Google today dropped the "beta" moniker off Google Music, and with that, it's announced a music store baked into Android Market, much like it has previously done with books. Google Music is available to anyone in the US, no invitation required, and has the ability to upload up to 20,000 songs to the cloud for free. There will be an app for Windows, Mac, and Linux devices that'll help you upload songs to your locker. Those can be streamed via the cloud or alternatively you'll be able to "pin" songs for offline listening.
The big news, of course, is the Android Market music store. Millions of song will be available and sortable by genre, sub genre, top albums, and top songs. There are Staff Picks and a New Releases section — standard stuff. Songs look to be in the range of $0.99 and $1.29. Every song is 320kbps MP3, with 90 second previews for each song. There's universal search in the market. Tracks will appear instantly in your Music Library in the browser as well as Music Manager.
A new free song every day — first up is David Bowie's "Sound and Vision." There'll reportedly be hundreds of free songs from the get-go. "Antenna" is a section for emerging artists that the Google Music staff — "music geeks" by their admission — love. The Google Music site will have video interviews and other exclusive content (e.g. Coldplay) that they're calling "Magnifier."
As rumored, the big major labels include Universal, EMI, and Sony music, and a number of smaller, independent labels. Overall, Google claims to have over 1,000 labels and 13 million tracks, with 8 million of those available today. Six never-before-released Rolling Stones concerts will be on Google Music (one now and five rollout later this year). Busta Rhymes will be debuting his new album exclusively, with a new single coming today. Coldplay, Shakira, Pearl Jam, and Dave Matthews Band, too, will also provide exclusive concert.
There will aslo be Artists Hubs as part of the experience, for musicians who want to make customized pages. They can upload and sell their music through Google — almost like an independent label. There's a one-time $25 "artist registration fee." The artists control the pricing for each song, and the split is 70 / 30, with Google taking the smaller share. The songs can be sold directly against their YouTube channels.
Google's going big on Google+ integration. You can share a song with a friend and they'll get to hear the entire song — not just 90 seconds.
T-Mobile has become the first carrier to let you buy music and add it to your phone bill — just like you can with apps. T-Mobile claims to have exclusive content for its Android-based customers through the end of the year.
Android 2.2 and above devices should start seeing the music store for Android as it rolls out over the next few days. The Music Manager will automatically update over the next few hours. In the meantime, check out our Google Music hands-on right now!

Comments
Yay! I love Google Music!
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:14 PM EST reply Recommend (6) Flag actions
Well, I do love music. Google Music? We’ll see.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:57 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
You know what you get when you Google music?
The youtube link for the song. Bam
Unless you absolutely must buy that song to go on living, I probably just saved you several lattes.
Plus, youtube will have a larger collection. Guaranteed.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:14 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Google Music has the tracks in 320kps. Youtube has mostly crappy rips other than the few Vevo branded music videos.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:51 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
And yet, you’d be surprised how much of the general public doesn’t care about the bitrate as long as they get their songs.
Now, techheads on the other hand, they care what the bitrate is. But they also know where to ‘get’ their music.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 9:00 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
yaaay!
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:55 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
This seems so brilliant, and I would switch (if I could, I’m actually in the UK) straight away if it weren’t for Spotify. I made the conversion from buying the music to subscribing to Spotify. Sorry Google, but I’m not going back!
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 3:51 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Surprise!
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:14 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Kind of disappointed there isn’t an unlimited / pay per month deal. I loved the Zune pass, and was hoping Google would finally give me an equivalent for Android. It’s kind of funny but Microsoft had some really great ideas for pricing and sharing (3 plays / 3 days, keep 10 tracks per month).
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:35 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
But will it fully compete with iTunes? How much market share can Google capture in the digital music purchasing game?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:16 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I don’t think it matters whether or not it is as popular as iTunes or even makes money. Google is trying to make its ecosystem comparable to Apple. They need a credible platform to stop normal people from fleeing android into the open arms of iOS. I’m sure Google will spend whatever it takes.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:26 PM EST reply Recommend (7) Flag actions
" to stop normal people from fleeing android into the open arms of iOS."
You can use iTunes without using iOS. Hard to believe, but Google Music actually integrates pretty well with iTunes.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:41 PM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
I did not know that. Thanks for the info.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:01 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Seriously. I rarely use iTunes nowadays except to purchase the occasional song (iTunes gift certificates FTW) and update podcasts. It’s all automatically synced.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:07 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I thought about this some more and I think the Google Music Store will probably be a big success. The main reason? Google already has a huge user base. Most music startups don’t, and must race to grow that base, a race against time. If they don’t get big enough, fast enough, they run out of money.
Google already has the user base, both Android users and people like me, who use Google services heavily, but don’t use Android. (yunnastan’ I’m an Apple fan, not a fanboi. I’ll bash Google for valid reasons, and poke fun at Android on occasion, but I’m also a long time Google user.)
Google is not going to run out of money anytime soon, either. They’re not facing the same pressure to execute that a start up would.
A counter example of a company that had an established user base and plenty of money, but that hasn’t really succeeded in the online music space is Microsoft. However, there are major differences in how MS went about it and how Google is going about it (MS made some major fuxx ups). It’s also not impossible that the Zune Marketplace will be a late bloomer and succeed eventually. I wouldn’t bet the farm on it, but it could happen.
Lastly, Google will have some major opportunities to screw up, and I look forward to commenting when they do. :)
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 11:22 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
And with iOS 5 and iTunes Match, you don’t really even need to use iTunes anymore even with an iPhone.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 11:28 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
With the Artist Hub, I can see Google Music becoming very predominant, very fast. Providing a platform for people to express the creativity and passions is what made both YouTube and MySpace take off. This is such an obvious missed opportunity for Zune. Microsoft should have been less hipster and more indie. I haven’t been impressed with Google in quite a while.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:02 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
Google will have nurture the Artist Hub though. Look at Bandcamp, they are probably worried. Maybe Google will buy them out.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:53 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I agree. They are definitely going to need to have some approval process or it will get real messy, real fast.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 4:20 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Well considering the Growing Android marketshare…and the shrinking iPhone one… i’d say they’ve got a good shot.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:03 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Consider also that Google has a pretty large user base beyond Android. It’s not a guaranteed success, but it’s looking pretty good.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 11:25 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Awesome!
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:16 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
music.google.com says “We’re sorry. Google Music is currently only available in the United States”
Boooo!!
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:17 PM EST reply Recommend (14) Flag actions
Ya, please bring this to Canada Google!!!
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:21 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
“PetiteBourgeoise” sounds more like French, unless he/she is form Quebec?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:41 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Use a VPN for initial signup to get past the country check, then you can use it internationally without a VPN. I’ve been using it in Australia since it launched.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:33 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
…but to add free songs from market to your library, you need a credit card made in the United States.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:51 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
That only helps with playing stuff, not most of the features announced today.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:57 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You know what doesn’t restrict things based on arbitrary national borders that really have no relation to an internet-based distribution method? Piracy.
…okay, snark aside, Bandcamp too. And you can get things in FLAC on Bandcamp, and artists don’t have to pay a fee to sign up, and the fee Bandcamp collects is 15% (or 10% if you sell enough) versus Google Music’s 30%. So, looks like Google Music is a cool enough service for the kinds of folks that love iTunes and such, but personally I don’t feel the pull. Plus, yaknow, I couldn’t buy from Google Music even if I wanted to.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:30 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
The “Shop” link within Google Music is pointing to https://market.android.com/music
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:17 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’ve loved Google Music as a locker service since day one, and the Shop could solidify it as my place for Music!
However, as of now, the Shop is 404ing. https://market.android.com/music
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:18 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Super pumped about this..
Protip: you Verge guys and gals might want to update your liveblog link in the above article… just a thought..
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:19 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Nice. Hopefully it will get as much content as iTunes. It may be cool that google has a music store now kids, but if the content is not there then its not cool.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:20 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Why do all the music services only come to the US! What about international?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:21 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
blame your country, noit Google
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:27 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yeah and Google, Apple and the labels also should blame someone else when I download the music for free because they give me no option to buy a God damn song. So yeah I pirate music because the music industry makes my a pirate Arrrrgghhh!
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:50 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
The agreements for international rights are difficult to negotiate as its a patchwork, with different rights holders in different countries and regions. For someone like Google or Apple wanting to license rights, there is no one stop shop. The have to find the rights holder for each song for each country, then negotiate for the song. Apple has been there, done that and has the infrastructure in place. Google is just getting started.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:31 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Use a VPN for initial signup to get past the country check, then you can use it internationally without a VPN. I’ve been using it in Australia since it launched.
Disclaimer: This works for uploading and playing your own music. I haven’t seen the shopping aspect yet.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:34 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Maybe only way to get Music purchases this way will be with using a Android Market Enabler.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:56 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:21 PM EST reply Recommend (6) Flag actions
Well, I guess that’s one more item that Tablet needs to mark off his trolling list… not that it ever made a difference anywhere considering half the planet pirates and the other half uses iTunes, Amazon and Spotify (or equivalents).
Let’s see how El Goog manages to talk up their service.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:21 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Ridiculous. There is many more countries in the world than the US.
Hell, isn’t the ROTW still (officially) waiting for the ‘old style’ Google Music?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:24 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
again its not Google., its your country. Complain to them!
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:50 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
As stupid as the UK music industry is, the fact that we got Spotify first shows that they are willing to negotiate terms.
It’s Google who are either being excessively awkward on their side, or they just didn’t bother. I’d go with the latter.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:54 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
How the hell is it the country’s fault for the uploading-ones-own-music portion? I know at least under Canadian law there isn’t any random unreasonable law against that. There’s no sane reason why Google should have to negotiate with anyone to allow their users to store their private data; after all, that’s exactly what Gmail does. The (as Putzy puts it) ‘old style’ Google Music is basically just a remote share, legally there’s no difference between it and Gmail/Docs/Picasa/etc.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:34 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I know it’s not “my country” in any way. It’s the labels that think that they get a better deal by geographically limiting distribution.
Well… Back to piracy I guess. Since these idiots don’t want to take my money.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 7:59 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
C’mon Google, you can still beat Apple for International Deployment !
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:28 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
There are tracks listed for sale in the web app, clicking on the buy button results in a 404 error.
Fail! :(
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:30 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
i suspect there are a ton of “switches to flip” to make this work… how bout you give it more than 30 minutes before declaring it a fail
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:08 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Too many international folks to reply to every one, so I’ll just add a new comment: Use a VPN for initial signup to get past the country check, then you can use it internationally without a VPN. I’ve been using it in Australia since it launched.
Disclaimer: This works for uploading and playing your own music. I haven’t seen the shopping aspect yet.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:35 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
That’s exactly how I did it in the UK. Works brilliantly for the uploading and playing, but for some reason I don’t think we’ll be able to bypass their checks for purchasing.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:37 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
It’s a different service, but I use my U.S. credit card to buy from the U.S. iTunes store and use gift cards for the Mexico store. I can make purchases from either store, no matter which country I’m in. Maybe there will be a work around like that eventually for Google Music.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:55 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yeah. I used a proxy to sign up to Music Beta. So I have the locker, but same, I don’t think we’ll be able to buy music until it comes to our specific countries.
UK user of Google Music.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:56 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Foiled. The “Shop” link is finally live and it performs a country check as well. I’ll try it tonight with VPN and a US credit card.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:10 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Cool. Call me when it becomes available in my country.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:44 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
Yep.
I read the live blog. It all sounds great. I am so glad that Google has learned to play nice with the Media companies. Gives me hope for GoogleTV 2.0.
But I guess I’ll wait a year until it comes to Australie.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:57 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Dito. Another US-only service… It’s like they don’t want my money at all.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 10:03 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
GG for 3rd world countries like Canada and Europe.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:50 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
How can Canada be a third world country when it’s part of the U.S.?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:56 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
America’s hat ain’t part of the U.S. They use the filthy metric system.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:12 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
You know that Europe is not a country, right?…
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:48 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Oh yeah? Then why are France, Germany, Italy, Greece, Spain, etc. all called “States”?
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 11:28 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I like the looks of this
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 5:52 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
+1 to Google for the “Sharing is caring” line!
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:02 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
This is really good because now artist dont have to go through Any major labels to get attention. They can just go through Google and get massive attention out there about there music. This could make record labels obsolete for everything but commercials. And real artist don’t need those anyway. Ican see this changing the music industry all together.
So this is how Google handles music compared to apple.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:05 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
HAHAH you do know that Artists have been using all kinda services like that for many years ,. .CD Baby is one of them and then artists can have their music on all mayor Digital Stores and can be their own label .. so whats new here ?
You can Fart 3 minutes and have it on iTunes and now u can go directly to Google the Heroes of music and have ya Farts there .. and once 500.00 and more done that you think it makes it easier to be found ? Last time i checked it needs hard work to get noticed not just being ONLINE and have a shop sell ya wares ..
Nice idea but its not like this will make ya group The BedroomRokkas the next Snow Patrol !
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:12 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
That doesn’t change the fact that none of those services havea 200mil userbase that’s prolly gonnabe double that before February. The only thing Google wants in return is 30% cut and $25. How is this not gonna change things even a little?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:24 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
The services are on iTunes, which is the largest music retailer in the world. I don’t have the user numbers off hand, but I’m pretty sure it dwarfs the 200 million you mention.
But you’re right, it will change things a little. There’s no reason for an artist not to be on all three: iTunes, Amazon, or Google Music. One more venue is a good thing.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 11:37 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Google’s adverts are getting much better. Hopefully this rolls out to the UK soon.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:09 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Great, things have certainly progressed since beta began… but lets clean up some of those bugs now that it’s gone public, mmmkay? Thanks!
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:10 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’m using Google Music right now from brazil, but it lacks the music store. The “independent label” thing google is doing is really interesting since normally the labels get much more money than the 30 percent.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:12 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You can theoretically do the same on iTunes.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:15 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
As an independent artist, I am very excited about this. To the person who mentioned CD Baby, they charge 15 dollars per song,, and 50 dollars per album,. Google is charging a one time 25 dollar fee, same as the developer fee, and I am hoping the music market updates just as quickly as the app part. Meaning an independent artist can release music worldwide, very quickly and very often for cheap.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:15 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
So we’ll probably see CD Baby drop their prices to compete with Google. Positive change!
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 11:39 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I think the killer part of this announcement is the Music Hub! For unsigned bands like mine this really could be a game changer, and in the long-term possibly even change the terms that traditional record labels offer. For too long it’s been too expensive for small bands to get their music heard… the Music Hub is much better and affordable than iTunes, CD Baby, or Tunecore etc for small artists!
Now bring it to the rest of the world asap pretty please Google
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:34 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
is it just me, or does spotify sound like a better deal than this?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 6:53 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Why is Google taking so long to create an irresistible completely vertical ecosystem, so I can feel comfortable recommending Android to someone like my mother?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 7:02 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Because it’s hard work and takes time. Apple has an 8 year head start on the iTunes platform, and has been vertically integrated since the founding of the company. Part of that, at least for the past 8 years, Apple has been wheeling and dealing with the entertainment business over content. They’ve had to educate the entertainment business, paving the way for services like Google Music.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 11:43 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
This is cool. I’m excited about it but now Google needs to redesign the Google Music browser player and the music uploader. Both are awful. All that needs to happen is match what’s been done with the rest of Google web sites and apps (Google+, Gmail, etc).
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 7:09 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Gruber makes a good point: Why in the hell is it called the Google Music Uploader when it’s used to download music? /facepalm
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 11:45 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Sounds great!
Now will they also host podcasts? Native podcast sync OTA in the Music app would be awesome.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 8:16 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
So it’s essentially an iTunes rip-off, minus the computer software to actually SYNC this content? Streaming and downloading from the cloud is cool but just screams BANDWIDTH HOG to me. Imagine how much of your monthly cellular data or home internet bandwidth that would use. No thanks.
We’ll see where it goes, but I think iTunes is still too established for GMusic to do much damage. Look at Zune.
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 8:58 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Antenna should be for the exclusive artists,
Magnifier should be for the emerging artists.
Makes more sense like that, no?
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 9:56 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
When another country can use. T__T
Posted on Nov 16, 2011 | 10:44 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Ohh boyy I can see Microsoft’s clean design inspiration here, anyways It’s something Google product UI’s needed.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 12:23 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I found a really nice alternative to google – http://winamq.com and there are lots of others! Why google? https://forums.craigslist.org/?ID=199785135

Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 5:58 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Did anyone else notice the White Galaxy Nexus?
I want that so bad.
Posted on Nov 18, 2011 | 1:19 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed