Patent lawsuits won't save Kodak from an overhaul, it seems: as predicted, the photography company just announced that it's filed for bankruptcy. Kodak says it's voluntarily filed for Chapter 11 reorganization in New York, in order to "bolster liquidity in the U.S. and abroad, monetize non-strategic intellectual property, fairly resolve legacy liabilities, and enable the Company to focus on its most valuable business lines." It's also tentatively obtained $950 million in debtor-in-possession credit so it can keep operating while it formally goes bankrupt: the company says it expects to keep paying employees, serving customers and honoring obligations for the time being.
When Kodak's talking about "valuable business," of course, it's not really referring to cameras. Chairman Antonio Perez reiterates in the press release that the company's remaining value is in intellectual property, particularly printing technologies and image capture patents. At this rate, though, that IP might get sold off cheaper: rumor had it that the company would file if it was unable to sell off its patents directly.
Kodak's set up a website at www.kodaktransforms.com to discuss the Chapter 11 filing further, but as of right now the site's asking us for a login and password. It's up now, and you can also find the company's full press release below.
Update: Want to read Kodak's bankruptcy filing for yourself? Here's the full petition in PDF format. According to the filing, Kodak had $5.1 billion in assets and $6.75 billion in debt as of September 30th, 2011. Amusingly, the document references a rather specific claim by Nokia: apparently, the company owes $12 million to the Finnish firm for intellectual property royalties.
Update 2: Kodak's bankruptcy website is live, and the company says it expects to complete US restructuring in 2013.
ROCHESTER, N.Y., Jan 19, 2012 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- --Non-U.S. Subsidiaries Are Not Included in U.S. Filing and Are Not Subject to Court Supervision
--Company Secures $950 million in Debtor-in-Possession Financing in U.S.
--Kodak's Reorganization to Facilitate Emergence as Profitable and Sustainable Enterprise
Eastman Kodak Company ("Kodak" or the "Company") announced today that it and its U.S. subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for chapter 11 business reorganization in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.
The business reorganization is intended to bolster liquidity in the U.S. and abroad, monetize non-strategic intellectual property, fairly resolve legacy liabilities, and enable the Company to focus on its most valuable business lines. The Company has made pioneering investments in digital and materials deposition technologies in recent years, generating approximately 75% of its revenue from digital businesses in 2011.
Kodak has obtained a fully-committed, $950 million debtor-in-possession credit facility with an 18-month maturity from Citigroup to enhance liquidity and working capital. The credit facility is subject to Court approval and other conditions precedent. The Company believes that it has sufficient liquidity to operate its business during chapter 11, and to continue the flow of goods and services to its customers in the ordinary course.
Kodak expects to pay employee wages and benefits and continue customer programs. Subsidiaries outside of the U.S. are not subject to proceedings and will honor all obligations to suppliers, whenever incurred. Kodak and its U.S. subsidiaries will honor all post-petition obligations to suppliers in the ordinary course.
"Kodak is taking a significant step toward enabling our enterprise to complete its transformation," said Antonio M. Perez, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. "At the same time as we have created our digital business, we have also already effectively exited certain traditional operations, closing 13 manufacturing plants and 130 processing labs, and reducing our workforce by 47,000 since 2003. Now we must complete the transformation by further addressing our cost structure and effectively monetizing non-core IP assets. We look forward to working with our stakeholders to emerge a lean, world-class, digital imaging and materials science company."
"After considering the advantages of chapter 11 at this time, the Board of Directors and the entire senior management team unanimously believe that this is a necessary step and the right thing to do for the future of Kodak," Mr. Perez continued. "Our goal is to maximize value for stakeholders, including our employees, retirees, creditors, and pension trustees. We are also committed to working with our valued customers.
"Chapter 11 gives us the best opportunities to maximize the value in two critical parts of our technology portfolio: our digital capture patents, which are essential for a wide range of mobile and other consumer electronic devices that capture digital images and have generated over $3 billion of licensing revenues since 2003; and our breakthrough printing and deposition technologies, which give Kodak a competitive advantage in our growing digital businesses."
Mr. Perez concluded, "The Board of Directors, the senior management team and I would like to underscore our appreciation for the hard work and loyalty of our employees. Kodak exemplifies a culture of collaboration and innovation. Our employees embody that culture and are essential to our future success."
Kodak has taken this step after preliminary discussions with key constituencies and intends to work toward a consensual reorganization in the best interests of its stakeholders. Kodak expects to complete its U.S.-based restructuring during 2013.
The Company and its Board of Directors are being advised by Lazard, FTI Consulting Inc. and Sullivan & Cromwell LLP. In addition, Dominic DiNapoli, Vice Chairman of FTI Consulting, will serve as Chief Restructuring Officer to support the management team as to restructuring matters during the chapter 11 case.
More information about Kodak's Chapter 11 filing is available on the Internet at www.kodaktransforms.com . Information for suppliers and vendors is available at (800) 544-7009 or (585) 724-6100.
Kodak will be filing monthly operating reports with the Bankruptcy Court and also plans to post these monthly operating reports on the Investor Relations section of Kodak.com. The Company will continue to file quarterly and annual reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which will also be available in the Investor Relations section of Kodak.com.

There are 58 Comments. Add yours.
“Developing…”
That was the most well written article ever. Lol just kidding. On a serious note, this is sad. They were definitely important to early photography. I hope they can pull through. I remember back in the early 2000s their point and shoot digital cameras were popular. Now I rarely see a Kodak camera. What happened to them?
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 12:42 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Digital happened and they didn’t jump on the bandwagon very hard or well.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 12:48 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
They had digital.cameras though.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 12:53 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
They invented the digital camera. Shame they either didn’t realise the potential or deliberately brushed it under the carpet to protect their film biz.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 3:50 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
Pretty depressing really. Anyone remember their SLR’s that had huge slots for floppy disks?
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 4:05 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
One of my friends had a Sony Mavica which took floppies. I didn’t realise Kodak made them too.
Posted on Jan 21, 2012 | 4:29 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
kodak’s problem wasn’t that they failed to realize the potential of digital, it’s that digital photography is inherently and permanently much less profitable and generates much less revenue than film, especially in the low-midrange space kodak occupies for consumers.
kodak’s only chances at avoiding this were downsizing a ton in advance, which would have required an incredibly far-seeing CEO or building new growth areas, which they tried and couldn’t manage despite a number of interesting attempts. the kodak that grew out of film was never going to be sustainable in digital photography, no matter how great their products were. (and I have and love one of their old dual-lens digital cameras, so I’m reluctant to say they just swept digital under the rug.)
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 5:06 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
But Kodak didn’t have to occupy the low-midrange consumer space. They had an opportunity to be one of the digital imaging companies and it slipped through their fingers.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 10:52 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
It’s not like they can’t make good sensors. Their sensor powers the high-end Leica M9 camera.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 2:52 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
That’s a great example, but I’ll be Leica doesn’t exactly move a lot of those compared with the numbers Canon and Nikon move, even just counting their respective high-end cameras.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 5:24 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Kodak’s film business is actually their only profitable department.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 9:17 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Instead of trying to become a premium digital camera maker, they decided to take on the low end of the digital camera biz and put out wave after wave of throwaway crap.
You can’t compete with China on throwaway crap. If they’ had any sort of vision or ingenuity, they could have become a force in the premium photography world.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 9:51 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
the do put out some the best mini camcorders and this was even when the Flip was still around the Kodak Zi8 ran circles around it.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 2:40 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
A story about a camera company with just the word ‘Developing…’. There’s a joke there somewhere.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 1:22 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I suspect that joke will be shot down in flames, despite deserving a decent exposure.
Posted on Jan 21, 2012 | 4:31 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I had a digital Kodak camera that took decent pictures, but there was never really anything special about it.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 12:51 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Just like any other camera.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 12:53 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
False.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 9:50 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Right, along those lines a lot of older companies just cant keep up with the changing world. Take RIM for example who said to the original iPhone “There is no way that phone can do what they showed off on stage” Its sad but its bound to become more commonplace. Blockbuster and Circuit City also come to mind as companies that used to dominate, but are now long gone.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 12:55 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I had c6200 and a v530. They both pretty good at the time, the 530 had one of the better lcd at the time.
Sad.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 3:23 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
Do kids today even know what Kodak is?
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 12:53 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
Negative.
GET IT?!!
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 8:03 AM EST reply Recommend (6) Flag actions
Well… no more kodak moments…..
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 1:00 AM EST reply Recommend (10) Flag actions
It just gonna have a whole new meaning!
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 5:49 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Exactly… RIM is gonna have a Kodak moment soon.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 10:20 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Oh, yeah. Epic!
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 4:03 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Expected, but still sad. They well placed to be at the forefront of digital photography. I can imagine some really cool looking yellow and red SD cards, cameras..whatnot..
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 1:18 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I know they already have cameras an sd cards….just sayin
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 1:25 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I bought a Kodak digital camera a couple years back. Pictures were never the greatest and it completely stopped working a little more than a year after I bought it. If that was the quality they were bringing to the table, I can’t say I’ll miss them.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 1:54 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Kodak has the same problem GM has – organizational arrogance and a tin eared approach to product development. The difference? GM was too big to fail and got bailed out by the taxpayers. Kodak is getting a 2 yr lease on life that will likely fall flat, also with taxpayer funds supplied by bailout recipient Citibank.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 2:33 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The day’s we said Kodak taking pictures over our CB to make truckers aware of the Radar is long gone
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 3:48 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Oh come on you know you were hoping the headline was “Microsoft files Chapter 11 bankruptcy”! Give it 8-10 more years that headline might be reality…
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 4:06 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
So, what’s going to happen to their film stock? Would be a massive shame to see Ektar dissapear.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 4:10 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Hi,
first of all, Kodak now has the chance to change. Currently it makes biggest loss in its’ digital business and quite a lot of profit (and growing sales) in its’ film-business. Film? Yes that ancient technology where you pop in not a card but a roll (or sheet) and get wonderful monster-megapixel-resolution images. Many people argue – and show with there images – that it is still much easier to get good results in photography than when trying to achieve this with current digital (affordable) cameras. Say skin-tones, say different or mixed light-sources. That might sound too technical but when one discusses merits of current digital cameras – convenience, image quality – the pain of post-processings stays under the horizon.
New Portra 160, 400 and 800 are amazing products which give great results. Tri-X black & white is legendary as well as T-Max-film. So I expect Kodak to keep its profitable parts intact and leave the rest to be picked up for scraps.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 5:19 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I hope you’re right. If not, Fuji better do the right thing and snatch up T-Max. Astia’s great, but their B+W offerings are shameful. It was bad enough losing Kodachrome…I don’t think I could handle the heartbreak of losing T-Max.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 6:36 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’ve always been more a fan of Ilford’s B&W films over Kodaks.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 10:20 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Personal preference. I always found the best combination of contrast and tight grain with TMAX. But that’s because I like contrasty pictures with fine grain structure.
Still, Tri-X 400 is probably the most versatile film on the market. You can push/pull it at least two stops in either direction without noticeable difference. It’d be a shame to lose that.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 1:57 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 6:43 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Kodak have an amazing pedigree in camera manufacture- the Kodak Instamatic line of 110 and 126 film cameras were a sensation. Think about all of those retro-revivalist apps that are released for mobile platforms which can trace their stylistic roots back to Kodak’s innovation (and startling product design – check out IDSA’s writeup here)
It’s a real shame that a giant of a previous era has seemingly gone bust. I’m not privy to any insider info, but I’d bet their slow speed to adapt to the digital consumer market, combined with WhiteNiteLite’s comment about not really seeing Kodak digital cameras any more.
I reckon they should have done an ‘Instamatic for the digital age’ – not simply a retro-looking digital camera, but taking the ideas that made the Instamatic a timeless classic & applying those to the digital age.
Oh, it’s also a sad day, because Kodak actually produced the world’s first digital camera too. See here.
Also, that’s pretty ironic.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 5:17 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Brownies, anyone?
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 6:37 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Capitalism strikes again
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 7:35 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
If they stop making film I will throw a fit. Just in time for me to get an old Minolta SLR..
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 7:39 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
Kodak going the Nortel way .Patents will be sold to highest bidder .
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 7:47 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
For their sake I hope they are right with their lawsuits. That might earn them a couple million.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 8:08 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
This is what happens when old companies keep thinking in old ways.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 8:12 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
totally agree, its like they just stopped evolving their technology + halted innovation. they need to refresh their brand cause no one will miss ’em
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 1:09 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
Please, please, PLEASE don’t sell your IP.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 8:48 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Such a shame, I hope they sort their sh*t out.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 8:49 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yay for creative destruction!
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 9:12 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
Their digital cameras couldn’t match Nikon/Canon.
But they did make decent cheap hd pocket camcorders, couple of years ago. I bought a ZX1, and later a ZI8. But then phones started shooting hd video.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 9:31 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
That’s not how you spell RIM… oh wait. DAMMIT!
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 9:52 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
RIM is profitable and has no debt… Sure both companies missed an opportunity to advance, but RIM is not going to be filing bankruptcy anytime soon.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 12:53 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I know, first hand, that some of their commercial printing departments make money and have an incredible technology. It seems like big printing is out but not necessarily if this tech is understood and taken into account. Think very close to magazine quality but 100% variable data and very quick. Variable data meaning full color but each page can be customized and completly different from the previous page. It’ll take some interesting marketing and some legitimate understanding of the tech, on Kodak’s part, but this tech is big printing for the internet age. Google Kodak Stream or Prosper to see more. My immediate thought is a per user customizable magazine or newspaper, but there are other options like customizable flooring, wallpaper, wrapping paper, maybe circuitry down the line?
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 9:56 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
NPR mentioned on the radio that they were going to refocus on printers and ink. I just read the NPR story online and the Democrat & Chronicle story they cited and I didn’t see any mention of that so I;m not sure where they got that info. I sure hope that isn’t true though.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 10:07 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
yea lets keep developing crappy disposable cameras instead of making quality products and sensor technology. what do you think is going to happen…
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 2:39 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I had many Kodak cameras throughout the years, mostly just cheapies, but in the film era, I was very happy with them. I made the jump to digital back in 2003 with the DX4330 (How do I remember that!?), and could not believe how disappointing the pictures were compared to my mom’s Canon Elph.
The quality in their products was lacking, and that is an obstacle you can’t overcome…
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 3:35 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The end of an era: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZpaNJqF4po
Though the last time I bought an actual Kodak product is 7 years ago. At least.
Photography doesn’t have the same feel to it as it did in the analog days.
Posted on Jan 19, 2012 | 4:23 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Here’s my letter to Kodak:
http://paul-d.tv/blog/2012/02/06/a-letter-to-kodak/
Posted on Feb 06, 2012 | 2:39 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.