While very few are still buying netbooks, many manufacturers have continued to release the small Intel Atom-powered computers (see Asus, Toshiba, etc.). However, Dell isn't going to be one of those companies. After noticing today that its consumer Inspiron Mini netbooks were no longer available on its website (thanks Liliputing!), Dell confirmed for us that it is no longer making consumer netbooks (the business-aimed Latitude netbooks are still available on Dell.com). Not only are the Inspiron Minis being put in the grave, but the company confirmed for us that it will not be releasing new netbooks based on Intel's forthcoming Cedar Trail platform. In other words, it is done with the category.
That said, it did clarify that its netbook / tablet hybrid — the Inspiron Duo — continues to sell well, and although it isn't in stock on Dell.com right now, it would available again before the holidays are over. Of course, Dell is still planning on being a lead player in the mobile laptop space and stressed that it has been spending time developing higher-end, premium laptops like the XPS 14z. Dell's Marketing Director Alison Gardner was very clear about the strategy: "Thin and powerful is where it is at for us." Seems like ultrabooks are indeed the new netbooks, now Dell's just got to impress us with whatever it has up its sleeve.



There are 67 Comments. Add yours.
Dell quits netbooks, Dell quits Android tablets, Dell quits Adamo. Does Dell wish to exit the consumer space? If so, just do it.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:04 PM EST reply Recommend (17) Flag actions
Was going to say the same thing. What was the last market Dell actually entered?
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:05 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
I dont know why, but i think they may be entering the thin and powerful market.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:07 PM EST reply Recommend (12) Flag actions
“Thin and Powerful” is marketing speak if I have ever heard it. I’d say it would be good to have some successful “Thin and Powerful” products in the market before giving these others the ax.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:29 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The ultrabook (Thin and Powerful) is a desperate attempt from the Wintel community to try to maintain a profit margin. The cheap, POS computer, is a thing of the past. Is that because customers don’t want them, or because Dell, et. al. couldn’t make any money selling them?
Dell should just close up shop and return what little money is left to their shareholders. Sorry, I couldn’t resist.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 8:49 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I bet Michael Dell wishes he’d never made that comment.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 3:54 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Thin and powerful? Hardly any of them have a competent GPU.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 10:07 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
No Mango (Windows Phone 7.5) devices either.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:09 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
the venue pro runs mango just fine, unlocked or on a carrier.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:15 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
You are quite right, All Windows Phone 7 devices do run Mango.
I did mean new devices (like HTC did the Mozart, HD7 and Trophy initially and then the Titan and Radar for Mango).
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:31 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Everyone forgets the 7 Pro :(
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 9:42 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I definitely see your point, but leaving a business with razor thin margin doesn’t sound like such a bad idea!
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:17 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I think it’s a great idea to leave these markets, I just think Dell has backed itself into a corner with respect to the consumer space. Razor thin margins are still more than no margins from no sales.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:32 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
HP has a division to sell.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:45 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
They seem pretty happy to keep producing gaming machines and those would hardly be considered commercial.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 12:52 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Dell quits markets that don’t have strong customer support and a necessarily large market to generate revenue. Yes, that includes Android tablets.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 7:14 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
What was that you said about Apple, Michael?
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:08 PM EST reply Recommend (8) Flag actions
After his mid 1990-ies “expression” he sure started moving in Apple’s direction… Dell needs someone like Cook
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:42 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Dell to his credit was Cook before Cook was Cook – along with Cisco, Dell was one of the first firms to switch to really emphasize supply chain management.
What Dell needs is a Steve Jobs.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 6:41 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Dell fails not at SCM but in supply chain optimisation.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 8:26 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Just make us a new Adamo (based on the original design, please), with updated components and improved battery, and I’d be happy.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:09 PM EST reply Recommend (8) Flag actions
So much this.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 7:28 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
im reluctant to believe you intended for that to make sense…
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 5:28 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Can they leave out the magnetic flap for the Windows stickers this time?
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 3:56 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
And affordable!
Posted on Dec 19, 2011 | 3:07 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Seems like these distinctions are arbitrary marketing lingo. You make a smaller less expensive “Notebook” and it becomes a “Netbook.” You make a “Netbook” that’s thinner and has better performance and then it’s an “Ultrabook.” What’s next?
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:14 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
They seem like arbitrary marketing lingo because they are arbitrary marketing lingo. “MacBook Air” was taken.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:19 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
Ultranetbook, obviously…..
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:30 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Ultranetbook = Asus Transformer Prime.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:43 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Ultabnetbook maybe? Ultranetab? Needs tab in there somewhere anyway
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 6:44 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I think you’re confusing Asus with Samsung.
Posted on Dec 17, 2011 | 8:05 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
dell hasn’t had netbooks available on their site for at least a month. it just shows how little people care that they’re just finding out now. how about the news that the inspiron duo has also been discontinued???
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:16 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
It hasn’t. Dell says it will be back up for order soon.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 7:29 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Remember when the iPad was going to be a failure because netbooks were faster/ more capable/cheaper? Or when no one was going to pay a price premium for a thinner laptop?
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:21 PM EST reply Recommend (7) Flag actions
Interesting. I wonder if OEMs are finally tired of the perpetual race to the bottom they have all engaged in over the past two decades. I really hope they are because consumers deserve better than cheap, crappy laptops.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:22 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Yes, they deserve overpriced equipment at all levels…
I can see it now – “No Kenny, you will have to go to school without a computer, unlike everyone else. Because every computer now costs $999 and above.We can’t afford a $999 computer and iPad doesn’t do what you need to do in school.”
A truly accessible world. That race to the bottom resulted in me being able to gain enough experience to earn a six figure income.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:48 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Who only makes computers $999 and above? Apple only makes laptops that much, but they make computers, and the ipad, for much less. I guess some of the boutique manufacturers might not make <$999 computers.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:52 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Would you send your kid to school with a Mac Mini and a display? Or would you go for a laptop?
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 7:19 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
The Mac mini is fine to carry. It’s just the monitor and the keyboard and the mouse that get to be too much. iCello missed the point.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 12:57 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Since when do you send your kids to school with their own computers?
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 4:59 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
SInce often
Posted on Dec 19, 2011 | 3:09 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Apparently a six figure income doesn’t make you smart enough to realize Apple makes computers that cost less than $999.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:59 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
A) Did I mention Apple in relation to the portable computer, aka laptop.
B) They make a portable computer that costs less than $999? Where? (An please, it’ll be at least 2 more generations till iPad will be able to replace a laptop)
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 7:18 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
A) You didn’t have to. Apple is not engaged in the race to the bottom, yet they make a $599 desktop computer. Something you left out in your original hypothetical doomsday situation where computer makers finally start basing their products on quality but then they all cost more than $999.
Remember, you said this:
“every computer”. Not laptops. EVERY computer. I’m only going by what you said.
B), Apple doesn’t make a laptop under $999, but you also made the argument that the iPad – which costs between $499 and $829 – can’t do the job. While that might be true, you are drawing an affordability line between the $499-$829 range, and the $999 the Air costs, which makes no sense to me. You can afford an iPad but not a $999 Air?
Anyway the point is you’re using the same tired “overpriced” argument to describe computers that are built with higher quality, and you need to get your head around the concept of getting what you pay for.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 1:50 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
(1) I was referring more to stuff like netbooks, and the extremely crappy $400-500 laptops OEMs peddle.
(2) I did not mention $999 laptops, or Apple specifically. No idea where you got that from.
(3) I base this on my experience as a system admin having to deal with a GM whose definition of “value” was “cheapest possible.” A lot of those budget computers were absolutely terrible—the name Compaq is like poison to me—and really had no business being on the market. I think people would be better off if those kinds of computers did not exist, and if instead they saved the extra $2-300 to buy something like an HP Pavilion or Lenovo Ideapad.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 7:12 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
A) No, you explicitly expressed your dislike of the race to the bottom. What kind of laptop you had in mind doesn’t bother me.
B) The $1k laptops are the devices that aren’t a race to the bottom. And I didn’t mention Apple in relation to the laptops either.
C) A lot of $500 Lenovo’s that I had in my hands lately were a result of the race to the bottom, while being extremely well built. And I’m sorry to hear that there are people on this planet with perverted minds, like your GM. That does not make those cheap laptops any less valuable to equal opportunity. The lack of those devices does have a negative impact on equal opportunity.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 7:26 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Over priced, compared to what? So if something costs more than the cheapest segment of laptops, it’s automatically overpriced. Doesn’t matter if it is more powerful, more durable, or will retain value longer, if it’s not the cheapest, bottom of the barrel, underperforming machine that a company can produce, it’s overpriced and a complete ripoff that will cause parents to lose their homes and be thrown on the streets.
What age are kids required to bring their own laptops to school? I know children are using them more and more at a younger age, but since when did a $300-500 computer get added the the list with crayons, construction paper, and sticks of glue? How well do you think a $300 netbook is going to hold up in the care of a 10 year old boy? Do you remember being that age? When the next school year rolls around, which kid do you think is going to be begging for a new computer because his has a cracked case from a few too many “accidental” school bag droppings on the bus? Let’s say the hing breaks at the fault of the child, Apple offers a quick solution for repairs with a visit to one of their stores. My friend just took an out of warranty first generation MacBook Air to the Apple Store for a few repairs, one of which was a worn out hinge, and they replaced nearly the entire computer for free. Do you expect that would he the case with an out-of-warrenty $300 netbook purchased from Staples? Which leads me to my next point, depreciation, something that doesn’t seem to hit the MacBook Air too hard.
If parents can’t afford $999 for a laptop of higher quality and durability with greaterr and longer lasting performance, then they should be upset that the school is making it mandatory without offering any loaner programs. I understand things are tough for a lot of people, I just think the chances are higher that a $300-$500 computer will need to be repaired, replaced, or upgraded sooner than almost all of the the higher quality and slightly more expensive laptops that reside in the $800-$1100 range.
Oh, and what ever happened to kids having summer jobs? Maybe a 14 or 15 year old can rake a few yards to help chip in towards a MacBook Air which he will no doubt enjoy more himself. I guess middle schoolers having summer jobs ended around the same time parents started suing schools when their kids came home with scanned knees.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 11:37 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Netbooks suck.
They seem like a great idea until you’ve actually used one.
But they suck.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:50 PM EST reply Recommend (6) Flag actions
Couldn’t agree more. Its like owning car with a 50hp engine.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 9:55 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
My sister went and bought one about 2 years ago as her primary laptop without consulting me.. God I hate that POS…
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 1:21 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Good riddance I say .Never been a fan of netbooks.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 6:57 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I agree Netbooks do suck, it was hot item cause it was CHEAP. Good to see Dell out of the market, now lets see what ASUS will do to cause they sell REALLY CHEAP Netbooks that people buy and be like “I don’t do know what ASS-EES is but its $200 ill buy it anyway”
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 7:55 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Is anyone just going to make a light small notebook then? I basically would like to see something like an HP DM1z, but with some form of sandy bridge in it. And ideally a decent screen.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 8:54 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It’s called an ultrabook. Everyone is making them now.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 1:22 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The hell man! I went to buy one of these a couple months back and no one sold it anymore! I thought it was already canceled! Who else shares my experience?! SO PISSED. This was the only good netbook on the market.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 9:01 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yay! Dell’s netbooks were terrible. I should know — I had one as my primary computer for a year.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 9:03 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
So they’re going to make Ultrabooks?
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 10:04 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
There Dell Inspiron Mini 10 may have died but the academic model still lives. the Latitude 2120 I have had both models apart the early mini 10 suck at staying together. the late units worked better the Latitude is basically an cheap tough-book built to withstand small children and it come apart easily since dell spent less time making it pretty. if anything they need to drop the duo and sell the Latitude as an home unit. Most of the net books ended up with children who are the roughest with everything.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 10:29 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Those netbooks were literally hot. My hd and graphics card were done after about a year. Thank god for ebay.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 11:00 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders.
Posted on Dec 15, 2011 | 11:37 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Who got a netbook right? Apple. Only they didn’t call it a netbook, they called it an 11" Macbook Air.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 1:01 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
that’s much higher than the netbook price range
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 1:04 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Why don’t they just quit existing,,
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 1:40 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I may be way off on this, but as a tablet user I feel like a tablet does what a netbook’s purpose was and still is and that is to surf the net. There are always going to be holdouts on the issue that tablets don’t have a keyboard and I have relatives that have made that statement before but as I have explained and showed them using a tablet at least for web surfing is easier because most folks visit the same sites over and over again and therefore use bookmarks, and have no need obviously for touch-pad since a tablet is touch. Also a tablet screen appears bigger because you can hold to your face instead of on your lap which feels so awkward for the typical small screen netbooks have. IDK I just see netbooks as a dead market with the price of tablets becoming so affordable, and if I was at Dell in unstable market I would focus my resources on other things. Then again do they make tablets priority instead……LOL has any company beside Apple made any real money there either…… on second thought maybe Dell should still make netbooks HA HA
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 9:47 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Once again Apple was right and now everyone’s copying their Macbook Air.
It’s seems like Apple’s the only company left to truly innovate and lead the way.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 4:18 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Netbooks are way more useful than tablets! I will be so sad if they ever actually die!
Posted on Dec 19, 2011 | 3:11 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’d like Dell to quit everything. HP, too.
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 7:53 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.