Ebooks may be the future, but paper still has the edge in a few key areas — not least, speed and usability. A research team at the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) is trying to bridge that gap, however, with new page-turning technology that'll let you skim and flip through the contents of a book at your own pace. Features demonstrated on an iPad include turning multiple pages at once based on dragging time, and the ability to flip through upcoming pages while holding your place at another. While KAIST claims it's more convenient than paper-based books, we're not so sure that the gestures are as immediately obvious to the novice user. It's definitely a cool demo, though, and KAIST has filed 11 patents for it in Korea and abroad. The company does note that its prototype has been implemented with a private Apple API, so don't expect it to show up in the App Store without a bit of tweaking.
Smart Ebook System from KAIST improves page-turning experience

There are 49 Comments. Add yours.
Oh look… KIRFers got something original /s
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 8:08 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Racism aside, it looks pretty cool. I’d love this in my ebooks app – I would think it would be especially useful for chapter notes and such.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 8:25 AM EST reply Recommend (7) Flag actions
Could you elaborate? Do you know how ‘notes and highlights’ works on the iPad? You don’t have to go hunting for the page, dude.. It’s.. like.. one tap away. Same for Kinde books.
If you thought the iBook page turn animation was eye candy, then what is this? From the country that brought you TouchWiz. its the next.. um.. ‘interpretation’.. of iBooks pageturning… sweet
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 10:57 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Agreed,
Um, not to mention you can TURN OFF THE PAGE ANIMATION on an iPad.
Page animation is simply to show off how powerful the hardware is, it’s not necessary in any way and in fact anybody who insists on having that feature built into their e-reader, really should go have their head examined. It’s not necessary and it’s why apple always introduces features like that as something extra and not as a major selling point.
What you want is instant access to the next page, and maybe just fast as hell page turning without bells and whistles. Anything other than that is just not needed except to placate people who are afraid of technology.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 12:54 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
As someone who’s been reading on tablets for ages, I strongly disagree.
It’s not about page turning, it’s about finding things, especially in scientific literature, where you have to skip back and forth all the time.
This app is genius and it’s exactly what tablets are missing today (apart from pens).
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 1:28 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Precisely. This is the first implementation of the ‘page’ paradigm in ebooks that ISN’T simply about eye candy. Here we have a dynamic more-than-animation experience that is highly usable while still remaining intuitive and easily understood. The ‘pages’ respond in a way that you would expect and not simply through drop-down or even full-screen menu options that are simply dumb lists of notations, chapters, ‘page’ ‘numbers’ or other meta data.
I imagine that it actually would be very useful for quickly skimming through notes on a page, particularly if they could be highlighted in the margins or the corners of the page as the reader ‘flipped’ through the pages.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 1:33 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Agreed. I’ve taken open book test online before and being able to quickly scan pages was very helpful. Having search functionality is great but sometimes you just remember a passage that was in a certain area of a book and you need to be able to quickly scan through to find it.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 3:07 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Well, I don’t recall saying the “iBook page turn animation was eye candy”, nor do I think there’s anything wrong with eye candy – I quite like it as long as it’s not too sweet.
I use Kindle and yeah, I’m aware of how the chapter notes work, but this seems nicer to me (personal opinion there). I think iBooks looks cool too, from what I’ve seen, but I’ve not seen this before – if I’ve missed it then my bad.
The only issue I really have is the Koreans=thieves thing, which – to me – seems like lazy racism. Perhaps I’m out of touch and racism’s coming back in, but I’m not keen on this bold new future in which we stereotype people based entirely on their geographical location.
Posted on Jan 25, 2012 | 3:37 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
what is that supposed to mean?
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 8:53 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
that u dont understand “/s”
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 9:19 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Kirf? Haha look at u. Sad isheeps. If apple came out with this youd be all over it
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 12:11 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
His post was sarcastic. He was mocking iSheep. Hence the “/s”.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 1:29 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
No, he was trying to be funny. He failed.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 6:26 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Me?.. Funny?.. You must be kiddin’….
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 6:33 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
At least they will probably licence it to other vendors. If one company I could name got it then it would only be available on one device.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 8:48 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
which company and which ONE device?
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 9:16 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
:-D
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 9:20 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
That looks very cool. Yeah sure, this kinda stuff will never have gestures that are as easy to learn as with a real book, since real books have physical feedback but still I’d say they’re as close as we’re ever gonna get (as long as we’re using a two dimensional screen and navigation surface). I love the fast flipping functionality in particular – very slick. Anyway, would love to see this on Android and iOS, and windows for that matter.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 9:00 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
i’m interest in how the anti-skeumorphic crowd react to this
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 9:54 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
We are appalled!
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 12:26 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I don’t know about the regular anti-skeumorphic crowd but I only have a problem with it when it serves no purpose other than eye-candy. In this case I think it’s actually functional. For example if you were to remove the page flip animations, arguably an eye candy effect, you’d have harder time tracking pages during fast flips because they would just switch from one another. Of course the biggest contribution of skeumorphy(?) here is that it gives user familiar cues about how to interact with the app. Leather bound fat borders around calendar app don’t really do that on the other hand. :)
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 4:09 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
From a Kindle owner, this actually looks really sweet. I would never be able to read a book on a device with an LCD screen, but for magazines this would be awesome. Hope it makes it way over to ICS eventually and not be exclusive only to iOS (that is if this company either gets bought out or cross licenses its patents on this).
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 9:00 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
no worries, it will make its way to ICS. either by licensing, or by … err … what does Google call it … “getting inspired”.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 9:17 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I particularly like the page number writing part. Hopefully iBooks will evolve into this, or at least some variation of it.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 9:17 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I’ve always missed such features!
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 9:29 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Exactly the reason why I would never buy an iPad. That’s why “closed” sucks. Period.
Creating an app like this for Android and selling it in the Android Market or through other channels is no problem at all, thanks to Android being 100% open.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 9:49 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Agreed in principle. But Android isn’t 100% open. In arbitrary percentages, it’s like 68% open. Maybe 71%, but definitely not higher than 72.8%.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 9:51 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Only if you count devices that get locked by OEMs (e.g. the bootloader or system partition write access).
But when I’m talking about Android, I mean Android. And that’s 100% open. Not only in the sense of being open source, but primarily in the sense that there’s no censorship and developers can distribute any apps they like (and of course, that also applies to media, like books, music, video content, which Apple also has the ability to censor).
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 10:12 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Actual most if not all platforms have private API’s
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 9:53 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You’re confusing something here. There are no private APIs on Android, only undocumented APIs. Huge difference!
Developers on Android are still allowed to use them, hence they’re not private – contrary to the private APIs on iOS, that can’t be used, because Apple will censor the apps that use them.
The problem is apps getting censored. There’s only one AppStore on iOS and no sideloading and Apple controls what goes into that AppStore and that excludes many, many great apps just because they’re either competing with Apple’s or using private APIs.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 10:09 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Well, do Google’s apps and services that are “closed” suck, just because they’re closed? What about the ones that are expected to be part of any mainstream Android install?
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 10:38 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Closed sucks. Period. And yes, that means “open” apps and services that others can integrate with are better. But there’s still a huge difference between something like a mail or mapping service and an entire OS. And Google’s services are not any more closed than the offerings from other companies (e.g. Hotmail, Bing Maps etc.).
Indeed, thanks to Android’s openness, you can always install/use a different (competing) app or service, something that Apple won’t allow.
Don’t like Google’s music player? No problem, install a different one.
Don’t like Google’s books/music/app store? No problem, install a different one.
So, if the platform is open, closed apps/services on top of it are not a problem. A closed platform is a problem. Hence, I’d never buy an iOS device (again).
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 10:52 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Reasonable opinion. I’ll stick with iOS devices though as long as the app quantity (tablet) and quality is higher – the fact that someone can’t write an app with a private API is far less important to me that people are writing great apps that I want to use within the allowed APIs :) Also, I’m guessing allowing “undocumented” APIs means there’s a greater chance of an app breaking with the eventual software updates. And having a greater chance of installing malware to my mobile device on the official app store is not something that appeals to me in any way.
Just saying there are still advantages to both approaches.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 11:04 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
No, there are absolutely no advantages to putting up with censorship.
The fact that someone can’t write an app using private APIs, along with the fact that Apple doesn’t like competition, is the main reason why app quality and quantity will fall behind in the long run, once the hype goes away.
You can only write so many quality apps for the same purpose. But for some purposes, there will never be any apps at all on iOS. This one is a good example. Emulators are another. Flash (whether you like it or not). And many, many more…
I really prefer being able to find an app for anything, instead of finding ten apps that do the same thing and none at all for another thing, because of some arbitrary restrictions.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 1:41 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Just to be clear: Being open does not mean you have to allow malware into your store. That’s not a by-product of the open model. It’s just a by-product of Google’s execution, probably for a lack of resources.
Hence why I said there are no advantages to the closed model.
In fact, Google could even start censoring their own store and still be open, as long as side-loading is allowed.
In turn, I would definitely have no problem with Apple censoring their store if they allowed side-loading, too.
I wouldn’t want to live in a city where the mayor owns the only supermarket and controls what gets sold there and does not allow competing markets to be built.
That’s exactly the situation with iOS. Hence why I wouldn’t buy into that ecosystem.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 2:03 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
THis is pretty awesome, if not implemented perfectly, it’s a great feature that should hopefully make it.
I love my Kindle, but the biggest problem with it, and others, is not be able to quickly flip from one area back to another like you can in a book. For instance, in the Song of ICe & Fire Series, I’m constantly flipping from where I’m reading to the maps in the beginning and end of the books, just so remind myself where places area, etc. On a physical book, this is done in one second, you place your finger where you’re reading and flip to page 6 or whatever where the map is… and flip back. It’s instant and you don’t think about it.
On the Kindle, you have to press the menu button, then go to table of contents, then go to like “forward” or something, and then usually skip a few pages ahead or back, and then getting back to your furthest read page is more steps. It’s 20 or 30 seconds of just navigating, especially if you don’t do it often.
I love E-Readers, but an easier way to flip content and find just what you want would be a great change. I don’t know if this solves the problem, but it’s a nice evolution of the page turner.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 9:50 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Seems like there should just be a “quick flip” feature where you designate a page (or pages) that will be flipped to with the press of a button or a gesture, and the same button or gesture brings you back to wherever you were in the text. In iBooks you can do this with bookmarks, it still takes 3 taps or so, but doesn’t take anywhere near 20 or 30 seconds.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 10:45 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I’m torn. Page animations are quite nice in practice, but they only exist to emulate a dying medium. Much in the way that the iBooks UI (inadequately) emulates a physical bookshelf. In a way, the forged pagination systems of eBooks seems antithetical to the whole HyperText/digital text revolution.
Functionally, these “fast-paging” techniques could be made totally obsolete by creating a great table of contents and a great bookmarking system….that people actually use.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 12:19 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Or, if I may humbly suggest, an entirely new method of navigation that uses these new-fangled tools in a way as-yet-unconsidered? I’m not saying I’m smart enough to know what the reinvention of the “table of contents” will be; I’m saying I feel that too much energy is being put into replicating what we already have, rather than thinking much more forward. What Aldus PageMaker did to publishing is what I’d like to see done on the media consumption level with these new toys.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 12:31 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
the last one killed me
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 1:29 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
ebook, epub, ibook, pdf, text, apps, websites !
What is needed in this “affair” is a new role more than anything else.
This new role could be described as “personal contracts/licences holder” “account managers for personal contract/licences and login/passwds or certificates”(no contents or copies in there, just references), something like that, several of them of course, and ability to move all your “assets” or “belongings” from one to the other, so that a trust relationship can exist regarding the privacy of these data (and privacy of these data also under strong legal constraints for these organisations).
Then you can have an environment with a clear role separation between these organisations on one side, and editors, on line shops, on line content holders and difusers on the other.
Which then could allow a user to buy an ebook, apps, websites (access to) “for life”(or with some timing guarenteed in a strict legal point of view, but “for life” in spirit), possibility of upgrade if new edition and you feel like it, and that’s it.
Enough with these “private bookshelves”(music, video, sito shelves) linked to some device maker, on line shops, “social network”, or some other giant !
A bit more developed below :
http://iiscn.wordpress.com/2011/05/15/concepts-economie-numerique-draft/
(and in the “copies_licences” text (2007) linked in the post)
And almost EVERYTHING already there really
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 1:33 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
that’s a great idea.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 2:04 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
As long as the interface and specific gestures are customizable, so I can turn off ones I know I’ll never use, lest they come up when I’m not in fact trying to do them, I’m game. This looks excellent.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 2:49 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Hope this is in iBooks 3
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 3:02 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
This is all very cute from an artistic standpoint. ("Let’s try to make a digital interface feel like its digital counterpart, like those jukebox-style media players from the 90’s! Those were cool, right?"). However, I really don’t think this will ever get anywhere sane by trying to mimic the act of flipping pages made out of paper, because ebooks are none of those things: they are not paper, they are (usually) not locked to pages, and you don’t need to flip them.
Why not just try to just make something that works well? Instead of trying to poorly mimic the strengths of analog media (while amplifying its flaws), how about make something that just works well for digital books?
For example, ebooks really don’t need to be anchored around imaginary seams in the middle. If I want to refer to the last line of the previous page, I should be able to do that, but it’s really hard with this "mimic a real book" idea because you can’t do that in a real book without moving your head, tearing the seam or folding the page (or flipping the page all the way, which defeats the purpose).
That’s why I’m a big fan of FBReader on Android: with page turning in Shift mode (and scrolling vertically), I can peek back at the last few lines, while the text I was reading before remains visible, instead of obscured by the last page. That little interaction actually makes reading more efficient for me, because I can see the text flowing smoothly from one page to the next (which is sometimes really useful) while still having the good part of flipping pages. That being pages themselves, not that they’re made of paper.
The finger bookmark thing is cool, but I feel like that’s a case where you really are thinking about the book more than the content, even with an actual physical book. So, I really don’t see why it would be bad to have some extra interface pop up and help with the job rather than forcing the user to perform some crazy gymnastics while supposedly balancing their phone / tablet / whatever on their lap.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 4:59 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
tl;dr
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 6:26 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Google buy them right now.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 6:26 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
How long till apple rolls this into iBook3 and then sues the company that made it!?
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 7:25 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I think you should be over at Engadget..
opens door
Posted on Jan 24, 2012 | 5:28 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.