It looks like S3 Graphics has gone from being a victorious underdog to a beleaguered combatant in the span of just a few months. A full panel at the US International Trade Commission yesterday reversed a previous July ruling by one of its administrative law judges that Apple's Mac OS X software infringed two of S3's patents relating to image compression technology. And it's likely the repercussions of this ITC reversal will extend beyond just S3's case with Apple.
On July 6, just five days after S3 received word of its original ITC win against Apple, HTC announced that it was purchasing S3 for $300 million — a move HTC itself proclaimed would bolster its patent clout. HTC was, and still is, involved in multiple patent battles with Apple. Having the S3 victory overturned certainly doesn't help HTC's attempts to gain leverage against Apple. However, we shouldn't assume this is the last we will hear of S3's infringement allegations.
S3 has a second ITC patent case pending against Apple that's moving through the early stages of the process. With regard to yesterday's ITC reversal, S3 does have some options of its own for appeal. S3 could challenge the commission's decision at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, but it's too early to gauge whether S3 or HTC will see value in devoting any more time to this particular case with Apple. And to be thorough, it should be noted that the White House gets all final ITC rulings, giving the President up to 60 days to "disapprove" of the commission's decision. Don't hold your breath on that one — it rarely ever happens. We'll keep you updated as we learn more.

Comments
Silly
Cat FaceHTC.Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 2:41 PM EST reply Recommend (6) Flag actions
can’t we all just, get along?
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 2:45 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
So basically, HTC threw away $300 million, huh? Nice move.
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 2:51 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Nope. Their parent company just transferred the money from one pocket to another.
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 3:32 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Incorrect, VIA don’t own HTC.
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 3:32 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Both are part of Formosa Plastics and their chairwomen are the same person
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 3:36 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
The chairwoman is the same person, but HTC isn’t a subsidiary of Formosa Plastics. It is independently quoted,
HTC is not only independently traded, but it’s actually worth MORE than Formosa Plastics.
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?ticker=2498:TT
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?ticker=1301:TT
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 3:41 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
I stand corrected. I understood HTC was part of Formosa but I think there was a bit of helping out going on there:)
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 3:51 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Wow. HTC stock is at a 52 week low. Yay Android!
Posted on Nov 23, 2011 | 12:52 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
All these lawsuits are ridiculous. Apple and the Android conpanies just need the chill the fuck out and invest more money into creating amazing phones and tablets, and the market can decide the winner.. Also i love apple and and an apple user but fuck them for patenting a black rectangle with a screen. And fuck the system that allows patents like that to be legal. /rant
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 2:56 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I agree. But, Apple is the instigator here so whatcha gonna do?
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 3:03 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
No HTC are the instigator by copying.
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 3:37 PM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
HTC was a respected hardware maker pre-Iphone and still is. HTC does not need to copy.
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 7:56 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I know HTC was a respected hardware maker before iPhone, I had two of them!
They were stylus operated Windows mobile phones. If iPhone hadn’t come along they would be making teh same or possibly wit the version of Androdi that was a copy of Windows Mobile with a touch of Symbian thrown in.
After iPhone HTC started making multi-touch, finger operated, pinch to zoom and all the other features than iPhone had that Windows mobile didn’t.
They blatantly copied
Posted on Nov 23, 2011 | 8:32 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
That is your fanboi inspired opinion. It is your right to believe that.
Posted on Nov 23, 2011 | 7:04 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Look, seriously, they didn’t. If they had then Samsung wouldn’t think that the Galaxy 10.1N would stand a chance of passing the injunction would it? Samsung could easily have avoided Apple’s design patents/community process if it had just shown a bit of originality in its designs.
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 3:45 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
They put a speaker in the front to break up the minimalist design. The fact that was enough shows how frivolous the claim was in the first place. If anything, HP should have sued both Apple and Samsung. Apple get its iPad look from slate pcs is no more or less egregious than what they accused Samsung of.
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 5:29 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
The slate PCs all had enormous bezels pre iPad.
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 6:13 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
A) This article isn’t written by Nilay Patel, so the legal analysis is next to worthless.
B) The decision will be appealed.
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 2:57 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Lucky for you, the letters in Matt Macari are an anagram of the palindrome of those in Nilay Patel. It’s Nilay’s pen name!
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 3:00 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Matt’s done a good job on the legal stuff so far so I’ve no reason to doubt his input, Nilay’s already explained he was brought on for his legal expertise
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 3:02 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Unlike Nilay, Matt is an actual Patent Attorney.
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 3:02 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
In regards to A, Matt Macari is a patent attorney so I do believe this os credible. Not as in depth as Nilay’s features, but most certainly credible.
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 3:02 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
I hired Matt because he’s better at this than I am!
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 3:10 PM EST reply Recommend (6) Flag actions
Prob because he aspires to be as awesome as you!
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 3:22 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
But does he have the matinee idol looks?
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 3:41 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
HTC’s next move will be to use their Sensi UI patents against Apple.
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 3:00 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Matt’s analysis is pretty on point. Thus is the world of technology law and patents, its just claim after claim, On an unrelated note, sweet shot of the Lincoln Park, Chicago, IL Apple Store.
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 3:08 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
does anyone know where that apple store is in the image above?
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 5:31 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
http://www.apple.com/retail/lincolnpark/ I believe
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 8:01 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
The picture is nice. Where is it taken? Is it available in higher resolution?
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 5:34 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I like Matt’s posts on legal stuffs. It’s clear, direct and I don’t feel like reading an article intended for first graders.
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 9:26 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Totally off topic but…. Which Apple store is that?!?!?
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 9:28 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
lincoln park, chicago – I linked the page a few posts up.
Posted on Nov 22, 2011 | 10:26 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed