Motorola Mobility has been talking about Android-based cable boxes for a while now, and it appears there's a little crossbreeding with the tablet and phone groups going on in the labs: we've just received these images of a 6-inch Android 2.3 tablet codenamed "Corvair" that's designed for use in the living room. We're told that it's in testing with cable companies right now, but we're not exactly sure how it's designed to be used: the box calls it a "dedicated controller," but it also seems to show the tablet wirelessly displaying its entire UI on the TV, so we're guessing it can be used to watch and stream content in addition to serving as a remote control for one of Motorola's cable boxes. (That would also explain the hardware power and volume buttons next to the display.)
We don't know much specs-wise, but the box says the design is "optimized for low cost," so we wouldn't expect anything high-end inside. It also looks like it says something "OS" in the upper left, so it seems like a fairly custom version of Android. There's also IR control and RF4CE, which is a ZigBee-based RF control protocol, as well as a high-capacity 4,000mAH battery — makes sense if you've got to keep this thing on a coffee table for days on end. It's definitely an intriguing concept and further evidence that the cable industry is considering all types of new ideas — we'll see what comes of it.

Comments
Looks like a cool product. But it needs to be cheap if they expect us to use it just as a controller for a tv.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 3:15 PM EDT reply Recommend (6) Flag actions
Logitech disagrees with you.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 4:21 PM EDT reply Recommend (8) Flag actions
Their sales numbers, on the other hand, strongly agree with him.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 5:47 PM EDT reply Recommend (20) Flag actions
Logitech has a history of making “poor” business decisions, over-pricing their products and conditioning consumers to wait for overstock sales being two examples.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 10:29 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Motorola has that same history themselves.
Posted on Nov 06, 2011 | 10:59 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
True, but they have the ability to sell off divisions to increase profitability and lets not forget that Google purchased their mobile and set-top division.
Posted on Nov 14, 2011 | 5:49 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
interesting. seems like Moto / Google is trying to meet a very specific need for consumers. if they meet this need well, it will definitely take off.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 3:29 PM EDT reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Well that really is the question isn’t it: Can they meet the needs of consumers? Given the Google TV debacle, Motorolla’s poor track record, and Android’s general flakiness when forced into formats it really was not designed for, my initial reaction is no, no they can’t.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 3:36 PM EDT reply Recommend (7) Flag actions
And here I sit with an IPTV box with a label Motorola on it…. I think they occupy the living room of a lot of people these days
So, when it comes to living room penetration(some double entendre for ya) Motorola is quite successful.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 4:32 PM EDT reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
How much did you pay for it?
Exactly.
Getting other corporations to shove your product down people’s throats is not a track record to be proud of.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 5:49 PM EDT reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
actually, sometimes a lot. I pay an extra 20 a month for my verizon fios multi-room dvr, which is a motorola box. The box in my living room is HD box, also motorola that is something like 5 or 8 extra a month (they nickle and dime you with the boxes). I’d pay a few extra a month for a box if it came with a pimped remote like this
Posted on Nov 06, 2011 | 9:12 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yeah, but the box you have still sucks. Google TV? Still sucks. Android shoehorned into products it wasn’t meant for?
Hate to say it, but my bet is that it’ll still suck.
Posted on Nov 07, 2011 | 4:49 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Google looks like they are improving their Google TV product, If i can watch a different channel on the controller than what is on TV, I’ll take that bet… but then again I am an android fan boy :)
Posted on Dec 02, 2011 | 8:47 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Exactly €0
Posted on Nov 06, 2011 | 7:25 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I was expecting an actual Google TV product. A little disappointed by this.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 3:38 PM EDT via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
In the bottom of the second picture of the box, it says “Dedicated Controller for the Conne” … my curiosity is piqued.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 4:10 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
If you zoom in it looks like there are more letters. I think it is supposed to say “Connected” something.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 4:39 PM EDT reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
yeah i’m sure there are more letters, and that it probably is Connected Something — though it’d be kind of hilarious (to me, at least) if they went with just “Connect”
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 5:10 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Are you kidding, this is great news! First Google buys Moto to piss of their phone partners, now they’re pissing off their (I’ll give you a minute to laugh…) Android Tablet partners. Two birds with one stone!! Great job Larry!!
Posted on Nov 06, 2011 | 3:38 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Anything that is coming out now has been in the pipeline long before google bought them, plus the transaction hasn’t gone through yet so google hasn’t bought them yet, plus this is exactly hat google said they would do. Moto will run themselves without help from google. Now this isn’t gonna stay that way but for now moto is obviously gonna compete in all the areas that they competed in before google bought them. This is not something the ompetitors can be pissed off about, nothing has changed…..for now.
Posted on Nov 06, 2011 | 5:40 AM EDT reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
It seems a good product, and if they sell at a reasonable price, won’t be a surprise if it’s more successful than the Xoom.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 3:39 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
ba doom chingggggg
Posted on Nov 06, 2011 | 3:41 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Awesome.
Imagine if all the shitty cable boxes made by motorola are replaced by Android powered machines.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 3:39 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Could be good competition to the Harmony remotes from Logitech. Very interesting, I’d like to see a price tag before I consider one and I’d like to know what kind of device support they’re going to offer. If it will run my TV, receiver, 360 & HTPC I’d be interested for sure.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 3:40 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Not sure it is displaying the tablet UI on the TV but rather the TV UI on the tablet. Seems to just be a shell for easy selection of what is displayed on the TV. At any rate this is probably concept rather then final.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 3:40 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I’ve always wanted something like this to be honest the Logitech harmony isn’t bad but a full touchscreen like this with App integration could be pretty cool if done properly.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 3:43 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Am I the only one who thought of the old Chevy Corvair?
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 3:44 PM EDT reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
Definitely not! I was thinking, “Why in the world would Motorola choose a name associated with Ralph Nader’s scapegoat?”
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 4:54 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Unsafe with any feed?
Posted on Nov 06, 2011 | 8:16 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Logitech must be bummed.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 3:44 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Looks like an interesting controller. However, can we just please make TV/Cable Box controllers from here on out with Wi/Fi as their primary method for input??? Why do we continue to play with IR blasters and specialized radio frequencies?
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 3:44 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Gosh Nilay, you said
but you could just hit enhance…. gosh you guys are so behind
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 3:52 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
There’s one huge problem with this. It’s a tablet not a remote, even if it’s sitting on your couch with the screen off, it’s going to die in around 12 hours. Unless it comes with a dock that is actually convenient for users then I see this being a huge problem.
Motorola, you’re already making Android tablets, why make a dedicated remote that’s actually a tablet, when you could have just made an app for your existing tablets? That way people have the choice of all different kinds of tablets but still get the remote functionality. Although it probably wouldn’t work unless they thought ahead and put an IR port on the side like the Galaxy Tab 7.7 or the Sony Tablet S.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 3:54 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Admittedly I don’t know about this specific tablet, but my experience with my iPad 2 is, that if it isn’t actively used it needs nearly no power. Just lying around doing nothing it easily keeps enough power for about a week. I guess it isn’t that much different for this one.
Posted on Nov 07, 2011 | 1:24 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Having owned over a dozen various remotes to control my home theater over the years, a controller MUST have physical buttons in my opinion. Touchscreens are great for some functions, but hard-keys for volume, channel, select, etc. that are easy to find by touch are essential.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 3:56 PM EDT reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Oops, I guess it has a few there on the sides. Still no replacement for a Harmony One.
On another note, anyone know how to edit a post (or delete it)?
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 4:00 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Seems pretty cool, I’d love to at least try it out but to really make the TV experience a lot better, you’d need more then just a small tablet as a controller.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 4:00 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Cool. But you know what would make a great TV controller? iPad.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 4:18 PM EDT reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Hmm…. Will we now see complaints about locked bootloaders on remote controls? :D
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 4:46 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
do you think comcast cable will give these away ?
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 4:48 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I’d rather want this as my universal remote. A tablet-sized controller for a whole TV doesn’t makes much sense.
Although, cool and funky, it’s a nice feature to have.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 4:59 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Similar Idea to the Wii U controller , I just saying this might validate the touchscreen tablet controller before Nintendo even lunchs the Wii U and that would be great.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 5:53 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
They could integrate the remote in the wifi-enabled MotoACTV. That way your remote would always be on your wrist. Great not only in front of the TV, but everywhere around the house.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 5:55 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I am not sold on a touchscreen TV remote. The beauty of a traditional remote is that you don’t need to look at it to operate it where as with a touchscreen remote you need to look at it to do simple tasks like change station.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 6:56 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Unless a clever dev writes a gesture control a for the remote. I can see an app that lets you draw the numbers of the channel you want to go there, for example.
Posted on Nov 06, 2011 | 3:29 AM EDT via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
It would be nice to have. but it needs to be cheap and I really don’t think it will be.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 7:15 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I don’t know, I think “optimized for low cost” is a good sign as far as pricing.
Posted on Nov 06, 2011 | 3:31 AM EDT via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
do we need such a big remote plus if it comes cheap then it most likely wont be good hardware
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 8:13 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Cool. Looks a bit like a Wii U controller, minus the buttons. Nintendo should integrate something like this into the Wii U, and make it work with like Hulu, Netflix etc.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 8:21 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Take a look at the bezel around the screen it looks recessed like the Neonode N2, would be pretty sick if that thing were rocking a zforce screen, would be nice to have that tech on something other than an e-reader.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 8:53 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Just please configure it so I do not have to search and configure my TV’s code!
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 9:10 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
It looks like they used the cheapest and shiniest plastics they could get their hands on…
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 9:42 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Why do I need another widget? Why can’t I use my phone or tablet I have? Logitech already makes products that let my tablet be a remote for $100 or less.
If I don’t have a tablet why would I buy this instead of a real tablet?
DOA
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 10:12 PM EDT via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
Hope they don’t stick with the codename… Can’t not think of this – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Corvair
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 10:16 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I wonder if Motorola ordered a few Tegra 2 chips/chipsets that Nvidia will not cancel?
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 10:31 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Cable companies? new technology? This is the first I’ve heard of a good idea coming out of the creative deathbox that are Cable companies.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 11:05 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Maybe it’s just me, but this seems like the kind of device that just screams for an inductive charging solution.
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 11:12 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I was thinking the same thing.
Posted on Nov 06, 2011 | 3:32 AM EDT via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
How has Logitech not done this yet
Posted on Nov 05, 2011 | 11:36 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Motorola Corvair , answer to the question no one is asking
Posted on Nov 06, 2011 | 3:55 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
If you were given the task to think up the ultimate TV Box I’m sure you would ask for
1 A simple interface method (touching and swiping is a favourite today)
2 Mimic the display on the TV and the hand held device
3 Have a load of apps to display the weather, tv listings, news etc
4 Be able to control the cable box to record etc.
So it looks to me as if they are ticking the box’s with this device.
Posted on Nov 06, 2011 | 4:56 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I know how Motorola works when it comes to cable boxes. They’ll put out a brand new version of their latest cable box, and offer the Android remote as an option to the cable providers. Which means 1 out of 1000 of the cable providers will actually offer it, and this product will just die off with the rest of Moto’s product line.
But I’m totally trashed right now, so what do I know?
Posted on Nov 06, 2011 | 4:58 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
It’s like using a tablet phone or pmp to control your htpc. My friend uses an I pod touch for this and it works really well I use my phone for my laptop and it works well but I wouldn’t feel comfortable using it as a communal controller. If apple took this concept and just made a cheaper version of an ipod touch with out a camera, not as much storage space, low resolution amoled display (what ever lcd they use now is garbage). I’d jump on that. I’m interested to see what the price for this would be.
Posted on Nov 06, 2011 | 8:39 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’d rather they just make a cheap little IR attachment for my phone. Why a whole ’nother device?
Posted on Nov 06, 2011 | 9:38 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I would not want a small device that I could lose down the side of the sofa that I had to plug into my phone just to change the TV.
If the price is right, you have the freedom that Android brings and it runs smooth it would win me over.
Posted on Nov 06, 2011 | 10:55 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It would be neat if you can be watching something on your T.V and viewing other channels with the remote. Also you can take it into the bathroom and watch T.V! Just think of the possibilities!
Posted on Nov 06, 2011 | 11:26 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
But does that mean I’ll need a Motorola TV? Because not doing that!
Posted on Nov 06, 2011 | 12:48 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
not a Motorola tv, but a Motorola set top box
Posted on Nov 06, 2011 | 10:20 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Not very interested in Motorola products personally, though i do like the idea, i just hope that if they take off remotes don’t loose their functionality.
Posted on Nov 06, 2011 | 6:06 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’ll just wait for my Wii U :)
Posted on Nov 06, 2011 | 9:57 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It’s a nice thought, but the Wii U looks pretty good. Plus, it may be hacker-friendly!
:)
Posted on Nov 06, 2011 | 10:16 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Anyone want a cheap small box to turn your android phone/tablet into universal remote control for you TV , air condition unit, or other Infrared controlled device, please contact me.
Posted on Nov 28, 2011 | 6:26 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed