN: Okay, so the Wall Street Journal just reported that Amazon is set to introduce a tablet. Jon you're on the board over there. Kindle was one of the launch apps for the TouchPad. Is that the kind of partner you want to have with webOS? Someone with a big ecosystem and a big audience? Is that a conversation that you're having?
Jon: So, we'd like a partner that would allow us to expand the webOS ecosystem. You and I have talked about this before. There's a variety of different sets of a characteristics to qualify as a good partner. I would say Amazon would certainly make a great partner, because they have a lot of characteristics that would help them expand the webOS ecosystem. As to whether there's been discussions or not... that's obviously not something I'm going to comment about.
TIMN: But you wouldn't say that you haven't had discussions?
Jon: I said I wasn't going to comment.
TIMN: But they have what a partner you might be looking for needs to have.
Jon: They're one variation on a theme.
Stephen: Josh to give you an idea, three years ago we were doing no revenue through Amazon in our PC business. they have been one of our fastest growing channels to the market. We haven't just said 'let's treat Amazon like Best Buy' — Amazon has tethered relationships with their customers. There's no company on the planet that has more intimacy with their end customers, or knowledge of their end customers. We respect that a lot, and we've learned from that. And our partnerships in other areas have taught us a great deal, so to Jon's point... as a metaphor, that's the kind of sophisticated partner that makes sense.
TIMN: Okay. Final question — we know Jon's answer to this. Stephen, have you used an iPhone?
Stephen: I sure have.

Comments
Jon looks freaky in that picture.
/justsayin
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 4:41 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Okay, after reading that, I went and stared at his pic for a few seconds.
And he stared right back at me.
I blinked first.
That pic does get under your skin after a while. Like he’s an Elf, or he’s about to transform into a Werewolf or a Bat.
(No, I’ve only had coffee this morning. Why do you ask?)
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 7:23 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
LOL
Posted on Jul 18, 2011 | 1:15 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
TIMN is THE BEST tech site on the web, and it’s only a temporary taste of what’s to come! Keep the rockin’ coming our way!
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 4:42 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Wow…. Jon is REALLY defensive over the Touchpad 4G CPU bump.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 4:48 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I actually have more empathy with him. It’s more meaningful than a storage bump, but if increasing the clocks peed of the Touchpad no-4G meant delaying by 15 days, that would have been bad, too.
Palm is already too late to the party, possibly. Coming in even later would be worse.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 4:58 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
But how hard would it be to just up the CPU clock speed by .3 GHz in the first place? Anyone who buys the first touchpad will already have an outdated webos tablet after about a month when the 4G releases. For someone who always wants the latest and greatest version of a device, I would be pissed.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:03 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
You have to look at it as a 25% increase, not 0.3 GHz. They (rightfully) expect to sell more wifi TouchPads, so they use a cheaper, more available part for it. For the more expensive (and lower volume) 4G version, they add an extra incentive in the higher-binned CPU.
It sucks that it wasn’t known at the original launch, but the reasoning makes sense to me.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:27 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Isn’t the Qualcomm chip the same in both? (I’m unsure about this) If so, why would it cost more for HPalm to clock the wifi touchpad at a higher speed so it would match a product they are launching a month or so later?
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:32 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Say you have a production line churning out your SoC. Every chip is identical right? Wrong. When you test them you find that some are stable at 1.5Ghz, and some are stable at 1.2Ghz, and some aren’t stable at any useful speed. Every chip that falls below your tolerance gets tossed, but you can always use the small percentage that clocks out much faster as a premium part.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:08 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Did not know this. Well, I guess you do learn something new everyday! :)
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:16 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Did not know this. Well, I guess you do learn something new everyday! :)
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:16 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Yeah, I think that’s why Jon was so bent out of shape over the question… He knows Josh probably knows the technical reasons behind it, but not every consumer does, in fact the average consumer probably doesn’t have a clue… Which is probably why Josh posed the question in the way that he did and why he pressed the issue.
To the average consumer the situation probably looks exactly as Josh presented it, even if the 25% bump in clock speed probably doesn’t make any difference in every day use… I’d bet HP had more to do with the different SKUs than Jon or the webOS team did, to them (coming from the PC side) it’s a commonplace strategy.
People stopped looking at GHz on the PC side a few years ago, the smartphone market isn’t quite there yet tho… So it might be a little misguided to play w/SKUs so much. Not a big deal in the grand scheme tho, or at ‘least not as big a deal as launching a product that they freely admit is in dire need of an OTA update that’s not coming out until weeks later… Ugh.
The Xoom launched in the same state, but Google wasn’t pinning all their tablet hopes on just the Xoom (as seen by the stream of tablets that launched since)… And they iterate faster than anyone else, HPalm’s gonna have to match that if they really hope to beat Google to #2.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 1:48 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
google doesn’t make tablets
Posted on Jul 17, 2011 | 1:19 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Yep. Intel and AMD have also always done this.
It’s obvious that the faster chips are now available at a cost-effective price and they don’t have to change their design, so this newer batch of tablets gets to go a bit faster.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 7:28 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
google does not make tablets
Posted on Jul 17, 2011 | 1:21 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
They’ve been doing this with PCs for years. Every processor has multiple speed steps – there are variations in quality and the yields are lower for the better performing parts.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:09 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Yep, though Intel got their process so good that they generally end up with a glut of superior parts that they underclock. Back in olden 486 times this was a bigger deal in the PC market
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:54 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I guess the same will be the case with tha Qualcomm-Processor in the Touchpad. I will see as soon as the Homebrew-Comunity has made some alternative Kernels with higher clock-rates :)
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 7:58 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
It is common when they fab cpu’s they fab them all the same then test them, and some test better than others. The ones that test good will be sold as 1.5 and the ones that test bad will be sold at 1.3 and a cheaper price, plus probably a greater availability at least on a new chip that hasn’t had several runs to perfect the process.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 7:59 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
What planet are you from? Apple is the market leader, they are effortlessly bashing the shit out all “competitors” with one damn hand, hell, with a single finger, and Palm…sorry, HP…try and pull these consumer shafting schemes now? It would be pretty shitty EVEN IF they were #1, but when they are absolutely, without a doubt “down and out”….with decades of constant failure, hyped product after hyped product crapping out BEFORE release….and “oh yeah, well you whine that our previous products were always slow, so now every half month a new product comes out, 300mhz faster! It all depends on how long you can hold out for!….” :-)
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 7:28 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
It might be bad for HP to do a slight spec bump within a couple of weeks after launch, but your Apple example is downright silly. Isn’t Apple the same company that convinced it’s legion of minions that the iPad GS, I mean iPad 2 was ‘IT’ because it was faster and thinner than the original. Now, a few months after the fact we’re hearing that they’re coming out with an iPad3 in time for the holidays with a Retina Display, an upgraded processor and iOS5. So, whose more wrong – HP, whose customers had nothing and could still return their TouchPads or Apple whose customers had iPad 1’s for a year and could have easily waited until December for the real iPad 2 (only it’s going to be called the iPad 3) but instead shelled out another $500 for a device whose only claims to fame were slightly thinner and faster as if they were must have features. Sorry, but your argument doesn’t fly.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 9:37 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
You’re comparing what HP is doing to what Apple is rumored to be doing. In fact, since iPad supply is only just now catching up to demand, it’s actually very UNlikely that Apple will release a new iPad this fall. And even if they did, there’s still a big difference between 6 months and 1 month.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 10:22 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
There’s a difference alright. At the consumer end, potential Touchpad buyers are basically told that a Premium model will indeed be launched at a premium price, and that if they decide to hold on for a few weeks, they can have it. They are told in advance, so consumers can make an educated choice, and they don’t have to wait too much.
Not the case with the iPad. Apple is basically saying nothing about the issue, so iPad consumers are left to blindly decide whether getting the iPad 2 now, and potentially getting screwed in six months, or wait for an unconfirmed product they know nothing about (and could eventually become unworthy of the wait).
Bottomline, HP is letting you choose, while Apple is asking you to make an impossible bet.
As a consumer i would prefer HP’s take on this, but we all know what’s going to happen, market wise.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 11:03 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Are you serious? When Apple first announced the iPad, they told customers that there would also be a 3G model but that it would have to wait for FCC certification. Customers were then able to decide whether they wanted one right away or wanted to wait for the 3G model.
HP did not announce this new device when users were buying on July 1. Now two weeks later, HP announces they have something else coming out.
Now you’re trying to say that because of rumors customers are unsure if Apple is coming out with a new device? Apple can’t keep up with demand for the current iPad, why would they introduce a new model? There is no uncertainty, unless Apple announces a new device, there isn’t one.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 4:04 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
back in feb when they announced the touchpad, hp said a cellular version would be out shortly after at a later date
Posted on Jul 16, 2011 | 4:00 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
yea, they just failed to mention that it would be clocked at a higher speed
Posted on Jul 18, 2011 | 2:34 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
If you do anything with WebOS, you would already be familiar with WebOS Internals and custom kernels. We can run the original Pre at 1 GHz (the 500 MHz Pre). We will most likely get 1.5 – 1.6 GHz min out of the original Touchpad. This will take two taps inside Preware. No jailbreaking, no rooting. Just a truly open OS.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:12 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
If you do anything with WebOS, you would already be familiar with WebOS Internals and custom kernels. We can run the original Pre at 1 GHz (the 500 MHz Pre). We will most likely get 1.5 – 1.6 GHz min out of the original Touchpad. This will take two taps inside Preware. No jailbreaking, no rooting. Just a truly open OS.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:12 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I disagree with your statement “too late to the party”. Perhaps, too late to be competitive with Apple in the short term, certainly not too late to compete with Android, Windows or RIM in the tablet space.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 11:12 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I think MS might be their biggest competition in the long run… There’s room for someone to play the field in between Apple and Google’s approach, both in the tablet and smartphone markets, and so far I think MS has straddled that line the best with WP7, but their tablet strategy (and Win8) are still a bit up in the air… People seem to like the current tablets for their simplicity, a full blown version of Windows on a tablet goes against that.
Anyway, RIM seems to be permanently stuck in an alternate universe where their competition doesn’t exist. I think they’re gonna self-implode before long… So that leaves MS and HPalm, which puts HP in a tough position, as the biggest Windows PC partner and also it’s competitor in the mobile space. it’s certainly gonna be interesting.
There’s still a lot of race left to run, and HP at ‘least seems comitted to playing catchup (as opposed to RIM who doesn’t realize they’re about to be lapped).
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 1:59 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I’m not sure it’s too late but I think it’s badly dressed, by which I mean badly branded. You know a brand name is bad when retailers suffer selective amnesia regarding it.
http://tablets-planet.com/2011/07/15/best-buy-thinks-hps-touchpad-runs-android-3-0-honeycomb/
Posted on Jul 16, 2011 | 10:42 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Why not? The processor that has HSPA+ integrated with it is available in 1.5 Gb. Why would they put a 1.2 Gb in there, when the cost difference is almost nothing. It isn’t the same processor, it is a compatible processor family.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:10 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Almost every processor “family” really is the same chip that has been binned. For example, AMD and Intel don’t ACTUALLY make 30 different CPUs for each SKU. Instead, they use chip binning to separate out the ones that can run at the highest speeds (and separate the ones the don’t run at all). They then disable/enable features not available on that SKU and sell it at a discount. It allows for much higher yields and simplified production. The lower clockspeed Qualcomm Snapdragon chip will be available at higher quantities and lower prices which makes it perfect for the wifi model of a tablet that will likely be lower priced (excluding carrier subsidies on 3G/4G models) and higher volume.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 9:48 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Wow…. Jon is REALLY defensive over the Touchpad 4G CPU bump.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 4:48 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Great interview Josh!
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 4:49 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
DeWitt kind of looks like a chubbier Mark Hamill, circa Ep VI.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 4:52 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Haha… nice.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:09 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
“As you know, HP is a big company, HP has very intimate relationships with customers from very big ones to very small ones.”
Creepy.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 4:52 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
As I sad on Engadget’s article about their review with DeWitt (no Jon) that this doesn’t look good. Thankfully DeWitt didn’t bash the reviewers in this interview but they just seem so lost. I mean look at their response to the TouchPad 4G processor questions, they can’t even give an actual answer. HP was definitely not the right company to purchase Palm. All HP gives an eff about is business and enterprise. It seems like HP doesn’t really care about the consumer aspect of webOS and I think that’ll really hurt in the end.
Why couldn’t Nokia have bought Palm?! :-(
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 4:53 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I disagree. They did give an answer (same chip, different yield, premium price). It actually sounds logic to me that they’re reserving the best SoC chips for the premium 4G version. It’s not that they weren’t responding, is that Josh kept repeating the question because he didn’t like the answer.
As for Nokia being a better choice than Nokia…¿are you serious?. Nokia would’ve been a disaster for WebOS. Nokia has never cared too much about the software side, they’ve always cared about the best hardware. Nokia acquired symbian, that was arguably the most advanced mobile OS of its time. ¿what did they do to it? let it rot, let it fall behind, outdated, underevolved. That’s why Nokia partnered with Microsoft, so they won’t have to move a finger to evolve their mobile OS. To let that heavy lifting to Microsoft. ¿And you wanted those guys to take care of WebOS?. Thank god Jon Rubinstein is much cleverer than you and me.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 11:23 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Josh really got after Jon about the random CPU bump for the 4G version, and rightfully so. I’d be pissed if I bought the TouchPad. The average consumer doesn’t know that they have the same CPUs and that the 1.2 GHz version can be overclocked to 1.5 GHz with some modding.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 4:54 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Yeah, I’m totally pissed about the 300Mhz of clock speed.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:16 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Is that sarcastic?
Directed to everyone (not you):
In reality, if you are smart enough to understand what 300mhz difference is, then you are also smart enough to overclock a chip instead of all these people whining about it. Palm products are suppose to be easy to overclock. Heck, they are probably the easiest as far as tablets and phones go to overclock.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 9:52 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
What about a 25% increase in clock speed? People keep saying it’s only ‘300 megahertz’ like we’re talking about 3ghz pentium 4’s. This clockspeed WILL make a noticeable difference in performance in certain applications.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 10:13 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Yeah. Kind of like buying an iPad2 only to learn an HD version is coming in a few months
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:33 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Yeah, but this is days rather than months
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:44 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Everyone knows that a new iPad will come once or twice a year.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 9:53 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Nope, not at all!
The iPad2 HD will be different product and by different product I don’t mean it has a 3G chip inside like the TouchPad…
The display will make the iPad really expensive and therefor targets another group of customers.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 4:50 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I’m not. I have a Touchpad. To get the 4G, I would either have to pay a few hundred dollars more, or $1500 or so for data for two years. I’ll take my WiFi 1.2Ghz.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:14 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I’m not. I have a Touchpad. To get the 4G, I would either have to pay a few hundred dollars more, or $1500 or so for data for two years. I’ll take my WiFi 1.2Ghz.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:14 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Exactly, it’s like being mad about Dell why, after offering the 2.2 Ghz Dual-Core PC for $ 300 they start to offer an 2.4 Ghz Dual-Core for $ 420.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 8:45 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Wait, what?
Are you new to the tech world? ANY time you choose to be an early adopter, you know you take the risk of facing any problems the products faces as it matures as well as a better version coming out soon after the 1st generation is released.
Why are people acting like they’ve been burned so badly? The average consumer doesn’t care about the specs race anyway.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:35 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
i hate how Jon answers questions. the CPU answers just pissed me off.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 4:59 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
First – see the difference betweet Ruby’s answers and DeWitt’s answers. Ruby pisses me off
Second – still no question about Sprint?
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 4:59 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
They should bring back the Palm Treo as a 4 inch slate style superphone.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:02 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
the problem with an aluminum back is that it would most
probably interfere with inductive charging.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 7:36 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
See, this is how Apple out-innovates everyone. Apple would just invent a new metal.
j/k
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 11:54 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
:D Nice one!
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 4:56 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
This Stephen chap talks in riddles. Both here and in the Engadget interview.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:03 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
That’s typical corporate speak from someone that has spent his life moving up the ladder while saying nothing, taking no blame for anything gone wrong and kissing the right asses.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:50 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Awesome interview! No punches pulled! Thanks for asking all the things we are thinking!
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:05 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Awesome interview! Loved that you pushed them on the 4g tablet/ different OS on touchpad and pre. Just kind of seems like they have no idea where they’re heading right now.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:06 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Yeah, well, Apple uses different OS versions for their tablets/phones, and there seems to be no problems with that. And i feel like it’s actually a good thing that the more expensive, premium 4G version will be available almost right from the start, to give consumers a choice.
Kind of seems to me that they have a pretty good idea of where they’re heading…only they’re not going to tell Josh ;)
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 11:40 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I can’t believe he would just lie to our faces like that. “We’re very loyal to the Palm base.” Hello, paging Stephen DeWitt, have you followed webOS for the past six months? Very loyal does not mean you just drop support for devices you promised you were going to support. And giving us $50 off the more expensive one is not “very loyal”. It’s “meh loyal” at best.
And Jon, come on, “split the effort”? What you did was put absolutely minimal effort into your phones and throw all your eggs into the tablet basket, a far cry from splitting effort. Also, damnit, stop it with the ambiguous timelines!
“Because we can.” What a lame ass answer.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:06 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Good read.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:06 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Great interview.
You didn’t go easy on them.
Keep it up.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:08 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Oh my god! “… all this is that in this new world order, the big beneficiary is….” The NWO, It’s comming! …. nah just kidding, guys. Great interview :)
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:08 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Just overclock to 1.5GHz, it will be the same thing.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:09 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
He said they were the same part but binned for the clock rating. That means that those chips sold to HP at 1.2GHz were tested in the factory to not be stable at 1.5GHz.
Sometimes the test is more intense than you’d encounter on a finished product, e.g. they might run them with an insane workload in an oven at 40C for two days. I’m not sure what Qualcomm does, so maybe you’ll be lucky overclocking in general.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 7:03 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
The original Pre was binned at 500 mhz, WebOS Internals got them to over 1ghz. I think I’m safe in my purchase of the 1.2 ghz touchpad.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 11:16 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
That’s not necessarily how binning works… They might only have been tested to be stable at1.2GHz because that’s what they deemed cost-effective for initial yields. Intel has sold billions of chips over the years that could be binned higher, but they’d have to be sold at a higher price, same principle.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 2:20 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
This is true, as well as the previous post. We just don’t know which camp Qualcomm was in in this case: were they “positive binning” (ie, only testing for stability at 1.2GHz, not trying all chips for 1.5GHz and then only keeping the “failures” at 1.2GHz) or “negative binning” (each chip gets tested at each bin until it fails, then falls back to the previous bin) or some combination of the two.
So, yes, the 1.2GHz chip might well perform at 1.5GHz. Or, it might not. If it doesn’t, you’ve voided your warranty on the chip (unless HP specifically covers that for you) and might end up with a $500 doorstop. Most importantly: just because your neighbor’s TouchPad overclocked to 1.5GHz just fine doesn’t mean yours will.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 4:52 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Its not “overclocked,” That CPU is rated and binned at 1.5ghz. If you took the 1.2ghz “rated” CPU and then bumped it up to 1.5ghz that would be the “overclock” not the 1.5ghz chip rated for 1.5ghz.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 7:45 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Why not return your touchpad, get the 1.5 and OC it to 2 gigahertz
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 10:15 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Please tell me there is video footage of this … !
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:10 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Jon seems to be reluctant to hear opinions. Being close minded is not a good quality in this industry.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:10 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Tell that to Steve Jobs. IOS 5 is the first version of iOS that shows that they’re aware of any other OS. And thinks have worked out for Apple I think.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:44 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Steve Jobs is the exception and his 30 year track record gives him tremendous carte blanche with everyone in this industry. Same with Gates.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:47 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
No, but they are following in his footsteps, which obviously is a good idea
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 9:49 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Just that Steve isn’t behaving like this just now, but since the very beginning even before he had a 1 year track record…
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 8:02 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
One success out of 1,000 myopic a*holes doesn’t mean that being a myopic a*hole is a good strategy for success.
I don’t think most people would wish the first Fall of Apple (early ‘90s) and near-death experience on WebOS. I’d rather it be run successfully from the start. Vision: yes. Determination: yes. Blindly emulating the negative aspects of Steve Jobs while not having the same all-encompassing and coincidentally highly popular vision: no way.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 4:15 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
You realize that Steve Jobs wasn’t present at Apple during the early 90s right? He had been forced out in the mid 80s. Of all the things that can be laid at Steve Jobs door, that isn’t one.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 10:08 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Yes, I do realize that. Do you think Rubinstein will be heading WebOS forever? The point, admittedly somewhat poorly made, is that emulating Steve Jobs’ character traits is not going to build a company that survives or thrives; even Apple which the real deal put together, barely survived his absence. Especially given Jon’s not-quite-all-powerful positioning within HP currently, the visionary-megalomaniac approach which has worked well for Apple since Jobs returned is not necessarily or even likely to work on Web OS.
Posted on Jul 16, 2011 | 10:28 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
You could just as easily make the point though that John Sculley and friends with their more corporate, De Witt style approach ran the firm into the ground after SJ left – and put the blame at his door.
Speaking just for myself here, I’ve found myself much more productive as an engineer when I’m reporting into an abrasive but talented asshole, than when I’m reporting into a vat-grown executive clone.
Posted on Jul 16, 2011 | 12:41 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
It works for him. Not so much for others.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 4:41 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I think iOS4 was the first release where they actually started thinking what actual users wanted more from their OS.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 7:46 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
To be fair, I think the world/industry has pretty much shown that Apple was correct in much of their thinking in iOS 1-3.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 10:15 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Yet the Industry has been farming on the shortcomings of iOS 1-3 in that same period (“Droid Does”).
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 11:45 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Closed minded is just another term for the Apple way of thinking. “Think different” is just think our way or the highway.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 9:49 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
What I meant to say is that HP doesn’t have a clear vision of what they want to do with WebOS. Apple can get away with not doing what everyone is doing because they can sense a new product segment emerging (tablets) and they are the first one to radically change that segment.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 10:09 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I strongly disagree… Apple didn’t radically change the tablet market, they just kick-started it by putting out a very polished consumer-focused product before anyone else could, and it was a good gambit… They basically got there before anyone else could, but they didn’t do anything particularly hard to emulate or even eclipse (other than grabbing developer mind-share). Taking iOS and scaling it up wasn’t particularly radical or revolutionary.
The webOS team DOES have a very clear vision for their OS, I’ll agree that HP isn’t sure what they want to do with it though… They’re gonna need to move much much faster on the hardware end (or start licensing the darn OS) if they hope to stay in the game, they can’t stick to once-a-year releases like Apple, not w/webOS hardware’s lackluster record.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 2:06 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
@Francisco Vigil
’ Apple didn’t radically change the tablet market,’
and….
‘they didn’t do anything particularly hard to emulate or even eclipse’
and….
‘Taking iOS and scaling it up wasn’t particularly radical or revolutionary.’
???? Yeah right… spoken like a true denialist.
It’s so easy that any man and his dog could do it – right?
So how come that no-one has come even remotely close, in the eighteen months since the release of the original iPad, to producing a viable alternative? Why haven’t the WebOS team with their ‘clear vision’ been able to produce a compelling product that HP ‘knows’ what to do with? Why do people think the answer lies in hardware?
And lastly, why do people not appreciate how difficult it is to optimise OS software to hardware? Seamless smooth and elegant are not just words, they do not just spring from nowhere with little or no effort.
An appreciation of the last question disproves your sweeping initial statements, answers the other ‘whys’ and negates the hardware importance.
The real answer is probably related to Jobs statement that Apple had been working on their tablet system for 6 years before it’s release and predated the iPhone idea.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 9:22 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Deniaslist or not, it took Samsung less than three months to release the original Galaxy Tab after the first iPad was released, and even Apple has sued over the similarities. So certainly not that hard to emulate.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 12:03 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
A direct copy is different than “emulating”. Emulating a successful product means coming up with a product which is different enough to not deliberately confuse the marketplace yet take the lessons learned from the original and apply them.
By the standard of “could someone clone your hardware” as the standard for innovation, there is no innovation, ever. This is why there are things like patents and trademarks and so on: anyone could dissect Edison’s light bulb and produce the same thing, but he was protected from such at the time by the power of patents.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 4:20 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
To be fair, MS had been trying to get there for years, they just kept (indeed, keep) insisting that tablets are another PC form factor while Apple had different ideas and Apple seems to have been correct.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 12:39 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Great Interview! Loved that you played some hardball with the launch questions & didnt just kiss their butt thru out the interview Josh!
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:10 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
“have you used an iPhone?”
Such a simple question that would make or break my confidence in webOS’s future; I’m so happy to see they’ve chosen correctly. Every creator of anything needs to have spent a good time with their competitors product to know what their up against. I hope they’ve used an Android and WP7 device as well.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:11 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I gotta say they sound soooo corporate that i can not be confident that they will deliver something I want. They don’t seem like they have it figured out and its a shame. WebOS is a great OS.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:19 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
They never did. HP in my mind has always been a really fat kid without long term focus. They buy toys without reading instructions, abuse them while hoping them to shine as they were in the toy store, and abandon them eventually without even shedding a tear. Think about VoodooPC, HP is cheap enough to even stop the user forum space for good.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:38 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I gotta say they sound soooo corporate that i can not be confident that they will deliver something I want. They don’t seem like they have it figured out and its a shame. WebOS is a great OS.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:19 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
hey you guys you know what would be great and a very differential factor among other tech blog sites. filming these interviews on video. it would make you guys look super legit. using good cameras and good microphones.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:19 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
hey you guys you know what would be great and a very differential factor among other tech blog sites. filming these interviews on video. it would make you guys look super legit. using good cameras and good microphones.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:19 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I’m really disappointed in the way they are doing things. How can you just make a faster Tablet right after you fumble a launch of the tablet?
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:20 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
ugh, give it up.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 8:36 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Another thing is it will cause buyer paralysis. Why purchase a touchpad when I can wait it out for 3-4 months and likely get a newer/better version. Apple mitigates this by having a yearly cycle, so that most tech people that care buy the product within a month or so of release, and the normal consumers don’t really dive in till later.
HP is sending a message that says, “we’re going to unpredictably upgrade/introduce new touchpads according to no natural rhythm”. It’s probably not a smart move.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 10:20 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Actually i think it’s the other way around: ¿How can it be “unpredictable” when they just announced it, in advance?. And it’s not going to be 3-4 months, it’s gonna be 3-4 weeks, so any TouchPad purchaser will know full well about the Premium version. That is the exact opposite of random or unpredictable.
Speaking of unpredictable ¿how many people expected a new iPhone by June this year? how many expected the iPad 2 to be released in january?. So much for that yearly cicle.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 12:20 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Wait one month and they will bump the processor up again and call it a new tablet
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 4:13 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I still don’t understand the CPU bump.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:21 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
As Jon said, it’s the same CPU. Some guy probably wanted to make the 4G edition better without too much cost, and asked the engineering dept to clock it higher. This means that the original Touchpad is also capable of being tweaked the same way, so it can be seen as a good thing.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:39 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
it’s the same processor but capable of a guaranteed higher clock
speed… so some of the 8060s that are in the current TouchPad model will probably do 1.5, but the ones in the “4G” version have been tested and shown that they definitely will run at least 1.5.
that’s how I interpreted what Jon said..
from what I remember, they “bin” processors based on clock speed, voltage, and temp.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 9:49 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I haven’t read it yet (can’t wait) but I have my beer and shot glass ready! Today’s drinking game: Take a shot every time Jon starts an answer with “So…”
And go!
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:25 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
any Audio version?
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:32 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
#1. Josh great job with the interview. It would have been nice to have them address the Sprint issue, but you hit all of my other points.
#2. According to Jon, I need to return my 1.2GHz WiFi TouchPad and wait until “There’ll be a variety of configs at different price points that bring different values to different customers.” so I can avoid getting burned again.
#3. So any developer would be insane to write for webOS (at least currently) or else they would need to support a phone version and a tablet version of their app. I sure thought Enyo was supposed to eliminate this problem.
#4. I refuse to buy into multiple ecosystems. If HP will not have a webOS phone available on Sprint, then I will be forced to move to Android which means I will purchase an Android tablet. Does HP realize this is an issue for other customers?
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:33 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Uhm, all current platforms out there have a tablet-optimized version and a handset version. Why would a developer be insane to write for webOS? Either pick one or the other, or both.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 8:28 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
iOS has unified development framework. So will Android with Ice cream sandwich. Both got huge markets, while HP is completely fragmented (Android is paradise compared to WebOS) and without any relevant market, even more so, the majority of their current users are (pissed) 1.4.x users:
WebOS 1.3.x
Palm Pre (Mexico)
WebOS 1.4.5
Palm Pre
Palm Pre Plus
Pam Pixi
Palm Pixi Plus
WebOS 2.0
Palm Pre 2 (some carriers)
Palm Pre Plus (some carriers)
WebOS 2.1
HP Pre 2
WebOS 2.2
HP Veer
WebOS 3.x
Touchpad
Problem is:
1.x has a different development framework than 2.x, and 3.x has a different framework than 2.x and 1.×.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 12:29 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
ruby has stated that their are plans to converge the various webos frameworks, and i’ve no doubt it will happen in the near future. i’m sorry but i just don’t see android as much better. with 500,000 or so devices being activated each day, there is still a great deal of fragmentation among them. and from a UI perspective, webOS kills Android..
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 12:37 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
All very true, but with webOS HP has to out-execute Android or iOS in some area other than UI… That alone hasn’t gotten them very far.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 2:17 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
i’m betting they can succeed where they need to. they seem fully dedicated to the platform which makes me hopeful.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 2:27 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Why no questions about Pre3? When its coming?what carriers?….was really expecting this interview had pushed them on webOS phones =(
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:35 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I can’t get my head round what Jon means when he says they have been working on an OTA update for three, maybe four months. It will not be available on the 17th, but presumably it is the same OTA that will be available by the end of the month? If that is the case, and they have known about the bugs and have been fixing them for 4 months, why release the product on 1 July? Why not release it when the OTA is available at the end of July- so the reviewers do not get a chance to rant about the speed and bugs? I am not a marketing expert, but all this just does not make sense to me. To me it would have made more sense to release 10k to 50k units, to a private pre-selection of power, casual, and techie users across the world and get their feedback privately and refine the upcoming OTA, rather than get into a marketing mess as I think they are in now, but that is just my opinion.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:35 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Because a launch isn’t just the software. It’s managing the manufacturing to ensure the HW is available and distributed to retailers. It’s ensuring the retailers have the displays set up and training. It’s ensuring that advertising is bought and scheduled. All of these are scheduled in advance and have lead times.
This is their first major webOS launch (maybe one of HP’s biggest launches ever), worldwide and more complex than what they have done before (how complex were any of their HP printer launches, for example….?) There’s some truth that the 7/17 was planned as an increase in the advertising (retailers were told not to have store advertising before then) but, even if HP is adjusting their game-plan on the fly, it’s not surprising that given the complexity of what they are doing now.
Oh, and none of the software issues are show-stoppers. If they were, then the launch would have been postponed.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:19 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
The current build 41 of WebOS 3.0 was frozen 4 months ago so they could send it to manufacturers. They have spent that 4 months making the next one better.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 11:24 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
You can make all the excuses you want, but Apple doesn’t do this. And that is who HP, like it or not, is competing with here. Pitch-perfect day-one release. Ad and media blitz on Day One of sales. Day-one release gets moved out if quality is not there.
This allows customers to see the hype, believe the hype, and buy based on the hyped, and not generally be burned by a not-ready-for-release device that then has to sit in a drawer for another month waiting for the “really cool” OTA update.
What a waste.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 4:47 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
because people were about ready to hang HP back in February, and were becoming increasingly more furious around May/June. They couldn’t have possibly moved it back any further due to the demand. Releasing it earlier and simply asking people to accept an OTA update about a month later is a fair compromise imo.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 8:34 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I agree with Scott and Jetsetter, but I think there was another idea behind the “pre-launch” launch. They were hoping to build word of mouth, just like Hollywood does when it has a movie in limited release before opening nationwide. HP was hoping to create a buzz before the big launch, but it mostly backfired on them. It happens in Hollywood, too, but any given studio has a number of movies at any one time, so a single movie flopping doesn’t seem like the entire studio is flopping.
This could also have something to do with Ruby talking about the wide range of products in the pipeline, soon to be announced or launched.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 12:12 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Quick simple solution: Release a unibody aluminum 4" slate phone with Tegra. That would sell a lot I think.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:38 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
as long as the metal doesn’t interfere with the touchstone.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 11:33 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
as long as the metal doesn’t interfere with the touchstone.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 11:33 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Josh, great interview. This is the reason that This is My Next is such a great place to get your gadget news. I love the “inside baseball” of the tech industry!
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:43 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Hm. Ruby makes it sound like the pre3 will never get WebOS 3.0. Either he’s learned his lesson, or more likely he knows convergence for WebOS is definitely at least one more hardware generation away.
Sad. This opens the door for me for ICS, android may score my smartphone/tablet dollars. Makes me sad.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:45 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
This confuse me a lot. If the upcoming phones will stay in WebOS 2.x for a quite a while, the rumor that next-gen WebOS phones may lose gesture area becomes such a joke… Can’t even think about a WebOS 2.3 phone running WebOS 2.1 mojo apps in ‘legacy’ emulator mode.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:53 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Great job Josh, after reading this I’m completely disenchanted with the former Palm now HP phone and tablet offerings. They, like the rest of the tablet community, are still stuck behind the iPad 1 I got a year ago. I really want to love a TouchPad, but after your review (where you were pulling for them too it sounded like) I just can’t do it. I’ve heard too much marketing speak at this point from this pair to feel good about their products….maybe if they do license it to 3rd parties I can reconsider, but that seems like a tenuous proposition as best too. Android has proven that licensing is a great avenue for fragmentation and hit and miss support for updates, as my Droid 2 that’s still hasn’t gotten a gingerbread update proves.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:54 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
So I’m confused, if the bugs are fixed (by the end of the month, and was the main part of the low review), what is stopping you from going with a touchpad?
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 11:32 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
You don’t buy a tablet. You buy an ecosystem. If the company creating that ecosystem is trending towards RIM incompetence rather than Apple brilliance, that’s a significant ding against the future of that ecosystem. Even if the current hardware/software were perfect (which even with the promised update it seems unlikely to be).
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 5:37 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
ok,base on the answer to the last question. I think I will buy the next WebOS phone. unless DeWitt was using an iphone 3GS
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:56 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Its pretty clear that they are going to try to license webOS to other manufactures. It also seems like they have no idea ho much they are going to squander webOS. If HP wanted to make great smartphones and tablets they would have kept the Palm brand. When BMW bought Rolls Royce they didn’t dissolve the brand, they leveraged their modern techincal expertise with Rolls Royce’s craftsmanship.
P.S. HP
NO END-USER WANTS TO HAVE THE SAME OS ON THEIR SMARTPHONE AS THEY HAVE ON THEIR PRINTER.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:56 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
If I had to choose between a printer that had webOS and one that didn’t, I’d take the webOS one…
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:00 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
You don’t chose. You pay for. You would pay extra for a printer to have webOS running on it? What is the purpose of a printer in your opinion?
Printers need should be accurate, fast, quiet, and power efficient. Tell me how my Pre – glued to my printer will help any of that?
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 7:04 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Printers are increasingly complex, often they are multifunction devices that will also copy and scan, convert the scan to pdf, email the pdf, secure print etc etc. They also mostly have really really clunky UIs.
Yes the enterprise market will pay another 10$ for a printer that has a better UI.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 7:38 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Show me a device that can run webOS for 10 dollars and you may have a point.
Who wants their phone OS to remind them of their huge printer at the office that is always out of paper?
No one. It cheapens the experience of webOS.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 8:39 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Actually I think it would be more familiar and therefore easier to operate. I don’t feel it would cheapen the webOS experience, just expand it to multiple areas of your life.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 9:56 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Actually I think it would be more familiar and therefore easier to operate. I don’t feel it would cheapen the webOS experience, just expand it to multiple areas of your life.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 9:56 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
You convinced me. Im now looking forward to being able to swipe away the “Printer ink is low” card and printing my twitter feed.
Posted on Jul 16, 2011 | 4:10 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Take a look at the latest eprinter series from HP. That interface will be replaced by webOS by the holidays. Office printers/copiers have an OS. Using webOS instead of a homegrown or contracted OS is a lot easier and cheaper.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 8:29 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
There are printers and there are PRINTERS.
Your little Deskjet doesn’t need WebOS.
But the gigantic Security Enabled, Networking, Scanning, Photocopying, Faxing, Sorting Colour Laser Beast that most medium sized offices has… they usually have a fairly complex LCD screen and buttons going on. And it can be rather daunting. Frustrated cries of “All I want to do is make a photocopy.”
Make that nice and intuitive, and you’ll have happy customers.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 10:31 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Look, thats fine. HP bought webOS they can do whatever they want with it. Im telling you that companies buy printers based on price. WebOS is either a mobile operating system or printer OS it wont succeed as both. For the same reasons why you don’t see the sub C class Mercedes Benz models in the U.S. because it cheapens the brand cachet.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 3:52 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Look, QNX either runs nuclear reactors or the PlayBook, not both… oh, wait ;).
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 12:52 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
QNX? really? what was the half life of the Playbook?
Posted on Jul 16, 2011 | 4:18 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Yeh that’s why you don’t get iOS in Apple TVs.
Oh wait.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 10:28 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
That little DeskJet may not need WebOS. But, HP finds that if it puts a color LCD with flashy graphics and “web-enables” their printers, people will tend to print out crap directly from their printers, printing “graph paper” for $0.10/sheet rather than 100 sheets for $1. Makes people use much more ink, and INKy, not the printer, is where HP makes its billions.
So, your DeskJet will likely get WebOS. It’s cheap enough to put a small CPU in there to entice you to use the printer more and thus spend more on the multi-colored-liquid-gold they call “ink”.
Will that cheap loss-leader CPU be able to deliver a really nice WebOS experience? I would guess that HP won’t try to make the printer and your TouchPad look too similar.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 5:22 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Engadget:Lets interview DeWitt!
TIMN:Their only interviewing one guy? screw that! lets do both of em! XD
Seriously though, nice review, dont understand why Jon was so defensive though.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 5:56 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
He’s defensive because people have been giving him shit for about a year.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 8:29 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
How defensive would you be in interviews if you bankrupted a company after being CEO for several years, then got bought out by HP who moves your position after a year.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 10:17 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Is this really true? If you want to develop for both pre3 and Touchpad you need to do both Mojo and Enyo at the same time! I hope I am wrong because that would be any developer’s nightmare and they really need developers onboard right now.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:05 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Pre3 will run both enyo and mojo code. You can make your app in enyo, but it needs to be in the phone format. Or you can just keep updating your mojo code for the Pre3, but I wouldn’t bank on that being around for too long after the Pre3.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 11:29 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
This is not really sure yet?!
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 5:03 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
This did not get me excited about the Pre3. Sounds like the focus is on tablets.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:06 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
“Is that a conversation that your having?” typo.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:09 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
This is great. I absolutely love this part:
“Jon: It’s the same CPU. You know this stuff…
…
TIMN: So people who went out July 1st and bought the TouchPad, they won’t get the same performance as the TouchPad 4G?
Jon: No, that’s a 1.2GHz version."
Classic fudging, and you did a great job calling them on it.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:29 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Time to buy an iPad.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:38 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
a video would ’ve been better
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:41 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
a video would ’ve been better
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:41 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
There seems to be a mis-stake here: all text + comments go onto a single page. As a result, I can read them all on the plane in a few mins without needing to load multiple pages or otherwise screw around.
Aren’t you people paying ANY attention to web standards?
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:42 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
There seems to be a mis-stake here: all text + comments go onto a single page. As a result, I can read them all on the plane in a few mins without needing to load multiple pages or otherwise screw around.
Aren’t you people paying ANY attention to web standards?
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:42 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
This was painful to read. There is so much corporate BS speak in this which makes me feel that DeWitt doesn’t get it and WebOS will die.
Bottom line, in software, companies that speak and act corporate always fail. They don’t get it. They’ve spent a career kissing ass, staying politically kosher and milqtoast.
WebOS will be dead. Corporate thinkers aren’t creative enough to steer software.
This is quite sad. I was hoping WebOS would challenge the entrenched players. It won’t with this leadership.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:42 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
You’re way off. Dewitt has a history of success. I really like the way he comes off.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 2:14 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
You’re not familiar with working inside large corporations, are you?
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 5:27 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
DeWitt was speaking corporate gobbledegook. He virtually said nothing, but, said it in spades. It was all meaningless rah, rah. If he is going to run the webOS product line, it is already dead. Rubenstein was being very defensive and with good reason. HP has ripped his product out of his hands and given it to someone whose goal is to promote himself first and the product second. Bad deal for Palm, Rubenstein and ultimately for HP.
Posted on Jul 17, 2011 | 7:22 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
This was painful to read. There is so much corporate BS speak in this which makes me feel that DeWitt doesn’t get it and WebOS will die.
Bottom line, in software, companies that speak and act corporate always fail. They don’t get it. They’ve spent a career kissing ass, staying politically kosher and milqtoast.
WebOS will be dead. Corporate thinkers aren’t creative enough to steer software.
This is quite sad. I was hoping WebOS would challenge the entrenched players. It won’t with this leadership.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:42 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
TIMN – Because we can.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 6:54 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
holy crap. Now I understand why changing the ink cartridges in my ink jet was such a pain in the ass. The whole of HP is so conflicted about whether they’ve filed the proper TPS reports that they never notice how many layers of cardboard and plastic the customer has to chisel through to get to their cartridges.
I’m sure their tablets will be equally well thought out.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 7:00 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
IMHO, if you are fringe, then you’ve got to work double hard on the hardware.
A big attractor of the iPhone is that it is good quality, good looking hardware. The OS is fine and all, but it’s not the first thing a person sees when they walk into a phone store.
Just a few stories down on this website, you have a hands-on with the Sony S1 and S2 tablets.
They’re just another bunch of Honeycomb tablets really, but the HARDWARE has people going “Woo… I like that”. Nice original design, high quality fit and finsh. That’s what people see before they even turn the thing on, and makes them want to pick it up and turn it on. Makes them willing to pay a few extra dollars.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 7:19 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Really enjoyable interview to read Josh, thanks a lot. I read almost every post on TIMN simply because they are pretty much always of a higher standard than what I can find elsewhere. Don’t stop.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 7:32 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Because we can.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 7:44 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Great ending comment.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 7:45 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
LOVE LOVE LOVE the last question! Josh, will you make audio available? I’d really like to hear the interview.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 8:26 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Ruby completely mismanaged TouchPad and Pre2 and other Palm launches before them. They managed to destroy the relationship with the only carrier that supported them (Sprint) and now they have no carriers left.
Palm’s dead but so is the webOS.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 8:26 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Just want to say, amazing interview. Funny how your temporary placeholder site is better than Engadget, Gizmodo or Techcrunch.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 8:37 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
This interview made me hate everybody at HP. I used to like Rubi but now…he’s just another corporate bastard. What kind of answer is “because we can”?
They want us to follow them, buy their products, but they can’t even answer a stupid question!
I’ve been with webOS since day one and tomorrow a UPS van will stop in front of my house to deliver me a TouchPad, but I just don’t get these guys.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 8:37 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I really like the idea of WebOs on the Amazon tablet, I hope that they are talking and work something out.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 8:43 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Imagine Nintendo licensing WebOs. Nintendo should join an ecosystem which integrates gaming platform with broader world (similar to what MSFT will do with xbox and windows ) and HP and Nintendo product lines are completely different. HP can do better job in evangelizing WebOs to enterprise and SMB space while nintendo would much easeier push WebOs to living room + mobile gaming.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 3:28 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I felt lobotomized after reading the first dozen paragraphs of meaningless execu-speak.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 8:50 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
HP is a blight. Their mediocre product strategy is going to drag their WebOS hardware (which is really nice) and software (the only viable competitor to iOS) into a cesspool of mediocrity. Remember the definition of a camel?
A horse designed by a committee. This is happening to WebOS. Android. And Win7 Mobile is irrelevant. Where is the competition for iOS?
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 9:34 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Android IS the iOS competitor. The fact that it is mediocre is not as relevant as its 550K units it sells everyday.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 11:53 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
There is obviously massive confusion about how processor speed and binning works, and Josh Topolosky may share this confusion. Qualcomm just released this chipset. If they could have released it at 1.5ghz, they would have done so – and HP would have bought it. Qualcomm’s announcements and roadmaps have always showed the 1.2ghz coming first and then the 1.5ghz would be released later.
When HP announced the Touchpad, they wanted to get it out this summer, the earlier the better. They knew that the 1.2ghz would be available, but they didn’t know the 1.5ghz would be available. Has any phone or tablet manufacture released a Qualcomm `1.5ghz yet? No – because it hasn’t been available. Higher speed parts are typically in shorter supply than the lower speed parts because of what Jon Rubenstein talked about – binning. Qualcomm wishes that all of its CPU’s would work at 2.0 ghz, but they won’t, at least not while stable at target energy requirements. They knew from their first tape out and modeling that 1.2 and 1.5ghz would be possible. As time goes by and more spins of the CPU are made, the so-called “yields” get better – more CPU’s that will run at 1.5ghz are produced.
So, when HP ordered the Touchpad and forecasted certain volumes that they were hoping for, they had to use the 1.2ghz – it was the fastest available. Now, the 1.5ghz is available from Qualcomm. It may not be available in enough volume for HP to satisfy demand for the wifi version, but it is available in enough quantity (hopefully) to meet HP’s expected demand for the more expensive 4g version (which will be less, just like it is for Apple’s 3G version). So, HP went with the now available higher speed version – because as Jon said, they could. They can give it to the consumer, so why not? If a 1.7ghz was available, they would provide that instead.
HP and Dell, etc., do this on all their computers. When Intel and AMD make faster CPU’s available due to increasing yields, they make them available to their customers. Now Apple doesn’t – Apple doesn’t spec bump their computers for a long time until new model’s come out, even though they could probably sell a slightly faster iMac every 5 months has Intel releases slightly faster chips. Over the life of the iMac, the processor from Intel is decreasing in price as Intel offers faster and faster chips. Apple doesn’t reduce the price of the iMac though – they just make more profit until the refresh.
I’ve got no problem with HP doing this. They are giving the consumer a faster processor as soon as it is available. I bet the 1.5ghz is not available in the quantities that HP hopes that customer’s will demand for the wifi version – so they are not going to update the wifi version. It’s not what Apple does, but that doesn’t mean it is wrong. Android manufactures do this all the time.
It is not a question of HP underclocking or overclocking this processor. They can’t overclock it – that would void the warranty from Qualcomm and cause all kinds of problems. They bought it from Qualcomm at 1.2 ghz and 1.5ghz.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 9:36 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Thanks for the info!
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 11:49 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Awesome explanation, thanks for taking the time.
I bought a day one TouchPad and was unmoved by the news of the faster chip. I don’t need 4G so I’m not about to trade up to the more expensive version and I’m not gonna act all butthurt because that device has difference specs. When a device is released it rarely has poorer specs than a previous model.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 1:09 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Anyone that’s followed PC hardware for a couple of years knows this, however the average consumer doesn’t, and CPU GHz numbers still cause enough of an impression on tablets and smartphones that the multiple SKUs are likely to confuse or irritate people. That being said, I seriously doubt it’ll be a big deal in the long run. Now, launching the tablet while in need of a serious update that’s almost ready, and sending out review units even before that… That is likely to cause a lot more damage.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 2:13 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Thanks for the explanation. I bought the Touchpad on day one as soon as Best Buy opened. I chose Best Buy simply for their buy back program. I’m an early adopter… better versions of hardware will come. At least I’ll get some money back so that I can buy a newer version a year from now. No regrets.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 2:54 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
The problems with this approach center around the one truism: tablets are not PCs.
I expect that my iPad 2 will run Infinity Blade the exact same way as your iPad 2. It doesn’t matter that my iPad2 has 32GB of memory and yours has 16, or that mine has WiFi only and yours has a 3G connection.
The pink Nintendo DSi and the blue Nintendo DSi play the same game the same way.
HP doesn’t get this, and I think it is because they are still stuck thinking of this as a chopped-down PC rather than as a consumer electronics device. Maybe they are “right” to think of it that way, but it adds for more marketplace complexity where there really is no need.
What should HP have done? Either market the “4G” as something with a different name, not just “4G” tacked onto the end of it, or sell the 4G with the 1.2GHz chip as well.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 4:28 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
One of the biggest complaints about the Touchpad has been a slight slowness and poor responsiveness, so it may be that the 1.5GHz makes a material difference and gets the UI feeling slick – in which case HP may be smarter here than we’re giving them credit for.
Especially if this OTA update doesn’t actually resolve the performance issues as promised.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 10:04 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Wow this was a great interview! I appreciate that every issue was discussed, not just the highlight reel like some other blogs.
I do get the feeling that they are very defensive right now. Thankfully they are not RIM-level defensive though. The issue with the CPU spec bump seems like a very lame excuse. If anything that will just eat at the battery that much faster.
I do like the idea of seeing more WebOS devices more often though, that is a platform that has me interested!
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 9:39 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
“TIMN: Okay. Final question — we know Jon’s answer to this. Stephen, have you used an iPhone?”
Has Jon used an iPhone?
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 9:45 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
No. I remember he said that when the Pre launched.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 10:04 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
No, he wants to be a “purist” of WebOs and not taint himself by using other products. For better or worse
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 11:45 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I’m pretty sure the lawyers had to check out iPhone though.
Posted on Jul 17, 2011 | 6:15 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Isn’t there an audio version of this or something?
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 9:50 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Nobody calls it “overclocking” when it comes form the the OEM that way (unless it is a spec GPU).
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 9:55 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Josh, keep bringing the heat. We love it.
(though I’m not so sure the guys you are interviewing love it…)
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 10:15 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Can’t believe how defensive he is.
It took 14 days to announce a CPU-bump and he’s acting like it’s fair go.
It’s not fair Jon. Especially to consumers who bought your critically unsuccessful device.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 10:20 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Honestly, if the software update tweaks fix the performance issues, I don’t think there will be a problem. Actually, wrong, people will still complain about getting the v6 model when the turbo charged v6 was released a couple months later that takes .5 seconds off 0-60. In others words, people are petty, impatient, impudent little brats. But what is to be done? You have faster parts available later on and choose not to use them?
the binning process gets refined, to the point where later generations have better yields of chips performing at a higher level, and so the yields of 1.4 or 1. GHz chips a few months from now is much higher than the yield is now. This is the way certain chip manufacturing. Would you prefer the same speed for over a year like say, the iphone 4? Is that consistency worth so much? They could have chosen to pocket some of the extra margin on cheaper cost 1.2 GHz chips a few months from now, but they choose to upgrade the line later and people get pissy.
brats
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 3:24 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
¿You mean the ones who bought it two weeks before the advertised release date, which is not until the day after tomorrow?
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 1:22 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Yeah, the people who saw it for sale, who had seen all the pre-release marketing, and who apparently foolishly thought that the fact that it was FOR SALE meant that it had been RELEASED.
This is the very definition of a botched release. I don’t think HP could possibly have done anything more wrong, short of replacing the TouchPads with a lump of coal in 50% of the boxes.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 5:31 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I wish you had audio of the interview.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 10:22 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Wow those guys are like totally cool. Amazing.
www.anonymous-tools.tk
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 10:36 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Wow that was really good Josh!! I loved how managed to squeeze more information out of them than in the Engadget interview at the same time I could feel how tense and irritated Jon got.
Two very different men there. Very different leadership. We will see how well Stephen does. Certainly a much much better spoken and media savvy guy. I welcome this change.
I also like that the Pre 3 will have the “older” OS. Hopefully much more stable, as WebOS 3 is very much half-baked at the moment.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 11:01 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
You really think the older webOS is much more stable?
It can’t even sync to Google without any errors…
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 5:00 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Very good interview Josh. This is why I keep coming back to This is My Next, I feel like I get so much more than all the other tech blogs out there.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 11:29 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
HP is dropping the Palm brand. I think that’s pretty obvious.
I’m sorry for the Palm loyalists who will be “screwed” by it, but HP has to think big picture, and the Palm brand is, frankly, mud. No one knows it, no one cares about it, and trying to ressurect it only invites consumers to consider WebOS another also-ran to the iPad and iOS. HP has a chance to introduce WebOS to the consumer as if it is an all-new product, and that’s exactly what they should do.
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 11:34 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Oh, and great interview!
Posted on Jul 14, 2011 | 11:35 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
What a painful interview. Jon should not even participate in interviews anymore, his attitude sucks. Oh you bought a Touchpad 2 weeks ago? Screw you, we have a new faster one out that we neglected to mention however many months ago the Touchpad was unveiled. WebOS 3.0 and 2.0 fragmention? Whatever, the developers (wait…what developers?) will sort that out. I like how he just glosses over major issues and pushes ahead saying how great their stuff is. He should have an educated response of some sort, as feeble as it might be.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 12:11 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I actually didn’t mind his responses, DeWitt’s corporate speak irritated me much more… HP’s partners and relationships mean little to the end customer but he goes on and on about all that. As far as Jon, well, there’s a reason he was moved to a position where he’s working towards webOS’s future and not it’s implementation now.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 2:23 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Um, Kindle as a ‘launch app’ is ridiculous. According to reports, the app currently is just a placeholder app that puts up a screen saying “The real app is coming soon”.
If that’s a launch app, I’m sure they’ll have thousands of apps in no time.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 1:19 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
“Launch” is July, 17th. If the Kindle App is not there by then, yeah, BS.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 1:30 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
That processor bump also has to burn all the early adopters (the ones that went out and, you know, bought a TouchPad when HP actually released them). When they see the stuttering scrolling on their device, while their friends have a 4G that doesn’t do it so bad, just a month or two later…
This whole launch seems botched. To release it, then say we really meant to launch it a month later, and then a release updated hardware a month after that (and announcing it AFTER all the early adopters bought your ‘pre-launch’ devices)…it’s like something RIM would do…
Add in the excuse that the software will be fixed later…definitely a RIM job.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 1:25 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Y’know, I’ve never been a big fan of Josh’s reviews or some of his more common articles… But he definitely tackles big-picture stuff very very well, just like this interview. Great work, I think you pushed hard enough to give readers a feel for actually sitting there and hearing Jon and Stephen De-Witt actually answering those questions… All too often these sorta interviews feel like softball PR but this didn’t, at all.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 1:38 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Lots of eyebrow raising while reading. Interesting how much bla bla one can generate
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 1:53 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
This really is a great interview. The more I hear from DeWitt, the more confident I am with HP’s direction for WebOS. DeWitt sounds much more in tune with the current market and has good insight on where technology is moving. I think HP most definitely made the right decision moving Jon out of the position he was in. Jon’s interviews were starting to get really hard to watch. I mean, someone who is trying to lead a smart phone’s development who has never even tried an iPhone? That’s just plain ignorant in my opinion.
Josh is very on point with questioning the announcement of an improved touchpad just 2 weeks after its release. As an early adopter I do feel burned by HP. It truly is bizarre and makes me feel foolish for jumping in with HP @ the beginning of their “marathon.” For Jon to say, “it shows how fast we’re going to innovate,” is a bad response. Making people feel they already have the old model just 2 weeks after release is TOO fast. Discussing the fractured development between webOS 2.1 and 3.0 was also sounding uncomfortable for Jon. I’m sorry Jon, I love your work, but you are not doing webOS any favors in the PR department. I, for one, welcome DeWitt.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 2:11 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Wow. Nothing about this interview really gives much confidence in the future of WebOS.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 2:12 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
TIMN FTW!
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 3:21 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I just hope these guys remember where their Palm Pre early adopters are living: On the Sprint network, waiting for an upgrade from the very early devices they are still using…
http://community.sprint.com/baw/thread/61482
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 3:28 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Yeah the whole “because we can” its that attiude that is going to sink them. You know i’m the consumer and I can buy something else like the Ipad, or an android tablet, because “i can”
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 4:06 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Oh Jesus, Jon’s answers are just awkwardly irritating at times. Even if DeWitt has all the PR speak, he seems to me much more tolerable to read, and even if he does put a positive spin on things he does give good answers.
On another note, I think I may need to jump to another platform soon. This is getting silly.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 4:42 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I don’t think one should make too much fuss about the small difference in chip specs. After all, they are 2 different chipset families and if I’m not mistaken the 1.2Ghz chip is a newer family than the 1.5Ghz Snapdragon chip.
I reckon that the 4G TouchPad needs the extra power to maintain communications with the network in the background, and the remaining power will be used for the actual OS and user input. If they used the 1.2Ghz chip, the device would probably be slower that the regular TouchPad.
So if you’re and original TouchPad owner, don’t sweat it.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 5:09 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Boy, this interview got awfully chippy on the clocking issue.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 10:07 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Boy, this interview got awfully chippy on the clocking issue.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 10:07 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Both are awkwardly irritating… Well done Josh at letting their… awkward and irritating qualities shine through. :D
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 10:34 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I don’t see the problems with Jon’s answers that all of you are whining about. So what, Stephen is more polished when it comes to delivering BS and talking around a question. He has the skill of a politician. Wonderful!
Jon isn’t so verbally skilled. It’s easier to get clues and info out of him. A question he can’t answer, he says “I don’t know”. A secret he can’t divulge.. he says “that’s a secret i can’t divulge”. It doesn’t bother me one bit. He doesn’t caress your ears with PR Poetry and techno-soliloquies. Everyone is not a PR guy, he’s an engineer and speaks like one.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 10:45 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
To be fair, he’s at the C* level, not in the trenches putting together code or even directly managing the folks that do. I do fully expect him to be able to come up with a cogent and coherent answer to questions about product direction.
This of course doesn’t excuse the wall-of-buzzwords-concealing-my-utter-confusion that is Stephen’s answer to just about every question.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 4:59 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
They look like Kirk and Spock.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 2:46 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Great piece!
Wow, though. That last half was…..uncomfortable. Props to Josh for having the stones to ask those questions.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 2:50 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Excellent piece!
Whoa! That second half was…..uncomfortable. Props to Josh for having the stones to ask those questions.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 2:51 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
This is just the BEST tech interview I have ever read! Keep it up TIMN team!
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 4:45 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
These are the voyages of the starship HP-1701-P…Our continuing laser-focused mission… To explore torn-apart iPad2’s and Galaxy Tabs …To seek out thin form-factors…To boldly push webOS where no one dare to follow – in printers and Windows.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 4:58 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
DeWitt’s a twit, Rubi’s outta there and Ari doesn’t give a s**t. WebOS is screwed.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 6:47 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Video makes interviews better.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 7:06 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Judging by this interview, I think it’s safe to say that DeWitt handles interviews more professionally than Rubenstein. Jon seems to be a bit touchy and I don’t blame him; he’s had to take quite a flak on webOS right from his Palm days and he just doesn’t seem to want to deal with this shit anymore.
I think it’s a good mutual decision by Rubenstein and webOS to part ways and let DeWitt take it from here.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 7:18 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
They can beat around the bush how much ever they want, but the fact is that they just burned all the early adopters, myself included.
I dont want to spend a bunch of money and then be outdated immediately.
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 7:34 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
VERY COOL!
Posted on Jul 15, 2011 | 8:53 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
All this whining about CPU speed is seriously ridiculous. People are acting like a faster Touchpad is coming 2 weeks later at the same price as the low end Touchpad introduced in July 1st. The 1.5Ghz Tp is very likely going to cost around $700+ as opposed to $499
As a consumer, I don’t expect a $500 computer to be the same as a $700 computer…and if I were paying $700 for a device like the Tp, I’d like to think I was getting more for my extra $200 than simply 4G service (which I end up paying monthly for, anyway).
I sincerely doubt most, mature, early adopters are going to feel burned (it was known a higher end model was on the way for a while now) and the pricing/feature spread is completely logical.
Posted on Jul 16, 2011 | 8:51 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I challenge any webOS fanboy to read that interview and feel good about web OS’ future. A few thoughts:
1. They weren’t candid as the blurb states. They were evasive. And defensive. Especially Rubi about the Touchpad.
2. Where are all these “products in the pipeline” Rubi keeps talking about? (yeah, we loved the veer!)
3. It’s pretty evident that DeWitt is a classic salesman (full of crap and misdirection)
4. I wonder now, more than ever, how Rubinstein ran this program so long. Clearly the most incompetent clue-less exec in tech.
5. Best most insulting answer: “because we can.” As stupid as it was inflammatory.
6. Best clueless answer: “no phone runs the same apps as a tablet”. Guess that proves he’s never used an iPhone.
7. WHY OH WHY would they not simply put the 1.5 chip in the regular touchpad?
8. If you believe that Rubi being replaced had been “the plan all along”, I got a bridge to sell you in west texas. He was sacked because HP had finally seen enough.
9. Beware what HP really has in store for webOS.
10. Why am I avoiding the webOS system like the plague? “because I can”.
In closing, what a great interview TIMN!!! You asked a lot of tough questions and used those questions to point out alot of stupid moves on HP’s part. I got the sense that those two guys (esp Rubi) where relieved to get out of there.
You guys rock!
Posted on Jul 16, 2011 | 12:25 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Great interview and good to see some tough questions being asked!
Do HP really think they will get a second bite of the review cherry after they release the software update?! Sorry guys, the damage has already been done…
The Touchpad launch hasn’t gone well for HP; no definite launch date, mixed reviews, Rubinstein being moved (Apotheker blames him for this – expect Rubinstein to leave HP within a year), promises of a software update that will fix the problems and then announcing a faster version that will ship in a month.It will be interesting to see how Touchpad pans out; HP doesn’t have much patience with products which don’t sell quickly enough. Worst case, it could all be over quite soon.
Posted on Jul 17, 2011 | 9:42 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Sooo… July 17th came and (almost) went and no update.
Posted on Jul 17, 2011 | 5:49 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Excellent interview Josh. I predict Rubi will be out the door within a year. His new “position” reminds me of the one Rahul Sood held for a period of time after HP gutted VoodoPC – Manager of Stay-out-of-the-way.
Posted on Jul 18, 2011 | 2:04 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Listen HP, Consumers will be loyal to you if you’re loyal to them.
Posted on Jul 18, 2011 | 2:51 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
the image size of dewitt and jon fits perfectly as a wallpaper on the touchpad.
Posted on Jul 18, 2011 | 2:54 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I wanted stab my eyes out after reading parts of this interview. I’ll be surprised if WebOS makes it 5 more years. I hope it does but, I doubt it.
Posted on Jul 18, 2011 | 4:06 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed