The European Union may be set to issue new data protection rules on January 25th. Reuters obtained a draft cppy of the new rules, which would impose strict guidelines on internet companies like Facebook when it comes to users' private information as well as fines if a company violates those rules. One of the more important pieces is a requirement that companies notify the EU if user data has been stolen, but the rules also cover the "right to be forgotten" and data portability so that users can ensure they can export their information easily.
Although the new rules will be proposed on the 25th, it will take some time for the legislation to work its way through the EU's bureaucracy — and even then the rules likely won't go into effect until 2014 or 2015. Between now and then, the regulations may face resistance from some member states, and they are already facing resistance from Facebook. That's no surprise as under the proposed setup, if a company violates the rules, it's possible that the EU could fine it up to one percent of its global revenues.
Update: The proposal is now officially published.

There are 20 Comments. Add yours.
well, im glad to see some people care about their citizens
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 3:18 PM EST reply Recommend (16) Flag actions
You do realize the EU is on the verge (no pun intended) of a second Great Depression? Ya, sure they care…
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 10:43 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Do you know the difference between EU and the Euro Zone? Or the difference between recession and depression? Apparently not.
Not to mention that they’re no closer to a recession than the USA. Who, lets face it, is at the root of this mess. The debt crisis is a result of the world financial crisis of 2008 – 2010, you know.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 3:38 AM EST reply Recommend (7) Flag actions
Sub Prime Mortgage.. I saw house values in California increase more than the mortgage payment each month..
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 4:14 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Also in what way does the economic viability of certain member states reflect the concern of European governments for their citizens? I’m not really following your train of logic here.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 5:02 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
And in response they have not cut the basic things that are essential to life in a developed world. Thus they still do care…. or are afraid of us enough.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 7:47 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
meanwhile in the US, Big Business uses the Gov’t to take control OVER it’s citizens.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 3:19 PM EST reply Recommend (18) Flag actions
Why would some member states oppose this?
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 3:24 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
€€€
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 3:26 PM EST reply Recommend (11) Flag actions
Plus – £, Lt, лв, Kč, Ft, kr, Ls, zł, Leu, Fr.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 4:35 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
What you don’t realise is that it’s cheaper to comply with those regulations than to “buy” enough political votes.
The likes of Facebook aren’t powerful enough to even make a dent in EU.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 7:45 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Some politicians oppose everything the EU does, they’re not necessarily bought by Facebook, they just don’t like “giving power to Brussels”.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 4:31 PM EST reply Recommend (6) Flag actions
“right to be forgotten”
THIS.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 3:27 PM EST reply Recommend (7) Flag actions
In most of the First World its already illegal for companies to require citizens give up basic rights as a condition of using that company’s services or working for them. I see online privacy protections as a logical (and necessary) extension of that. The “information economy” turned out to be a private sector Big brother.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 3:37 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
This sounds positive.
Too bad there are things like ACTA floating around the European Parliament as well. It’s not all good.
ACTA is a “trade agreement” that basically makes ISPs responsible to block infringing sites. It’s as bad as SOPA/PIPA and would affect much more people (USA is also one of the participating countries). This is one of those shady agreements that has been drafted in quiet and with not too many eyes looking.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 3:51 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
I was just about to post the same. Forcing companies to protect your privacy, and at the same time forcing companies to completely violate your privacy so that the Government can track every little thing you do on the interent.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 3:58 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
The USA should have something like this
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 3:56 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
If it passes in the EU it will be much easier to force through in the US. Facebook might even do it proactively (well, reactively to the EU).
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 4:32 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
@JX3
Thanks for sharing your post and the ACTA info. Many non-EU readers hardly know about this agreement which is currently rising so much concerns and resistance.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 4:23 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Does that include the government itself? Or did they convieniantly forget that part.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 12:59 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.