Earlier this summer, a teaser page appeared at Socl.com revealing Tulalip, an oddly named service from Microsoft promising a new way to "Find what you need and Share what you know." Facebook and Twitter sign-ins were offered, and the design was reminiscent of Windows Phone's tiles. It turns out Microsoft has been testing this service with a select group of "friends," and this week, I got an early look at Socl — "Tulalip" appears to be dropped — a curious site that's coming out of the FUSE research group that will eventually be rolled out to the public. The site mixes search, discovery, and, go figure, a social network. How's it hold up? Read on.
Design
Ignoring for the moment that the interface looks a lot like that other social network, Socl offers a bare bones, three column layout, with basic navigation in the left rail, a social feed down the middle, and invites and video party options (more on that soon) on the right. As usual, you can follow other friends, but you won't find any list-making tools. Core to the experience is the large search field at the top that asks, "What are you searching for?" effectively creating a new type of status update. You can also toggle the field to a traditional status update. With Socl, you've got the option to post to your feed either a note that you're searching for "live Prince covers" or that you're 'live at a Prince concert." Entering a search term or status update drops it into your feed with appropriate Bing results, where your friends will have the option to comment, like, or further tag it. Clicking 'tag' adds the search term to your personal list of tags, and you can sort your friends' searches and status updates by type (i.e. web, video, news, images).
Tagging
While tagging seems like a decent idea in theory — I theoretically want to track topics I'm interested in — I can't imagine going back to a simple tag search for news, browsing, or much of anything, really, and Socl's implementation doesn't advance what Google's doing with saved searches. I've got a mix of trusted friends, publications, and hundreds of RSS feeds to get a broad mix of focused news and information on topics I'm interested in, and tag searches for Politics, Film, or Technology, for example, aren't going to offer much. And, there's a big difference tagging an interest and actually searching. I might like the band Yo La Tengo, but I'm never searching only for that 'tag.' Instead, it'll be a Google-ese mix like 'yo la tengo scores ost 2008 album,' which isn't going to look good in any design and isn't really relevant to me or my followers outside of last Thursday night.
Video Party
And then, seemingly out of nowhere, Socl also includes a video party feature, complete with chat, for watching YouTube clips together (currently no support for Vimeo, DailyMotion, or any other services). It's a clean, intuitive UI, and aside from the lack of a controllable scrubber, it could be a fun service on its own. Socl is mostly built on HTML5 — we saw no instances of Silverlight or Flash — and the site showed no slowdown in Chrome or Firefox while video partying, searching, or tagging.
Social Search
I understand the push to make search a more social experience; Google's been trying for months with the +1 buttons littered across search results that are then integrated into Google+. Let's say you're searching for great burrito restaurants in San Francisco Mission District. Traditionally, you might check Yelp (or a similar service), trusted friends, regular search, or a mixture of all three. And this side of social networking generally works; people ask for recommendations all the time on Facebook and Twitter, and you often get great answers that search simply wouldn't have turned up. And, with social search, Microsoft is hoping that your friends will see your query and bring their expertise to it.
Wrap-up
Note that Socl is a research project, so it's possible that it won't ever get released as a mainstream product, but we're hearing it's still going to be tested publicly. Socl is starting late to the game, so it's no surprise that you can plug into the potential traffic firehose that is Facebook. While all of your searches and tags are visible to your friends on Socl, I've been told your Socl activity can be limited via Facebook's lists. Otherwise, there's not much here in the way of interacting privately with other users on Socl; no private messages, no @replies, and none of the curated, semi-private groups like Google's circles.
Socl ultimately needs to better show how yet another social network and search tool can help users find the information they're looking for; without mobile support or integration across the rest of the Microsoft world, Socl's got a big hill to climb. We're hearing Microsoft is nearing the end of its private testing period and will roll this out to a bigger public audience through an invite system. Stay tuned.

Comments
looks a bit like google + with different fonts….
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:13 PM EST reply Recommend (19) Flag actions
It’s hard to look completely different from Facebook and Google+ if you’re going for a clean look. This looks like a mishmash of those two.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:14 PM EST reply Recommend (18) Flag actions
I suppose that’s true. Incredibly skeptical either way. Hopefully Socl is a codename.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:24 PM EST reply Recommend (7) Flag actions
Maybe it’s a “Socl Hoax”. Har har har!
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 7:03 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The real name will be: “Windows Live Social Connector (BETA)”
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 1:43 PM EST reply Recommend (6) Flag actions
You mean, “Windows Live Social Connector 8 BETA” – If they didn’t take advantage of the new Windows line with the 8 at the end, that’d clearly represent a downfall in the ridiculousness that is Microsoft – and alternatively a plus for the rest of the freaking Universe. Yes, the entire Universe.
Posted on Nov 18, 2011 | 12:35 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Disagree entirely. You can’t possibly believe that the only way to get a clean look is to mimic g+, not to mention your belief that facebook (as it stands as of the last reworking ~1 month ago) is remotely close to anything described as “clean”.
NOTE: Any reference to porn-filled news feeds is entirely unintentional.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:46 PM EST reply Recommend (6) Flag actions
Agreed, I’m finding Facebook cluttered like using XP with all the crap hanging around that I’ll never even dream of using.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:52 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
The sad thing is, the only positive development Facebook has done lately has been Timeline, which is a modestly unique yet nicely clean look and layout. This is sad because it’s also the one feature that, rather than forcing it on people, has been held back (I’m the only person I know who’s made the jump). Anything crappy or with huge downsides or arbitrary changes they’ll roll out immediately, sure, why not? But an actual improvement languishes indefinitely.
(Not to drift too far off topic, but wow, what does it say about our patent system if someone can literally get a trademark on the term timeline in a web-page context? I’m not even necessarily against them on this one, though, if only because Facebook has gone after sites with “book” in the name . . . despite how Facebook itself is a term appropriated from existing websites of a similar nature. Gahh.)
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 4:39 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Err, I meant to say something more general than “patent system” since I know that trademarks are something different, but forgot to go back and replace that placeholder. I have to say, The Verge’s lack of an edit button is probably my only major gripe with this new site . . . but it’s a fairly big one.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 4:40 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
To be fair, I’ve never once seen one of the porn posts that people are complaining about. Do you have secure sign-in enabled? https? I’ve heard someone say that solved their situation [though i’m not sure how true that is admittedly]
Posted on Nov 18, 2011 | 4:34 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Anyways, making it look even somewhat like a well known social network is simply lazy. If Microsoft wants people to use this thing they should’ve actually made it original and inspired.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 11:35 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Well, for start, DONT USE BLUE AS YOUR MAIN COLOR.
Didn’t MS invest in FB a while back? Some partner.
Zuck is watching Pirates of Silicon Valley right now.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 1:30 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
What, so you think Facebook should hold exclusive rights to blue as a main colour for social networks?!
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:31 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Well, maybe not ALL blue colors, but they may as well own #3B5998.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 12:43 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
facebook sure is not the only one entitled to use blue, but using it in a new social network may not be the best way to create a unique image.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 12:54 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
The new service is probably run by hipsters, so they are using blue ironically.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 6:58 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
But isn’t Hotmail and msn mainly Blue and Orange, like they have on the picture there? Sure Facebook uses a similar blue, but Microsoft are well within their rights to use their colour scheme don’t you think?
Posted on Nov 18, 2011 | 4:36 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Facebook’s design has not been “clean” for 2 years. It’s full of junk that I don’t use.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 2:29 AM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
And Google+ was already a mashup of Twitter and Facebook.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:23 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
Good point, it is like saying every smartphone looks like an iphone with different edges.
Posted on Nov 19, 2011 | 1:43 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Isn’t Google+ essentially Facebook with different fonts?
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:15 PM EST reply Recommend (8) Flag actions
Not really.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:16 PM EST reply Recommend (38) Flag actions
yes really
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:42 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
No, really?
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:44 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
are you blind?
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:45 PM EST reply Recommend (16) Flag actions
tablet, you make good points, but you don’t win anyone over with a negative attitude. keep in mind that every commenter on this page is actually a living, breathing person (!)
-your fellow commenter,
Dan
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 7:01 PM EST reply Recommend (27) Flag actions
where is his good points?
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 7:07 PM EST reply Recommend (9) Flag actions
I agree with DanTheScienceMan’s… But “his good points” are the ‘fact’ that Google+ does look a lot like Facebook when looked at like that (taking all the “noisy” feeds and ads you would get on FB).
And I am no fan of either social network BTW.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 7:17 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
there are a lot of similarities in the interface screenshots that tablet included. the general layout of photo posts, the notifications box, etc. no more egregious than facebook stealing the “like” concept from friendfeed back in the day, the only difference is that facebook later bought ff to cover their butts.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 11:03 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Also, ANDROID AND IOS ARE EXACTLY THE SAME! They both make calls on dialers that look almost the same, they both have browsers that look almost the same, they both have messaging apps that are relatively the same, they both have notifications that are somewhat alike….. Therefore they are exactly the same with different fonts. BOOM.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 11:37 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Hey, are you on Apples legal team?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:18 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
I think he may be Steve Jobs.
…too soon?
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 4:42 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yep, too soon. SJ joke season opens January 1st.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 7:00 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Yeah, seriously. If not, why was Jobs so angry with Google over Android? He considered it a complete copy of iOS.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 10:31 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Also, everyone knows that every smartphone is pretty much designed exactly like an iPhone. They have touch screens, are rectangular, are black, have buttons on the side, etc. They are exactly the same with different edges.
Point is, these silly extremely general comparisons can be made in any competitive market. Stuff like this leads to patent wars that do nothing but hurt consumers. These products are clearly different, but share similar basic functions and forms. If the auto industry was as ridiculous as the gadget industry, we would be stuck having to choose from either a handful of cars because companies would be putting all their effort into blocking other companies innovations rather than developing their own.
Posted on Nov 19, 2011 | 1:57 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
The general outline is the same, but not really the same
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 2:47 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
best reply ever to shut someone up!!!
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 8:49 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
No.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:23 PM EST reply Recommend (16) Flag actions
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:46 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
They “look” the same, but I wouldn’t say they “feel” the same. Doing things like changing settings on G+ seems easier to me than on FB. This may be more subjective, though, I’ll admit.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 7:06 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
But the argument was that they look similar, not they feel similar.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 7:10 PM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
U r absolutely right Haydn. The experience is different. For me, the best few things about Facebook are Social Inbox and Photo Album and Google+ are Circle, the best way to share your post to multiple group of friends or individual, this setting Facebook don’t have even they have Friend List but they cannot choose to post a single post to multiple group and individual. G+ is much more easier to use than Facebook in setting privacy, account and profile. The only problem is it’s hard to convince all your friends to move to G+. That’s why it’s need take time or if G+ have better, unique and useful feature to provide user so G+ will gain more user and beat Facebook.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 3:29 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
they do feel the same. the only reason you think that is because there is noone updating on google+, and it looks the same except google+ uses a different font which was the original point.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 7:19 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yes, I enjoy strangers telling me why I think a certain way. /s
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 7:22 PM EST reply Recommend (14) Flag actions
They feel the same TO YOU. Your opinion not equal fact.
Also “the only reason you think that is because there is noone updating on google+” …because you don’t have anyone that’s updating doesn’t mean that we don’t. You are not equal to us. We just may have social friends, whereas you don’t.
Posted on Nov 18, 2011 | 4:40 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
the original argument was that they look the same, anything else is offtopic.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 7:19 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Uh, I addressed the topic and brought up another related point. Please do not tell me what I can and cannot post about.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 7:21 PM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
also, Facebook does not have an amazing email app, a very decent music app, the best search engine there is, etc.
in this battle, the focus should be on features :)
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 11:38 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Nope. This is about social sites. Nothing else matters. Good try to push an agenda, though.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 12:45 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The fact that Google is integrating their social features into the rest of their properties means that those properties are no more irrelevant than Facebook’s gaming is to a discussion about the appeal of facebook.
If I use GMail and my G+ social network seamlessly integrates with it but my Facebook doesn’t, I may have a reason to use G+, no?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 4:28 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Almost now all it needs is spam from hell like Facebook.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:32 PM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
Your post actually could be considered spam, using your own context.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 12:46 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
This will probably not go over well at all. Already two huge players and Microsoft seems to not know social
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:34 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
two huge players? i see one huge player and a bunch of copycats.
this is not a seperate social network, it uses twitter and facebook to log in. microsoft partially owns facebook, why would they compete with one of their assets?
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:44 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
Microsoft partly owned myspace and apple but proceeded to compete.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 8:25 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
microsoft does not partially own myspace
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 10:59 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I used to partially own myspace… Surely "MY"space means it is mine,… I don’t know I will have to ask tom, he is on my friends list.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 11:25 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
It used to… Re-read my post before you get too bitchy
Posted on Nov 20, 2011 | 7:56 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You see, to have assumed he meant Facebook and Google+, and I would agree that Google+ is certainly not a “big player” (yet, anyway). But he could have meant Twitter, which is also a social network, and also a pretty big player, not to mention far from a Facebook copycat.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:29 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
Except that Bing now incorporates Facebook “Likes” into their own search engine. Your point has been rendered moot. Try again, or take the I5 back to work, Google employee?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 12:49 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Nope
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:47 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
http://nooooooooooooooo.com/
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:30 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Not really. It also has no users. That’s a feature. I think?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 1:31 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
socl existed internally before google+ did. but nice try.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:43 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Source?
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:44 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
bing “’tulalip” and you will get results from years before google+ launched.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:44 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I would but I don’t goto that site.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 8:16 PM EST reply Recommend (8) Flag actions
you dont go on google+? neither does anyone else. but whats your point?
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 11:00 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
hehe you’re a clever kid aren’t you?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 2:09 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
A hater, is what I would call here, check the what is hot section, honey.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 2:12 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Bing is cool. Their US search is much better than the Google search, as Google puts loads of customisation in it that I don’t always prefer. I’m from the UK, and switched to US mode to find something, and then I found it! I could have never of done that with Google.
Posted on Nov 19, 2011 | 5:55 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
lol Bing. Hey everyone, look at this guy.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 8:33 PM EST reply Recommend (8) Flag actions
I Bing it.. What’s so funny. Google has become so full of spam… And Yes, Socl was invented prior to G+
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 9:22 PM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
So was Diaspora… your point?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 2:13 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
And Diaspora is still around. What counterpoint are you making?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 10:10 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Looking at this guy… what I see is you getting pwned. Try again.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 12:37 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Bing it, or use a lesser search engine… If you care to see outside your own bias. Both turn up results that degrade your argument to mere foolishness. Sidestep that…
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 12:53 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Lesser? Are you aware that Bing uses Google results?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 1:14 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
lol Bing?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 9:12 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Just seeing you shied the hell out of this Social thing out of nowhere make me believe you are quite the MS drone calling names on other services without proper background to rely on.
G+ a copycat, fair enough. Last time I heard it was intended to be something else rather than what you paint it.
So, this thing here, is trying to do what others have, but no G+, sry.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 2:12 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
That’s a bit of an odd way to look at things considering Socl looks decidely Mcrosoft/Metro. And Google having gone the whole hog to redesign all their services to look like a close derivitive of Metro.
and google+ being a derivitive of FB with Metroness and some decorative flourishes added on.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 11:08 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
If I have to read another Web 2.0 word I will kill myself.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:14 PM EST reply Recommend (6) Flag actions
web 2.0
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:20 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You murderer!
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:34 PM EST reply Recommend (25) Flag actions
I read that out loud in an overly dramatic and resentful tone. My finace and her father were in the room.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:15 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
fiance*
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:16 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I was worried your finance had a gender and ancestry for a second there.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:49 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
Yay! One less person in the world!
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:42 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Ya, but you’re still here.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 7:56 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
VLOGOSPHERE.
Mama,just killed a man,
Put a gun against his head,
Pulled my trigger,now he’s dead,
Mama,life had just begun,
But now i’ve gone and thrown it all away-
Mama ooo,
Didn’t mean to make you cry-
If i’m not back again this time tomorrow-
Carry on,carry on,as if nothing really matters-
- Queen
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:36 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
i really don’t think we need another social network, hard enough for google+ to set foot!
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:16 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yup, but you think they are thinking in if you need more of the same history?, they are thinking about gettin money with the profit of the social networking like facebook
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:46 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Exactly. I think the they blew it by following the same formula as facebook & google+. To me the next evolution of a social network will exist behind the scenes, without a webpage hub, connecting all of your OS’s, services and devices.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:07 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You mean like… going up and talking to someone, in person? That’s deep.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 1:32 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Holodeck!
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 11:45 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Nno.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 2:17 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
“Facebook and Twitter sign-ins”
Didn’t know that Microsoft was planning to create a separate social network while offering sign-ins from other services. What an interesting concept.
/s
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:52 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
This.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 2:17 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I hope that the concept of this research project is for Microsoft to discover that they aren’t meant to have a social network.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 7:03 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
they do have multiple social networks. they partially own facebook for one, and also have xbox live with 45 million members.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 7:21 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
So, why not? You stepped up to the plate swinging wildly, throwing around words… but, really, your statement lacks any substance. Is there research you’re relying upon, a professional in the business sector you’ve taken on as a mentor you haven’t mentioned, or should the entirety of the community rely upon your vacant obsessions and bias as proof positive that what you say holds any credence? What I thought. Bye bye.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 12:59 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
This is my next…social network.
…until I get bored and return to Twitter and Facebook. :)
(someone had to say it)
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:16 PM EST reply Recommend (8) Flag actions
Is anyone really going to want to use a social network made by Microsoft?
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:17 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
A new social network could be made by Jesus and ‘people’ would still use Facebook instead.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:01 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Diaz? Heck, I don’t think anyone would ever use that. I don’t know how it would stay afloat either, with people getting booted off left and right for airing their opinions…
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 3:48 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It’s ironic, people might trust Microsoft a little more with their information than with Google now.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:11 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
People use XBOX Live. It’s a little social networky.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:32 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
For potty mouthed pre-teens, mostly.
(joking, joking…)
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 8:21 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Nope, I disagree. A big number of people bought the xbox 360 5 years ago, when they were 20 to 25. Today they are 30 and still either playing on it or watching content. Xbox live is pretty amazing. And doesn’t get hacked…
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 9:23 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
So true. Been on Xbox since the Beta.. Seasons change, days go by, people come and go.. but I have NEVER been hacked on XBox Live!, My passwords are intact, and the integrity of the system is unheard of when considering it’s always-on connectivity. At this point, I’d recommend this type of service to the likes of the Federal Government and Julian Assange.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 1:05 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Because playing video games is so…. social
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 1:33 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Yes… it is. I play games with friends.
Posted on Nov 21, 2011 | 2:44 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
In a minute I’d join :)
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 7:14 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’d be willing to give it a shot :)
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 3:49 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
This looks way too much like Google+! I hope Microsoft doesn’t ever launch this – it’s seriously not the time.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:17 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Why, because you don’t like Google +?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 1:06 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
No, I like Google+ (although not as much as Twitter). I meant that I hope Microsoft doesn’t launch this because I really doubt it’d see any significant user adoption. I mean, Google+ is statistically popular, but very few people I know in real life use it.
Posted on Nov 18, 2011 | 6:37 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
it would be cool if it worked only with internet explorer 6
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:17 PM EST reply Recommend (23) Flag actions
ActiveX Scrabbulous anyone?
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 7:56 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
In which case it would garner millions of users.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 8:17 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Microsoft+?
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:17 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Microsoft#
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 8:05 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
MS#
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 11:48 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
This is such a slap in the face to the better design decisions they’re making for WP7/Win8/Xbox
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:17 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Seems pointless considering they already own a small part of Facebook
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:17 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Awesome. I was just thinking that we needed another social network
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:17 PM EST reply Recommend (11) Flag actions
Well That’s a facebook ripoff layout wise…
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:18 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
No.
This pissed me off in “The Outsiders” too. “Socs?” “Socl?” Unless it’s a social netowrk about socks then they fucked up.
Yeah I know how it’s pronounced, and I don’t care.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:19 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Way to spell!
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:20 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
They should have just stuck with investing in Facebook instead of this. Although this does have a chance, there are a lot of people that still use MSN / Hotmail.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:21 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
So i guess Microsoft will sell its Facebook shares?
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:21 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
I agree. Microsoft’s “social network play” has always been its investment and partnership with Facebook. I can’t see them trying to reinvent the wheel with their own service this late in the game.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:39 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Why do they even try this? The social network field is getting increasingly cluttered and Microsoft doesn’t have a chance to survive. The only reason Google + will possibly last is its strong integration (menubar at the top) with gmail. This is important because many young people (the ones who are on social networks) have gmail accounts so it works.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:23 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
LOL.. Google +… When they have to lie about their userbase at every opportunity… people see that and react accordingly. Or, they deny the underlying truth and pretend to be interested.
LOL.. Google +… When they have to lie about their userbase at every opportunity… people see that and react accordingly. Or, they deny the underlying truth and pretend to be interested.False Start, Google, 15 yard penalty. Unnecessary roughness/idiocy. First down Microsoft.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 1:12 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yes, because we were all in desperate need of another social network.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:23 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
We’re gonna need a bigger fail whale.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:23 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
Looks like Facebook. Looks like Google +.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:25 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
All the social networks I had known had the same stupid concept
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:45 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
If you go to www.socl.com, you can see an apology from Microsoft. How embarrassing. Socl is clearly not a code name, or they wouldn’t of gone to the trouble to buy the 4 lettered domain.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:25 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
What a weird apology.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:27 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Wasn’t it put up in response to the original Tulalip leak? It went live for a hot second and brought the project into the open before being replaced with that apology.
http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/15/microsoft-leaks-tulalip-internal-project-planning-to-launch-soc/
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:35 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Yes it was. That message is not in response to this latest story. And I don’t find the apology ‘awkward’.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 7:16 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Wow, good catch. That’s a really awkward apology.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:28 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
They just had their Rick Perry “oops” moment.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:29 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
What did it say? There’s nothing there now.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 7:57 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.socl.com/
“Thanks for stopping by.
Socl.com is an internal design project from a team in Microsoft Research which was mistakenly published to the web.
We didn’t mean to, honest."
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 12:37 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
If you try the link, you have to copy and paste the whole thing; for some reason The Verge won’t take the whole thing.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 12:38 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
How on earth do you mistakenly publish something to the web?
Especially something so big, with a purpose bough domain name and all the stuff that goes with it?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 1:25 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Researchers may have not expected their work could tinkle anyone’s curiosity, like well… most of today’s research. But since this was MS, some keen eyed follower saw it… dang! we are sorry that people actually watch our work.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 11:52 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
im done joining social networks. Twitter, Facebook, Google+ is enough. Two companies have my life’s info in their hands don’t need another one
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:28 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
If I was Microsoft I would simply buy Twitter.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:29 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
SCOOOOP. Go Verge!
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:29 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I wonder if this is aimed at other countries which don’t have a Facebook or Twitter stronghold if they ever do make it public.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:32 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
What other countries ?!
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:45 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
looks stupd
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:39 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
well if they get everyone on skype and msn on it should work… but that will be damn hard.. unless they force people
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:40 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I don’t get what’s the Microsoft point this time, they always have supported Facebook, and now they are trying to play the same social game, I think that the corporations never had enought of something, they always want all, or is just because Google is trying the same?
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:41 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Could it be a skin on top of facebook+bing+couple of extras, all wrapped in metro style skin? If so, I’m already sold.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:50 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Please no
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:52 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The name comes from a local Indian tribe/reservation/casino/hotel/spa/resort up here in Washington state.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:54 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Yeah, they changed it on request from the tribe,
http://www.komonews.com/news/local/125957503.html
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 5:56 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
How is this pronounced? Sockel?
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:13 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I would assume it’s pronounced “social”, as in “welcome to the social” and “hey, let me squirt that on you by touching my squircle”. Not that any of those names are much worse than the Wii or the Ipad but we all have had time to get used to those.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:40 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I know it’s just a research project, but the UI is a bit…mweh, especially considering they can dish out stuff like Windows 8 and Windows Phone 7.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:13 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Thats why it’s just an inside project, never said it was final.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 2:21 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Thanks for stopping by.
Socl.com is an internal design project from a team in Microsoft Research which was mistakenly published to the web.
We didn’t mean to, honest.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:21 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Socl looks a bit like Google+, which looks a bit like Facebook.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:22 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Why dose this remind me of Windows XP ?!
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:25 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I hate this already, because I will surely sign up when it comes out…
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:31 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Let the social platform war begins! Don’t know if its good, but definitely there will be blood
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:36 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
There is plenty of room for a thousands of new ‘social’ networks, mostly for niche products, hobbies and experiences but room nonetheless. This isn’t trying to be Facebook or Google+ from what it sounds like. It’s the standard Microsoft approach, take what someone else has built and make it their own. If you can log into “socl” from Facebook then it’s trying to be Facebook, if you can log into “socl” from Google+ it’s not trying to be Google+. It’s trying to be a hub for all of your social networks. I don’t have a problem with the idea, in fact if I can see all three networks in one place this could be a huge time saver.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:52 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Just when you thought Google+ looked like Facebook, this comes around and rips off Google+ entirely.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 6:53 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yes, and the number ‘1’ was ripped off by the number ‘0’, binarally. It just had to differentiate itself oh so slightly. And, FWIW, any website now rips off BBS’s of yesterday, in that they provide services and software over a connection. Thanks for your insight, f’ing swammy.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 1:24 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
As long as they don’t make a movie about it.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 8:06 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It’s pretty obvious this was accessed without consent. Don’t you guys think you should lay off until there is more information about it? Great job in leaking this
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 8:36 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Welcome to the social!
Wait… whoops.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 8:41 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
MS Eng A “It’s not cool unless you take off one of the vowels.. like Flickr”
MS Eng B “Hmm.. the Norms are so illogical.” delete, “There, now it’s called Socil”
MS Eng A “Still not cool enough. In the next generation, cool is gonna be….OMG”
MS Eng B “Are you thinking what I’m thinking?”
In Unison “WELCOME TO THE SOCL!!! STEVE QUICK GET IN HERE”
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 1:36 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
These naming conventions make me upst.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 10:54 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
lmao
Posted on Nov 19, 2011 | 5:57 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Just what we need. Another site no one signs in to use (like Google+)
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 9:05 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Hehe, unless you believe Google, which would be happy to tell you how many people ‘signed up’ for Google +, but leave out details like actual contining users. Heck, I signed up for innumerous betas, but there’s a reason I don’t remember almost any of them. They all sucked, and have never shown signs of unrelenting ‘suck’.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 1:20 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
But doesn’t Microsoft own 12% of Facebook?
They’re competing with themselves here.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 9:23 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
12%? it’s more like half a percent. Please. You think Zuckerberg would sell 10% of the company to Redmond?
And yes, this is what MS does to its partners. Just ask the PlaysForSure guys.. if they’re still in business.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 1:37 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
It’s a research project, not a product. What do you people don’t understand?
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 9:24 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Exactly what I’m saying!!
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 2:22 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
And by the way, Microsoft invests more in R&D than Google and Apple combined.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 9:25 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Three words:
Big
Ass
Tables
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 1:38 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Microsoft already do have a base in Social Networking – fundamentally this is to social networking what Bing was to Live Search/MSN Search, a replacement and modernisation of the existing Windows Live profiles.
The base of users on Windows Live Messenger are Microsoft’s main social network, and it is rather large. Integrate Live Messenger into a social network and in a lot of nations you have a huge member base. It won’t be a Facebook killer, but there’s a userbase Microsoft can serve well here with an upgraded offering.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 10:45 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
You just made a very good point, I think you may be right. Since this thing is internal right now, there’s no reason for the name of the website and all to carry over. They’re probably just testing a redesign of their live spaces. You surprised me with your insightful baconness.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 3:54 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
ah come pls tell me why everyone company feels it needs to make its own social network like they need to stop this holyy loke at PING “A social network for Music” complete failure
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 10:49 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
English, MF’er.. do you speak it?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 1:15 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
give her/him some credit. i could actually understand the first half.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 11:57 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Tulalip isn’t an odd name, it’s the name of a tribe here in the PNW. Microsoft has a history of using local sites and names as project codenames
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 11:05 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Am I missing something here? SOCL looks more like a companion service to services like Facebook. If that is the case, I don’t see why it couldn’t work. there are some overlaps but they look to be doing different things no?
In any event there are different types of social networks in existence right now. Some companies have social networks setup with just employees and yet some, institutions (universities). There is room for more.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 11:11 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Yes! My thoughts too. It could just be an extension of their social hub.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 11:59 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
wait….is this a companion to facebook or just another social network?
Isn’t Microsoft also a part-owner in facebook? If this plugs into facebook, then maybe this could be something, but by itself, it’s stupid. Microsoft simply doesn’t have enough of a web presence to make it work.
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 11:27 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Really ?!
Posted on Nov 15, 2011 | 11:52 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Do they need this.. ?? Don’t they have a huge stake in FB ?? .. Quit wasting time MFST..
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 12:02 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
A huge stake? Seriously?? facepalm It’s 1.5%.
http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3707121/Microsoft+Buys+Facebook+Stake.htm
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 1:39 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Well Diaspora looks cleaner imo.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 12:21 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Well everytime a new social n/w site’s released they’d always compare with FB…ask Google plus…;)…Let’s see if this one’s got any new stuff …so that we can share it on facebook…:)
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 1:13 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You say Every time like it happens alot. It doesn’t. Google copied Facebook because FB is becoming the #2 targeted ad platform on the Internet. That’s it. There’s not much else going on in the space. And MS wants to be an advertising company (first sniffing Googles butt, now this). They’ll leverage Hotmail and get a few hundred million users… whatever…
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 1:49 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Why does the design remind me of a travel service?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 3:42 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Looking nicely design seems may compete with Google +
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 4:32 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I really don’t think this is mean to replace Facebook, Google+ or Twitter, so I think all the arguments about how much it looks like any of the above, or how little of a chance it stands against any of the above are missing the point.
From the very first leak we got of this,it has been described as aresearch tool. Given this, the social integration in Windows 8, and the option to sign up with existing social networks, I suspect this is likely a forerunner to some sort of yet-unseen, search-related, deep social integration Microsoft has planned for Windows 8. And that is certainly much more exciting than Facebook by Microsoft.
A side note, don’t forget how invested Microsoft is in Facebook, and how closely the two have been working togther. With this in mind, it seems even less likely that Microsoft plans to compete directly with Facebook.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:40 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
i feel bad for you. Good comments really get drowned in the crowd. :)
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 12:00 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
So Microsoft buy shares in Facebook and then make a social networking site that allows you to sign in using your Facebook? Thus, if better, removing the need for ever directly using Facebook, smarts!
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 7:37 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
they are saying sorry! it was published accidently
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 8:52 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
If this works for Microsoft, then I don’t mind it taking over the phone. I can’t see it taking over Facebook or Google+. Nobody is looking for the best social, they’re looking for the most popular.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 9:57 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Am I the only one who thinks this looks just like Amazon? Design, colors, and even the logo…
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 11:31 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
another social network, just what we needed eh!
At HP we’ve had our own social network called WaterCooler since 2009, internal is where it should stay.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 11:39 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I think this is a terrible idea. While I in fact do like to share some of the interesting things I find on the internet, I do NOT like the idea of publicly sharing what I search for on the internet. That’s a whole new level of sharing and interaction that I’m not interested in. Building a social network around that idea is a bad idea.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 12:19 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
This is what the site reads as in Google’s cache:
Socl.com is an internal design project from a team in Microsoft Research which was mistakenly published to the web.
We didn’t mean to, honest.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 12:46 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Microsoft shouldn’t waste their energy.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 1:40 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It always funny when a gigantic company tries to be cool and exclusive and capture the same nuance a once small company could establish. Goolge can’t be Facebook and after watching how that didn’t work Microsoft thinks they can pull it off. No you can’t dudes, that was a one tiem fluke. Social networking is too common place which makes it mainstream hence loses that ultra=-cool, couture tech essence it once possessed.
Don’t thier marketing people have any other ideas, we all know they will have to open it up to survive,. The only was this gets cool is if they can offer Facebook style functionality ina bottle and sell off the shelf social networking software with the robustness of SQLServer. But even that would be on shaky ground because there is software like BuddyPress and Dolphin. .
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 2:00 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
One thing missed from this… Diaspora has the simplest, cleanest look, and is the design inspiration for G+. Diaspora is open source and its layout has been in the public domain for quite some time. Now THIS looks nice:

Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 2:33 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Even though I know better, I’m gonna pronounce this Sock-L if it ever launches publicly. That’s what you get for dropping letters, Microsoft!
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 4:59 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
People are saying its jasn (just another social network) and far too late to the game. Looking at how g+ is struggling to take off then I’d agree except I don’t think it is jasn, but an evolution of search. This plugs into Facebook to leverage your existing social network to make your searches social. It is their way to improve Bing and take it ahead of Google.
As for the design, I think it is a mix of Metro with the familiarity of Facebook, works for me.
So, I think it is potentially great and could be the thing to make Bing properly take on Google search. But my problem is I am a private person, I don’t post on FB, I don’t post banal status updates or want my real life friends knowing I’m a geek and read tech blogs all day. So while I can see how Binging something like what is the best rom for my SGS" could give me some good advice from my friends, personally I don’t want that on my wall.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 3:19 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yawn. Seriously Microsoft? Ever heard “Too Little, Too Late”?
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 1:04 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Maybe it’ll be included with Windows 8. That’s typically how M$ rolls and gain market share as it is the de facto application if it ever gets on Windows 8 just like Internet Explorer back in its heyday…
Posted on Nov 20, 2011 | 3:56 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
My bases are covered well, in order for Microsoft to interest me in it’s social platform, it needs to make room somewhere in between the following:
Of all the networks I currently make use of, I’ve been with Facebook the longest, it holds most of my personal connections and memories shared online, yet I use it less and less. I dont really care to continue using Facebook, but I’m not deleting my account anytime soon, either.
Google+ is apart of Google’s suite of services, I use and love most of those services, and spending so much of my time using them, Google+ could be the most integrated in to my life, if everyone else I knew were more like me.
As integration of Google+ and +1 continues, it is quickly becoming the social network I use the most, yet still the one interact with others the least.
Twitter is light and casual, yet incredibly efficient. I find that I use it for more than I ever expected and it brings both my personal and professional contacts together, but it’s a one trick pony, and I’m happy with that.
LinkedIn, it’s where I acknowledge working relationships with people, not much else.
The only place Microsoft fits in my life is Xbox Live, but I don’t make friendships with people I meet in games, and anyone I am friends with on Live, I’m likely associated with on Facebook, Google+, or Twitter.
That being said, what can Microsoft provide that I don’t already have?
Posted on Nov 23, 2011 | 3:21 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
Some have the Passcode of this MS Private Network? or can send me the invitation?
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 10:02 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
http://www.so.cl/
http://www.so.cl/PrivateBeta
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 10:04 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed