In what is widely regarded as his greatest presentation ever, Apple's Steve Jobs introduced the iPhone to the world on January 10th, 2007. In the nearly 5 years since then, the iPhone, iPad, and iPod Touch have literally redefined the entire world of mobile computing. That world is moving so quickly that iOS is already amongst the older mobile operating systems in active development today. That certainly doesn't mean it's underpowered or underfeatured — quite the contrary. Through what can only be described as relentless and consistent improvement over the years, Apple has made iOS one of the most feature-rich and well-supported platforms on the market.
iOS 5, the system currently powering Apple's mobile devices, offers an easy-to-understand smartphone operating system to new users, a powerful platform for app developers, and a relatively un-fragmented experience across multiple devices. Perhaps the most remarkable thing about iOS is how similar the OS as it exists today is to the OS as it existed 2007, yet the number and breadth of features that Apple has baked in since then is mind boggling. Far from suffering from the "feature creep" that typically bogs down operating systems over time, iOS has managed to stay relatively snappy and is more internally consistent than anything else available today.
How did we get from a platform that began without 3rd party apps, multitasking, or even copy / paste support to where we are today? Read on to see exactly how Apple evolved its mobile platform over the years, in our history of iOS.



































There are 355 Comments. Add yours.
Bottom line: it’s looked the same from the beginning.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:31 PM EST reply Recommend (92) Flag actions
that’s kind of apple’s point. it has much more features though
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:34 PM EST reply Recommend (44) Flag actions
I hate how people use that argument against iOS as if five years down the line people won’t be talking about how dated WP7 looks.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:41 PM EST reply Recommend (27) Flag actions
Your comment is only valid if we knew for sure that WP7 will look exactly the same 5 years from now.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:36 PM EST reply Recommend (37) Flag actions
And if Microsoft is silly enough to continuously change the look of their mobile OS the way Android has, that’s be sad.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 8:40 PM EST reply Recommend (10) Flag actions
What? Android hasn’t had much revision in terms of UI when you look at TheVerge’s post. It is only the most recent Android version that has been a dramatic change in UI (a much needed one, at that).
You seem to be under the impression that change is a bad thing. I’m afraid you’r wrong.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 10:45 PM EST reply Recommend (15) Flag actions
Totally agree with you.
Change moving forward IS ALWAYS A GOOD THING.
It’s more commonly known as ADVANCEMENT.
Advancement has brought us from B/W CRT tvs to 3D LCD Screens, the combustion engine to the Shuttle Jet, telegrams to instant messaging. And even to improved nutrition, better medicines. Who isn’t all for that?
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 1:20 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Change is not necessarily a good thing if it worsens something that was already good. Both Android and iOS have aspects of their UI that need changing, but people advocating for “complete overhauls” and drastic changes because Android is too “robot-like” or iOS is too boring don’t see the value of what is already there.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 5:29 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
I prefer change for worse than rigid conservatism. When things go bad, as long as the consequences aren’t so permanent, we can change back or to something better. It is humanity’s only hope to get things anywhere near right.
Posted on Feb 04, 2012 | 7:15 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You’re wrong; because you’re confusing ‘advancement’ with ‘refinement’ – and in Android’s case, it took them four versions to decide on a consistant skin for their mobile OS.
How dare you compare Android 1.0 → Android 4.0 to the Shuttle Jet.
Posted on Dec 22, 2011 | 8:56 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It could very well be different, but too much change could be a bad thing.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 8:42 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Then don’t add to an argument if you’re not comfortable with valid points.
The advantage of all this is the iOS experience started to get really good around iOS3 but it still had problems. I like to make things my own, and the Apple experience doesn’t offer that.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:39 PM EST reply Recommend (6) Flag actions
Although I agree a tad about wanting to make things my own; owning devices with high customization options, etc., I have to say, after spending three years with Android, it’s become a very convoluted process. The spectrum is consistently changing, almost on a daily basis about the ways and techniques you can use, either native or otherwise, to customize Android – and having gotten busier with my business and life in general – it’s not as important to me anymore. My Nexus S is a great device, don’t get me wrong, but fiddling around with widgets, homescreens, launchers just doesn’t have the appeal to me anymore and I’m starting to become disillusioned with the whole ideal. Having played around with iPhones in the past, I didn’t like how static the UI was, but I have to say, having just played around (extensively) with a 4S, Apple has nailed the perfect balance between flexibility and user experience, something that Android has yet to do. I’m about to load an AOSP Ice Cream Sandwich ROM onto my NS4G, and I’m going to trial ICS for a bit to see if it brings me back to the nostalgic feeling that Android once provided for me. But if it doesn’t, a 4S on Sprint will be my next phone.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 5:08 PM EST reply Recommend (16) Flag actions
I highly recommend: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1364221
I’ve been using it for several days now, it’s quick, spiffy, and possibly the most feature complete one out there. The only thing that doesn’t work is MMS receiving and Wimax (and camera effects). But everything else works beautifully. It really has added new life to my phone, such that I really don’t mind not upgrading to the biggest and best new dual core phone. My Nexus S 4G is snappier than ever.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 7:34 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
But your friends/family can’t MMS you pictures…
Wouldn’t it be nice if your “Nexus” device got an official build of ICS, well, the day it’s released? I don’t understand why people put up with this on Android.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 7:52 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
“Wouldn’t it be nice if your "Nexus" device got an official build of ICS, well, the day it’s released?”
You mean on the 15th? Or whenever the Galaxy Nexus is released in the US? Yes, it will be nice getting the update..
Put up with it? You can’t be serious, right? I “put up with it” because I want to run the newest software before it’s completely finished. If I didn’t, I can just sit back and wait until the Galaxy Nexus is released and updates start getting pushed to the Nexus S.
But I LIKE being able to try new things. Heck, now that my phone is rooted, I may try out many different ROMs. But right now, I’m enjoying ICS for free and with very little drawbacks. In fact, even with the missing features, I’m still enjoying the heck out of it. The pros far outweigh the cons.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 8:09 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Good luck with it then, and hopefully that official update rolls out sooner than later so you can edge out some of those cons .
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 8:19 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Hahah you just exemplified every reason I don’t want an Android phone
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 10:04 PM EST reply Recommend (11) Flag actions
He just said every reason I want an Android phone. Customization.
Everyone is different. Problem?
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 3:42 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
No problem. It’s just that if you asked 100 iPhone owners the thing they most dislike about it, very few people would actually say “lack of customization ability”.
It’s cool, though. Everyone’s different.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 9:17 AM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
Yes everyone’s different. For instance, there’s people who like to pull statistics off their asses.
In my opinion, the lack of costumization may be in fact one of the major complaints about iOS UI. It’s not just that it gets mentioned in almost every comparison between iOS and Android (including this very series of articles) but if you look at the Android Marketplace, many of the most popular apps are Launchers (UI replacements) meaning that a whole bunch of Android users do care about customization: since iOS is overly a better polished UI implementation, if it also had that same level of customization as Android, how many people would be using Android anyway?.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 10:33 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
the most popular apps on the marketplace are generally widgets.
Jailbreaking should be mentioned here, where full UI transformations can happen, and WyndWarrior has built an entire engine for building UI’s with menu’s and features in dreamboard, while fully supporting everything springboard supports.
I know because i used to design UI’s for it.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 6:20 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
It wasn’t until ICS that you could customize the dock of your Android phone. iOS has this in version 1.
Posted on Dec 29, 2011 | 12:02 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Really? Because I’ve had a customizable dock ever since I started using LauncherPro a few years ago.
Posted on Dec 31, 2011 | 4:51 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You know, there is a very interesting progression new forums/tech blogs. First you got the sensible, smart users, then you got the platform A fanboys, then there come the platform B fanboys. Everything turns into a shitfest and then fanboys from smaller platforms join in.
We’ve reached step one. The comments where we would have ACTUAL discussions have been replaced by mockery of other users. In a month or so, this comment section will have the quality of Engadget’s comment section.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 2:40 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
please don’t say that.
/is slightly scared your right.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 6:21 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Unfortunately, I think you’re right.
Posted on Dec 31, 2011 | 3:33 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’ve tried about 5 builds of ICS now and like DrewGaren’s the best! Significantly better than Koush 11… haven’t tried 12 as it has terrible reviews.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 10:26 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
With all seriousness and respect, I think that’s called “growing up” :)
iOS is certainly not perfect – as much as anyone, I’d love to see a nice UI refresh next year. But far too many detractors of iOS just can’t wrap their head around why most people don’t care for obscure tinkerings and bleeding-edge features. They laugh that iOS users live in a “walled garden” – why not just download out of the Wild West and keep an eye out for irregular resource usage and permissions? Or download anti-virus software for your phone? They don’t get that most adults just want their phone to work and behave like they expect it to. People don’t want to replace the battery halfway through the day, manage RAM, or risk downloading malware onto their main communication device.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 11:57 AM EST reply Recommend (7) Flag actions
And you iOS fanboys can’t it get through your thick skull the people might actually like different things. Growing up? Really? You should take a better look at yourself my friend:
>They laugh
You are generalizing a whole group of users just because you don’t use the same platform.
>iOS users live in a "walled garden"
It IS a walled garden but there is NOTHING wrong with that, unless they make it a matter of principle. There are a few advantages of being able to install apps outside of the ecosystem, but this applies to jailbroken iDevices as well. Want to me to expand on this? Let me know.
> download anti-virus software for your phone?
Unnecessary, even Google said this. Want to use pirated apps? Well that’s your own problem and risk, not Android in general. Go ahead and run pirated apps in iOS and OSX and keep giving root permissions to every single little thing. It’s a problem of users not handling security and it happens in every platform.
In any case, I would bet my money that the majority don’t even care about custom ROMs or alternative markets (outside of the Amazon app store maybe).
>They don’t get that most adults just want their phone to work and behave like they expect it to.
You keep throwing your cleverly disguised ad hominem. Don’t expect anyone to take you seriously when you keep calling Android users “not adults”.
> People don’t want to replace the battery halfway through the day, manage RAM, or risk downloading malware onto their main communication device.
Just beacuse you change the battery doesn’t mean you have to, just beacause you can manage RAM doesn’t mean most people do or have to. And again, you have the same risk of downloading malware in a jailbroken device as you do from downloading random apks outside the market.
Don’t get me wrong, there are many flaws in Android, but you hilariously managed to miss all of them and instead just focused on things you don’t like. And no, iOS is not perfect either.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 2:37 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Except pirated apps and viruses also exist inside the regular android market.
Also, you have to acknowledge that whether there really is a need to manage ram/kill apps, or not, there is built in functionality for it and a compelling reason to use it (it actually feels like it speeds up your phone) — and it shouldn’t be there.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 5:36 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
I think you got it right. I was on android for when it first came on Verizon and I realized that the constant changing of themes and roms and widgets was just exhausting and unnecessary. Once the iPhone came on Verizon and I switched it was like a load off of my head.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 4:55 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I totally agree. Blackerry os looks no more or no less different than iOS’ history, Android looks no or more different than iOS history. Why do we not feel the same about these operating systems?
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 7:37 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
people do complain about how dated BB looks, and look at their marketshare plummet. and android does not look the same whatsoever, especially since ics has been released (and all the manufacturers switch up the ui). The other thing about android is it is fully customizable by the user for the most part. if the user gets bored he can install a new launcher or move some widgets around or something. the iOS version of customization is changing your wallpaper, which didnt become available till like 4 years after the first iphone.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 8:09 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Changing wallpapers and arranging apps folders in different places. You can even throw some emoji in the folder names.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 12:29 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
No, because then WP7 will be five years old. This is saying that iOS 5 looks dated, and its brand new
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 10:57 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I know I said WP7, but if you try using critical thinking, you can deduce that I was talking about whatever version of Windows Phone is at that point.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 1:52 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
iOS has more features? Every single feature listed under iOS was already available in Android. Fine if you prefer iPhone, but saying it has more features than Android is just silly.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 7:50 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
And rarely do any of those features work as well as they do on iOS. Can you guess why Android has them in the first place? They were copied. Like the whole concept of the OS.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 11:08 PM EST reply Recommend (7) Flag actions
This is not a troll comment, I hope you can respond like a normal person (or anyone for that matter)
I dont know if you didnt read the comment you were responding to or you miss understood him. He was said " Every single feature listed under iOS was already available in Android". I think he was referring to iOS 5 and how a lot of those features were on android a few years ago.
you responded with “They were copied”, that would be invalid since android already had them.
care to explain witch features don’t work as well as iOS?
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 12:55 AM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
All those features, as in Notification Center? That’s one aspect of the OS. It’s like the drop down menu (which Apple invented) with a nice pull down. animation.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 1:12 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The notification center? please explain further. What exactly doesn’t work as well?
BTW android had the notification bar and i believe it did all the thing the “notification center” does.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 1:16 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
No in android you can’t put what apps appear in notifications, which appear on lock screen, which go above each other, and you don’t have the weather and stock widget. Also you can regulation how many notifications you get from each individual app. Furthermore you can also choose between the old pop up and the banner notification.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 12:32 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
But but, didn’t some Apple users above said that they dislike Android because of the level of customization????
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 2:42 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
First and foremost in almost every android app you have the option to set notifications in the Settings Menu. Second the need for a weather widget in the notifications bar makes no sense for android given its homescreen widgets. Just letting you know that you don’t know stuff
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 4:06 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
LIke i Have stated before, not trolling just picking ppls mind on this.
“No in android you can’t put what apps appear in notifications”
if the app has the functionality all you have to do is set it to display in the notifications bar. Most weather and stock apps have this functionality. It will also show you the temp on the bar (without bringing the bar down)
It was kinda hard to follow after that sentence but there is an app called widgetlocker that lets you put any widget form apps in your lockscreen.
What exactly do you need to regulate? if you could explain please.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 6:14 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Android had a pull-down notification bar before iOS you know….
I personally don’t like Notification Centre; I tried it out on my brother’s iPad and it’s got the weird denim texture. I much prefer having it black and ever so slightly transparent where there are no notifications.
And yes, I am running a buggy build of ICS on my HTC Sensation. It reboots occasionally and there’s no hardware acceleration yet. But I wouldn’t have it any other way.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 3:46 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Why would you open the notification center if there were no notifications?
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 9:50 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
What I don’t like about the way iOS looks, that there is no continuity of style. Youtube icon looks ancient while Siri looks like an electrified robot.
Apple needs to stop fragmenting the way their environment looks.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 1:09 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
How does the youtube icon look ancient? I think iOS is very constant with it’s design.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 9:10 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
They did it right from the start and didn’t have to redo it to catch up with the competition.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:34 PM EST reply Recommend (65) Flag actions
I’m sorry, but iOS’s original homescreen looked exactly like the Blackberry OS homescreen and other smartphone homescreens before it.
I’m not saying other parts of the iPhone weren’t new or unique, or that they really need to change the homescreen, or that it isn’t a elegant UI, but it wasn’t something Apple invented, or “did right from the start.” They copied what was out there, something that was tried and true and familiar.
It (like most smartphone homescreens even today) is really just a familiar computer desktop-style grid with icons and folders representing programs and functions, nothing more.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:09 PM EST reply Recommend (11) Flag actions
What was out there before Apple’s Newton (1993, way before either PalmOS or Blackberry) that had that same grid layout of icons? Copying from yourself isn’t really copying, is it?
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:27 PM EST reply Recommend (14) Flag actions
Grids of icons were popular in early versions of Windows also.
Would everyone stop with this arguing over who did what first and realize that in technological evolution, interfaces tend to trend towards whatever works best?
I don’t see everyone complaining that the method of using doors to section off a house is “copying”. It’s just a good way to do things. In the same way, a grid of icons (Whether it be Android, Windows Phone/desktop, or iOS) is a good layout for quickly accessing information in an organized manner.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:58 PM EST reply Recommend (18) Flag actions
You forgot to mention grids of icons used in OS X, which was out before the iPhone. And as for the person above, where is RIM today? Drunk on a plane, that’s where.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 6:05 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
Grid icons have been used everywhere…. Windows 3.0 used grids of icons in windows to display apps…….. Its nothing NEW!
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 7:37 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Except it all started with the Mac… which came out some FIVE years before windows.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 9:56 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I believe you meant Xerox…but anyways.
glad to help.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 10:53 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Except they didn’t have a product. So they were not used anywhere other than inside Xerox.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 11:10 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
They did, but almost nobody bought it.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 2:46 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
OMG GRID ICONS!!!?? What will they think of next?
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 7:36 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
who cares??? the point is they made it easy to use and specifically for a smart phone.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:30 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
Shorter Mark LaCroix:
"SS said, ‘They did it right from the start and didn’t have to redo it…’ "
"No, they didn’t. Except it was actually OK, maybe ‘elegant.’ But somebody else did something sorta like it first, so I disagree with your attitude even if you are factually correct."
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 6:52 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Your avatar explains why you are blind, I guess.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 11:05 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
That’s a great point that a lot of tech companies seem to miss. You often hear companies (specifically thinking of early versions of Android and Nokia around the days of the infamous Ryan Block open-letter) take criticism and say they will fix these things in future versions of the OS and improve upon what they already have.
That is an excellent attitude. Honestly, it is the attitude that every company should have. Our product is unfinished, we’ll keep making it better. But, what most companies seem to miss is that if you do things right the first time around, spend time and money making sure you provide the best possible product at that time, you don’t have to spend time fixing things. At best, you squash bugs, improve materials, etc. You know, the things that are damn near impossible to completely get right the first time around. That means that the next time around isn’t the product the last generation should have been, it’s the product that next year’s generation should be. You get to focus on making it a better product, rather than repairing your issues from the last gen.
Don’t get me wrong, I love Android. My EVO is the best thing in the world, but Google has developed Android in a very unfortunate manner and has treated it like every other one of their products — a continuous WIP, but never a finished product (though, ICS seems like it may shake that). Apple, though, are masters of product development. There is no one better. They make their missteps (AppleTV, mainly), but they give customers a great product from day one, 9 out of 10 times. I hate their ecosystem, but companies could learn a LOT from the way they develop and release products.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:11 PM EST reply Recommend (18) Flag actions
It seems like I semi-contradict myself by saying that treating products as unfinished and continually developing them is a good thing and then criticizing Google for doing so with Android. Not entirely the case, I just worded it poorly. Google is notorious for launching half-baked products (a ‘pet’ project for companies like Apple) and making it a full-fledged and powerful product years down the line. That has led to more product deaths at Google than anyone can possibly count. I fear that G+ is heading in that direction right now, honestly. Companies should be pushing themselves to beat consumer expectations, not meet them with the generation after the one you are about to release now.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:14 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Oh yeah, like Gmail Gmap Gdoc Gcalenday Gearth Ggroup they were all half-baked products and you should also fear they are heading in that direction right now.
And so much for “G+ is dead”. Do you really care to use it and see how well it’s doing?
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:42 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
You completely missed my point. For every Gmail, there’s a Buzz and Wave. They develop great products, but so many of these great ideas aren’t ever fully formed and result in early death because too few use them to be worth any value to Google.
As for G+, the amount of people actively using it is astonishingly low, at least in my circle of friends. I’m friends with everyone on my Facebook that has a G+ account and other than non-friends that I follow like Topolsky and Peter Scrietta, I see maybe 5 posts a week.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:56 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
“so many of these great ideas aren’t ever fully formed and result in early death because too few use them to be worth any value to Google.”
Because your’e confusing the point of these projects. They were mostly done in the 20% time Google gives their employees. They’re made public to see the public’s interest, and if there’s no interest, there’s no point in maintaining them internally any more unless someone inside really wants to.
“As for G+, the amount of people actively using it is astonishingly low, at least in my circle of friends”
That’s because you’re using it far too much like Facebook and not enough like Twitter. I’ve circled tons of people, so I always get interesting information. The Google circles alone are fun to see and interact with. Not to mention some tech pundits that have joined and actively use G+.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:01 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
20% time? Then why did Google have a big press event to launch Buzz if it was just a vague test of public interest? Why was it integrated practically by default into every gmail user’s inbox?
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:10 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Because that’s how Google does things. They create something, raise it up a flagpole to see if people like it, and then if they don’t, they take it down.
It’s really quite simple.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:38 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
That seems to be the OP’s point, no?
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:59 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
I just don’t understand why a WIP is a bad thing. Things are always works in progress. Yet he asserts that Android isn’t really a finished product. I highly disagree with that sentiment.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 5:32 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Mike’s right. Nothing at Google is ever a finished project. It’s continuously evolving, changing, and being made better.
Even Google’s biggest project (and first project), Search, will never be finished. Because Google see it as not perfect, like with all their projects.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 3:51 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Yes, Google doesn’t make anything perfect, but that’s no excuse to justify blatantly lazy attention to detail.
Sony in the 80s and 90s, and Apple ever its conception, have focused on those details (even Microsoft, on some occasions!). Perfection is never achieved, of course. But they’re damn perfect compared to Google products.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 4:52 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
20% time?
20% time is why Google has 1 hit for every two dozen + failures (and these are high profile failures; there’s probably far more internal that the public will never hear about)
20% time is the major crux of Android’s problems.
They bought the first 20%, and 20% time is why you get features working 20% of how they should in Android.
20% is the amount of effort they spend on distributing new Android versions, and that’s why less than 2% of the phones out there are using ICS.
20% is how much work they do vs. the manufacturers. Push out a source and MAKE the manufacturers develop their own versions.
20% is how much android apps make when compared to the same app in the Apple store (okay, it’s 24%)
20% is how much Google cared when it came to Verizon dictating terms for the Galaxy Nexus. (When’s it coming out again? You can probably guess with 20% accuracy)
Can you remember or name any recent Apple products that have come out from just “20% time?”
Rhetorical question.
(The Hi-Fi doesn’t count. =D )
“20% time” is not something you want in a mass market device designed to manage a large portion of your life, without the other “80% time” invested in it too. **
**Of course, there’s you tinkerers out there who play with ROMs and whatnot for Android, citing “customizability” and “control” and even “open”. Takes up 20% of your time to do it, and is almost always never worth it.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 4:52 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I think you massively and I hope deliberately misunderstand what 20% time is at Google, Android is developed in 80% time, it’s peoples full time job, 20% time is where they let people go and do the things that interest them, and still get paid for it, if it works it’s released as a product, if that’s a success it goes into 80% time. As for the rest of your ridiculous diatribe I would attempt to respond, but feel it would be much more productive to just go for the troll flag.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 5:38 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I know what 20% time is.
You fail to understand the point I’m making, which is that no matter how many people they get working on it, “full time” or not, what is released, what is considered by you as ‘success’, and what they develop with Android is of quality on par with projects they develop with their “20% time”
In essence, a metaphor. Not 20% time in the literal sense.
Plain and simple: Android may be a massive undertaking of appreciable scale and ambition by the Google and its staff, but they really need to work harder on it if they want to make it as refined as it should be.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 6:06 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’m pretty sure any product which has gained 52% of global market-share would be considered a success by any unbiased outside source. So that established what exactly is your issue with quality, what makes you feel as though this is some amateur hour product undertaken in peoples spare time?
I guess your going to hit on the laggy UI, yes you don’t get one to one responsiveness when you move your finger across the screen, but seriously so what, in a large number of cases this is a deliberate decision in order to allow for better “slinging” of lists, other times it’s really not something I notice.
Other than you you mostly seem to be complaining about OEMs ( and note this is the OEMs and not Google) failing to release updates in a a timely manner. Well yes this is true and it is a problem with Android devices, unfortunately this is an inevitable result of an Open Source model, you can’t MAKE people do anything, of course the flipside is that the project is Open Source which means in the next few months a whole host of community made roms will be hitting the web, and anyone who actually cares will grab one and upgrade.
Besides all this you seem to be content with simply ranting without having anything useful or constructive to say, you think Google should work harder, Ok, how? On what? where in your considered opinion would there efforts be best spent so they can manage to match Apple’s glorious 80% time?
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 6:52 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I’m not going to argue that 52% market share isnt impressive, but I do want to point out that even with 52% (and that’s phones not all mobile devices like tablets) market share, about two thirds of Google’s mobile revenu comes from the iPhone. We could talk all day about how Google is going to crush Apple (or flip that), but the truth is that the relationship between Gooke and Apple is more than just a binary “good/evil” sort of thing.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 9:04 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Have you got any sort of source to back up this statistic, or is it simply an arse pull? Given the previously mention disparity in market-share ( http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-11-15/tech/30400455_1_ios-iphone-smartphone-market just in case ) you’re suggesting that the average iOS user generates at least 7 times as much revenue for Google as an Android user, how would this even be possible? I the click through rate for iPhones that much higher? Please explain, I’d love to hear it.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 11:33 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The 2/3 mobile search figure (and one can debate to what extent this would correlate to mobile revenue for Google) was given recently by Google Counsel Susan Creighton during formal Senate Judiciary hearings:
http://9to5mac.com/2011/09/21/google-23rds-of-our-mobile-search-comes-from-apples-ios/
If you don’t trust the information in the above article you can listen to the actual testimony on the CSPAN site.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 2:30 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
That is what I’m suggesting. I don’t ever pull anything out of my ass. About once (sometimes twice) every 24 hours or so something comes out of it, but I do my best not to force it. That’s bad for your health. I also don’t usually put anything up it, although on occasion I have needed it medically. But to answer your question, take a look at what Observer84 replied with.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 7:48 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Also, Google makes money wether there are click-throughs or not. Most of their advertisement revenue comes through “impressions” (an ad simply appearing on the screen).
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 7:52 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Sorry, the statistic just seemed wildly unlikely is all, in fact if you watch the lead up to the clip you will find that this just relates to direct mobile browser searches, so all searches from the Google search bar, or from inside the Maps application are excluded, given that these are the primary ways in which I personally, and I would imagine a large majority of android users access search the numbers are already skewed. It further has to be pointed out that there will be a significant difference between mobile search share and mobile revenue, Google also makes money out of market transactions, and through their AdMob program, ( in App advertising ) which a large number of Android apps.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 5:27 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
O my God! Only five posts a week?
…That’s awesome! Time to ditch Facebook.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 7:16 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Here’s the problem:
People use Facebook to be on Facebook.
People use Google+ to do other things.
Facebook can become “unused” like MySpace or Digg, but Google+ IS Google. You’ll see it when you use Gmail, Maps, Docs, Android, etc… It’s easier to ignore a single product like Facebook than a common thread like Google+.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 11:23 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Also the problem is you can’t get away from G+ (easily) if you’re using gmail or gdocs, because Google keeps SHOVING IT IN YOUR FACE.
The recent change they made to SHOVE STUPID TOP FEEDS IN YOUR FACE also doesn’t make me warm to their service much.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 6:08 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
It could be argued that, actually, iOS has been an unfinished product until iOS 4. iOS 1 was certainly not the finished, “right from the start” product" you make it seem to be. I will not go into detail because they’re extensively explained in the article.
Ever since iOS 1, we’ve seen an unending series of added features that were already commonplace in other platforms. It seems to me that the only difference between Android and iOS in terms of platform developments a semantic one: while some may call Multitasking in iOS4 a “new feature”, some other may call it “something that didn’t work in iOS”.
I would say, the only thing really different is the process in which features get added: in Android, features are developed, but released at fairly early stages of development, so process until the feature is properly polished is out there for all to see.
Meanwhile, Apple develops the same feature in the same way, but the early versions do not get released. Only the much later, polished version will see the light of day, keeping those less-than-perfect but usable versions under secrecy, and maintaining the illusion that Apple got it right in the first version.
Anyway, if we have anything to learn from iOS 5 and ICS, is that both are valid ways to get to a fully-featured, well-polished software platform, and that both ways take time to get there.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 10:57 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Yes to this. I can only wonder where Android would be now if stayed the way it was at 1.0
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:34 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Apple added custom wallpaper and notifications since the beginning.
I bet Apple will add widgets at some point.
Widgets are very useful and can be beautiful.
(The calendar app icon is already some sort of widget since it shows the day of the month).
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 5:05 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
There are technically “widgets” now in the notification menu of iOS 5. Currently there is only a weather and stock option, but maybe we’ll see more in the future. Honestly though I hardly use those anyways. Widgets are cool on my android tablet, but I don’t find myself using them too often either! Some of them, Pandora for example, take you into the app anyways before the widget functions properly. The only one I glance at often is the weather/clock (Beautiful Widget I think)
A vocal number Android users love to hold features such as widgets, customization, swipe keyboard, AMOLED screens, HUGE 4"+ screens, and other specs on such a high pedestal and look down their noses and verbally/textually abuse other mobile OS users.
With all their ranting and hype around the Galaxy Nexus, I was actually shocked at how mediocre the device is when I got to use one for a few days. I’d certainly be satisfied if it were my daily driver, but I’m not convinced it’s a better device than an iPhone.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 8:04 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
sure they did they had to play catch up in
multitasking
OTA update’
notifications
voice commands
folders
shall i keep on going?
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 5:55 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
actually yes please, liking the list a lot
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 1:02 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
As Dieter pointed out (did you miss this part?) Those things were so much less important than the things Apple did right out of the gate that your complaint is 100% irrelevant.
It was every other OS that had to play catch-up to Apple after the iPhone came out. You know that, and so does everybody else. Other phones had folders when the iPhone came out. Where are those other phones now? Yeah. Clearly not the highest thing on anybody’s priority list.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 11:35 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
They did a great job, but there is a lot they lagged behind.after the second/third year that’s why ios5 was a welcome change. If you don’t evolve you dissolve.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 1:18 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Exactly. I love Android but, my love for it came from being tired of Apple’s walled garden – a beautiful and always updated and safe walled garden – but closed nonetheless. My god, can they make phones though. Everything just works.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:39 PM EST reply Recommend (8) Flag actions
Very well said. Each one of these phones has been great. I believe we are seeing some innovation saturation where each update is less spectacular than the last. But that’s inevitable. There’s a lot that I don’t like about Apple, but as a former iPhone user (up until the GS2) I must give credit where credit is due: iOS is the reason for the modern day smartphone. If not for iOS we would probably be using BB’s with their tiny screens.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:07 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend (9) Flag actions
Love your last sentence. I was pissed 8 years ago when I had to put away my Treo for a BlackBerry in order to receive corporate push email despite solutions like Good that would have allowed for other devices.
Thanks to so many senior execs clamoring for corporate iPhone support many companies now support most platforms. The success of the iPhone is what finally cracked RIM’s stranglehold.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:42 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
very true about RIM.
I even ditched my Blackberry Curve when the iPhone 4 was released. iOS doesn’t handle email as well, but it is leaps and bounds more useful at everything else
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 8:06 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
just works, it’s magical
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 5:55 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
And that’s why I went from an HTC Thunderbolt to an iPhone 4S. I’ll take “always updated and safe walled garden” over having an OS that is completely open but ridiculously unstable any day.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 12:54 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
“Ridiculously unstable” is pretty harsh. Too harsh. No one can dispute Apple’s superior update history, but to call Android “ridiculously unstable” just makes you look like an iSheep and a fanboy.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 5:38 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Point taken. It depends on what Android device your talking about. The Thunderbolt is ridiculously unstable, I know it all too well. Some Android phones, like the Nexus line, OG Droid, or the Galaxy S II, are solid all around, I’ll give you that.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 12:56 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
how many people (people=_.reject(worldPopulation, nerds) if i may) do you know who complain about the look of iOS?
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:42 PM EST reply Recommend (6) Flag actions
many :)
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:55 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
What god-awful language snippet is that?
Posted on Dec 22, 2011 | 8:59 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Change doesn’t mean good. It doesn’t need to be skinned every year. More focus on making things work.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:45 PM EST reply Recommend (23) Flag actions
classic. but true.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:24 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Quite amazing that they got it right from day one.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:42 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
So Does a Porsche 911. What’s your point?
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:59 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’m sorry, but are you seriously saying that this:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a4/Porsche_911E_ca_1969.jpg
lokks anything like this:?
http://www.porsche.com/usa/models/911/911-carrera/gallery/#
And by the way, that’s the point: visual evolution. iOS has had very little, specially compared to Android.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 11:08 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It looked the same from the beginning. Well, that’s so true! The new iPhone is the old iphone in a better print paper. The same thing but it look much better.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 6:00 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
What you have to do now is explain how that’s a bad thing. iOS is still the highest rated UI out of all smartphones on the market. Why, exactly, would you change that? And how would you change it?
It’s like you believe that an interface that changed how the entire world expects smartphones to work needs to be changed, for no apparent reason.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 7:30 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I didn’t really believe Steve at first when he said the OS is 5 years beyond anything. Granted it has changed, but the main stuff got nailed on day one.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 1:16 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I wouldn’t have it any other way! The only smart phone my parents can finally use and that is because it’s been improved professionally and wisely.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 9:04 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You must be proud of the 52 recs your comment got considering your completely irrelevant point.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 11:20 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I personally believe (but don’t expect anyone here to agree with me) that the reason it hasn’t changed much in 5 years is because how clever thought-out it was to begin with. Icons on a screen still remains the most elegant and simple solution to the smartphone OS UI. It might not be the most powerful, but there something truly simple, and I would submit; even calming, about having icons on a phone in the manner in which iOS has them. Especially when you consider the number of well designed icons there are out there on iOS.
iOS isn’t for users of The Verge – it’s for everyone else.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 10:51 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Josh, please give us a damn edit button?
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 10:51 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Um, I’m a “user of the Verge” and I love iOS. What are you talking about?
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 3:06 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Bottom line: They got it pretty much right from the 1st try. I think that deserves a hell of a lot of credit. Shows how much foresight they had, in that they were able to create a UI and framework 5 years ago and elegantly integrate the latest features without needing to change the core interface. This is even more impressive considering they were the 1st out of the gate, and came up with so many UI paradigms and control methods that have trickled down and been adapted to pretty much every other mobile device. I own phones with the 3 major Oses, and iOS is still by the far the most solid, consistent, and reliable in so many respects.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 4:43 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
And your point is?
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 3:05 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Which is actually a good thing if you’re not a tech geek (posting on The Verge qualifies you as one, don’t worry). We’re all incredibly biased by a lust for shiny new things.
Regular people tend to profoundly hate change, even if it’s for the better. Apple was very good at keeping the platform consistent throughout its evolution.
Posted on Dec 19, 2011 | 3:59 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It’s so awesome to see the evolution of an operating system like this. Great job.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:35 PM EST reply Recommend (23) Flag actions
It’s a great mobile OS. And that’s the thing – I get a much more “computer-ish” feeling from Android. If it is a good or a bad thing deside for yourself ;)
Anyhow I can’t wait for changes in iOS 6 – widgets anyone?
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:36 PM EST reply Recommend (9) Flag actions
PLEASE bring widgets! might convince me to switch :)
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:42 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Widgets don’t really fit in with the minimalist approach of iOS. All the information you need is right on the lockscreen, and if you need more information from an app, then just go into the app.
We’ll see if they add it though. They obviously don’t mind filling in the gaps for iOS when stacked up against Android.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:44 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
With android IP.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:45 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Don’t pretend like there isn’t give an take from both sides.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:42 PM EST reply Recommend (13) Flag actions
Agreed, competition is good
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:49 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
How about the whole concept of the OS.
Most of the things that Fandroid idiots claim iOS copied from Android wasn’t even invented on Android in the first place.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 11:23 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Funny:it could be said that not a single thing iOS fanboys brag about was invented on iOS either, and when they’re confronted with that, they just reply “but it was the best implementation”.
In very much the same way, Notifications weren’t invented on Android, but Android’s implementation (which was present from version 1, by the way) is actually the best one. Something that not even Apple seems to argue with.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 11:15 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Actually multitouch, the scrolling, a virtual keyboard that you typed on with both fingers, slide to unlock, pinch to zoom, acess to open wifi, pinch to zoom in camera, tap to focus, the web browser that was actually usable, and more came with the iPhone. It’s the things D was saying ios did right that everyone tried to do.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 1:54 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
All their core apps could be widgets: World Clock, Weather, Stocks, Calendar.
I think its stupid these “core” apps can’t be set to update automatically on your homescreen.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:14 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Widgets can fit in with a minimalistic approach. Take a look at any ‘Post your homescreen!’ post about Android and you’ll see a load of people rocking some pretty slick minimalistic designs. That might be more due to Android’s extensive customisability, though..
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 10:50 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
the point of a widget is that you don’t need to enter the app, why would you want to go the extra step?
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 1:06 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Very true, and that’s the strongest argument against it.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 4:54 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
wait what? that its functional?
so if you had a store and people needed to see a product you would rather have it in drawers than showcase them behind glass?
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 6:19 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I hate widgets on Android. They’re messy and a big battery hog. If iOS ever adds them I’ll turn them off.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 3:10 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
For me it would be the outrageous amount of space it would take on my home screen. I love how weather is on the notifications screen. But as much as I admire Metro and how it can have widgets that communicated useful information while closed, I prefer the way iOS does it. Even on my iPad’s big screen. Though on the iPad, the notification window is pitifully skinny.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 5:32 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I reckon Live Icons would be a great move.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 7:30 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Please do not bring widgets. Though knowing Apple, they will give you the option of completely turning them off. Superficial, fluffy crap.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 11:22 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Until Apple releases them in iOS 6, then they will surely become the Best Thing Since Sliced Bread.
History does tend to repeat itself, you know…
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 11:18 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I doubt they will do it. They’ve increasingly neglected widgets on OS X and have shown no interest at all in them on iOS.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:16 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I agree. There is a more computer-ish feeling because there are more customizations. Also, there are more areas to explore like the multitasking interface and notification centre and widgets and stuff. Whether that makes the phone better or not is open to debate.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:33 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Android-style widgets would be completely out of tune with the look and feel of iOS. I can see two simple examples of how they might implement widget-like behavior.
1: Notification Center. They’ve already added a weather and stock widget of their own. I could see them adding a limited set of options for widgets here.
2: App icons. The calendar icon updates but the weather one doesn’t. Go figure. It at least gives a little precedent for them to allow it on 3rd party apps. I actually think that, int he right hands, this could be much better than even Notification Center widgets…but (this is a huge but) there is way too much room for abuse. This would have to be hugely limited in functionality. Can you imagine all the corporate goons demanding their icon flash and animate and jump around, to “increase visibility”? It would be a nightmare.
I would say the former option is the more likely of the two. Maybe it could be implemented as early as iOS6. This is Apple though. They aren’t likely to allow this feature just because it’s widely demanded.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:33 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I don’t think the notification center really counts as a widget, nothing beats the convenience of having the info you use every day right on your home screen. IMO ios would benefit from this approach. I don’t think it would be abuse, androids widgets haven’t and if anyone tried I am sure there would be a backlash from users.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 1:10 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Great feature Dieter! Love these magazine-style articles on the Verge.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:36 PM EST reply Recommend (14) Flag actions
Recently I’ve set just plain black wallpaper on my iPhone 4, first on my mind – holy shit, nothing changed since 2007:)
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:38 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You don’t use app groups?
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:50 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Groups were built in out of the necessity to control the overwhelming amount of tiled icon pages you’d be stuck with after downloading so many apps. It’s a welcome feature, but still for me hardly the correct solution. The visual history is pretty telling of it’s tale, since it’s incarnation, not a whole lot has visually changed. That said, iOS changed a whole lot with it’s original OS, so it’s hard to see anything after that as significant without being completely and radically different.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:03 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Just because it hasn’t changed much visually doesn’t mean there haven’t been many significant changes. This article lists dozens of them.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 3:14 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Next we need a visual history of BlackBerry OS!
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:38 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
Do a visual history of Windows Mobile if you want to see real change haha.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:41 PM EST reply Recommend (31) Flag actions
That article would be MASSIVE lol.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:46 PM EST reply Recommend (7) Flag actions
It would probably set a record for the longest page on the internet?
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 7:17 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Someone just challenge Longcat?
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 4:57 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
“In the beginning, there was Windows CE…”
… or as most liked to call it, wince.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:41 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
^^^ [loads pistol}
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 7:25 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I like the app iPod more then music and videos…
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:45 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The cingular logo changed to AT&T and then Verizon/Sprint? Cool story, bro.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:46 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I would say “Finally” if Apple decided to change its iPad music app to a fart app because that’s about as useful as it is right now…
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:46 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Huh? I use it all the time. With Home Sharing I can basically have access to anything in my iTunes library while I’m reading my RSS feeds / emails / whatever.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:50 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
I get what PGABoury is saying: my iTunes Match collection is almost 21K songs strong and Music grinds to a halt on both my iPhone 4S and my original iPad. They need to massively cull the metadata they store and speed things up for large collections.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:55 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Ah yeah proformance wise I agree, sometimes it takes upward of a few minutes to start up home sharing with 35k songs.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:57 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I can only imagine how many days that would be over 3G lol
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:59 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
You can switch playlists but Music.app will keep reading from the original playlist you had selected. The random function at the top of every playlist is gone. The random and repeat buttons are unreadable in the little controls which are almost too little to be usable. Whenever I listen to podcasts, there is nothing to tell me which podcast I already listened to and I cannot access the podcast summary to see if I want to listen to a particular episode. These are all functions available in iTunes and that were available on my iPod. Music.app is broken. It is the most broken thing I’ve ever seen Apple put out.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 8:57 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You make no sense. It’s a great music player.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 3:15 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Gimme a call when the visual of iOS indlucdes a Verge app.
(also, pretty great article…)
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:46 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Did I see a verge app in the image at the top?
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:37 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Looks like a homescreen link to their mobile-optimized page.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:13 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You guys continue to amaze me. So glad to be a member of this community, and I can only imagine how badass the CES coverage will be :)
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:50 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Some other recommended topics:
1) A visual history of Windows
2) A visual history of Mac OS
3) A visual history of Mac OS X
4) A visual history of desktops
5) A visual history of laptops
6) A visual history of cell phones.
The list goes on and on.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:50 PM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
7.) A visual history of gadget blog trolls.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:51 PM EST reply Recommend (20) Flag actions
DONE
http://www.engadget.com/
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:19 PM EST reply Recommend (26) Flag actions
Bra. Vo.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:42 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
You good sir, win the internets!
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 7:27 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’d lov eto see more of these, but if you want a visual history of OSX, check out Ars Technica’s review of Lion. It’s pretty much exhausts the subject…
http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2011/07/mac-os-x-10-7.ars/1
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:02 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
A visual history of…. the Web.
Would love to see how we have grown from plain jane, gray backgrounds with black text and blue hyperlinks to the bandwidth demanding, HTML5, multimedia powered superhighway we have today.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:14 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
These visual history write ups are excellent.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:55 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Lets see if there is anything wrong with this one like the Android one. I caught some glaring mistakes in the Android one and it was slightly changed this weekend.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:58 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Just like the Android article, this is a great, dispassionate-but-positive look at the history of an OS! Good work!
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:59 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
I remember one clear instance of what I would call platform fragmentation that happened early on. When the iPod touch came out, it did not include Mail.app, Stocks.app, Maps.app, Weather.app or Notes.app. Jailbreaks quickly added these as an installation option but Apple chose to leave them out with no explanation as to why. Eventually Apple relented (I believe in early 2008) and offered them as the “iPod Touch App Pack” for $20.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 2:59 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Yeah, I remember letting my friends borrow my iPod touch to test out “the apps that cost $20”
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:02 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
And there I thought I was the only one who’d been suckered into paying $20 for that App Pack.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:13 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Yeah, I seem to recall that they came bundled into the next update… which was also $20.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 5:54 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
We need a visual history of this comment thread.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:03 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Wait, does the Notepad app really say “… you get a full Jew of your content…” (look under the iOS 3.2 update).
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:10 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yes, yes it does. Oh AutoCorrect…
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:11 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
omg autocorrect. fixed. Ugh!
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:40 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Hey, Dieter are you still using a Pre2 or 3?
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 11:09 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You don’t ever go full jew
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:51 PM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
Please be circumsi… er circumscribed in your ethnic jokes.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 5:35 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It’s features like this one that make me not miss reading certain other tech news sites one bit, not naming any names, but quality like this isn’t available elsewhere.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:15 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
so, Engadget? Don’t be shy about naming names. But yeah, I agree with you.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 7:33 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Yes, that’s the one I was alluding to.
Posted on Dec 22, 2011 | 7:20 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I like these “Visual History” articles and this one is as good as the last, but I wish you would have included more (read: any) credit to the jailbreaking community. Apple declared that a platform allowing 3rd party apps would lead to a buggy, broken operating system, and therefor forbid 3rd party software from the start. It wasn’t until the early jailbreakers and the Installer app (on which the App Store would be obviously based, later on) that native third party software existed at all. Some apps and games, like the Tap Tap series (which Apple used in their own advertisements!) got their starts through the jailbreaking community and distribution through Installer (which would later be replaced by Cydia and, for a short period of time, Rock). It became such a glaring omission that Apple had no choice but to make it an official thing, and only then did it really take off.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:23 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Dieter, ever since I read Chris’s Android article, I’ve hoped that given your history, you would write a history of Palm starting with the Palm Pilot or Handspring VisorPhone (my first smartphone) through to the present open sourcing and possible future predictions. This could be epic!
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:29 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
Great read, I had thought multitasking had been around longer.
I still don’t get the ’it’s just a big iPhone’ jibes that were made at the iPad (or Android tablets like the Galaxy Tab for that matter). That such devices can get away with it testifies to the validity of the phones as being more than just phones.
Of course, what really rocks right now is the fact that the path today leads to the iPhone being like a ‘small iPad’. I cannot wait to see where iOS goes next, although right now, the not needing a PC isn’t strictly true, unless you want to pay for the media you have already accrued before.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:30 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
The original Galaxy Tab was a big phone. Which I kind of liked about it. It was a little too big for normal pockets, maybe a big chest pocket or side pocket on cargo pants. Just a shame it had Touchwiz because I would’ve stayed a Linux only user if it was better.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:14 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
There was about an inch in it. If it had been just that bit shorter in height, it would have been a contender. The price on contract (plus data only at time) finished it off.
As for the iPad, I can make a case for one, but pricing next to a laptop is a tough hurdle; however, the direction that iOS is taking, or at least appears to be, offers an interesting scenario. One that will certainly upset the proverbial cart (at least I didn’t say ‘apple’)
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 7:33 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
Oh fudge.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 7:35 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
Pricing next to a MacBook Air is why I have an iPad 2 and iPhone 4 rather than just a MacBook Air… Also, I have a work MacBook, but literally use that only at work, whereas I’m using Airport Utility on my iPad every day.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 9:10 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Unfortunately, there’s a part of me that looks at the iPad price, then looks at a 15 inch laptop that sells for less, then just gives up on the idea.
But as I said, the direction that iOS is taking gives me hopes for the future. I’ve been thinking about what will happen in the PC space, and the iPad is a heavy occupier of those thoughts (along with the Transformer Prime), we are not entering a Post PC world, we are looking at a change in what the PC form factor will be.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 10:42 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I understand, after working with PC laptops for the first 5 years of my career, then MacBooks and MacBook Pros overlapping in, I just can’t justify buying a $500 laptop that won’t resell for as much as a MacBook.
I wouldn’t necessarily buy an Apple Desktop, but their portables are just much better quality than $500 PCs, which I would have to give away in a year or sell for half the original cost. I sold my iPad 1 for £400 a year after buying it.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 12:39 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’m curious, what do you do with Airport Utility ever day??
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 3:22 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Is it just me, or wasn’t YouTube considered a huge feature when the original iPhone came out? I mean I thought it was kind of amazing, and I hadn’t seen something like that really before, I mean you can lump it unders Safari, but I still think that the Youtube app at its time was a defining feature, which has sadly not seen much of an update since then.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:30 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Yeah, YouTube wasnt ready at the time of Macworld 2007, so it didn’t feature, but the initial ads highlighted it.
I know this article is about the OS and it’s additions, but I think the ads themselves were also revolutionary, highlighting only the device and what it could do, and not some crazy hipster-starred scenario.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 5:13 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Or the retarded cars crashing into each other/robo-violence trend of current smartphone commercials.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 11:33 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
with iMessage and FaceTime, i think they need to merge them and relaunch iChat for the mac, iphone, ipod touch and ipad… and then see what happens…. if it becomes popular release it for android and windows phone as well as windows and i think it could be a major competitor to skype!
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:48 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Agreed. They already have a FaceTime app for OS X. Seems like adding iMessage functionality to that would be a pretty natural move. It could make for a pretty cool convergence in messaging… making it really, really easy for phones and computers to communicate with each other. I never use iChat, because I don’t actually use any of the services it uses. But, you can bet I’d use iMessage on my Mac.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 6:38 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I highly doubt Apple will release anything like that for its competitors.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 7:23 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
After reading A visual history for Android, I was wondering there probably wouldn’t be one for iOS since there’s no good point as iOS remains the freaking same from almost 5 years ago. I have no problems with apple products, in fact I own many of their products, iPod, Mac mini, iPhone, Apple TV. It just works. However, I don’t like this company’s culture, they are just hypocritical. Consistently leave some key functionality in purpose and add it into the next product advertising as a new feature, meanwhile declaring themselves customer-oriented…….. Also, Look at the many “features” from iOS5, most of them are “borrowed” from jailbreak community, heck, I really want to say “all of them”. One ultimate example is the WIFI SYNC. I remember when it first come up to App Store, immediately got rejected without much explanations and then later on, apple built this one into the platform advertising it as an out of world feature. I mean, it sounds like you are yelling around you parents who made you really take off are so freaking ugly and you sit comfortably on the couch, keeping drinking their blood and wasting their money. This is so insane.
Another thing about iOS is I don’t see it have much potential to innovate further as its layout and everything seems got locked up tightly. And Look at the notification center, just ugly.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:54 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Look at Crumple Zones, they were just “borrowed” by car companies from Volvo.
You’re a fool.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:16 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I don’t think that was his point. More that people have tried to introduce new ideas to iOS that Apple stops only to release their own version later. It was awhile before they allowed third party apps to replace their Safari browser. That Camera app that got pulled because it used the volume key as a shutter button, only for iOS to include that in their next update. Thumb keyboard for Android tablets – no developer could make this for iOS, but then iOS could introduce it into their core OS. Same thing with his Wifi Sync example. Even notification center, despite being Android inspired, was created as he said by the jailbreak community (although I believe that developer was compensated greatly).
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:53 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Indeed he was – he was hired by Apple and they have just hired a guy who has done some great concepts for App switching and active tiles – see 9t05mac.
The reverse is true of the guy who did the wifi sync. They rejected his app but asked him for a CV and his source code, discovered it was crap and used other people’s patents and rejected him. So he went crying to the Murdoch press that Apple had copied him
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 5:10 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Ah, interesting
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 9:02 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The horrors of consistency! >_>
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 10:54 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I don’t mind they “borrowed” the idea or the actual code, whatever, you just never know. What I mind is if you borrowed it, then bitch about whom you borrowed from.
In Steve’s bio, he pissed so bad about Android being a “stolen” product (we don’t argue if it’s true at this point). It turned iOS5 “borrowed” or “stole” many ideas from Android and WP7, too. Don’t you feel like it’s very oxymoron?
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 5:32 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Sorry about calling you a fool. But in context, I agree. They are all the same market and there are only so many awesome features about each of them that will stay exclusive.
Whilst Apple has hurt reasons to jailbreak by bringing in developers’ ideas in newer versions of iOS, they have also given some people with great ideas in the community reason to continue by ultimately employing some of these developers.
Apple and Google have carried over some of the best parts of WebOS with Apple employing the guy behind notifications on WebOS and Google bringing in Matthias, who has been instrumental in making Android a nice looking OS.
Steve Jobs was an amazing guy, but he did let his RDF affect him too, and you should never get high on your own supply.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 9:16 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Don’t you think Apple might possibly have denied the wifi sync because they were already well on their way towards adding the same capability to iOS 5?
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 5:08 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
And:
Because it violated app guidelines (which the author knew before he submitted it)
It used patented code and ideas from another company
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 5:42 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Thanks for your intel. I didn’t know that he used patented code.
However, it’s not really my point in this post as I don’t mind the OS’es share the great ideas. I actually love it because it is one of many makes the OS’es true innovated. I just don’t like them keep badmouthing the jailbreak community and then squeezing the blood from them meanwhile.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 5:49 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I don’t think they do.
They hired the guy that did the notifications and they hired a guy today who did some great UI ideas:
http://www.macrumors.com/2011/12/13/apple-hires-ui-designer-who-helped-mock-up-leaked-siri-design/
Any software company worth its salt has got to be on the lookout for talent. Sometimes they do it right, sometimes they don’t.
They liked the look of the Bookshelf Mac app so they hired the guys who wrote it but the guy who owned the company was pissed at them.
The guy a couple of weeks ago who found the exploit in the app store process – they kicked him out when it put a proof of concept app in. Maybe they should have hired him – MS have!
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 6:11 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I know they lookout for talent. I know the UI concept guy works as an intern now. Even @comex is an intern at Apple now. But it doesn’t change the fact that Apple and Jailbreaking community is always a cat and mouse game.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 6:29 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It is, but it’s funny how they always have these little holes for them, isn’t it?
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 9:17 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Because you will have it included in the next update, then you reject the app. What an excuse it is?
Boghog’s intel about wifi sync made your point invalid already, not to mention even the icon looks almost exactly the same. I am not sure if that dev used other people’s patent or has poor programming skills(hardly), what’s the true reason he got rejected at the first?
As tuftslax18 mentioned many examples up there, I don’t have to explain even further.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 5:42 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I think the icon is an obvious progression of Apple’s own icons. Wifi is obvious, and the rotating arrows is used in Time Machine, iSync, iTunes, etc.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 1:20 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Hug me, Dieter. Hug me as hard as you can.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:55 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
HUGS
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:05 PM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
Oh…my…gosh……that was amazing.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:56 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Wow, personal service!
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 6:12 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
i threw up a little …..
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 7:31 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
How about: WP – A Visual History? :P
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 3:56 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
If they start at Windows Mobile 3.1, I would love that. I feel Blackberry is next.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:04 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I hope they bust into Desktop OS’s, too.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:22 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Can’t wait ‘til you do this for desktop OS’s…
;-)
Great article like the Android one.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:01 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
My personal wish list for iOS 6:
Some sort of widget panels when you swipe to the left would be cool.
Live icons (at least for native Apple apps, like clock & weather)
Much improved Google Maps and YouTube apps (I hope that Google & Apple can get along at least that much…).
I would love to see the same exact (optional, of course) integration for Facebook as it’s now done for Twitter.
I want to be able to create hotspot with my 3G iPad, because when traveling to other countries I still want to roam & use my regular phone number, but I could easily purchase a local data SIM for the iPad and share that internet to my iPhone…
Bluetooth settings as a top-level choice in Settings.
User accounts, or at least a "Guest mode" for iPad?
Siri for the iPad?
Native Calculator, Weather and Clock apps made universal.
THE BIG ONE:
iMessage. I want it fully integrated between my devices. I want to see also my regular SMS/MMS messages from iPhone on the iPad, and I want to be able to respond (the response is synched through iCloud and then the iPhone sends it via regular SMS/MMS).
Oh, and give us a Mac&PC iMessage App as well! I’d also like to see full separate Mac&PC Reminders and Notes apps, that look the same as on iOS and are fully synchronised through iCloud.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:03 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
I’d like a new theme if anything.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:05 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I’d like the ability to pin favorite searches on that swipe left screen.
I don’t think we’re going to see better maps until Apple launch their own
FB integration will happen but I think there is still a lot of bargaining to do – it is a huge moneyspinner for FB and Apple wil want to be sure they get the right deal.
BT settings in the top group – how easy would that be? “Carrier” doesn’t need to be there. I have setting open all the time and can hit Airplane and wifi easily, BT should be there
iMessage and Facetime integration with iChat – it is just crying out to be done.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 6:17 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I agee with your points.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 11:38 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It was January 9th. Not the 10th.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:04 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Wow… Visually nothing been changed.
06 / 2010 Multitasking? Is there anyone who is still thinking that Apple is innovative company?
I had true multitasking on my Nokia / Symbian in like 2004-2005 i think.
Sad Apple!
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:05 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
So are you asserting that Nokia innovated multitasking in 2004?
The original iPhone DID multitask
-music could play in the background.The point is they made a design decision to limit multitasking to specific situations. Over time, especially as the phones have gotten more powerful and using better batteries, they’ve opened up to different forms of multitasking.
This isn’t a lack of technological innovation (hell, iOS is based on OS X which includes multitasking). Rather, it’s a series of design decisions. Perhaps with what you want to do with your phone it doesn’t fit what you need, but there is a logic to their decisions in this regard.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:16 PM EST reply Recommend (8) Flag actions
My washer-machine played music switching to a new step while washing my clothes in 1999… so what u going to call it multitasking? I’m talking about true multitasking – switching between apps, closing them, terminating process and stuff…
U r saying iOS is OS X – that is not totally true. But the fact is that Apple company after year 2000 is making series of a very stupid moves targeting only $$$ flow not a userfriendly, high quality products.
I used to love Apple. But after they started putting crap in they computers, using all PC parts and charging you 2-3 times more money – c’mon! No respect for that! I refuse to be one more victim of they advertisements.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:24 PM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
Not user friendly or high quality? Are you serious? Put your fanboy mentality away, it’s making you look stupid.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 5:52 PM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
talk about terminating a process and stuff to some one above 60. They don’t care – they just need the app to run when it has to .. which is in the current form. iOS is OSX .. I don’t get what is true multitasking and Untrue multitasking. Either it is capable or it is not. iOS is true multitasking just that apple wouldn’t allow any application to run and use up the memory. Why would you want a game to run in the background when you are out of that app? i mean even on a desktop. I think apple got it right .. and introduced it with the right hardware .. somewhere i was also pissed off – but looking back i see their point. you haven’t yet !
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 6:42 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
You’re arguing from a personal standpoint that you needed and wanted multitasking. I did not mind it one bit.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 10:38 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
he he he … well collection of personal arguments and opinions are what creates a need for something. If none complained about multitasking Apple would not have enabled it in the first place.
But Honestly, i was talking in general. if Apple had not advertised what are the areas it allows (making it sound too less) and mentioned what it wouldn’t allow i think somewhere people would find it sensible. Its just that a restriction on what it does sounded like it does less. Mention it otherway round .. you would be fine with it :)
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 1:45 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I don’t get it. How is Apple’s implementation not multitasking? I’ve never had an instance where it didn’t do anything I wanted. Games resume, music apps keep playing, you can even play audio from a video app that isn’t open. The battery life of the iPhone is still one of, if not the best. Just because it doesn’t have a cool interface it’s not multitasking? I think it’s elegant enough and really efficient having 4 recognizable icons in the order you opened them. Just double click, click, and you are taken back to that app.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 1:24 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
There are a few edge cases where it doesn’t do what you want, my only good example is that of a pedometer app, which can’t track your number of steps unless it’s in the foreground 100% of the time.
But for 95%+ of cases Apple’s approach works fine and the benefits in terms of battery life, simplicity of use and security are considerable.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 2:55 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Only music from the Ipod App. You couldn’t listen to Pandora or any other sort of streaming music/podcast app.
I think. Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:54 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
That’s true.
My point is that it wasn’t because iOS was incapable of multitasking. Rather that Apple intentionally limited it.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 1:02 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I laughed when I read, “This isn’t a lack of technological innovation (hell, iOS is based on OS X which includes multitasking).”
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 8:37 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
What I meant by that was it wasn’t a matter of Apple learning how to program their OS to include multitasking. It was already part of the OSX package. Their limitations on multitasking were responsiveness and battery-life driven.
Some people don’t prioritize those two things as highly and found the lack of multitasking frustrating. That’s all well and good and I’ve got no qualms with other people’s preferences.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 1:03 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I think is is a hardware limitation. If you actually enable multitasking after Jailbreaking on a iPhone 3G, it is extremely slow. I think Apple would have gotten more bad publicity for having slow phones that die in 5 hours than from the vocal minority of people who wanted multitasking.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 1:27 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I have to say, I like that they haven’t changed much visually, as it would’ve been just for the sake of change. When I look at those original iOS screenshots, I can see it was thought out and polished from a UI perspective, whereas Android’s perspective (nothing wrong with it) was get features right and have a spartan interface which doesn’t really worry about a design aesthetic. Now Android is at 4.0, they are knuckling down on design.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:58 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Just one point, Android 4.0 has the best visual design among icon-based UIs.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 5:55 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
That’s a subjective point, so no.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 11:58 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
So because Apple waited to implement multitasking that renders them un-innovative? I’m really glad I don’t think the way you do.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 11:57 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I love Android and I love iOS too from a musical perspective.. at least in this time being(well I mean who knows if android will advance in the likes of the serious music compo apps already available on iOS and even the ones in development now). I still don’t want to choose sides but I do agree that iOS needs just a little bit more exciting features to come in iOS 6.
Another thought: Apple needs to redo YouTube. I want to say that because Android’s UI on YouTube blows it out the water IMO! Though there are a number of very good other apps that look better on iOS that can match that as far as viewing videos..
Also I’m hoping Apple will add something new in iPad 3! Or at least the dev work
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:13 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Android will never have music composition apps a la Garage Band because of its latency problems, which are systemic to the way the OS was designed. http://www.musiquetactile.fr/android-is-far-behind-ios/
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 6:11 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
As a musician, this along with laggy UIs is keeping me away from Android.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 3:27 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I dont use apple products but still found this article to be very informative , excellent piece thank you
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:40 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Tell that to the 3GS users that upgraded to iOS 4. If the OS still feels snappy, it’s because you’ve been upgrading your phone every 1 or 2 years.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:55 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Every 2 years makes sense though. How many Android phones released with 2.0 were upgradeable to 2.3, let alone 4.0 without the community’s assistance
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 5:00 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
half of them
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 10:42 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I wouldn’t call half a very good rate.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 2:00 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
iOS 4 AND 5 run great on the 3GS, what are you talking about? Maybe you’re thinking of iOS 4 on the 3G. Y’know, when the phone was already two years old…
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 12:06 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
even that got mostly sorted by iOS 4.2
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 2:56 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Shhh don’t let him know Apple looks after their older devices after bringing out new ones.
Whereas Samsung fucked over original Galaxy owners 4 months after they came out…
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 12:42 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
No they didnt, the i9000 is running gingerbread worldwide while you’re stuck with your US carrier locked down version
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 6:12 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
What an amazing contrast. The visual style of iOS has changed very little from the beginning, whereas nearly every Android release has subtle or major visual tweaks to just about every piece.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 4:55 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The question is whether it’s because iOS has always looked good or whether Android will soon start to look better.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 6:09 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
its neither … Android still seems to miss the point of “ease of use” while trying to satisfy users with options…
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 6:36 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
thats an interesting point you make, I feel that indeed the options can make an android device seem much more complicated and intimidating, but once you get past that I feel all those options actually make it very easy to use.
If they made a computer as restricted as iOS no one would buy it. I think its vital that they add more options to iOS to ensure future success
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 7:58 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Well said.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 8:34 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yes I guess that’s why no-one would buy a very restrictive console to play games. You’re talking from nerdville. Most people look at what they can do with their iPhone, rather than what it can’t.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 12:09 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
This is true and I don’t doubt the paradigm shifting powers of Apple. A few years ago, to suggest playing HD 3D games on a touch screen device would be insane, and now its the norm. Within a few years, I think(especially if Apple builds it into future OS’s) the norm will be to have super powerful, super customizable phones, that still offer unique user experiences. I can customize the crap out of a PC but using OSX is an entirely different experience than using Windows
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 9:11 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Are you being sarcastic about ‘no-one would buy a very restrictive console’?
Nintendo – restrictive about who can get licenses
Sony – Restrictive by removing features from the PS3
Microsoft – Not actually as bad as the other two
All are restrictive in that you can’t buy a game for one console and stick it in a completely different console. Can’t do multiplayer with a user of a different console despite playing the same game.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 5:26 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The difference is form factor. and the intention of device. Do you want some 50 year old to use a phone to consume data and create one quikly or have them figure out how to organize their phone given its limited screen size. Even if its 4" .
thats why they call it post pc – that the paradigm of PC and why you need a PC has changed. I agree with you thati cannot even imagine an ios like pc. if that happens they are crazy (and not the “crazy ones”) but for a phone the company i am paying for must decide the best possible UI and acceptable options provided to me.
PS: i was also thinking like you until this holiday when i gifted my mom an android phone while she was playing labyrinth on my iphone. It changed what i thought !
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 12:40 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yeah, but there’s also a subjectivity to this. I don’t want my phone to be that much work. It needs to be simple, the interface needs to get out of my way, because it is a mobile device, my usage of it is mobile; quick & simple. For me, the interface should reflect that type of usage. I have yet to run into a single thing that I need on my phone that Android would offer but iOS does not.
Also, I think you’re wrong about the “If they made a computer as restricted as iOS no one would buy it.” comment. Tons of people have transitioned to an iPad being their primary computing device.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 4:10 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I don’t use it as a primary computer and would miss “real computers”, but you could argue that the iPad is a computer for people who are afraid of computers. In that way, it is a “computer as restricted as iOS” that people ARE buying.
I don’t think the mac or desktop pcs will go away, but I think we are already seeing them become more of a niche. As Jobs put it: Desktops/laptops will be the trucks. Most people will only need a car.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 2:02 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Thought exercise for you. I started to use an Evo before I had an iPhone 4s which I eventually traded for a Nexus S. I found the iPhone terribly unintuitive to use and felt as though it took me far too many clicks to get where I wanted in the phone. I am not claiming the iPhone is bad but do you think the reason so many people find it unintuitive is because so many people saw the iPhone first?
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 4:17 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Dieter Bohn is clearly terrified at the possibility of offending any portion of his readership. Which unfortunately makes for a crap article.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 5:31 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
If this is a crap article I’d love to see what you call a good one. One that praises Android endlessly, perhaps? Just because you don’t like Apple doesn’t mean that articles written about iOS are bad. Especially on this site, which arguably has the best writing to be found on any tech blog anywhere.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 7:41 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
TheComment is clearly terrified at the possibility of offending any portion of his readership. Which unfortunately makes for a crap comment.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 10:40 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
This wasn’t really a visual history…
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 6:04 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
It had pictures and letters. I’d say you use your vision for that history…
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 9:25 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Brilliant!
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 6:26 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Is interesting to see the difference between the original release and the current, the real only innovation with the original iPhone was the touchscreen & full web browser, its exciting to see how far we have come in short years. I cannot wait to see what phones could do within a few years..
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 6:28 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
“the real only innovation with the original iPhone was the touchscreen & full web browser”
Really, those are the only real innovations? The original iPhone’s most impactful innovation, arguably, was the OS itself. Transitioning the OS from a file focused system to app/use based system has had an immense amount of influence on every OS that followed, not only mobile ones. Look at the touch interface of win8. The interface may be vastly different, but the paradigm shift was a direct result of iOS’s initial implementation.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 4:17 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Apps existed before the iPhone and apps weren’t on the Original iPhone. Did you read the article or ever handle a pre – 2007 smartphone? Also, you are reinforcing that the touchscreen was the biggest innovation
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 4:20 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I owned an original iPhone. There were apps on the original iPhone. They were just Apple’s core apps, and web apps.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 4:24 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Also, he didn’t say “biggest innovations” he said the touchscreen and browswer were the only real innovations, which is just…silly.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 4:25 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I can agree with you there though I can also see where he is coming from. The original iPhone was sort of a perfect storm of several technologies but I can completely understand why one would think of those two as the only real innovations because they were the only things that hadn’t really appeared on other platforms
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 4:29 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
wow.. i cannot imagine i was a part of all these things… i used to hate the fact that the ere is nothing visually when it came updates not until when i found my mom hating android UI. The fact is the idea of using an app at a time and moving in and out seemed all easier and obvious at her hands.
wow.. i cannot imagine i was a part of all these things… i used to hate the fact that the ere is nothing visually when it came updates not until when i found my mom hating android UI. The fact is the idea of using an app at a time and moving in and out seemed all easier and obvious at her hands.she thinks – though absolutely no tech knowledge by any means – that iphone in its current form is the best. I was surprised when she compared it to android (Wildfire S) to call this ‘clean’. I think apple will continue to make incremental UI changes that doesn’t necessarily disrupt the Learning Curve or the Core UI. After using Android (Wildfire), Windows 7 (Samsung Focus) and Iphone (2 3 and 4) i am somehow at peace that i would need is the clean lock screen notification as that of Windows 7 and app switching along with some amount of widgets. Would prefer how some one showed that an APP to extend as a bar from a square to show details or updates. B ut nothing more. Keeping it simple and easy was the bestapple could do for those million non tech customers.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 6:35 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
i think they need Google to update their apps or try to bring something new altogether. Youtube, Maps suck when compared to what android eq. apps can do.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 6:44 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
@Dieter, I’ve seen the claim that days before the iPhone intro in 2007, it was constantly crashing, not demo-able. Somehow they got it good enough to use for a few minutes, then put it behind glass. And yet you document that about 12 months after shipping the device, Apple had a very usable SDK for developers and they had built hundreds of apps. Surely there were beta testers who had access before that; maybe 6 months after it shipped.
In contrast, RIM has made an utter hash of a native SDK for the Playbook in about that same length of time. No announcements, release dates, etc. Instead, they support Air and web apps.
As of the original release, wouldn’t the timing have required that Apple was building out the SDK for 3rd parties from the get-go? Apple is famous for dismissing any category or capability that it doesn’t have a product aimed at, and it probably WAS true that the software SDK was a mess as of mid-07. Any evidence about the actual timing of the SDK/3rd-party effort?
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 7:04 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
While the executive team argued whether to have 3rd party apps on the iPhone, I highly suspect the development team already had the tools to write the apps that were on the iPhone in the first place.
iPhone app tool-chain is essentially the NeXTSTEP Objective-C tool-chain (Project Builder, Interface Builder, Debugger, Appkit→Cocoa→CocoaTouch) that spans back 20 years to the late 1980s with the NeXTSTEP app development tool chain. This was probably all already done as part of the first iPhone release, just not polished. I doubt the internal development team was handcoding the first iPhone apps.
If the Steve Jobs bio is true with Jobs not wanting 3rd party apps in the iPhone at the beginning, I think it had a rather significant effect on the UI to this day. The UI for switching apps (and search and notification center) is a bit of kludge.
This may be evidence that Jobs truly didn’t want these features – as opposed to pushing the features out of the release because they had to ship – then the UI design suffered for it. If they wanted the features designed in, those features would have been implemented more elegantly but would have just left them off the table until the hardware, people, and time was available.
Who knows though. Apple had to delay the Ma OS X 10.5 release by 6 months as they took those engineers to get iOS 1.0 out the door. Even with the feature set of the first iPhone, they still had to do something pretty extreme to get it out the door. So maybe Jobs was just reducing the feature set as much as possible knowing that development team already had a huge amount of work to do.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 12:18 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I loved this line…I’ve been trying to explain to my iPhone and Blackberry (yes blackberry, they’re still pretty popular in this part of Canada eh) friends the main reason I got an Android (Galaxy Nexus) over the already awesome and proven iPhone.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 7:51 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
looking forward to the next instalment of iOS, and I’m looking forward to being jealous of what Apple comes up with next
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 7:52 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
i really hate the multitasking in iOS. even on the iphone 4 is just too slow for my liking. why do i need to wait for the springboard animation and reloading of the app EVERY TIME I SWITCH. i want it to just be ready when i switch apps ffs.
this, and the lack of toggle controls (hello WIFI!) are the reason i’m seriously considering jailbreaking it.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 8:26 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
On the iPad, 4 finger swipe between apps is a godsend (Jobs-send?) and I miss it or something with that effect on the iPhone.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 9:29 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Why spend so much time on the evolution of an app drawer. That’s all iOS is.
I mean, it’s a great app drawer, but not a great OS. I use an iPad at work and it’s just so one dimensional, all I can do is open apps on it, that’s it.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 8:31 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Thats what IOS is about! APPLICATIONS!
A Galaxy Nexus User!
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 8:50 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Wait… what do you do on your smartphone/tablet/computer, besides use applications?
Stare at it while it’s powered off?
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 11:37 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
And what do we do with our smartphones anyway? We open applications. I love my SGS2 but I’ve got to admit, as I also use my mom’s iPad 2, that iOS’ design is truly elegant and simple. It just works. It’s the same thing I do on my SGS2? I open applications as well.
Granted, Android’s UI designs have gotten so much better and is improving with every iteration, I still hate the fact that FRAGMENTATION is still a major issue with Android. Until now, we still have no idea when we’ll be getting ICS 4.0. They say Q1 of next year but when specifically? Take note that even the Nexus S hasn’t been updated yet. Worse, when we do get them, they’ll most likely be skinned anyway (though admittedly I like Twiz 4.0 better than stock 2.3 skin). I’m excited though that ICS allows for users to freeze crapware that bogs down the phone.
My point is, there’s nothing wrong with iOS’ simplistic UI. Yes it is getting dated, but I’m sure Apple will refine it sooner than later. As a fan of BOTH Android and Apple, I love that these 2 companies continue to innovate. Can’t we all just get along with that? Why does one OS always have to be better than the other?
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 11:40 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Have you even tried to do anything else? I mean, it’s pretty easy to use, you should try it.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 12:16 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Ugh, I ’m so annoyed that all I can do on an iOS device is use it for apps!
Don’t you see how ridiculous your statement sounds? What would you rather an OS does?
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 9:30 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
All smartphones are boxes that let you use apps. Widgets don’t really help much. You don’t get any real functionality out of most widgets. The only widgets I want are weather, date and time. Music control is useful to. But the main thing you use your phone for is apps. Even Joshua tops said “a smartphone is a box that runs your apps”.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 12:47 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
thanks for making this website worse, by trolling an already special needs thread.
apps are what make smartphones functional. a multi tasking interface, and support the applications, and lets the user edit preferences about how the phone performs. That’s what the OS does. I don’t get how you can confuse this with a simple launcher.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 6:32 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
FINALLY! Love these big awesome editorials sorta things the verge is doing.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 8:47 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
That picture with the change in the icon dock is hilarious. Almost no changes whatsoever.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 9:02 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
if it ain’t broke?
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 2:05 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
If I may throw my 2 cents in. I never owned an apple product until the iphone 4, hell i even owned a zune 80GB (dont ask), what i think is appealing about the iphone is that it is a technology product that keeps it simple. When I use android I am presented with either a frustratingly sluggish interface, or errors. I get enough errors in my life from using and supporting windows at work that when I go to use my phone, I want it to be quick, simple, and reliable.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 9:20 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Extremely well written article. What a breath of fresh air to see how well designed and thorough these pieces are. Goodbye Mashable.
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 10:23 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I love these visual history articles. They’re really fun to look at and read. It’s amazing to see how in just a few short years the changes that have come to Android and iOS. Keep up the great writing guys!
Posted on Dec 13, 2011 | 11:35 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It bothered me in the “On the Verge” episode. The technology presentation regarded as the “greatest ever” still has to be the so-called “Mother of All Demos” way back in 1968. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mother_of_All_Demos
The list of technologies Engelbart introduced massively outclasses anything Jobs demoed.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 12:30 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
But did Liz Lemon base her presentation on TGS (30 Rock) on a presentation by Engelbart?
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 9:35 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I don’t really watch television, but I assume that she didn’t. That’s not the point, though. I really don’t see how Jobs’ demos could even compare to Engelbart’s. All of Jobs’ achievements are really just tiny details encompassed by what Engelbart introduced.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 7:28 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The iOS revolutionized and set the standard for a “smartphone”.
I’m hoping for big things in iOS6.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 12:52 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I can say only one thing about this blog post! It’s rock solid post on IOS… I read entire blog post and come to know about many new things about IOS… Thanks for wonderful post!
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 4:05 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I wouldnt call the name ‘iPhone OS’ awkward. If anything, its actually a logical continuation of Apple’s naming scheme, as Mac OS is the OS for Mac and that iPhone OS is the OS for iPhone. They only needed to rename it to iOS when they introduced iPad, thus the moniker no longer applies since the same OS is used on both devices.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 5:26 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Well written article. A friend turned me on to Verge and if I may say, it is a relief that there are still websites out there that write great articles!
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 5:58 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
At least they did away with the IOS upgrade charge that was a killer feature :P
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 6:36 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Everyone always gets this wrong – Apple neither invented the capacitive touch screen, nor were they the first to use them in a phone.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 7:03 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Just like they weren’t the first to make an MP3 player.
They just made the technologies more usable for the general public.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 9:36 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Here’s hoping we’ll see more great articles like this covering the evolution of Windows (NT) and Mac OS (X).
A daunting task, I’m sure, but an amazing read as well.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 9:07 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
and what about WP7? not one comment has mentioned how they are doing things?
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 9:21 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Well this isn’t exactly an article about Windows Phone.. I’m not trying to cut you down or anything, just saying. No one has really talked about WebOS either.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 11:54 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
LOL. Basically just looks the same.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 11:04 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I really wish fake wood textures had died with the first generation Dodge Caravan.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 11:50 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
“Instead of competing on specs, Apple focused on getting the core experience right”
I think this is a weak argument as its implying that you can not have a good core experience AND good features. Apple fans have long used “the experience” excuse as a battle cry to lagging specs but I think its just trying to justify and validate the fact apple fell behind with its boring barely changed ios. Yes I have an an iPhone but i feel im in the dark ages. the Samsung “next big thing” commercials really struck home. Ios is dead
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 12:19 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I agree with that the wording of “competing on specs” is misleading.
But getting the core experience is an Apple company design ethos. Good product design boils down to ensuring the user is satisfied with a product, that it does something that is easy and pleasurable for the user. You typically need good hardware (“specs” is simply a horrible term) and software to do that. So, Apple has to have contemporarily competitive hardware combined with good software to provide a good experience, to provide a good set of pleasurable uses cases for uses. The iPhone 4S has competitive hardware and feature set with the Galaxy Nexus after all.
The problem with “competing on specs”, where the go-to-market strategy is to have the fastest CPU, biggest screen, etc, is that it takes a prospective company’s design focus away from providing a good product for the user to a focus where having the latest and greatest hardware is the number design goal, where you’re caught in a having-features-for-features sake type of mentality.
This type of scenario devalues a product, taking focus away from designing a good product, and setting up a race to the bottom with its competitors. The Galaxy Nexus will be old hat and worth $250 used in 6 months. This may be great for a certain class of users, but for the company, and I say the majority of users. It’s just not a good situation.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 12:44 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Why are people arguing so much? This is a wonderful article on the development of an operating system, not an invitation to figure out which phone OS is the greatest.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 12:22 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Apple got the look and ui right the first time that they didn’t need to change it. They only added features which people wanted. Each feature they added they made sure it worked excellecently. That’s why ios is still on top because they didn’t throw features on a half baked os. They made their os and ui beautiful, then added features without crippling the os.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 12:43 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
The worst and most obtrusive part of the OS was notifications. Once they fixed that in 5 (through hiring a Palm engineer and borrowing/stealing WebOS and Android ideas) they pretty much got the experience nailed.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 3:44 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Great article Dieter. Like others, I disagree with the concept that Apple needs to change its fundamental UI “look”. Just as the fundamentals of desktop UI haven’t changed much since the GUI, I think the fundamentals of mobile UI will not stray far. The two-level framework is extremely efficient for phones; less so for tablets, but still vastly easier to comprehend for novice users.
The desire for “Quick look” info (the soul of widgets/live tiles) is well placed but achieving it has faltered. Widgets fail because having a interactive element that takes up only a fraction of a 3-4" screen is a waste. “Live tiles” of WP7 is a good solution because it displays info without interactivity, though, like widgets, constant pinging/displaying of data is a battery drain. I believe the Apple solution (if they feel its really a problem) is to expand the pull down notification menu such that user selected programs/feeds can be updated all at once but only when selected. Thus, more information than a badge can be shown, but doesn’t expect interaction, and doesn’t drain battery unless user-initiated.
I expect Apple to add more “Hub”-like functionality. Its a no-brainer that the iOS photo app will be able to subscribe to photo feeds, like Facebook feeds, Flickr etc like MacOS already can. I’m surprised Apple hasn’t offered a “Genius-radio” a la Pandora or other music radio subscription service. While, I don’t think the MOG/RDIO framework will work for Apple, I’m surprised Apple hasn’t pushed for better music discovery vectors since their crash and burn of Ping.
Personally I would love to see Apple completely overhaul Ping into a social hub that consolidates all the major social networks people use. Apple makes Mail to consolidate all the different email accounts, iPhoto can subscribe to multiple photo streams, Address books can use multiple LDAP servers, but aside from something like Socialite, there isn’t a good way to manage your social stream.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 1:07 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
When are we going to get an OS that blatantly rips off the best features of every OS and gives consumers what they want?
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 4:31 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Never, because consumers aren’t a monolithic block that all want the same thing. A lot of consumers don’t even know what they want. There’s a difference between asking for a feature and actually wanting it.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 4:33 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Mostly a good article. Very well-written and researched. Definitely hints of anti-Apple bias in some of the presentation; compared to the Android visual history, some of the updates here are belittled (iOS 4.3 especially) where on Android smaller updates were played up as “major revisions.” And the iOS 4 pull quotes? Come on, guys. Those were seriously the highlights of the iOS 4 section?
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 4:32 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Nice article. Would have been even nicer if the comments section didn’t turn into a boxing ring.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 6:07 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I can’t help but feel it’s a bit boring that it basically looks exactly the same as it did from the start. I’m an iphone user and have been since the 3G, but it’s just starting to feel stale.
Posted on Dec 14, 2011 | 6:49 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Nice overview. I still remember picking up the first iPhone when I went to the Apple store on a whim the day of its release… played with it for 40 minutes and I couldn’t put it down. People tend to forget there was nothing like it before, even though it only brought together various familiar elements in a slicker way. “So what, the X had Y feature before the iPhone!” completely misses the point.
I also think it’s pretty funny to read comments like “So it hasn’t really changed” as though that’s some sort of insult.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 2:29 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Looking back, Apple created a really strong foundation for their mobile platform. Following iOS 1.0 up till today, a lot has changed yet it looks entirely the same. Smart design indeed.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 3:03 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Best part of being part of the iOS ecosystem is that I can hand my iPhone to my girlfriend (terrible with technology), my mother (also terrible with technology), grandmother (you get the idea) and they all know how to use it. The fact that iOS has remained relatively stagnant I think is a great feature. Im tired of explaining how to use my technology to everyone that touches it. With android every single phone has a completely different feel to it down to the rom and down to the home screen pages with different widget layouts yada yada yada.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 5:00 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
iCloud?
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 9:39 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Great article !
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 9:42 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Awesome article — two corrections:
bq.establishing an OS that could be dominate on the feature front.
dominate should be dominant
bq.Apple removed the requirement that iOS apps be physically tethered to a computer via USB in order to be activated.
iOS apps shoudl be iOS devices
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 11:56 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
iOS 5 has been the most amazing update yet and I can’t wait to see what’s in-store for Apple in the near future.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 10:13 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
One thing I never see anywhere is how Apple added in ARC (Automatic Reference Counting) for iOS, which the compiler looks through the code at compile time and finds when to release objects from memory and things like that. It saves on developer time and more important it results in far less crashes in apps. The user experience will be a lot better across the board, as developers start using this technology.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 9:40 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
There’s no sense changing for “change’s” sake. The look, while going through moderate iterations, is largely the same because it makes the most sense.
Posted on Dec 17, 2011 | 12:35 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It was actually January 9th, 2007.
Posted on Jan 02, 2012 | 7:44 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I think Apple has to work on apps communicating with one another. I think it is one of the biggest missed opportunities of iOS. If my app requires taking pictures, why can’t I ask Camera+ app to take the picture for me (instead of native app)? I am suggesting a mechanism like Android’s Intents. They need it. I certainly believe they’ll make it happen at some point. It’ll make apps more… robust.
Posted on Jan 02, 2012 | 10:31 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.