Late last year, Google made changes to how its autocomplete and Instant search services dealt with piracy-related terms like "BitTorrent" — it blocked them entirely. Now Google's taking the fight directly to sites like The Pirate Bay, ISOHunt, and TorrentReactor by blocking their proper names from autocomplete and Instant. These results are not being filtered out of Google's search index entirely — Google just isn't making it any easier for casual pirates to get to these sites. We did some testing of our own, and found that while the piracy filter is largely effective, there a few inconsistencies. While "The Pirate Bay" is completely blocked from autocomplete and Instant results, a search for "Lady Gaga BitTorrent" is autocompleted and served up in Instant results.
It's worth noting that just last week, Google protested the Stop Online Piracy Act along with eight other internet giants, even as it continues to censor and filter its own search results in an effort to better comply with copyright law. The moves aren't unreasonable, but they place Google in the tenuous position of saying the government can't ask it to do what it already seems to be doing of its own accord. We'll see how the search giant tries to maintain this balance in the months ahead.
Image credit: Timothy Tole (Flickr)

There are 50 Comments. Add yours.
Don’t be evil mantra – it is BULL after all.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 11:50 AM EST reply Recommend (10) Flag actions
Yeah! Its such bull! They are in fact being evil by refusing to make it easy to steal copyrighted media! Down with evil!
Wait….. wat?
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 12:25 PM EST reply Recommend (13) Flag actions
yeah, all torrents are copyrighted, idiot
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 9:16 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
As a matter of fact, any piece of written, recorded, etc material not created by the government is automatically copyrighted in the US, unless explicitly released into public domain. GPL, MIT, etc are all forms of copyright licensing. Registering it simply makes it easier to defend in the case of infringement.
Posted on Nov 26, 2011 | 4:57 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It was probably a requirement to the deal they made with the music companies for Google Music. That was the reason why they wouldn’t give Google the deal the first time around, because Google refused to take the sites off completely from the site.
But just disabling it from auto-complete and instant search isn’t so bad of a compromise. I guess if I had to pick for a record deal or a slightly less censored auto-complete, I’d pick the record deal.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 12:40 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
Just remember it’s not a complete removal of the sites, you can still search for “The Pirate Bay” and it will come up.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 12:41 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
…it’s evil because you can’t be lazy and have to type out your whole search instead of Google finishing it for you? They’re not filtering results, they’re filtering the autocomplete. Stop being lazy and get over it. They were nice to even cater to lazy people in the first place.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 3:48 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Y’know, if Google hadn’t introduced autocomplete and Instant Search this wouldn’t even be an issue.
Posted on Nov 26, 2011 | 5:00 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Oh.. oh..
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 11:50 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Like it matters, anyone would just type the URL in before googling it. And Chrome has a Pirate Bay plug-in so you can search for torrents without opening a new tab. Not sure what effect they hope these measures will have on piracy.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 11:56 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
1. Google starts selling movies.
2. Google filters out bit torrent sites
……
Profit
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 11:56 AM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
They don’t filter them out. You can still search for “The Pirate Bay” and thepiratebay.org will still show up as the top result. Just no auto-complete.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 12:44 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Yup it comes up for me. Even “bit torrent” comes up in auto complete but when i type in “the pirate bay” it says hit enter to search so I hit enter to search. huh. I have to hit enter now. Anarchy! /s
Also, they also would benefit from censoring pirating because Google too now sells music so it would be hurting them too.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 1:05 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Maybe a step towards blocking it entirely. Many baby steps and up to one big step. People protest less with baby steps.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 10:02 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
who even used the “the” in the search anyway. I’d just put pirate bay, which still auto completes nicely for me!
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 11:57 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
I guess this is to slow down uptake? Like those new-to-torrenting folks? It seems silly though, as any newbie would search “Pirate Bay” or the content they want +torrent, and anybody who’s used it has the site bookmarked.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 12:01 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Slippery slope, Google. Slippery slope.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 12:08 PM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
magadget,CCasper etc I doubt have ever produced a single bit of content in there life.
This measure will do nothing to stop the theft continuing so why people are up in arms about G’s actions is beyond me. Any one who want to can type www……
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 12:11 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Who knows what else is being filtered or will be filtered in future.
Google’s monopoly needs to be broken.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 12:18 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
What monopoly would that be? if you don’t like Google, use Bing instead. Or Yahoo!. It’s hard to see a monopoly where alternatives are so easy to reach.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 7:38 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Google isn’t appeasing the masses with this one, just the other rich people.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 12:29 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
If the supposed poor people are too lazy to type out “the pirate bay” then they don’t deserve to be on the internet. This only affects the autocomplete. And why is it wrong for people to want you to pay for something they worked hard on or invested in? You aren’t entitled to free content, get off your high horse.
How dare Google filter the autocomplete on their free search engine and how dare people who work to make entertainment want to get paid.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 3:55 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I’m glad they’re taking it out of search results; if you haven’t noticed, torrent sites like The Pirate Bay, ISOHunt, etc., are beginning to mainstream downloading which is a system and a culture that thrives on staying outside of the lowest common denominator’s consciousness. Once it gets too popular, it becomes a large target to take down (a lá Kazaa).
What this means is that torrent sites, downloading communities, etc., are going to be less accessible, but in a good way. It means that Joe Schmoe in Des Moines can’t Google ‘Transformers DVD.torrent," but it also means that two-bit Darren Districtattorney can’t either. It means that these communities are going to be found socially and through word-of-mouth, as it should be.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 12:34 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Except…wait a minute: you didn’t even read the article, did you?
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 7:47 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I love Google and I hope they will become great mall cops of the internet.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 12:35 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
“Someone told me” it’s like they already do for porn sites, for example start typing “tube8” and after you enter the 8 suddenly no more suggestions (I kind of agree with this though)
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 12:41 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
How are they “better following copyright law” by filtering out these sites? It’s not illegal to link to them, so The Pirate Bay isn’t even illegal, only the underlying sharing going on is. Plus, BitTorrent isn’t piracy, it’s a type of peer to peer file sharing protocol (irrelevant to the content shared) and it’s also a piece of software that uses said file protocol.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 1:00 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Because they’re not filtering out results, they’re filtering out suggestions. Until now, Google was actually “suggesting” results like ThePirateBay.org and others to users who hadn’t even completed their search query. And the pirate bay and other Torrent sites may not be illegal, but their legitimacy is certainly in a grey area. The fact that they’re not illegal is because of a technicality: they don’t provide storage to copyrighted material themselves. But they do provide access to copyrighted material by providing (and hosting) the Torrent files, which is enough reason for Google not to suggest them to users who hadn’t actually requested them yet.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 7:57 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The auto complete still works from Australia, so far.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 10:05 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I think this article makes what Google is doing sound worse than what it actually is. They only blocked auto complete and instant. This doesn’t restrict access to the domain at all and is more of a nuisance than anything. Of course this is censorship of sorts but what I (hope) to see here is that Google will try to argue that they can already censor and somewhat control piracy with this measure rather than bills like SOPA. I mean I’d rather have Google control their own censorship rather than laws that do it because Google understands that nobody wants it won’t be as strict about it. Time will tell how they use this.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 1:04 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I see at least 3, maybe 4, instances where Mr. Ingraham said in the article that this is pertaining to auto complete and instant search.
Be fair to the man and read properly. And I mean that to everybody else too.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 1:19 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Ops, I meant to say that everyone seems to be over reacting to the article. I even used the “autocomplete and instant results” in what I was saying but didn’t catch that error xD
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 3:14 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I do apologize if I came out as harsh. It’s just seems really inappropriate that the writer gets flamed for no reason other than because some people didn’t RTFA and just the title and went bonkers. Cheers.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 4:40 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
ZOMG really need an edit function. Now that I checked back the article title, it even said so. :P
Faith in humanity: lowered. :<
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 4:41 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
It’s just the internets xD
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 9:10 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Google, thanks for extending american hegemony to all non-american countries with different copyright laws than the USA as well. It’s nice to see that Google still breathes manifest destiny and american exceptionalism when it comes to their search engine policies.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 1:16 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Disclaimer: Like yourself, i’m not from the US.
Now, Google is based in the US. As a US company, it has to abide to US law, Not that from other countries, just the US. Moreover, if copyright laws are indeed that different between countries, it would be impossible to abide to all of them at the same time. Then ¿which country’s legal frame should Google abide to? ¿yours? so much for American exceptionalism, then.
If you want Google to abide to your specific location’s laws, go to China. That’s exactly what they’re doing there.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 8:06 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
inb4 “OCCUPY GOOGLE!!”
Please read the article carefully:
Mr. Ingraham is saying it clearly in the article, 4 times to my count, that Google is restricting these in auto complete and instant search. Come on, I thought the readers here are better than some other place. The result will come out normally. There’s no search result censoring, yet.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 1:24 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
this is just the beginning of a slippery slope, their first foot is in the door
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 9:18 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I guess it’s time to turn off Instant…
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 2:49 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
this means nothing. there is no balance… piracy still reins supreme, in the wild wild west of the internet
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 3:34 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Good thing i don’t use the useless instant “feature”.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 3:50 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
or you could just go to the torrent website.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 4:16 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
“do no evil”
yeah…..
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 7:44 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Do no Evil. That’s exactly what they’re doing. Unlike those sites who make quite the cash in advertising by using everyone else’s creative work. Hell, they don’t even look for the Torrents themselves, they just expect their users to upload them.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 8:11 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
yes, because all torrents are copyright, it’s not like there are linux distros, millions of books, movies, science documents, and hundreds of patches on there
0/10
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 9:13 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
imagine a store that sells millions of linux distros, books, movies, science documents, and patches from a catalogue that nobody reads. is it still primarily a linux distro store if almost everybody goes in there to illegally download Transformers 3?
quantity of downloads says bittorrent is, to most people, a method for downloading copyrighted material without paying the copyrights holder.
Posted on Nov 27, 2011 | 1:24 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I think this is fine. I’m tired of hearing copyright shit anyway.
Posted on Nov 25, 2011 | 9:40 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Nice photo! Pirates not the Navy :)
Posted on Nov 26, 2011 | 12:56 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I don’t see how this is a tenuous position at all.
Posted on Nov 27, 2011 | 1:25 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.