Vizio is pursuing every segment of the home theater market at this year's CES. Along with announcing an updated line of mainstream HDTVs, the company has introduced a premium collection of HDTVs known as CinemaWide. That name is a natural fit for the LCD sets, which the manufacturer touts as the world's first to utilize an aspect ratio of 21:9 (something Philips may disagree with). Such unique dimensions allow movies shot in CinemaScope — the predominant method used by today's filmmakers — to be displayed without black bars. Three display sizes will be offered, and they're of the larger variety, coming in at 50, 58, and 71 inches. Edge-lit LED backlighting is in use on the smaller two, which exhibit a contrast ratio of 1,000,000 to 1. The flagship model features full array "TruLED" backlighting, resulting in superior black levels and contrast, says Vizio.
Further, its Theater 3D technology will be incorporated into the high-end family of HDTVs, with each model also bringing access to the company's V.I.A. smart TV platform. Vizio claims the CinemaWide series as the first to allow users to access the web while simultaneously viewing full-res 1080P television content in the native 16:9 format, another benefit of the ultra-widescreen design. Suffice to say, we're eager to get some time with Vizio's latest; stay tuned for impressions. Unfortunately, we've got nothing to share related to availability and pricing — the company hasn't yet released those details.




There are 29 Comments. Add yours.
What’s the native resolution?
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 8:16 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
2560 × 1080
Oh my, I want it.
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 9:02 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
This is much more desirable than some stupid 3D gimmick that other manufacturers are trying to sell. I like how they can use the extra space to display extra information.
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 10:29 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
I almost wish this was available without 3D so it would cost a bit less, but whatever… I still want it.
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 2:37 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Yea but 99% of out hd content is 16:9
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 8:19 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Not its not, it’s less than that. Plus the part of the screen thats not “being used” could be utilized really well. I think 21:9 is the way we are going for sure.
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 8:59 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
The problem with it is there’s no content for it. Yeah, there’s HD content but this isn’t native and even 1080p HD content that has black bars would be stretched to fit on this TV. Blu-Ray and streamed content is produced at 1080p, not 2560×1080. I’m not knocking it, but you’re not getting anything more with it than you would a standard 16:9 image.
Would be interesting to know what the quality of picture is like when it’s stretched.
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 9:07 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I don’t think the content would be stretched, it would just zoom and the bars would end up being cropped out. Sure the resolution wouldn’t be full 2560 × 1080, but if this is the new “thing” I’m sure Blu-Ray’s will start including video in “Wide HD” or some stupid new name like that.
Currently the extra pixels can be used by the apps, as shown. We’ll just have to wait to see where this goes.
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 9:09 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It would have to be stretched. A 21:9 format Blu Ray is still displayed at 1080p resolution – you’re kind of losing the top and bottom of the picture when it’s displayed at 1080p. To make it fit to 2560×1080 it has to be stretched proportionately so you’re effectively pixel stretching.
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 9:16 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Stretched pixels, but not stretched image. As the article says “Such unique dimensions allow movies shot in CinemaScope — the predominant method used by today’s filmmakers — to be displayed without black bars”, you’re not losing any of the original movie, just making it fit like originally intended. When you’re viewing content at different aspect ratios, the content is cut from the sides, not the other way around?
Posted on Jan 15, 2012 | 9:51 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I suppose the key word here is “CinemaWide” indicating that this design is more geared towards a specialized market. Home theater owners will predominantly watch movies on this display and do not need the extra vertical real estate.
Posted on Jan 16, 2012 | 12:43 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
But this is a TV for the 1%, who cares about the 99%? #OccupyCinemaWide
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 9:36 AM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
If you’re joking…haha, if not…good lord…
Posted on Jan 15, 2012 | 6:47 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
100% of HD content is either 1920×1080, or 1280×720 pixels. The aspect ratio used is variable, but the pixel count is always 16×9.
So what you have is a situation where a TV like this is simply stretching pixels to fit its canvas, rather than having some pixels be black.
In DVD times, most discs featured extra pixel content for those with a 16×9 set, actually allowing those users to see more detail. I wish Blu ray offered the same feature for sets like this…
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 12:14 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
I wish the studios would switch to 16:9 instead of manufacturers have to make realllly wide TVs just for movies
Posted on Jan 11, 2012 | 10:39 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I kinda want this. stupid money.
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 8:19 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Imagine all those homes with double stretched 4:3 “so there’s no black bars”, 4:3 stretched onto 16:9 is bad enough
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 8:26 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
yeah go over to grandmas house and shes watching the weather channel or the 700 club in 480i stretched to 21:9 lol
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 11:59 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
I’ll take two.
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 8:55 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I think I like this.
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 9:06 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It’s a shame that Blu-ray didn’t allow for anamorphic video, as of now cinema scope movies are stored at about 1920×800 so they actually have less pixels than a 16:9 movie that is 1920×1080.
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 9:29 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
With a TV like this you could author movies for it such that they were the full 1920×1080 frame (and then the TV would only need to stretch horizontally), but yeah it’s unlikely anyone would do so since they’d look wrong on normal 16:9 sets.
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 10:30 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Buy a projector!
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 1:03 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Got one already. My living room is too bright.
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 5:21 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
I can’t wait until phones adopt this aspect ratio….oh wait, LG already tried that with the Chocolate BL40. Ever heard of it? Me neither.
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 9:35 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Of course if you tried to watch a film from before about 1950 on this thing, it’d only occupy about the half of the screen.
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 10:28 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I want this only because I can surf on the sides of my content or run apps. I can watch a ball game and read The Verge. Best of both.
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 10:59 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Ohio State and Utah State are playing 2 games simultaneously? Awesome.
Posted on Jan 10, 2012 | 11:12 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Let me know when Samsung, LG or Pani release a 21:9. I know many people own and enjoy Vizio but ugh…I don’t want to say I’m a TV snob but…yeah
Posted on Jan 15, 2012 | 6:50 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.