In an apparent reaction to the US Department of Justice's seizure of Megaupload's assets, FileSonic has disabled its own file-sharing functionality. The site previously offered storage and sharing services similar to the now-defunct Megaupload, but its front page currently reads, "All sharing functionality on FileSonic is now disabled. Our service can only be used to upload and retrieve files that you have uploaded personally." Other than that banner, FileSonic's been quiet on the subject; neither the official blog nor its Twitter account mention any change.
According to TorrentFreak, FileSonic is among the top ten file-sharing sites on the internet, serving up a quarter-billion page views every month. Like Megaupload, the site had at least made gestures toward curbing copyright infringement: its "In the Press" section still touts a partnership with content-analysis firm Vobile, signed in December. The partnership was meant to keep copyrighted material from ever reaching users, but it's unclear whether FileSonic put Vobile's technology into place. In the wake of the Megaupload seizure, the company may have settled on a more drastic solution.
In a similar move, cyberlocker Uploaded.to has apparently blocked US users, greeting them with a homepage reading, "Our service is currently unavailable in your country. Sorry about that." It's also been quiet about its motivations.
Thanks to everyone who sent this in!

There are 77 Comments. Add yours.
Another nail in the coffin of the falling empire. Sooner or later the other parts of the globe will look elsewhere for innovations and influence.
Greed kills.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 7:27 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Neither the current legal model, nor unrestricted torrenting is the way forward for music, films or tv.
Also, hyperbolic much…
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 7:37 PM EST reply Recommend (10) Flag actions
True but since the music, film, and tv industries refuse to provide another (reasonable) option it seems like torrenting is the way that it’s gonna be. Not that that has stopped sales and ratings from going up.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 7:58 PM EST reply Recommend (6) Flag actions
Why do you absolutely need to see the blockbuster movie? Why not read a book instead? That is a more sane approach than stealing. And it hurts more to lose relevance, trust me on this.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 10:35 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
If the people bank rolling mass media do not value their “product” as art, then the public will not value it at all.. Music, TV, and Film are treated like “products” and the art value is being watered down and the price is not going down with it.. If you force a musician to make an albulm that appeals to twice as many people I should pay half as much money.. Real artists do not operate on greed alone and are aware of advances in technology so they open up distribution channels much faster; instead of releasing their “product” in stages and on incompatible formats so one work is purchased several times by the same person.. Stealing is wrong but these corps don’t give a shyt about anything but CASH, that’s why piraters do not and will not ever stop or lose any sleep over stealing their “product”..
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 3:09 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Like you couldn’t download books too…
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 10:36 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Film and TV download/streaming is fragmented and often annoying now, but music? Nearly everything is on itunes, Amazon, rdio, spotify, zune, etc. and trivially easy to get and share with your devices, and often DRM free. Is that not reasonable?
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 1:40 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The problem as I see it as a recent cordcutter is that most Americans are paying $30-$120 per month on Cable TV and it’s really not a good value. It’s basically occupying their entire entertainment budget and there is little left for buying overpriced music and movies. People need to stop paying for stuff they aren’t watching and start buying A-la-carte. The door is opening to make it a reality. I was paying $1100 per year to Dish. I can buy tons of commercial free shows and movies for that every year and with a good antenna I can pick up the network channels in HD. The problem now is supply. I can’t buy everything I am interested in in HD. It won’t happen until more people do what I did.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 10:38 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
incorrect.
first of all, sharing files ISNT ILLEGAL.
its all fine and well that everyone is somehow being brainwashed into this idea that sharing files is ruining the world, but dont let your poor opinions destroy legit operations.
sharing files is not a crime.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 8:37 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
If it was up to the people bribing our government, sharing files would be illegal.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 10:14 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Sharing copyrighted files certainly is illegal, as is charging people to access them. MegaUpload’s business was centered around getting people to subscribe so they could download as much as they wanted. The prosecution will probably also argue that they actively encouraged uploading copyrighted media because they paid uploaders according to the amount of large files that were subsequently downloaded – MegaUpload must have realised that the most popular files are copyrighted movies and albums.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 10:15 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Are you talking about media companies being greedy or the MegaUpload owner? We should not be encouraging piracy or the companies that facilitate it.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 10:27 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
What’s next? YouTube?
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 7:29 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Doubtful.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 7:35 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Megaupload and Filesonic are down. The internet has fallen. They are coming.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 11:07 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
YouTube have filters for copyrighted material and don’t charge a subscription fee for unlimited access.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 10:28 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 7:33 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
You know, just something I’ve noticed in the past few years, ever since Rapidshare got reamed – maybe if uploaders were actually disguising their files in password protected, split archives, they wouldn’t have to worry about this. Instead, they just upload “OBVIOUS-COPYRIGHTED-FILE.avi”.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 7:36 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
I agree, even though the renamed, split-rar-in-rar files do get taken down sometimes, they aren’t with as much frequency as the obvious ones.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 7:40 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Exactly. Good luck to Vobile for identifying AES-encrypted rar files named test.001, test.002 and so on.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 7:51 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
In the words of Samuel L. Jackson, “Aw, HELL no!”
Do you have any idea what a pain in the ass it is to spend hours downloading a set of rar’s that is missing a piece or needs a password you have no way of finding? Will no one think of the leeches?
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 8:38 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
You ought to know in advance if all the links were alive. And you should know where to get the passwords. If you’re complaining about the system, you’re doing it wrong.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 11:04 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Teehee
This reminds me of magazine/newspaper articles with example photos of illegal material they always take a CD-R and a sharpie and write it on the medium. You know “Illegal Copy” or “Child Pornography” or “Warez”.
I hope nobody ever took that as a hint how to label their childhood pictures… snicker
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 8:43 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Actually, if you really want to pirate something, you’ll do the extra work to get it for free, otherwise, you’ll just pay out of the sake of convenience.
Posted on Jan 24, 2012 | 12:09 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
As MG Siegler wrote (or rather Y Combinator is planning to do):
Let’s all kill hollywood.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 7:38 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I dunno man, I really enjoyed “The Muppets”.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 7:54 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
“I dunno man, I really enjoyed “The Matrix”
Fixed.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 9:01 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
he had it right the first time
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 9:11 PM EST reply Recommend (8) Flag actions
Megaupload was just the beginning of the end.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 7:39 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
This isn’t the beginning, it’s the climax. This has been going on for years, even to file locker sites. Rapidshare got reamed in like 2008 or so, and had to worker harder at being legit.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 7:46 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Honestly the Obama admin has nothing else better to do? let say, solve the unemployment problem. So their indept Justice department goes after this? Are you kidding? I voted for this boob, but cannot wait to disable his administration in November.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 7:42 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
This has nothing to do with Obama.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 7:43 PM EST reply Recommend (14) Flag actions
everything is Obama’s fault. if your pee gets stuck in the pipes it too is Obama’s fault.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 7:45 PM EST reply Recommend (17) Flag actions
Nothing is Obama’s fault. He doesn’t ever do anything to begin with.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 9:13 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Really? Because he’s been pretty open about his desire to gain control over the internet, and he’s a bigger darling to Hollywood than Bill Clinton was. He’s had major contributions from the entertainment industry since he first announced his candidacy.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 7:52 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Which is why he stopped supporting SOPA before the Wednesday blackout?
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 8:17 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
honestly, that was just jumping on the bandwagon before it is too late.
he doesn’t want to align himself with such a controversial issue in the election year, especially considering that most of those yelling against SOPA on the internet were his voters in 2008.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 8:34 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
this is one of the things i love about people that are anti obama, people that are hating on this person/persona that doesn’t really exist.
Obama is soft on defense – wasn’t the Defense budget increased for 3 consecutive years? and dramatically at that…
Obama is soft on terror – how many of the top al qaeda operatives has he killed? i think he’s ordered more done strike than bush’s entire term by now
obama made the recession worse – 700k+ jobs a per month lost before he’s even sworn in…stimulus passed, then after that, the amount of weekly jobless claims has gone down DRAMATICALLY. lowest levels since before the recession started
obama hasn’t put forward 1 single jobs plan – are you seriously serious? SMH.
it’s one thing not to like someone, it’s one thing to disagree with them, you’re more than entitled to that. but you’re not entitled to your own facts just so you can support your seriously flawed stance.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 11:26 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
You have a bizarre capitalization scheme.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 10:19 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
because i missed capitalizing a proper noun a few times? don’t tell me you’re one of those grammar nazis…
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 2:09 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
No, because it seemed random and oddly chosen. And I’m not.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 2:43 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
just so we’re clear, not capitalizing obama is just a mistake. Capitalizing Defense is appropriate, it’s the Department of Defense, or DoD…don’t see what’s so random about it after looking it over…(scratching head)
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 3:40 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
http://wyden.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/?id=12a5b1cb-ccb8-4e14-bb84-a11b35b4ec53
He has everything to do with it. ACTA is in effect RIGHT NOW
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 8:48 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Sure it does. I’m not a hater but Obama did appoint lobbyist and industry insiders to the JD.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 9:55 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Who wouldnt have?? He’s the Pres. not Merlin the magacian..
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 3:14 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Having watched all the interviews from last nights results I can only assume you hope to do this by running yourself, because you shouldn’t vote for those four.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 7:45 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Ron Paul, as an incumbent Representative, said he explicitly opposes SOPA. Still think he’s a bad choice?
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 10:33 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
They are all bad.. We haven’t had a good pres since the corps took over.. There isn’t much different between Dem and Repub in the REAL sense of things.. Lets argue over trivial shyt and not complete the 9/11 investigation lol
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 3:16 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
One issue doth not make a candidate.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 5:28 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 7:49 PM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
unfortunately, tin hats need not apply, because this is all real
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 8:39 PM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
Oh god, it’s happening. I hope this doesn’t spiral out of control. Before you know it, it’ll be the Night of Long Knives, except instead of German military/brown shirts being purged, it’ll be cyberlockers, torrent sites, IRC itself.
IT’S HAPPENING
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 8:14 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I believe this is what’s known as a chilling effect.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 8:16 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
For all those who have subscribed to Filesonic they should all ask for their subscription money back.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 8:23 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Already did that. Submitted a ticket asking for a refund. Lets see what happens now.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 7:28 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Question for the lawyerly, does stopping now actually protect Filesonic from prosecution?
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 8:36 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
No. If they’ve broken the law in the past and it can be proved, then stopping now won;t change that. That said, going forward they are less likely to be the focus of legal attention as they have “already changed their ways”.
Uploaded.to’s option of blocking US users is an interesting one as well, as some how the FBI has to show US jurisdiction to prosecute. If a site has a .com domain, has servers in the US, or bank accounts in the US then they seem to be able to claim jurisdiction. By avaoiding all this and blocking US users – it would be pretty difficult to show how US law enforcement could claim much… Not saying they won’t of course!
With FileSonic out of the game, there are still numerous file hosting sites around that are trying to avoid prosecution in the US using various methods. What is worrying the the chilling effects the seizures might have on services like Dropbox or Box.net and if they feel forced to implement more hoops for users to go through before uploading – that would ruin my workflow!
I go over the chilling effects side of things in more details over at:
http://www.techfruit.com/2012/01/22/the-chilling-effects-of-the-megaupload-seizure/
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 8:58 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
I think Dropbox is mostly safe for a few reasons:
1) All Dropbox files have to be stored on a user account’s computer somewhere in order to be accessed with Dropbox, creating IP records that make it easy to find pirates.
2) Dropbox didn’t have any rewards programs promoting people to share more files like MegaUpload did. It only incentivizes getting more users.
3) Since most people know Dropbox as a legitimate company and not in the grey area MegaUpload is, they have/had to respond to any DMCA requests quickly to maintain their image.
Posted on Jan 24, 2012 | 12:14 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Piracy didn’t end when they shutdown Napster?
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 8:53 PM EST reply Recommend (10) Flag actions
they’re burning their servers!! destroying the evidence!
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 9:21 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I remember as a child, certain adults I knew had these mythical “black boxes” that gave them all cable channels with no hassles. As a kid I didnt know where they came from and why grown ups were so weird about hiding them… because almost everyone I knew had a “black box.” Black boxes went away, but loopholes in systems will never go away. I see no difference here other than the fact that users will have to be more clever.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 9:32 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Piracy can never be stopped…and no one can censor internet. Hackers will somehow find a way to get whatever they want
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 10:09 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
That said, some of the hackers will do a lot of time… don’t expect any of them to say it was worth it.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 10:44 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
The smart goal of fighting piracy isn’t to stop everyone, but prevent casual piracy that literally takes two clicks. If you have to jump through hoops, go to shady websites, and possibly get malware but are still determined to pirate, then there’s no stopping you. But for people who don’t want to deal with that kind of risk, they’ll pay. Why? Because their time is more valuable than that.
And if it wasn’t worth the time to pirate or the money to buy it, they’ll move onto the next best thing.
Posted on Jan 24, 2012 | 12:17 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Let’s look at history. Anti-gun-rights areas have criminals illegally procuring firearms. Marijuana has been illegal for ages, yet a significant portion of the youth smoke it or grow it.
Certain things just don’t go away simply from making them illegal. Humans like to do certain things in large numbers for some reason — such trends should be a clue to marketers and lawmakers.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 10:43 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
Clue was already taken. We already privatized prison industry. Your sorry ass will be making someone in the 0.1% even richer than he is if you stay this naive.
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 10:48 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
GOD SAVE MEDIAFIRE
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 1:26 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’m telling you man..we need to build that satellite of ours.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 1:37 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Filesharing is not piracy. Piracy is selling dvd movies down in Shenzen.
Filesharing has been happening since the dawn of the computer network. It is sad that tech blogs and sites have turned filesharing into a taboo. It is not a taboo and it is nothing immoral about it.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 7:34 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
MegaUpload didn’t get shut down because it allowed file sharing. It was shut down because the business model actively encourages sharing large media files – they charge users for premium accounts and reward the uploaders of popular files.
Yes, you could use MegaUpload for legitimate means, but I’m sure the vast majority of people would instead just use box.net, skydrive, or a free non-subscription service like mediafire.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 10:25 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
No, it was shut down because their system to filter and take down copyrighted content failed or was only for facade. They had a policy in place to take down those materials, only thing that it was just a paper, so to speak, policy.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 6:05 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
NNTP. RAR/PAR
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 9:45 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
wow! If I was a filesonic paid member, I would be filing a CC dispute. They are no longer supplying the service they were paid to provide…
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 9:46 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’ll be on DC++ if anyone needs me.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 9:58 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
looks like the terrorists won… America F#$% Ya! Score one for the World Police!
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 10:41 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Not sure what you mean by World Police. The U.S. authorities were within their rights to prosecute the owners of MegaUpload. The nationalities of the various defendants, or the countries they’ve chosen to live in is immaterial here. The alleged crime took place partially on U.S. soil. MegaUpload has 1000 servers in the U.S., they paid $13 million in hosting fees to U.S. companies between 2007-2010, and they were paying U.S. citizens rewards for uploading ‘popular’ content. Seems like a pretty strong case to me.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 3:46 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
this sucks but filesonic really did have a GRIP of infringing content on it…regardless I personally hated both filesonic, megaupload, AND most of all hotfile…I used to have alot of my stuff on FS, but then their service went down to crap…then switched to hotfile, who’s servers crashed & lost ALL my files…then megaupload which omg i can’t believe what happened.
now I have all my files on:
http://www.peeje.com/upload
…decent sized allowance, and it gives my users direct-links…which they love….so far, it’s been better than sonic, MU and HF COMBINED!!!
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 7:44 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.