Check out the desk of your average graphics designer and you'll most likely find a Wacom tablet plugged into their computer, likely the Bamboo or — if they have the budget — a Cintiq. These tablets are great for precision editing, but you've got to be at a computer to use them. But Wacom's new Inkling is all about portability — you draw on paper first and edit on the PC later. By utilizing a digital pen and special receiver, users can digitally capture any and all scribbles on any piece of paper. It’s similar to IOGEAR’s Digital Scribe Pen, but has more of a focus on sketching and art and less of an emphasis on text recognition. I've been testing the Inkling for the last week, and while I may not be a professional designer, I do my fair share of note-taking and doodling. So, is this the solution that'll finally force you to digitize your notebooks and sketchbooks? Keep reading to find out.
Wacom Inkling review
Wacom's digital pen solution lets you write on any piece of paper, but does it really work as advertised?
Hardware
Hardware / design
The Inkling is minimal, but not everyone will find it comfortable to hold

The Inkling pen has a fairly minimalist design, with subtle curves and clean lines all around. It’s heavier than your standard Bic pen, and like most digital pens, it has a larger circumference. I personally found it to be rather uncomfortable when gripped, and was longing for my gel pens still tucked away in my backpack. Personal preferences will dictate how users feel about the pen, but something about the way it rested in my hand made writing with it feel more like a chore than normal. Since it uses standard ballpoint ink cartridges, you won’t be able to get fancy with edges and lines, but does mean the color can be changed should you purchase a replacement. It has a single status LED at the top that flashes green whenever transmitting and red when it’s powering down.
The most well-designed part of the Inkling is its case
The pen’s counterpart is a specialized receiver responsible for recording and storing sketches. It has a built-in clip for easy attachment to any piece of paper or sketchbook. Interestingly, every time you squeeze the clip, it recognizes a new page and begins a new sketch file for subsequent pen movement. You may unintentionally create two separate documents if the receiver detaches from the sheet, but layers and drawings can be combined in Photoshop after the fact. The top of the device has a power button as well as one to create a new layer, and LEDs to indicate power and transmission status. The front of the unit houses the ultrasonic and infared sensors, which help capture drawings from the pen itself — but more on those in a bit.
The coolest part of the package is the included plastic case. When not in use, the compact carrying case houses the Inkling and all its components, while doing double duty as a charging system for the hardware within. The case houses the digital pen, spare ink cartridges, Mini USB cable, and Inkling receiver that all fit into special slots on the inside. The pen itself is stored in a spring-loaded circular slot on the side and uses tiny gold contacts at the top for charging while the receiver connects via secondary Mini USB on the inside. A singular Mini USB port on the outside of the case charges the receiver and pen simultaneously. I found it annoying that the device uses a Mini USB cable rather than a more common Micro USB cord. The included cable and dedicated storage slot does make it a little easier to swallow.
Upon unboxing, you’re instructed to charge the whole unit for at least three hours, at which point the battery is quoted to last 15 hours for the pen and eight for the receiver. I didn’t exhaustively test the battery, but any time you plug the unit into your PC it begins charging — where you can also view the current battery level. I used the Inkling for three days without any explicit charging (aside from the initial one), and it still had juice when I plugged it in. The bottom line is that battery life shouldn’t be a major issue for this product so long as you have a computer nearby.



Usability
In real-world use, the Inkling system works much like you would expect: touch the pen to your paper within the line of sight of the receiver, and a green light appears on the end of the pen as well as the top of the receiver. So long as you're making contact and nothing is blocking either piece, all touches are registered and recorded to the 2GB of internal memory. (I didn’t experience a single file size over 1MB, so storage shouldn’t really be an issue.) You can add new layers by tapping that aforementioned button atop the receiver, and they can be separated in Photoshop or the accompanying desktop Sketch Manager software during processing.
Real World Performance
Performance-wise, I have to describe the Inkling’s output as inconsistent. I used the Inkling to record notes for the better part of a week in class, and was disappointed to see a good amount of textual distortion and the occasional missed stroke. Simple sketches fared better, especially when relegated to central location on paper. Wacom’s listed maximum paper size is 8.27 x 11.67-inches wide, which is slightly narrower than the standard piece of notebook paper. I didn’t have issues with width, but rather the height, and noticed that sketches at the bottom of the page suffered from more missed strokes than higher up.
Inkling works great for sketches, but less so for text
I was careful to make sure that I wasn't interfering with the signal transmission, but ended up with output of a far poorer quality than if I had simply scanned the sheet of paper manually. You see, the pen's tip has to be visible for the receiver to register strokes, so your wrist or even fingertips can get in the way unintentionally. I'm really unsure why my text came out so terrible, but smaller drawings and sketches did fare somewhat better. Still, for a device that's all about drawing, there shouldn't be any distortion whatoseverr.




Other Minor Gripes
Other gripes I had with the system are its one-color limitation and its weak text applications. You can switch the pen’s color using a standard ballpoint ink cartridge, but most people will not switch colors on the fly. Similarly, there are no OCR (optical character recognition) capabilities, and text capture was less than stellar.
One other interesting but lesser-known feature of the Inkling is that it can function as a secondary input device for your PC. With the receiver plugged in, you can use the pen as a tracking device much like a mouse or actual drawing tablet stylus — hovering around the page’s area to move the mouse and touching down to actually register a click. It won’t be as sensitive or full-featured as a dedicated drawing tablet, but is a nifty bonus feature that you might have not known about before.
Sketch Manager software

Once you plug the receiver in, you can scan through all sketches and evaluate your output using Wacom's Sketch Manager software, which is basically horrible. The app’s UI is unintuitive and backwards, with oddly placed buttons and a fickle toolbar that often hides important buttons in an unnecessary drop-down menu. Annoyingly, the app opens at login on OS X, and I couldn’t find an option to disable it either in the app’s preferences or in OS X’s Login Items window either. To make matters worse, Sketch Manager is the only app that can read Inkling's proprietary WPI files, so you're forced to use it no matter what.
Similar to Livescribe’s software, you can replay an entire drawing, which is a cool feature in theory but probably not all that practical. It will also export Inkling drawings directly to Photoshop, Illustrator, or Autodesk Sketchbook, preserving layers from the original file as you would expect. Layers can be toggled from within the Sketch Manager app, and are compiled together when you press the Photoshop button at the top. You can also export sketches to other file formats (JPG, PNG, PDF, etc.). I just wish it wasn't such a chore.
Wacom's Sketch Manager software is basically horrible

Wrap-up
The Inkling should satisfy a small group of target customers, but it's not for everyone
The Inkling is a well-designed product with terrible software that takes away from the user experience. It does work well for sketches and doodles, and will probably satisfy what I imagine is a small group of customers who prefer to sketch on paper but still want the perks of going digital. For $199, I expected a much more comfortable pen and perfect accuracy, but instead it's uncomfortable and I noticed too many missed or distorted strokes while writing text. Inkling's feature set won't replace my write-and-scan tendencies for digitization just yet, but designers looking to break away from the computer and sketch on the go might be able to overlook its limitations.
Wacom Inkling
Good Stuff
- Excellent all-in-one carrying case design
- Layering capabilities for designers
- Compatible with any piece of paper
Bad Stuff
- Sketch Manager software is unintuitive and poorly designed
- Pen can be uncomfortable
- Easy to miss strokes unintentionally due to hand placement


There are 57 Comments. Add yours.
This seems like a natural evolution from LiveScribe pens (even though they’re now competitors). I ended up shelfing my LiveScribe Echo though because of the fact that it’s uncomfortable to use. The pen comfort I thnk is the biggest factor in products like these, and until they make them with a more natural and good feel, they’ll never be popular.
Good review!
Posted on Nov 28, 2011 | 4:12 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Agreed. I’ve had a LiveScribe Pulse for quite a while now and although I have gotten used to taking notes with a pen of that size it still becomes uncomfortable over time. I also have worked with a graphics tablet, but find it awkward when I do probably because I don’t use it on a regular basis.
Hopefully either LiveScribe or Wacom build on what they have, reduce the size and put together a solution that works great for graphics and text recognition.
Posted on Nov 28, 2011 | 5:12 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I think the size is so big because of the sensors needed on the pen. Of course this is only based on my observation through reviews and not real life use, but that’s just what my engineering instinct tells me. :P
Posted on Nov 29, 2011 | 2:06 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I love my Wacom Bamboo, but there was a significant learning curve. I think it would be even harder if I have to be cognizant of how I write pen on paper, something I’ve been doing a certain way since primary school.
Posted on Nov 28, 2011 | 4:20 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
For the iPad or Wacom tablet? Im really debating if I should spend the $30 on the iPad stylus?
Posted on Nov 28, 2011 | 9:06 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
As someone who has both a iPad stylus and a wacom tablet for use with the computer, they are wholly different animals. The ipad stylus is a bit more natural for drawing for some folks, but It has the feeling of drawing with the fattest most blunt crayon you can find. its imprecise at best. the wacom tablet is fantastically precise, and gives you a much better feel due to pressure sensitivity, but in the case of the intuos and bamboo tablets there is a disconnect between your hand and whats being drawn. for some people its a big deal
The inkling looks like a compromise between the two, not 100% on the accuracy but the benefit of pressure sensitivity and being able to see what you are doing on paper. For me, The ipad stylus price made it worth trying to see if it works, and my answer was a resounding “kinda”.
Posted on Nov 29, 2011 | 9:48 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
A 6.8?
Not the shining review I was hoping for but you have saved me 200 large because I was going to order the Inkling as soon as it was available. Now I think I may just stay with my Precise V5’s and Moleskine until the 2.0 version comes out.
Posted on Nov 28, 2011 | 4:35 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
See, I tried to use it to replace my current write-and-scan solution for school notes with the Inkling, but found the output to be borderline terrible for text. However, if you’re in the target demographic and really only using this for “concepting and sketching,” then it does work as advertised.
Still, for $200 it should be perfect all around.
Posted on Nov 28, 2011 | 4:48 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’m in school to be a graphic designer and I love vector art and making it but lacked really good penmanship and have trouble with a Wacom Bamboo. So I was really wondering if this could be something for me but I guess not….
Posted on Nov 28, 2011 | 4:38 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
See my comment above. If you actually are doing vector art and graphic design, this product may be perfect for you. The layering capabilities alone will probably make you thrilled. However, I wasn’t really satisfied with its prospects for writing text, but you can see from the comparisons that my sketch — simple as it may be — did translate pretty well.
Posted on Nov 28, 2011 | 4:50 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
EVERY TIME somebody releases some really cool and gamechanging hardware it sucks on the software side.
Posted on Nov 28, 2011 | 4:56 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
That’s because a lot of times companies (even IT Hardware companies) fail to realize the value of good software developers, and that as much time should be put into software development as hardware development.
Posted on Nov 28, 2011 | 5:09 PM EST reply Recommend (6) Flag actions
If this thing saved sketches to .AI or .PSD files off the bat, you wouldn’t even need the software in the first place.
Posted on Nov 28, 2011 | 5:15 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Would they have to pay Adobe for that?
Posted on Nov 30, 2011 | 7:54 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Probably. But they could get around this by outputting to vector formats such as PDF or EPS (which although originally Adobe are now open standards) or a raster format such as PNG and then write a plugin that integrates into Illustrator and Photoshop.
Posted on Dec 03, 2011 | 12:33 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Oh, that’s kind of what it does. I should’ve read the whole review first.
Posted on Dec 03, 2011 | 12:38 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
ESP might have been the winner if it is open, but something tells me they would have if they could have.
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 5:56 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
EPS…..SOB EDDDDDDIT!
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 5:57 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Great sketching skills right there! Keep it up homeboy.
Posted on Nov 28, 2011 | 5:13 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
first generation product means first generation problems.
Posted on Nov 28, 2011 | 5:48 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
While at the end of the day a ‘6.8’ score isn’t exactly bad, it seems like you’ve dinged the Inkling for poor performance in areas it simply wasn’t intended for. Don’t get me wrong, the shortcomings of capturing notes/lack of OCR tools are valid criticisms and as shown by other comments important elements to bring to people’s attention, but nowhere has the Inkling been promoted as such a device. From Wacom’s own promotional materials:
Apologies for the imperfect and exaggerated metaphor, but that seems to me to be a bit like rating a screwdriver poorly because it doesn’t work well as a hammer. Well of course it doesn’t, because that isn’t the intended use. And the vast majority of this review focused on the text recognition.
Posted on Nov 28, 2011 | 6:01 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
I agree 100% and I did my best to put as much perspective into the review as possible while still objectively testing its features. I’m not sure if it’s because of poor hand placement, excessive rapid strokes, or something else entirely that I had terrible experience with text, but it does fare much better for sketches
Posted on Nov 28, 2011 | 6:24 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
That was a simile.
Posted on Nov 29, 2011 | 12:49 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Dangit! You are correct sir.
Posted on Nov 29, 2011 | 9:47 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It’s interesting to read Macworld’s review from an artist’s point of view too. Although she has slightly different expectations her results and conclusions on the software are pretty similar to Jacob’s. As a designer I’d be interested to see how well this converts to vector illustration, shapes and smart objects within Illustrator and Photoshop.
Posted on Dec 03, 2011 | 12:49 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Interesting product, your review has confirmed my doubts about this technology in its current state, however i hope these pens do well so we can start to see improvement in future generation pens.
Once these problems are relatively solved, i would consider purchasing one of these pens even with a rather large price tag for a pen.
Posted on Nov 28, 2011 | 6:06 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Out of curiosity, how much bigger/smaller would you say the pen is compared to a Bamboo stylus?
Posted on Nov 28, 2011 | 7:34 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I don’t have one to test with, but it’s not really the thickness that bothered me (it tapers down towards the tip and then flares out again), but the curvature of the pen itself and the way it sat in my hand personally.
Posted on Nov 28, 2011 | 8:04 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Hmm, fair enough – thanks!
Posted on Nov 28, 2011 | 11:37 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
@Jacob Schulman …“your average graphics designer” would likely have an Intuos plugged in their computer. I think you should have collaborated with a professional illustrator / sketch artist while writing this review.
Posted on Nov 28, 2011 | 10:01 PM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
I don’t necessarily believe the Inkling is geared towards “Professional Illustrators”. Professionals that I have worked with use the Cintiq series exclusively for their work and not an Intuos. Which industry are you in that uses an Intuos? I haven’t seen an Intuos in use in years with the last one being my Intuos 2 which was replaced by a Wacom Cintiq.
@artconcept: The beauty of this site is that you can easily go to a forum and write up a constructive review that you would like to read.
Posted on Nov 29, 2011 | 10:33 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
You should really get out more.
Posted on Nov 29, 2011 | 12:22 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
There’s a quite a bit more to a proper setup than a Cintiq, and it’s for that reason that a lot of independent illustrators and designers alike can’t justify it. Simply using one as opposed to another tablet in’t going to give you any sort of edge. Although, it will make your life a bit easier. As someone who’s independent you probably wont make your money back faster than someone who went with a so-called lesser tablet. Because as opposed to brick-and-mortar firms successfully being independent is more about communication and creativity than it is regimented production. You might only drop a handful of projects a year as compared to one or more a week,
Posted on Nov 29, 2011 | 3:31 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
@bob.kozik – Every freelancer or professional I know or have worked with (toy design/Web Design/ Advertising/ Animator/ Artist) uses a Cintiq over an Intuos. I am not saying it out of anything other than observation. I am not looking down on anyone who does use an Intuos or trying to infer that those who do use them are less than qualified. What I am saying is that the time savings you get with a Cintiq means that they pay for themselves. Not to mention the learning curve involved.
I personally bought a Cintiq as a hobbyist to replace my aged Intuos 2 and the time savings were far more than I expected. I was sincere in my question asking about which industry/freelancers are using the Intuos models over the Cintiq alternatives after I read @artconcept’s comment critizing the professionalism of the reviewers review::
Posted on Nov 29, 2011 | 5:56 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’m “your average graphic designer” and I use an Intuos 3, because it’s perfect for my current needs and the price was right. As a freelancer struggling in a small market during tough times, I can’t justify shelling out more than my entire new computer + 24" monitor cost for a Cintiq which would only make my life somewhat easier. In the end, it’s all about what you perceive as “average”.
Posted on Nov 30, 2011 | 5:36 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
This is why I like this place. A lamen can come along as see sheer badassery. I have tried a cheap pen tablet solution before, but I couldnt get passed the learning curve. This I could make work. Sheer badassery.
Posted on Nov 30, 2011 | 8:22 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Finance? gun to head, pulls trigger
Posted on Nov 28, 2011 | 11:27 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Story of my life.
Posted on Nov 28, 2011 | 11:57 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
If you want to prevent a lot of eye-rolls from working designers, do yourself a favor and swap out Bamboo for Intuos in the first line.
It might not seem like a big deal, but it’s actually a blow to the credibility of your review in the eyes of the people who are most likely considering this device.
Posted on Nov 29, 2011 | 1:24 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Thank you. And especially since the Inkling pen is only slightly larger than more recent Intuos pens…
I’d like to see the Inkling evaluated by a graphic designer/artist. Interesting review, nonetheless.
Posted on Nov 29, 2011 | 3:41 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Thank you Jacob Schulman
I am a graphic design who likes to do a lot of hand done text. From the sounds of your review I should stick to scanning it in :(
Posted on Nov 29, 2011 | 9:28 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
200 dollars saved
Posted on Nov 29, 2011 | 9:28 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’ve gotta say that I’m pretty disappointed in this review, sorry. Keep in mind that I’m not directing this at the reviewER! So please don’t take this personally! :) I just think that The Verge should have chosen their reviewer much more carefully, and reviewed this product for what it was intended for. In general, and specifically with this product, Wacom directs their technology towards the VISUALLY creative types, not the lingually (word?) creative. I was hoping to get a Verge caliber review about the Inkling’s sketching abilities, but instead, only read about it’s (in)ability to reproduce text. It’s sort of like reviewing a nice mountain bike, saying it’s too sluggish for the city, and ending the review there.. Yes, it can be ridden in the city, but it was meant to be taken off-road; a full review would cover that aspect in full too.
Your final score will now need to be viewed as incomplete.
Posted on Nov 29, 2011 | 10:53 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
I think this product answered a question nobody asked and the review is spot-on.
Posted on Nov 29, 2011 | 11:46 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
What was the question?
Posted on Nov 29, 2011 | 12:00 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I think you read that half-baked observation in another review on the internet, and thought you might come off as clever copying and pasting it here. But you don’t even know what the question nobody asked is.
Nice try.
Posted on Dec 02, 2011 | 11:44 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I don’t take it personally at all and I agree with that you’re saying, but I think I did a pretty good job of putting this review in context. I say it sucks at text (which I also say it’s not made for), but is great for sketches (which it is made for).
The score it got is reflective of it being good at sketching, and only sketching. If I was going to knock it for bad text performance, it would not have even gotten a 6.8.
Posted on Nov 29, 2011 | 12:18 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Thanks for clearing that up. I was’t sure if the score was affected by the Inkling’s bad textual connotations, because in the Wrap-up you mention “I noticed too many missed or distorted strokes while writing text. Inkling’s feature set won’t replace my write-and-scan tendencies…” and, well, the Wrap-up is the section right before the score, so it reads like it plays a factor into the score.
And I want to make this clear to anyone else possibly reading this: I’m not upset about the score. From what I’ve read in other reviews, this sounds about right. I’ve noticed some artists being skeptical about the Inkling, and others praising it.
However, if you guys feel like sending me the unit, I’d be more than happy to do a thoroughly detailed follow up about it’s sketching abilities from a sketcher’s point of view! I also discovered the joy of sketching IN ball-point rather early in my life as well, so the review would have that extra layer of experienced objectivity too. :D
Also, is the picture in the banner a 1:1 scale picture?! If so, that’s very cool that you did that. If not, is the second picture?!
Posted on Nov 29, 2011 | 1:52 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Not sure what you mean about the “picture in the banner,” but the lede image up top (full page width) is one photo that was only adjusted for white balance.
Posted on Nov 29, 2011 | 2:33 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
yeah the lead picture :)
Posted on Nov 29, 2011 | 3:10 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Jacob, could you clarify what you think is the best product to use for text and audio recording, such as for a business meeting or lecture? I think your review of the Inkling (give them points for a great product name!) is just fine, but it did leave me with that “unasked question,” what is the best product for text? Thanks.
Posted on Dec 05, 2011 | 12:50 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I agree 100% (and no offense or animosity intended toward the reviewer). I went through a long and annoying registration process to register this feeling because every review of this product I can find suffers from the same problem. This isn’t for casual doodlers at all, so seeing a casual doodler review it just drives me insane. This product has 1024 levels of pressure sensitivity but the drawing sample looks like it was done pressed down at max pressure with one big long stroke with the pen held in a fist rather than multiple small strokes like one would ACTUALLY use (yes even with a ballpoint pen — I use a ballpoint pen to sketch more than a pencil just because pens are more readily available and it’s very possible to create highly realistic and shaded sketches with ball point pen). So why is the test drawing the type of thing that a child’s art tablet from the 90’s could handle rather than something meant to test the capabilities of the highly specialized equipment? I want to know how it can handle ACTUAL sketches, not random doodles from people who never ever draw. In my view that makes this review even LESS useful because not only does it focus on text capture over sketching (which is actually an interesting question, something I did wonder about), but there really is no ACTUAL SKETCHING being tested. Heavy-handedly drawing a square box or a few spirals tells me very little about how this is going to work in real world situations.
It’s more like going to read a specialized mountain bike review that’s been reviewed by someone who hates riding bikes and can barely ride at all. Again, no offense to the author who did a really wonderful job under the circumstances and seems very likable and competent.
I’m not a professional, I’m just a hobbyist and barely that anymore. But I find myself sketching a lot at work on breaks and maybe if I could use that time for an actual project rather than random doodles I never scan in, I’d be able to get back into my hobby. But 200 is a lot of money to plunk down on something that may not capture my sketches very well to start with and I still have literally no idea how well it would actually do that. I sketch faces, figures, comics, etc. but the literature seems to say that it’s really only good for conceptual sketches that you plan to clean up heavily… it makes me wonder whether it’s good mostly for layouts and rough scenes or poses rather than being able to capture facial expressions or a stylized sketch with specific line weights or what, y’know?
Posted on Nov 30, 2011 | 11:18 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I think, from the images you submitted, that the problem is in the vectorizing software, not the pen. The subtle (and sometimes not so subtle) changes in the curves on the drawing suggest fidelity setup issues similar to what you’d get in Illustrator when fiddling with the Pencil Tool settings – the Inkling software seems to smooth out strokes too much by default. This should be possible to correct in software, but if you can’t – dealbreaker right there.
Posted on Nov 30, 2011 | 5:41 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I was stalking this thing since August, when the first batch of was released. From that time nobody got their Inkling up to some time in the mid November. There was so many discussions, whining and crying on the Wacom’s forums. People made pre-orders and waited for 2+ months. And now I think – is it worth it? I still consider buying it…or a wacom’s pen’n’touch. Those are totally different products, but still can’t decide. Anyway I’m glad to read this review and get some feedback. Though it would be even better to get it from a designer\artist who uses it for sketching, rather than doodling or writing stuff.
Posted on Dec 01, 2011 | 8:06 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
you probably want to read this review http://ministryoftype.co.uk/words/article/the_wacom_inkling/
Posted on Dec 01, 2011 | 9:47 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Thanks for that. Excellent, thorough review that reviewed it’s sketching abilities in detail! Something I was expecting here at The Verge lol
Posted on Dec 02, 2011 | 11:42 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yeah, is the damned thing finally shipping now? Back in October (when it was supposed to ship), the European Wacom site said:
I don’t know what a tranche is, but my preorder has been been in since Oct 21, so who knows it’ll get here in time for Christmas for my wife. And then I read these lukewarm reviews. Damnit.
Maybe I should just replace her aging Intuos1, for which she’s lost the pen.
Posted on Dec 05, 2011 | 5:04 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.