A group of nine internet and technology companies including Google, Twitter, Facebook, Yahoo, and Zynga ran a full-page ad in the New York Times yesterday, voicing their opposition to the proposed Stop Online Piracy Act (H.R. 3261) and PROTECT IP Act (S. 968). They're not happy that the the two proposed bills will modify the "safe harbor" provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which protects companies hosting content from copyright violations so long as they make good faith efforts to remove infringing material when they're given notice from the owners.
The timing of the letter, entitled "We stand together to protect innovation," coincided with a public hearing this morning that saw testimony from the MPAA, Pfizer, Google, the U.S. Library of Congress, the AFL-CIO, and MasterCard.
The big concern for these companies is increased risk of liability for infringement — the proposed bills provide new penalties for copyright infringement on sites that host user-generated content. Under the DMCA, copyright owners are responsible for doing the grunt work of finding infringing material, and requesting that it get taken down. Under the new scheme, sites dedicated to providing stolen content would be subject to harsh penalties — and while a site like YouTube that plays ball with the DMCA isn't the point of the bill, there's a legitimate fear of collateral damage and increased cost of compliance and enforcement. You can see why a company that hosts a ton of user-generated content like Facebook or Google would want to keep things as they are.
We'll have lots more on SOPA in the coming days, but for now see the links below for full text of the bills under discussion.


Comments
Good to hear it. Hopefully they’re using all of they’re lobbying power as well.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 4:11 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The media industries couldn’t stop with Napster, they have to destroy the internet, too.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 4:11 AM EST reply Recommend (16) Flag actions
Right? And I could imagine how this could backfire for them if it gets passed. A lot of the new music, film, and television I discover comes from people sharing it or using clips on YouTube, Facebook and Google+. I doubt I’m the only one…
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 12:36 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
whoops, I mean their
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 4:11 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You were right the first time :P
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 6:42 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
…and I should pay more attention. Let’s just delete this, shall we?
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 6:42 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
The media will turn this into an even bigger storm than it already is.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 4:25 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Stop Online Piracy? I thought we all moved past that when Spotify/Rdio/MOG/Netflix/Hulu/etc. came around… just saying.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 4:26 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
As someone who can not access any of those services, I rely on the power of (mostly) US-based internet to satisfy my media needs. And I’d hate to see your government screw things up for me.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 9:32 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
No, they mean stop all online piracy. Everywhere. Forever.
In other words, they’re trying to do something impossible. Since they can’t, they’re trying to implement ever-increasingly draconian laws in the hopes that… well, I don’t know what they’re hoping for. In France, a couple of centuries ago, you could be killed for piracy. People still pirated.
But sure, let’s let the MPAA and the RIAA do their level best to destroy the internet so they can keep making record profits while crying that they’re losing record amounts of money. At the same time. I don’t understand.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 9:46 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
It’s ridiculous this is even being considered. It’s literally like these representative live in a different world. The government should protect its citizens, not Hollywood. We pay the taxes, we purchase goods, we fuel the economy. Without our materialism and willingness to pay for crap, these industries that support this wouldn’t be shit.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 4:29 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
They do live in a different world. Have you ever listened to them talk?
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 10:23 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Summary: RoboCops are needed, but no one wants to pay for them.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 4:32 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Take the fight to them. Create as much bad publicity for this bill as you can.
These media content companies have consistently shown their intent is to shut down the whole internet as a threat to their old business model. When given the tools, they took down many more innocent websites than illegal sites and their response essentially amounted to “oh, you can’t expect us to check all of those sites to make sure they are legit or illegal”…
Basically: We’ll shut you down whether you infirnge or not, actually have our content or not. It’s just easier to shut you off even if you’re innocen and have nothing to do with our content. Too bad.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 4:32 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
And another tendril grows from the bloated mullosk that is our government.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 4:33 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
A bit off topic, but why is Zynga being pushed (more and more) shoulder to shoulder with the likes of Google and Facebook and Twitter and similar? I mean, yes, they are cool, but they make games which for most part use infrastructures of others to thrive. Facebook and Twitter offer entire infrastructures and ecosystems, Zynga is here just to hitch a ride. What weight does their word carry compared to them?
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 5:47 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
They can still get blocked because of any nonsense copyright violation, they can have their ads get pulled..etc.
This bill is menace.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 6:11 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Zynga still have hundreds of millions playing their games, probably more people than use Twitter. I think they have a fair amount of weight.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 6:22 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Hitch a ride? Are you seriously complaining about them supporting this these laws not getting passed. I don’t care what weight the company has, the more support the better.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 6:50 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I said the same thing. It’s like seeing a McDonald’s logo at the bottom of this letter. zynga, like the little leecher of a company they are, is using this to get their name out. And it’s quite ironic they are for this bill as all their work is plagerized from other people. Wake up people.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 9:19 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Zynga is an investor of Facebook, and FarmVille has more users than Twitter. Zynga would publicly not support the bills.
Posted on Nov 19, 2011 | 5:44 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Pretty sad that it has come to this.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 8:36 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Mmmm… if they want to have an impact, they better inlist some of the internet’s heavy hitters, like myspace.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 9:44 AM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
I cant never vote for or believe in its sincerity a bill that has in it the words “Provides immunity from liability” What this does is give free range to circumvents the law to protect individuals (enteties) right to be innocent before proven guilty or the spirit in which it was written. We should all be held responsible by our actions.
Taken that aside I believe that some parts of it are requiered specifically when it comes to national security, but with a check and balabnce, and the check I mean not the same people who controls the off and on switch. I think this bill overreaches some aspect, but if they take out the Business aspect of it, it should be passed. Now the busienss aspect should be a concern, but not as part of this bill.
Its a political move by adding to different things to a bill for passage….I hope it does not pass
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 11:21 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
the verge needs to take this story very seriously.
Posted on Nov 17, 2011 | 10:27 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
They seriously just pulled a Don Draper!
Posted on Nov 18, 2011 | 5:52 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed