Beginning in January 2012, Facebook's "Sponsored Stories" ads will find their way into users main news feeds. Previously relegated to the sidebar Ticker, these ads are created when a friend or user interacts with a business by liking or commenting on its pages. TechCrunch reports that the ads will only appear once per day and that users will not be able to opt out of them, though each ad can be individually hidden as it appears in the feed. The ads won't appear on mobile versions of Facebook at launch.
Sponsored Story ads will look similar to what you're seeing above — virtually identical to regular stories from actual users, but with a small "Sponsored" indicator. They'll be relevant (and therefore valuable to advertisers) insofar as they will only appear if the ad content is already socially linked to the user by a friend or liked page. It will be the first time that ads have ever appeared in the main news feed intermixed with more genuine social content, which will make them lucrative for Facebook but potentially annoying to users. So it goes.

There are 73 Comments. Add yours.
Why is it that lately I am just dying for Facebook to fail at something? So sick of them… yet I still have an account open. So it goes.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:27 PM EST reply Recommend (15) Flag actions
They’re not going to fail at anything. They have hundreds of millions of continuously logged in users who are ADDICTED (meaning NOTHING on their newsfeed goes unread). Just wait until they REALLY perfect the targeting algorithms, and more importantly, your newsfeed ads feature one-click purchasing/shipping. That IPO’s looking more rosy every day.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:35 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
well said… I mean let’s face it, to most people, iPhones exist just so chicks can check Facebook
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:07 PM EST reply Recommend (7) Flag actions
LOL.
If the new comment system included some way for us to cast one vote per day on a comment of the day, you sir, would be my winner.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:24 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
so true….dats freaking common sight
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 9:38 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
My thing is… more and more people are abandoning the site, whether they deactivate or just never logon — like me. Lest we forget – MySpace was a behemoth before Facebook took off. And where is that now??
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:37 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
The number of people abandoning it is but a drop in the bucket compared to the number of new users every day. Keep dreaming, though.
Myspace failed because it was complete junk. Facebook offered a much better platform, and most of all, the newsfeed. If anyone was going to dethrone Facebook, it would have happened already. Social networks aren’t going anywhere. One ad per day extra isn’t going to change anything. Geez.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:47 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Last I heard they weren’t actually getting that many new users. o_O
There was also speculation that a lot of new users are just trying to start a clean slate because they don’t want all their history showing up with that new feature… whatever it’s called… timeline?
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 8:03 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Myspace lacked any kind of vision. Love it or hate it, Facebook is always trying to expand on to new (social) things.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 5:09 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
My sentiments exactly.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:41 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
That simple, cause Facebook has become about revenue… It’s always been like that since it went out of the private college scene and exploded into a crappy myspace like site ….
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 6:35 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Well thats why I just have my pages news feed turned on and let my freinds crap go through that terrible sidebar edition they have
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:29 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
It would be nice if FB published a fully baked Mobil app: their flaky betaesque iOS FB apps are glitchy!
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:30 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Perhaps if they rake in more crash they will fund the dev of quality Mobil apps: then again money is not always the solution for better software builds: look at IE !
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:31 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Yea, they are really struggling to come up with cash right now as it is….
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:32 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I mean it’s not like Mark Zuckerberg is the world’s youngest billionaire, is it?
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:57 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
He’s actually not anymore. Dustin Moskovitz took that title from him a few years ago (although he is only like a week or two younger). Wouldn’t be surprised if there is someone younger there now, though, since they’re 27
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:32 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Well the point is the same. Moskovitz got his money from Facebook, as did many others. They aren’t short of cash and they don’t need to stick ads in our news feeds.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 8:54 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Why are they doing this?! Because of the money?! Thought they had enough money selling their users personal information to other companies..
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:33 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
You can never have enough money.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:35 PM EST reply Recommend (6) Flag actions
I want Google+ to win this war!
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:38 PM EST reply Recommend (6) Flag actions
Because you don’t like ads?
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:40 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Because G+ is actually useful.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:43 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
It’s only useful when people actually start adopting it. The only people I know who use Google Plus are also habitually logged into Facebook. With extremely rare exception, nobody’s leaving Facebook entirely, only to go to Google Plus.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:45 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Its only useful when they let 17 year old’s on it
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:15 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
YES!
Posted on Dec 21, 2011 | 3:25 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Right because Google won’t put ads in G+ when they get the chance.ey get the chance.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:46 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Right, because Google won’t put ads in.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:46 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Whoa, déjà vu!
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:06 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Glitch in the Matrix
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:37 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
its not a war, its not even a fight, to most people, Google+ doesn’t exist
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:08 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Facebook doesn’t need to die for Google+ to succeed. Actually, I think Google+ is more of a competition to Twitter than Facebook.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 7:59 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I now shake off this mortal coil, and depart for Google+
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:45 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
and you’ll be there all alone
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:08 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I have the Verge in my Circle. What more needeth I? :P
Posted on Dec 21, 2011 | 11:12 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Looking forward to the various browser add-ons to block this.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:45 PM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
Yeah if ABP can’t do it, hopefully Social Fixer can.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:48 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
If anyone is truly surprised by this, they haven’t been keeping track of trends. This only makes sense to me. Let’s not forget that ad space is Facebook’s biggest source of revenue at the moment.
I fail to see what the big deal is, Adblock Plus will probably help filter out these ads anyway. I don’t even remember what ads look like anymore ha.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:45 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Very true, AdBlock should deal with 99% of them. Facebook ads just target the unsuspecting users these days, so anyone with a brain should probably have them removed by now :D
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:48 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Facebook and Google are both dead. The future is really going to be about private social networks. Path is on the right “path” (pun intended) Facebook and Google+ will survive but their influence will wane as better solutions arise.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:49 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
I really dig Path, my biggest problem is their 150 friend limit. I’ve got 15 friends requests pending that I can’t do anything with — realistically I only want to approve 6 of them though.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:52 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I know ;) Path forces you to really decide who’s a friend and who’s just really an acquaintance
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:53 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
because people want to have to make that decision????
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:13 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You’re using it wrong.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 6:26 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Adding my friends is using it wrong?
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 6:39 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
iPhone 4 antennagate joke me thinks.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 8:57 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I agree. I said it as a comment to a different post, but Path is simplistic. It has a few different sharing options and that’s it. It’s streamlined. As a result of it being only a mobile app, users don’t need to deal with extra content that’s built for desktop platforms (applications and such).
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:12 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
“Sponsored Stories” is just another name for bullcrap!!!!!
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:51 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I don’t believe they’ll do that. They’re making tons of money right now and it’s not enough ?
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:51 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
they are?
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:13 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Umm… Bye bye facebook.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:54 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
don’t let the door hit your ass
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:00 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Wasn’t this announced back at f8? If not, I remember it being reported by someone a few months back.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:55 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I love seeing stories like this. The worse Facebook becomes, the more likely it is that people will move to Google+. Seems unlikely that people will but I’m still hopeful..
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 3:56 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The only reason people are leaving Facebook is over privacy concerns. This doesn’t change with Google+. The whole reason why G+ exists is to data mine personal information which Facebook would not share with Google.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:02 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I don’t know why you people can’t understand that some people LIKE ads. Personally, I enjoy getting the morning ski report straight from the source, I enjoy hearing about my favorite bands’ upcoming shows, I enjoy receiving coupon codes, all already in my newsfeed.
These sponsored postings will still be highly targeted, and will probably even feature a “this ad is / is not relevent to me” button so that they can better target ads to you.
It’s like you all think that they should just run the site for free. :-\
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:04 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
good points,. Ill go a step further and remind everyone that when people fill out their profile, no long can they just write in any show or movie or band, they type in the band and select a previously created option. As it stands currently, you can either have an empty profile, or have one where your newsfeed is filled with ads (albeit you dictate what they are). Now, Facebook decides what ads to put in there.
This isn’t exactly a big change people
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:32 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
People only likes relevant ads, but 90% is irrelevant.
If I keep saying “fxxk” in my wall, does not mean I am looking for prostitute. We talk we like we watch we listen doesnt mean we want to buy, google know this, but not facebook.
Posted on Feb 11, 2012 | 11:08 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Nope, Facebook is a mainstay. Like I’ve said with iPhone/iPad in the past, Facebook could serve up shit on a plate and people would still lap it up.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 8:39 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Hey Facebook! How about adding the freaking ads in our asses too?!!!
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:00 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
That’s a solid idea
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:07 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
L2 Adblock
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:10 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Another reason to use the Adblock plugin.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:18 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
for those Google+ people…
Lets point out google owns youtube and recently has made it nearly impossible to watch a video without watching an add first. Lets also point out in gmail, there too are adds.
XBOX live (which is a paid service) has adds, Cable TV (another paid service) has adds.
Apple’s ecosystem was/is the only savior from adds… but a world without adds is a world with-out market share. You couldn’t pay them enough not to have adds.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:20 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
but does it have subtracts?
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:49 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Microsoft is one of the those highly profitable monopolistic companies and with their xbox being a paid service they still have ads. Hotmail also has in-your-face ads and upon exit forces you to their MSNBC site. Google and Apple are nowhere near this level of intrusion.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 7:05 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
@seankyte, ads is ok if it is not disturbing users.
Putting ads in main feeds definitely annoy user, no doubt!
Posted on Feb 11, 2012 | 11:11 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 4:20 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Facebook newsfeeds on other planets have had sponsored stories since 2009.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 8:09 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 5:01 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
So glad I jumped out the bandwagon some time ago and deleted the account for good. Now I may give a try to Tumblr or Quora. But that’s a big maybe. Also thought about creating a FB account with no real personal info and refusing any friend request. In the end, when I want to talk to a friend I just call him/her. I don’t care for their rant or pictures.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 5:10 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Come to the dark side! Darth Zuckder is awaiting your arrival.
Posted on Dec 20, 2011 | 8:18 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Tools will be tooled.
Posted on Dec 21, 2011 | 3:27 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.