We've seen urban cars with a single, windshield-mounted door and we've seen a baby stroller that can fold itself, but this is the first time we've seen the two combined. It's called the Hiriko (Basque for "urban"), and a full-sized prototype of the folding electric car was unveiled in front of the European Union Commission chief in Brussels yesterday. The tiny vehicle isn't just a Smart car: it can fold to minimize the amount of space it takes, and three of the vehicles can fit in a typical parking spot once folded.

Making a car that can fold itself isn't as simple as adding some hinges; the Hiriko has a single, upward-swinging windshield instead of doors and each of the Hiriko's four wheels contain a drive motor, steering, braking, and suspension, leaving the inside of the car uncluttered and free to be collapsed. The wheels also give the car a zero-point turning radius (meaning it can spin in place) and enough speed to drive safely on city streets. It's said that the Hiriko will have a 100 kilometer (about 60 mile) range, and it's target price for individuals is €12,500 (about $16,355).
The Hiriko is the commercial version of MIT Media Lab's CityCar, and the model demonstrated in Brussels represents the first full-sized prototype. Although it's possible that the vehicle will be sold to individuals, it's planned for shared-use projects like the bicycle sharing programs that are popular in many European cities. If you can't wait to see the Hiriko in person, you're probably going to have to head to Vitoria Gasteiz near Bilbao, Spain, where a 20-unit pilot program is scheduled to start up next year. If you can't make it there, you'll be glad to hear that San Francisco, Berlin, Barcelona, Malmö, and Hong Kong have shown interest in the program as well.
Check out a full gallery of photos at the National Post of the Hiriko prototype's unveil, and see below for an MIT clip on the CityCar and a Spanish video from the event in Brussels.

There are 32 Comments. Add yours.
I feel sorry for people who compensate…things….with a huge SUV, they have less and less choices.
^^
Posted on Jan 25, 2012 | 8:42 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
…but we can haul more and more stuff…
Posted on Jan 25, 2012 | 11:34 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Why do people like you always insist its about compensation? I enjoy driving my jeep, because of the utility it offers. Let me guess, you’re a Prius or Insight or other like vehicle? Its divers like you who make everyone hate people who own eco-pods.
Consider this, in the not so distant future, when the majority of energy is generated via wind/solar/other green tech, what would be wrong with driving larger vehicles? My guess is that many people will revert to using larger vehicles out of utility, or just because they enjoy them.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 12:44 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
energy will always be valuable.. And they could make a removable chassis with a motor for larger hauls when you need it.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 12:57 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
such a petty comment.
I have an SUV because I have 4 young kids and I wanted them to be strapped in their car seats. And the youngest are twins only 16 months old so has to be a car with a decent size boot that can hold a twin pram as well. My Q7 TDi gives me about 14 km/l. The Prius I think, gives 27 km/l, but thats not going to fit my family of 6 :)
We use the tools that fit our circumstances. Its not for some societal affirmation or “compensation”.
I think the Hiriko is an awesome idea though.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 1:44 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
People had kids before SUVs were invented…. That’s what mini-vans and station wagons were for.
However i’t not just SUVs all cars on the road have gotten unecessarily bigger in order to compensate for all the other big cars and SUVs on the road. Look at a car today vs a car from the 80s and it’s obvious,
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 3:36 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I agree to an extent. Look at a Mini now. Hardly suits its name does it. Effing thing is as big as a small truck.
Most MPV’s can seat 7 people in their 3 rows but will have no space in the boot for a twin pram. I live in Singapore so we don’t always get the same car as in the US.
The Honda Odyssey would have sufficed as well as the Q7 but it was a 2.4L with 5 gears and no airbags for the 3rd row. The sales guy at Honda was excited because the car had AC!!! Look we have AC in the 3rd row. I say eff that… where’s the airbag? Which child do I put in the last row? The one I like the least?? Perhaps the missus…. thats a thought.
The big Audi on the other hand ended up costing me ~ 20% more than the Honda. Was safe where it mattered and with its 3.0 TDI was just as efficient with its mpg.
Look, I’m not saying one is better than the other. I drove small cars all my life. Sometimes, people have to drive a car thats big because they have a need for it. Its just not right to judge/insinuate without knowing all the circumstances.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 8:39 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’m not judging or complaining, just amused at the different worlds…
Over here in the UK an Audi Q7 is considered a “tank” or “drug dealer” car, and most families like yours would drive a 7 seat family car, about 2/3 the size but with the same space, expected to do 20km/l as a bare minimum!
I guess the fact we pay nearly $2 a litre might affect things though…
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 8:37 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Lol at the drug dealer car. I’d agree if its black with 22" alloys. No… mine is a more modest 18" and white. No blacked out windows either.
I live in Singapore btw, and the fuel here is about US1.80/litre. The cars aren’t cheap either. Government puts a 130% import duty and a 7% sales tax on that. And before you can register, they make you buy a paper (COE) saying you’re entitled to a car. The COE is bought on auction. I paid about US50,000 for my COE. After that, another US170,000 for the Q7 itself. The road tax and insurance isn’t cheap either.
All of this is to discourage car ownership. But with my big family, its an absolute necessity. I only use in the evening and weekends so its somewhat better. All other times, its the tube/bus.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 8:43 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Wow that is some expensive ownership costs with all the duty and taxes! Sorry for some reason assumed you lived in America to begin with. And yeh I think the drug dealer thing definitely comes from the 22" rimmed ones in black, with the blacked out windows! They do look pretty damn good though! Anyway, Im sure you chose the right car for you and your family…
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 11:25 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
This looks small enough to just throw on the back of a pickup truck to steal. Don’t even have to break into the vehicle anymore!
Posted on Jan 25, 2012 | 8:44 PM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
Why do I want my car folding up again? I assume it isn’t drivable in that position, and it will just encourage people to part so close that you can’t unfold. Seems dumb to me.
Also you better hope you didn’t leave any drinks in the cup holder.
Posted on Jan 25, 2012 | 9:09 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
To avoid getting stuck in the car, it’s designed so that you park 90 degrees to the curb. In its folded-up form it’d stick out from the curb when parked at 90 degrees no more than a typical car would when parked parallel to the curb. See the first video for an illustration of this.
Posted on Jan 25, 2012 | 9:20 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
If this means you can get those impossibly small curbside valid parking spaces in San Francisco (and I’d assume similar cities), you could save $40-$60 on parking per day. :o
Posted on Jan 25, 2012 | 9:27 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
This is dumb. You’re gonna need an extra car just for your groceries. Plus, you’ll just get laughed at wherever you go because it’s the most wimpy looking car ever.
Posted on Jan 25, 2012 | 9:24 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
it sounds like a good idea but this kind of round small design will never sell to this generation of Americans
Posted on Jan 25, 2012 | 9:55 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
i wouldnt buy it because it is hideous, make something attractive thats small and i’ll consider it.
Posted on Jan 25, 2012 | 10:16 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
it has to be round cause they are trying to maximize volume
so until some badass designer is born and creates something that looks good and maximizes volume all “city cars” will look something like this a bubble basically
Posted on Jan 25, 2012 | 10:52 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
because of mindset or bulging midsections?
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 12:03 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Let me know when it folds into a briefcase. Then we’ll talk.
Posted on Jan 25, 2012 | 9:46 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Donald Duck can beat that.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLhW51HMNUY&t=1m50s
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 3:05 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
lol. this is dumb.
Posted on Jan 25, 2012 | 10:16 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
“Shared-use projects” guys. This is for cities to have a taxi or subscription-based service for a more individualized public transport option.
Posted on Jan 25, 2012 | 10:51 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The problem with projects like this at the moment is that the city infrastructure is built around a normal sized car. I used to see Smart Cars in San Francisco and see a few here in LA. But they don’t make much sense here because there are no spaces built for a vehicle that size. There are a couple Smart cars that park at my local grocery store with normal parking spaces. It still takes up a whole parking space alone unless you happen to just travel everywhere with another Smart car driver so you can share parking spaces. And since it doesn’t get amazing gas mileage, it’s basically a car without a purpose (here).
A lot of city parking situations require parking in metered parking spaces. There’s no point in having a tiny vehicle to park in a whole parking space. In fact, having a very small vehicle in that situation might actually be detrimental because it encourages other people to just share your space since it’s already paid. Until they start making spaces built for very small city cars, there’s no advantage to them.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 12:17 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Meet George Jetson!
Posted on Jan 25, 2012 | 11:35 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
So lets say you find yourself in a city that has more than three of these things… what are the chances that they are all going to find one another, and park with enough space to fit two more in the same spot? We all know the first one of these is going to park just offset from the center of the parking spot, making it impossible to fit two more of these things in the same space.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 12:48 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I don’t think this would be as practical state-side as a similarly-sized gas-powered car that doesn’t fold up..we could really use the mileage for long commutes (at least in so cal).
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 1:21 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
Godsakes, when will manufacturers get it: People want a REAL car, not some gimmick that will cost 2x more than a Hyundai or Toyota with less functionality.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 1:46 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I understand that it is a gimmick but the price said $16,000 definitely not twice as much as a hyundai or toyota. In fact, that’s more like half the price of a prius. This model has actually been around for a long time. They ran a tv thing on it like 2 or 3 years ago. But it really isn’t going to go anywhere. These kind of cars will be the ones we “have” to use in 500 years when populations are more than the cities were designed for. But really, we’re just gonna do the same thing we always do.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 9:05 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Disney did it better.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLhW51HMNUY&t=1m50s
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 3:05 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
But are electrics vehicles really an option for business use?
Andrew Yeoman, the Managing Director at Trimble UK said in his recent blog (http://www.trimblemediaeurope.com/blog/4560012387):
"The recent launch of the Hiriko electronic car has propelled electric vehicles into the limelight once again. These new funky, zero-emissions cars are not only environmentally friendly but also claim to be a ‘social innovation’! The idea being that local authorities owns a fleet of Hiriko cars and rent one to people when they need it – for a small fee. This makes them ideal in large cities where limited mileage is covered and charging points are plentiful. But are these or indeed any electric vehicle really of any use in the business world?
Would the average businessman or woman use these cars to drive up and down
the motorway to attend meetings or to load up the boot with the tools and
equipment they need to do their jobs out on the road? Probably not today.
While electric vehicles are wonderful in terms of green credentials, in reality at the
moment they can be expensive and impractical for those doing significant miles.
Take for example a typical field or service engineer, for argument sake lets say a
printer engineer. They travel an average of 500 miles per week, carrying 5kgs of
equipment plus, in many cases, a spare printer adding another 35kgs. An electric
car would be totally unviable for them due to current vehicle range and battery life.
The manufacturers manual states that they’d have to charge their vehicle every 50-75 miles but with a lack of charging points across the country, it would be impossible for the engineers to reliably get from appointment to appointment.
And of course, lets not forget that electronic vehicles cost between £10-15,000 more than a ‘normal’ petrol/diesel car.
So what’s the answer? It’s clear electric vehicles aren’t yet suitable for the business world but macro hybrid vehicles are. They don’t cost the earth but with their combined electric and internal combustion engine they will help save the earth. They can be filled up at any service station or charged where a point is available saving an average of 20% on annual fuel costs. They are now a viable option for businesses and could be the first step in paving the way for electric vehicles to offer the same value in the future."
Posted on Jan 30, 2012 | 10:55 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I am surprised to see such folding car .It is really amazing.Is it possible ,if yes it can solve parking problem completely.Keep sharing updates.
car rental Singapore
Posted on Feb 07, 2012 | 8:06 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.