The high-speed network AT&T is keeping to itself — and what to do about it
That's more like it.
When I purchased my unlocked GSM Galaxy Nexus a few weeks ago, I switched from Verizon to AT&T. Starting a line without buying a phone from AT&T is pretty easy (just as it is with T-Mobile): walk into the store, explain that you've already got a phone, and they'll be happy to activate a line for you contract-free. They just pull out a SIM card and hand it to you. No complaints there.
Since then, though, I've dealt with some pretty miserable data speeds. I don't think I once saw a downlink over 1.5Mbps or a latency under around 125ms, and it was usually much slower than that. I did some Googling and saw a number of suggestions across the web (and Twitter) suggesting that I change APNs. The Galaxy Nexus — like many modern unlocked handsets — is capable of auto-sensing the appropriate APN for your carrier, and the one it uses by default for AT&T is the same "wap.cingular" setting that you're probably familiar with if you've tinkered with any AT&T device in the past five-plus years. Most of the recommendations online suggested using APNs called either "phone" or "pta" (Google around and you'll find them readily), but for the life of me, I couldn't get either one to work. Reboots, battery pulls, didn't matter — the "H" symbol would vanish from the status bar and I wouldn't have any data service at all.
Eventually, it occurred to me that these newer APNs might need to be provisioned for my account, since they're probably considered "4G" APNs intended for use with newer HSPA+ and LTE devices. Fine, no problem. I called into customer service, and after bouncing around between a few reps (the first one didn't know what an APN was), I was told three things:
- Yes, there are separate data plans for "4G" devices.
- I can't be activated for a "4G" data plan, because my device isn't one of AT&T's "4G" devices.
- It didn't matter — all the APNs and data plans are the same. Just stay on my data plan and use my old APN, and everything will be fine.
The first two are true. The third, though, is a bald-faced lie. I don't blame the customer service rep — I don't think he knew he was telling a lie. But it's a lie.
In reality, the data plans are very different. AT&T's 4G plans — which are the exact same price as their 3G equivalents — unlock those additional APNs (which you can see are in use on any newer AT&T smartphone) and operate at much higher speeds when in HSPA+ service areas.
I tested this by slipping my personal SIM (from my Galaxy Nexus) into a Galaxy S II Skyrocket, one of AT&T's newest smartphones — capable of both HSPA+ and LTE service. I then called into customer service and simply said "I'm using a Skyrocket now." The representative promptly took my IMEI (which confirmed for them that I was using a Skyrocket) and switched me over to a 4G data plan. I then removed the SIM, put it back into my Galaxy Nexus, changed the APN from "wap.cingular" to "pta" and immediately got data speeds two to four times higher than I had been seeing before. Problem solved.
So the takeaway here is that AT&T is currently refusing access to top-speed HSPA+ to customers who wish to activate a "SIM only" line of service. Indeed, they appear to be saving it for themselves — only AT&T's self-branded "4G" devices, both HSPA+ and LTE, can be activated on the best data plans.* I'm fairly certain this isn't illegal on the bands that AT&T is using, but it's immensely frustrating and effectively introduces a new type of lock that artificially hampers unbranded devices brought onto the network.
*As a commenter points out below, this is strictly an issue of mapping IMEIs to plans and the fact that the carrier's "placeholder" IMEIs for SIM-only activations are identified as 3G devices — if AT&T has any unbranded devices that are denoted "4G" in its system, I would love to know about them. At the time of my activation and customer service call, the Galaxy Nexus definitely was not.
What do you do if you're caught in this situation?
If you come across a really friendly rep on the phone or in store, they might allow you to use an IMEI off a 4G device in their inventory to momentarily associate to your account and grant you access to the 4G data plans. Once you have it, it doesn't go away — it's just a one-time roadblock. That also means that if you've ever owned a 4G-branded AT&T device, you should be all set. This is only a problem for newcomers activating a SIM-only line and legacy customers who've never owned an AT&T-branded phone capable of HSPA+ or LTE.
Good luck out there, folks. Don't let The Man slow you down.

There are 94 Comments. Add yours.
or just switch to t-mobile’s $30 5gig data plan(includes unlimited texts and 100 voice mins and virtually unlimited voip mins)
Posted on Dec 17, 2011 | 10:28 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Careful. The 5Gb plan doesn’t work on all phones. Try it on a galaxy tab. Won’t work. Try it on a Mifi Hotspot. Won’t work. And I’m sure if you try it on the Phones you WANT it to work. It won’t. They mean to have you use 5gb but only if you don’t mind waiting for all that data to squeeze through your nokia C7 Astound’s little 3G antenna.
Posted on Dec 19, 2011 | 9:37 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Really? The galaxy Tab and Mifi are not phones…. The 5GB plan works on PHONES. Data is provisioned differently for Mobile Broadband.
Posted on Dec 23, 2011 | 1:21 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Preach.
Posted on Dec 17, 2011 | 10:39 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Your Freedom carriers really suck balls.
Posted on Dec 17, 2011 | 10:40 PM EST reply Recommend (11) Flag actions
Freedom ketchup with those freedom fries?
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 1:09 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Awesome post, Chris, and a very sneaky solution ;) I don’t understand why carriers make it so complicated to use unlocked devices properly on their networks. Obviously they want the money from the actual sale of the device, but we pay enough in monthly charges that we should be allowed to use any device of our choice to its specifications so long as it matches the carriers network.
Posted on Dec 17, 2011 | 10:40 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
And people wonder why AT&T is so hated…
Posted on Dec 17, 2011 | 10:48 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
No, we definitely did away with that mystery a long time ago.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 12:26 AM EST reply Recommend (10) Flag actions
Lol no joke. Everyone knows why they hate AT&T. Several reasons.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 2:56 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
This just adds to the list. I left AT&T this summer to go to PagePlus Wireless by way of Kitty Wireless, an MVNO on verizon’s network and while data is limited and expensive I’m much happier so far.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 12:51 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
So should this make any difference for a non “4G” phone?
Posted on Dec 17, 2011 | 10:57 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Well unless you have a pretty old phone, it’ll probably have HSPA.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 3:01 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Just wanted to chime in and say that this isn’t the case at all.
When someone comes in with their own device, we set the account up like normal. Scan the SIM and input the IMEI. If the IMEI isn’t in the database (a lot of unlocked/unbranded phones aren’t), it doesn’t get added and a generic placeholder IMEI is put in it’s place (most people in the stores don’t even ask for the IMEI, they just put the place holder in place when someone says they have their own equipment).
When a placeholder IMEI is put in, it DOES NOT generate all of the data plans available, just the standard 3G ones.
I admit, most people haven’t the slightest idea what an APN is, but it’s not at&t being shady. It’s just that most reps don’t know that there is any difference between the plans in terms of APN’s used and at&t doesn’t provide this kind of information. They just say if it’s a 4G phone, make sure the 4G plan is on there.
Source: I work in a corporate store.
Posted on Dec 17, 2011 | 10:57 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
But you would still need a 4G IMEI to activate the 4G data plans, correct?
Posted on Dec 17, 2011 | 10:59 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Yea, that part is correct.
Posted on Dec 17, 2011 | 11:01 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Right, and that’s exactly the problem. The Galaxy Nexus isn’t identified as a 4G device in AT&T’s system (the rep took it and punched it in when I activated the line).
Posted on Dec 17, 2011 | 11:03 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
For what it’s worth, I made a note up in the post about this. If there are any unbranded devices that are automatically identified by AT&T as being eligible for 4G service, I’d love to know about them. The cure-all solution would be for AT&T to simply permit access to all APNs on all plans, particularly since they’re the same price regardless.
Posted on Dec 17, 2011 | 11:09 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I don’t get a very many unlocked phones coming my way other than iPhones, but if I do come across any I’ll let you know. If you have any phones you want me to try, just let me know here or via twitter or whatever your preferred method of communication is.
Like everyone else, I would love for at&t just to do just that. Seems iPhone APNs are also different from the regular 3G ones even those it’s all 3G devices.
Posted on Dec 17, 2011 | 11:17 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Great, thanks!
Posted on Dec 17, 2011 | 11:19 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
One thing you should pay attention to is PTA is routed through separate servers with much lower latency and higher throughput QoS, but they also apply more strict traffic shaping algorithms. Therefore so many LTE unlimited data users are reporting warning messages from AT&T for reaching 2GB, and throttling point’s as low as 2.3GB.
On Wap.Cingular and Phone APN’s you won’t see as much of the same.
Posted on Dec 17, 2011 | 11:30 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
Interesting. Very good to know.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 12:08 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I have experienced this throttling first hand. Went from Nexus One to Galaxy Skyrocket (a LTE phone) and was throttled immediately after 2GB. I was using approx 5GB/month previously. Not happy at all.
Anyone know how I can escape this throttling? Get a 3G only phone? I’m confused a little because the Galaxy Nexus isn’t LTE and it needed to be on the PTA APN to access decent download speeds according to this post.
Posted on Dec 21, 2011 | 7:12 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
I wonder if I should try to get the newer APN on my Captivate? I already see ~4Mb up and ~1Mb down with the i9000 modems and that’s with my 7Mbps rated hardware. I’m actually surprised your GNex isn’t faster.
Posted on Dec 17, 2011 | 11:24 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
You have to remember that The Verge is headquartered in New York, and network usage is much higher there than the average person experiences.
Posted on Dec 17, 2011 | 11:46 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I believe Chris is in Chicago. Just to be fair.
Posted on Dec 19, 2011 | 10:02 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Fair enough,, although Chicago isn’t much better
Posted on Dec 19, 2011 | 7:11 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Why is this so surprising? The less people who stay off of AT&T’s LTE/HSPA+ network, the faster it will be. Of course they are not going to offer this service to customers who have not already been locked down into a contract with them or purchased a AT&T branded handset from them. Typical AT&T, but that is just mho.
Posted on Dec 17, 2011 | 11:53 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
There physically isn’t an option to add the faster data plans unless you provide an IMEI that’s compatible. It’s the same for an iPhone or a BlackBerry. You can’t access the web on a BlackBerry if you have the MediaNet feature on your account.
THIS IS ALL BLOWN OUT OF PROPORTION. This is no different than every other smartphone nowadays.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 12:11 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
At&t is being greedy and hogging the faster speeds for their devices, its just a system issue. It doesn’t recognize your equipment and doesn’t allow the proper provisioning. All you have to do is get an IMEI from a buddy, or right off the wall of an at&t store. The demo phones are right there for the browsing.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 12:00 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
isn’t* being greedy
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 12:08 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
But here are the questions: 1) why should you have to jump through those hoops? And 2) how in the world would anyone know to do that?
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 12:13 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Why should AT&T have to jump through hoops to accommodate your obscure unlocked cell-phone?
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 12:29 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
What hoops? Let me be very clear: AT&T is arbitrarily nerfing its network based on your IMEI. All it needs to do is stop. It can unify the data plans, it can activate 4G data plans by default for all accounts. Why wouldn’t it? They’re the same price across the board.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 12:31 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Basing data plans according to IMEI is nothing new. Let us not let facts get in the way of a good story.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 12:38 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
What am I missing here? Why is this acceptable?
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 12:39 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Verizon has different data plans for different phones as well, so they must be just as evil. The fact that at&t lets you bring your own device makes them extra evil, though, huh? It sucks that your unlocked device doesn’t work as well as it can without some finagling, but its not new. My Skyrocket didn’t perform as well as it should, then I updated my IMEI in the system. On to the next one.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 12:45 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
But you COULD update your IMEI. Here’s the problem: if you’ve got a SIM-only plan and an unlocked device and nothing else, you have no way to convince AT&T to give you the best speeds that it can offer, even though it charges no more for those speeds.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 12:46 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Yes, but that isn’t the result of nefarious implications on AT&Ts behalf (as you make it out to be); it’s just a blind spot in their method of doing things.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 1:21 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I don’t think Chris is trying to say it’s nefarious, just something of which to be aware. He’s complaining of this blind spot and telling us how it effected him.
I prefer carriers be called out whenever someone runs into possibly shady policies or practices than to assume they meant no harm when harm is being done.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 1:28 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Cool, I’m just here to inform him that it isn’t the result of shady practices; I can see why one would be so desperate to jump to that conclusion given all the bad air surrounding US carriers.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 2:26 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
No one deserves worse service for the same price for any reason. If I pay the same as you. and we both have the same plan then I deserve the same service/speed/quality.
Besides. You’re not better speed because I’m “not on your APN” I’m going through the same cell phone towers and your radio is OFF and not receiving for that fraction of a second when it’s my radio’s turn to talk. Don’t believe you’re getting better service because no-one’s on it. It’s all the same pipe and the same frequencies (If we’re both not on LTE or EDGE)
Posted on Dec 19, 2011 | 10:08 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I asked to switch tonight after reading this article, and At&T considers iPhone 4S a device that qualifies for the free upgrade to ‘4G’ data. Once he flipped the switch, I got double my former speeds. (From consistent 1.5-2 to 4.5-5 down). That means all iPhone 4S users are being screwed by default, which makes Chris my new hero.
If I were Apple, I’d have an issue with this.
Say what you want about this article and your opinions, but make sure to tell all your 4S user friends to get the speeds AT&T has advertised.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 4:06 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Can anyone else confirm this? My GN will be delivered tomorrow and I don’t have access to a 4G phone but do have access to a 4S.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 12:37 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
so i thought if i get a iPhone 4S i get HSPA+ activated by default, is that wrong to assume?
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 12:42 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I think it’s on by default. At work I consistently get 3-4.5 up and 1.5 down on a 4s. At home, where I believe every cell phone user has a smart phone :| I get 1.0/.5.
Last week when I was in Vegas I got as high as 7.0/2.5. Same phone. Same amount of bars. Did you bring in your phone from outside the system? I got mine at the apple store and they scanned the IMEI just like they do at the AT&T store.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 1:36 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Did you just put your old sim in your 4s or just change sims when you got it? Just curious as if you did that you would not “unlock” the faster data rates. If you purchased the phone and they added the IMEI and sim you should have had those speeds from the start. 4s users are not being “screwed” by default.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 5:53 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The 4G plans are not defaulted unless you buy from an AT&T store. Apple does not push you to a new data tier. I am positive.
Posted on Dec 19, 2011 | 10:46 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
This might not seem acceptable to the customer but the Carriers have been doing this from a long time(just to add i mean in other parts of the world, as i am not in US). Typically as most of us know the carriers apply QOS and even network admittance preferences based on the follow:
1. The Plan you use
2. The location you are in(same plan in another location will give lees or more data or voice minutes per dollar)
3. Carrier identified Premium customer lists etc based on Average Revenue Per User and some other factors (for e.g. a customer spending more bucks on an average might get a better QOS then someone spending less)
4. The device type you have
There can be other form of QOS applying filter too but haven’t seen any other being used.
So here whats going on is that AT&T is allowing the use of the LTE networks to customers who have purchased their devices from AT&T. This allows AT&T to push their branded Devices as those will be better suited to get the full advantage of the AT&T LTE network. By all fairness as much as i understand AT&T does have the right to do even though its not right
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 3:08 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
well this comment was in reply to
Chris Ziegler’s reply:
What am I missing here? Why is this acceptable?
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 3:22 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Hey. Unless you’re from north korea, you’re too smart to believe any other reason than saving money. If I charge you $100 and I give you less than $100 then I make money. If I give some people less then I make more money than if I gave EVERYONE more. It’s simple mathematics.
It’s all the same radio frequencies. It’s all the same pipe out of the tower.
P.S. it’s that way in other countries too. I get 4-5Mbps in argentina just fine from my HSPA+ phone. If they can’t give it here it isn’t because we’re in a poor country that just can’t afford fatter pipers to the towers.
Posted on Dec 19, 2011 | 10:15 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Relax Chris, they are just being AT&T, and trying to be AT&T-Mobile. That’s all. Now, can you imagine what will happen if you loose a competitor from the market like T-Mobile?
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 12:44 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
They’re setting a precedent where only their provisioned devices can access the faster network. I think there needs to be pushback from users, otherwise, our ability to import phones like the GN from the UK may be crippled. Typical ATT, sure, but when have any of their policies made any sense or benefited the user.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 12:47 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
AT&T’s only competitor, Verizon, doesn’t even allow you to bring your own device at all. This arguement isn’t valid if Verizon does the SAME EXACT THING. Shitting on at&t isn’t the answer here, its just the go-to, knee-jerk reaction from tech bloggers. It gets the clicks, and us riled up.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 1:28 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Because AT&T allows users to bring their own devices, they open themselves up to these types of criticisms (as does TMo). Verizon’s locked down CDMA network doesn’t have to deal with these issues, but if and when they begin provisioning imported and unlocked LTE devices in the future, they will have to decide whether or not to allow these devices to access next gen networks (LTE Advanced and so on). It’s a simple matter of AT&T doing what’s best for itself in ensuring that they can levy charges on HSPA+/LTE data in the future using IMEI’s as differentiators. Their actions, given their “open” GSM network get users riled up because they hurt us in our ability to access a data infrastructure that’s already in place and that our devices are capable of accessing.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 2:36 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It seems to me this could possibly leave the door open for AT&T to charge extra for 4g network access. If they are tracking data plans with IMEI it seems like they’d be able to charge people with “4g” plans extra at any point they choose.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 1:20 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Or, they could add the 4g plans as an option for placeholder IMEI’s, that way when you activate an unlocked phone you could simply tell the rep that it is a 4g capable phone. That way it’s just a database change and it preserves their ability to keep track of who is using the 4g network without limiting who can use the 4g network.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 1:24 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Obscure? What like Googles hero device?
Get a grip.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 1:15 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Its honestly not that difficult. I like this article as far as getting the word out there on how to obtain the appropriate data plan, but the rest screams “first world problem,” Chris.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 12:30 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
It still a problem, 1st world or not.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 1:16 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Aren’t all problems on a site about the latest technology “first world problems”?
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 1:40 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Anti-Competitve and Dishonest behavior against consumers by a behemoth company is a big deal.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 4:20 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I’m quite shocked at the pushback is getting. I guess that’s to be expected with the US’s corporatist “blame the victim” culture.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 12:49 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Seriously. Did that first guy get all his work buddies to pile in on this, or what? Wonder if IPs are logged on your comment system, Chris… ;)
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 12:56 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
And by that first guy, I mean FiddlingCactus.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 12:58 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
No, I didn’t, btw.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 9:15 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’m not in cahoots with FiddlingCactus, just tired of these meaningless attacks on a company that someone doesn’t HAVE TO deal with.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 5:15 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
AT&T shouldn’t make its customers jump through hoops. It lost me as a customer for this very reason – I couldn’t get decent speeds on my GSM Galaxy Nexus and they wouldn’t provision my account for HSPA+ speeds.
It was easier for me to switch to T-Mobile’s $30 Monthly4G 5GB/100min prepaid plan than to fight “the man”.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 1:13 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
I’d say switching to T-Mobile is the right thing to do in your situation; good thing the GN is pentaband so you can get full speed there.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 1:16 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yep. I’m getting about 9-10 Mbps down in T-Mobile’s backyard in Bellevue, WA. On my AT&T SIM I get about 1.5-2 Mbps down.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 1:32 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I was wondering what kind of speeds i’d be getting if I swapped my Nexus S for a Galaxy Nexus. The only concern I have is if they release a branded version that supports the ‘42mbps’ speeds that they have activated recently.
As a result I think i’ll wait it out until next year to see what T-Mo’s next move is.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 4:59 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
all the carriers are greedy. T-Mobile has some “ultimate premium” plan for $119/month. Ridiculous.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 1:36 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It’s only a matter of time until they charge differently for their 4G network compared to their 3G one. More speed? More money!
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 1:43 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
That would be no different than home internet services so it wouldn’t surprise anyone.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 6:00 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I agree with the author. It sounds like AT&T is arbitrarily nerfing their network performance based on imei.
And I can’t believe the backward logic I’m reading to the contrary. Perhaps Nexus envy is skewing some peoples’ reasoning.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 1:48 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I asked to switch tonight after reading this article, and At&T considers iPhone 4S a device that qualifies for the free upgrade to ‘4G’ data. Once he flipped the switch, I got double my former speeds. (From consistent 1.5-2 to 4.5-5 down). That means all iPhone 4S users are being screwed by default, which makes Chris my new hero.
If I were Apple, I’d have an issue with this.
Say what you want about this article and your opinions, but make sure to tell all your 4S user friends to get the speeds AT&T has advertised.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 4:08 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Do the iPhone 4 and the iPhone 4s have the same radios? In other words can the iPhone 4 achieve higher speeds by requesting the 4G data plan provisioning?
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 10:13 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
No, the HSPA+ capability is only on the 4S.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 10:16 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
so at&t doesn’t activate this by default upon upgrading to a 4s? ( i asked because i upgrade to a 4S and didn’t really notice the better speeds)
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 12:43 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The upgrade should happen automatically if you do a carrier activation that doesn’t require a SIM card swap. However, if you buy an unlocked iPhone 4S, you need to call to get the new data plan as AT&T doesn’t switch you over automatically.
Posted on Dec 19, 2011 | 2:10 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I think this was set up to keep the countless dumb phone\smart messaging devices from guzzling up sweet 4g bandwidth not the very few unlocked HSPA+ devices on the network.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 10:43 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It seems like the easiest solution for unlocked phone owners who want HSPA+ is to “try” one of AT&T’s new 4G phones and get their SIM set up on the new 4G plan, then return the phone, retaining the SIM on the new plan.
Not sure if this plan is foolproof, since I think they usually do that return policy for new contracts only. Also, I would double-check stocking fees prior to trying this…
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 12:31 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
This isn’t a viable option, since you’d have to pay a $35 restocking fee. You can just get a Skyrocket, Vivid, or Nitro IMEI off a demo phone.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 5:18 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
It’s a shame you had to write this post, shows what a mess the carriers have got themselves into …
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 1:50 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Good info Chris. And while slightly off topic, I am still wondering why I had to root and then install another radio (baseband sw) on my at&t banded Nexus S (courtesy of Samsung and Best Buy), in order to get HSPA speeds equal to my pure stock Nexus One that I ordered directly from Google (3.5 Mbps DL, 1.5 Mbps UL).
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 2:40 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Thanks for the Article!
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 3:27 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I wonder if I am experiencing this problem. I have a gn on rogers and get about 5 mbs down. I doubt it.
Posted on Dec 18, 2011 | 8:32 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I wonder if the iPhone 4S data plan is considered 4G for HSPA+ use….
Posted on Dec 19, 2011 | 12:35 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Has anyone actually seen great HSPA+ speeds on AT&T? The most I’ve ever seen living in urban Houston right in the middle of HSPA+ territory is 5-6Mbps down on my iPhone 4S, but even my iPhone 4 could get those speeds on a good day.
Posted on Dec 19, 2011 | 2:11 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’ve upgraded to an iPhone 4S, however I’m still on the old ‘Unlimited Data Plan’. Would I be able to switch over to the ‘4G / HSPA+’ without downgrading to their 2GB/month plan? Hmm..
Posted on Dec 19, 2011 | 2:05 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yes, you can keep unlimited.
Posted on Dec 19, 2011 | 10:41 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
I wonder if this would make the data speeds on the iPhone 4S faster… Since the 4S is HSPA+…
Posted on Dec 26, 2011 | 2:27 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
They should provide plans like their wired equivalents.
Instead of limited data & “unlimited” speeds, it should be unlimited data and limited speeds. 2 Mbps is fine with me as long as it it constant, with low ping and unlimited.
Posted on Dec 26, 2011 | 4:12 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
So which APN is best for the iPhone 4s?
Posted on Feb 13, 2012 | 10:00 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.