The movie industry's big UltraViolet initiative, designed to move digital movies under one master DRM umbrella, kicked off in mid-October, and so far the consumer response has not been terribly positive. UltraViolet first became available as a digital movie copy bundled with a few Warner Brothers Blu-Ray releases, but the system was overly complex and didn't work well at launch: social media measurement firm Fizziology found that three percent of comments relating to UltraViolet were positive, 17 percent were negative, and the rest were neutral. This was among the worst reception the company has tracked, and a quick look at Amazon reviews for Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 echoes this sentiment, with hundreds of one- and two-star reviews slamming UltraViolet.
The main issue with UltraViolet is that well-known content providers like Amazon and Apple haven't adopted it, so the only option is to use Warner's Flixster site as a portal to access movies. This adds layers of complexity: for example, to add a movie to your iPhone, you must sign up for UltraViolet, sign up for Flixster, download the iPhone app, and finally download the film to your device — a more involved process than the old iTunes digital copies. While UltraViolet makes sense in concept and has strong support from across the industry, it'll need support from content distributors to be successful; we expect to hear more news on that front when CES rolls around.

There are 27 Comments. Add yours.
This headline seemed like an inevitability to me when this was first announced.
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 5:28 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Complexity kills things. This is why Torrents aren’t going away any time soon, no restrictions and access to (usually) better quality.
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 5:44 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
give me my effin itunes copy and ur ultrastupid copy to yourself
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 5:32 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
I had moved to the model of buying iTunes movies when they are HD and buying bluray with iTunes digital copy if iTunes only offered standard def. I bought one ultraviolet copy to try it out and refuse to buy another until iTunes supports it. So worthless until you can get a copy in iTunes in my situation.
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 6:57 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
I too just rececently started semi-regularly buying movies and TV shows from Zune. I’d like to see Microsoft support it too.
Posted on Dec 09, 2011 | 3:03 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Since I saw the first ad for this, I knew this was going to be a failure. They obviously haven’t seen what happen with companies with extreme DRM.
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 5:33 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
They’ll never be able to use DRM on my vinyl music collection! I beat the system!
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 5:35 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I have purchased a ton of 1080p movies on Zune for my Xbox 360, unless Ultaviolet is compatible with Zune movies on Xbox I will never use it.
So far it just seems like UV is just the latest gimmick that they’ve bundled with Blu-ray to try to boost the mediocre sales and convince people that Blu-ray is future proof.
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 5:35 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Blu-Ray sales are up 35% in 2011. It’s the best thing to happen to my movie collection in a long time.
I’d say Blu-Ray is pretty future proof. I don’t foresee them coming out with another physical format any time soon if ever. By the time we need an improvement on Blu-Ray (4k?) it probably will make sense to go with some sort of cloud based delivery. And this is if you can even distinguish the difference between 1080p and 2160p, which at home screen sizes you can’t.
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 5:40 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You think you’ll be able to stream high quality 4k video? lol. You’d hit your bandwidth cap after 2 movies if the ISP’s continue to have their way. The average 1080p Bluray (movie only) is 35GB. 4k will be at least triple that.
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 5:57 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I can’t wait. 4K will be amazing.
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 6:24 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Up 35% from what? Statistics are awesome. I’m not questioning if Blu-ray quality is good, just the long term value of another disc format.
No physical format is ever future proof. Especially blu-ray considering new laptops and tablets aren’t even shipping with optical drives. Some game consoles probably won’t even have optical drives in the next generation. Everything is moving towards on-demand which is why the Blu-ray group keeps pumping out these UltraViolet gimmicks to try to reassure consumers.
If Blu-ray was future proof there would be no need for UV to exist.
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 6:46 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
until video streaming quality can match blu ray then yes blu ray still has a future.
It frustraste me that people are willing to embrace mediocre HD video for laziness.
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 5:49 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Probably about .001% of the population can tell the difference between Blu-ray and 1080p HD video on Vudu or Zune.
Convenience is a bigger advancement than quality. See MP3 vs. DVD Audio or SA-CD. Consumers want instant on-demand content much more than they want marginally higher quality video and sound.
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 6:51 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
The real problem is that most ppl sitting at distance won’t even know the difference. Only enthusiasts will bother, and so why ppl make do with 1080p or 720 even. As long as these things weren’t encoded with massive compression, it is for all intents andpurposes, about even.
I get what you are saying but most ppl aren’t like that.
Posted on Dec 09, 2011 | 6:21 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Ultraviolet is actually a pretty good system. As a household with more than one person, where one person uses iTunes and one doesn’t, and one person is on an iPhone and the other on Android; this allows us both to have a digital copy of the movie handy.
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 5:41 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Can you watch it on an Apple TV? No.
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 5:42 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
why would you need it on Apple TV? If you have an UV copy then obviously you have an blu ray because that’s the way you get an UV copy and if you have a blu ray player with the movie in blu ray why on Earth would want to watch via Apple Tv which has worse video quality?
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 5:52 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Perhaps because not everyone watches things in the same method that you do for the same reasons.
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 5:53 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
But your scenario makes no sense. The digital copy is to be viewed on a computer/tablet/phone/pmp. If you want to watch on a TV, that’s what the blu-ray is for. The digital copy is usually in a lower resolution, has higher compression, and worse audio than a DVD (which is also usually included in the package). If you have the blu-ray and the DVD, why would you ever want to watch the digital copy on your TV? If you want a high quality media file to watch on your TV why didn’t you just buy the movie from Amazon, iTunes, Zune, or Vudu (depending on which box you have to stream)?
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 6:40 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Because not everyone watches things in the same method that you do for the same reasons.
Posted on Dec 09, 2011 | 9:01 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’ll explain further. My setup is basically as follows: main “TV room” which has the best, biggest TV in the house connected to a nice surround system and a blu-ray player. I have a comfy couch there and I want the best sound and video possible, so I prefer to own the blu-ray for that room. However, that’s the only physical disc player in my house. In my bedroom I’ve got a nice 40" but don’t have or want a disc player. It’s too loud and takes up space. So I use an Apple TV and stream movies. I don’t care that it’s not 1080p with the best sound because my watching habits are different. But I want access to the movies I own all the same.
Now, I could rip and encode the DVDs that come in the combo packs (and I have in some instances), but I prefer a copy meant specifically for iTunes. If there’s an option for me to buy a combo pack then I will if it has an iTunes copy. But I certainly wouldn’t pay for a format like UV.
I also like combo packs because I want a DVD format for the occasional time I need to use a DVD player and can’t use the digital copy.
Many times the combo packs contain the best extra features also, features you may not be able to get in other packages.
Posted on Dec 09, 2011 | 9:23 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
No, it will need the support of consumers, which hasn’t and likely won’t happen. Those who want digital copies won’t be bullied into the UltraViolet nonsense. Those who don’t want digital copies couldn’t care less.
If you simply complain to them, they will offer to send you an iTunes code to keep you happy. I simply refuse to buy the films unless they give me an iTunes copy.
They should take note o the large number of 1 star ratings on Amazon for popular films all because of UV.
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 5:42 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
why should yo get an itunes copy?
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 5:47 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
If they want my business they’ll give me an iTunes copy instead of UV. If not, they won’t. And they have each time.
The first frustration was Deathly Hallows Part 1. My digital copy was iTunes. However, this was not an option for Part 2. So I could watch half the movie on my Apple TV but not the other half? Ridiculous.
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 5:50 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I’m pretty happy with the UV versions and would much prefer a cloud service like UV, regardless of how locked down it is, to DRM’d download files that are very inflexible. As long as they are willing to make it viewable on many devices, and they seem to be, then I have no complaints. I’ve pulled up my copy of Harry Potter on my phone, online and on my TV and while the quality isn’t stellar, it is very convenient and I look forward to having more videos available through this service.
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 5:42 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Streaming quality is pretty awful. I got my first UV release when I got Cowboys and Aliens this week. I’m glad they also let me have an iTunes version cause I would be pissed if I was stuck with that horrible mess of a stream. The iTunes version is only SD but at least it’s not all garbled and blocky.
Posted on Dec 08, 2011 | 5:45 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.