Taxi companies in cities like New York and San Francisco have installed cameras in their cabs for the safety of their drivers, but the city of Oxford, England is taking it a step further. Citing increased complaints by taxi passengers and drivers that include overcharging and sexual assults, the city is proposing that all taxis be outfitted with CCTV systems that record video and audio by 2015. The recordings will run continuously and the encrypted footage will be stored for 28 days. It will remain unviewed unless an incident is reported by a taxi passenger or driver, after which relevant footage will be turned over to the police.
Unsurprisingly, civil liberties group Big Brother Watch — which has called the plan "a staggering invasion of privacy" — plans to file a complaint with the Information Commissioner's Office. The city council has responded to criticism by stating that privacy has to be balanced against the interests of public safety, adding that there will be clear notices informing passengers of the recordings. All newly licensed taxis will be required to install CCTVs beginning April 6th of next year, while already registered cabs have until April 2015. We wouldn't be surprised if the proposal is met with more resistance — not everyone wants to star in their own episode of Taxi Cab Confessions.
Thanks Fat Trucker!

Comments
As I live in Oxford, I was surprised to see The Verge covering this. Still, I’m all for it if it improves security and safety around the city. Besides, the footage is only viewed if the police believe it’s essential to an investigation, could help track criminal movement too.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 10:48 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Really? Are you that naive?
Installing the cameras is just the first step, man!
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 3:54 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Not being viewed unless a complaint by either party is made is a good thing, however this could just be the thin end of the wedge. The erosion of civil liberties is something many people have had too much of, the “it’s for your own or other safety” is always the reason.
How much is too much?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 10:59 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
the question is also, can it be viewed, even without an official complaint? i can imagine cabbies having to endure quite a lot.. and quite a few funny/embarrassing situations.. if they, or somebody else can just get the recordings and put them online.. that would certainly be a breach of privacy!
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 11:09 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Could also result in some hilarious YouTube videos! ;)
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 11:43 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I don’t see how this is a “staggering invasion of privacy”. People are way too quick to jump on that bandwagon, as if they’re special enough for someone to be watching their every move, every moment of the day.
I say the more CCTV cameras, the better.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 12:04 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I think it’s perhaps time that people realised that, particularly in the UK, pervasive CCTV coverage is a fact of life, a condition of participating in society, perhaps. At least they seem to have set out fairly stringent guidelines for data protection.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 12:24 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
So much for banging a hooker in the back seat now…
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 1:38 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
How does anyone have an expectation of privacy in a cab?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 1:58 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
In New Zealand (yes, the whole country), this has already happened, and so far, less reported violence.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 10:03 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
How is this “a step further” than the AV recording most San Francisco cabs already have? We have both internal and external video cameras, and a mic.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 7:12 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed