Samsung's factory in Austin, Texas has been operational since 1996, and until recently only produced NAND flash memory chips. However, a report from Reuters published today suggests that the factory is also responsible for Apple's A5 processor, used in both the iPhone 4S and the iPad 2. According to Reuters' sources, Samsung has invested in a new $3.6 billion production line with over 1,100 staff which reached capacity earlier this month, and Apple accounts for almost all of the non-flash output of the factory. While producing the chips in the US and assembling the handsets in China might seem like an inefficient decision, Apple's rumored assembly lines in Brazil makes the Texan plant more central. Both Samsung and Apple have declined to comment on the matter, though Samsung confirmed that logic chips are made at the plant.
Apple's A5 processors made on $3.6 billion Samsung production line in Texas, says Reuters




There are 36 Comments. Add yours.
Best love-hate relationship ever.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 5:05 AM EST reply Recommend (43) Flag actions
i wish i can +1 you more then once :(
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 5:23 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
“though Samsung confirmed that semiconductors are made at the plant.”
Well, considering that flash memory is a semiconductor product, I would say that Samsung confirming that flash memory is made at their flash memory plant is a pretty safe bet…
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 6:54 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
My mistake, I misquoted. Updated the post, my apologies.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 7:08 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Samsung Mobile is a completely different arm (no pun intended) than Samsung Semiconductor. I don’t think people realize that whatever fight Apple is having with Samsung Mobile, Samsung Semiconductor’s main consumer is Apple. While I think that some want to believe that whatever happens to one has implications on the other, it doesn’t work that way because at the end of the day, it’s just business.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 8:50 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
We know that, at least I know that but on the other hand Samsung is Samsung.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 11:11 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Even so, there were quite a few reports suggesting that Apple is leaving Samsung for TSMC for A6. I wrote in most of those reports that i would love to see them move over to another semiconductor company that isn’t intel or samsung. Isn’t TSMC the reason why nvidia’s next gen products are constantly delayed due to yield rates?
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 11:57 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
And that would get better with Apple hogging most of the production, how?
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 12:14 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Then again, isn’t the reason the Exynos was late and not widely used at first due to poor yields?
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 12:25 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
If Apple shifts away from Samsung for processors, does it stop using Samsung’s new Texas line?
If so, who gets blamed for killing ~1000 jobs. American jobs.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 2:17 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I’m sorry, but how can any factory in America be operating in “stealth mode”, to the point that no one really knows exactly what it produces? Wouldn’t this be a matter of SOME government record accessible through a FOIA request? Wouldn’t the feds want to know exactly which chips come from where? Seems like it would be a matter of national security as well as trade regulation.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 5:24 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
don’t make your head heavy, it already is with nothing inside.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 5:26 AM EST reply Recommend (8) Flag actions
Why on earth would the government need to know exactly what every factory produces? All they need to know is that the factory is obeying the various laws and regulations that cover its operation.
In this instance that means they’d need to know that it made semiconductors, and they’d need to know what chemicals it used and how waste was disposed of. But whether it was making an A5 or an Exynos? No. The government doesn’t need to know that.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 5:39 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
The government does know. Just like the government can get information about trade secrets and confidential income statements. But not all information that is collected by the government is publicly available.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 12:16 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
National security? digs out tin-foil hat
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 5:39 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Nonsense.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 6:43 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
one is the cat so 2nd is the mouse.
(tom&jerry reference)
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 5:25 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Why don’t we just call it the Samsung iphone?
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 6:00 AM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
The same reason we don’t say Intel/Quanta iMac and Foxconn iPod touch?
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 6:06 AM EST reply Recommend (14) Flag actions
nVidia manufactuers with TSMC, should it be called a TSMC GPU? Apple designs the chip, Samsung manufacturers.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 6:11 AM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
Apple didn’t design the chip, They bought the company that did both the Exynos and the A4.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 9:57 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
If they own the company that designed the chip then Apple designed the chip.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 10:27 AM EST reply Recommend (9) Flag actions
ARM designed the chip you sad fanboys, Apple just tweaked it.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 10:41 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
ARM designed the CPU, Imagination Tech designed the GPU, Apple design how they fit together and talk to the other devices
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 12:45 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You should go suggest a correction on Wikipedia. Apparently they think Apple designed the A5.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 12:48 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Thats right..I though AAPL signed the deal with TSMC to make the chips.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 11:33 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Well the Flash is by Hynix, the display is by LG and the baseband by Qualcomm, all of which cost more than the SoC. So no.
Oh and by that measure, wouldn’t it be the Texas Instruments Nexus?
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 6:32 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I wish! Because then we could call it the “Texus”.
Sorry. I’ll just see myself out.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 12:46 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
you’re looking for Galaxy series ?!
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 8:28 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
That product already exists, hadn’t you heard of the lawsuits?
;) ;)
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 9:31 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
“i thought samsung made the iphone.” (that was gold, pure gold paul miller)
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 12:44 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Texas!? They’re going to Texas!? Thats like trying to get Sneakers O’Toole to take his sneakers off.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 8:41 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Humph. At least they’re producing SOMETHING in the US. The Fed needs to give Apple their tax holiday in exchange for building factories and production facilities here in the US. Put one or two of those billions to work instead of just sitting around in an offshore bank.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 9:32 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
this is a samsung factory….
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 11:47 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
with 1100 ppl making a5 chips.
Posted on Dec 17, 2011 | 4:43 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
The title should read "Designed in Cambridge (UK), tweaked in Califonia, built in Texas.
Posted on Dec 16, 2011 | 10:40 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.