According to an interview with Mobile Magazine, HTC UK boss Phil Roberson says that the company will be looking to reduce the number of devices it releases this year — a concept we've been pushing for at The Verge, and a trend echoed by Motorola CEO Sanjay Jha recently at CES. The talk of a strategy shift is hot off the news of a weak Q4 earlier this month, and seems to be a tacit admission that flooding the market with countless SKUs isn't a profitable concept (unless, perhaps, you're Samsung).
Furthermore, Roberson says that HTC will "take a backseat" in the tablet market without exiting it completely — in other words, it's not likely to chase Samsung's strategy of a tablet for every conceivable market and form factor. Said Roberson, "So 2012 is about giving our customers something special. We need to make sure we do not go so far down the line that we segment our products by launching lots of different SKUs."
Word of a strategy shift in Peter Chou's house isn't necessarily new: the company has been saying since November that it wants to re-focus on the product, and a BGR report from December pegged 2012 as a lighter year for HTC SKUs. Is it the right move? By all accounts, it would seem so — as long as it can keep customers excited in the design language and continue to compete head-to-head in the eternal Android specs game.

There are 47 Comments. Add yours.
That doesn’t really mean that their items won’t look the same, does it?
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 3:02 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
all htc phones will continue to look like slightly modified htc evo until the year 2023 when they go extinct.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 1:21 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I think it was actually the Nexus One that kicked off their current hardware design language
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 6:36 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Hallelujah, HTC.
Differentiation is the only way you can succeed. You used to have style, build quality and customer service but you blew it.
Lets see some inspiration.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 3:04 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
Hopefully they’ll tone down DenseUI enough to give a high-end phone a battery life longer than 4 hours
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 3:04 PM EST reply Recommend (16) Flag actions
-htc will not change sense.
android is the reason for bad battery life. all android phones get crap battery life. until the day you admit that, you will continue to blame things like sense as if its an app when its not, its just a modified version of the android OS.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 1:28 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
HTC phones get worse battery life than any other Android phone.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 10:21 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
My Galaxy Nexus has awesome battery life. Even with moderate to heavy use I end the day with well over a third left.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 6:37 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’d love to see them have a go at a portrait slider, as discussed on this week’s mobile podcast.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 3:14 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Last one was the G2/Desire Z, If I’m not very much mistaken. So yeah, it’s time for a revamp!
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 6:08 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Those are landscape not portrait..
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 6:47 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
You’re holding it wrong.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 9:27 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
All the same, HTC need to revamp it. It’s almost two years old now.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 3:31 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Hehe, HTC recinded his dumping the of models on us. I have been saying its crazy how many HTC models are out there. I am sure they themselves have lost track of these models. Throwing so many models out there and watch what sticks is not a true strategy, it doesn’t bind users to your Logo. What Apple got going for it is the visibility of its product, every idiot on this planet can recognize every Apple’s product, they are distinctive, and recognizable. I am glad these OEMs are learning a thing or two from Apple.
Also this encourages third-party accessories manufacturers to produce for your product, which drives adoption.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 3:15 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
I’d HTC has a very strong brand language. You’d be able to say that’s an HTC device. The only issue is you’d never be able to say which one it is since they are all the same.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 3:55 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
It’s mindboggling that tech companies still don’t get consumers or users at all. I would say that at least 50% of Apple’s success is because it’s easy to buy the product. They even tell you WHEN to buy it(at the yearly refresh)!
If you want a phone, you get an Iphone. If you want a tablet you get an iPad. For a small laptop, an MBA.
Apple’s product line is simple and each product is distinct. I almost broke down and got an iPhone when I bought my first smartphone, because I had to spend weeks if not more to research which one I wanted. For every single other manufacturer you need to decide between an infinite number of minor variations of the product, like Asus eee 1205b or 1205c. Who cares?
In the end I got a Galaxy S2, but I just barely managed to avoid the closed future of the fruit.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 1:22 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
HTC and other mfcs should settle on at most 4 models. 1 highend, flagship, 1 budget, 1 with a keyboard(?) and one for games or one that is rugged like the Defy.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 1:24 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
So now instead of having 35 versions of the same phone they’ll only have 12?
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 3:20 PM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
Even that would be start..
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 3:22 PM EST reply Recommend (14) Flag actions
And if they committed to timely OS updates on even half of those 12 models we’d be making real progress.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 3:48 PM EST reply Recommend (6) Flag actions
I didn’t realise The Verge had a resident comedian.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 6:49 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Sounds about right. 1 cheap one, 1 middle one, 1 high end, and 1 older one. per carrier. Sounds better…
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 8:44 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Wow… about time common sense was brought back into the smartphone market.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 3:22 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
This is smart. Remember how RIM got shafted for wasting months of engineering hours and millions of dollars on Playbook with nothing to show for it. The tablet market is not for players who are financially constrained. Focus on what you’re good at, make that the money maker and then diversify.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 3:22 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
This makes me glad. HTC is one of the few electronics manufacturers that seems to actually listen to feedback on things like this—they offered a solution to the locked bootloaders, now this
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 3:31 PM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
this is awesome
i would divide the market in to 4 categories and make 2 devices for each:
high end phones:
with/without keyboard
mid range phones:
with/without keyboard
low end phones:
with/without keyboard
tablets:
10" and 7"
that would satisfy most of the customers and you can focus on making great devices and providing good support/fast updates
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 3:33 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
that would be android devices, as htc also makes WP devices I would add one touch WP device for each category (excluding tablets of course)
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 3:35 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Funny, I was just going to say the same thing, except substitute mid-range phones for tablets: high end phone / low end phone; large tablet / small tablet
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 6:11 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
NOOO! ME LIKE Mid-Range devices. They work right for the right price! But yes, add WP7 devices in each category. (In fact, just change the buttons and slap WP7 on there.)
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 8:46 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I would totally agree with you.. in an ideal world where the handset manufacturer calls the shots.
unfortunately, HTC doesn’t get to tell AT&T or Sprint what they’ll be selling this year.
If HTC made just 2 ‘high end’ devices (with and without keyboards) who would they sell them to? Do you really think Sprint, T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T would just stock them and start selling them against each other?
of course not.
Verizon would buy some, but insist on some sort of exclusive “differentiating” higher-end screen, ‘value-add apps’ pre-installed and call it the “Droid Dominatrix” or something.
T-Mobile would want some other slightly-lower-spec-so-we-can-hit-$99-on-contract variant that works on HSPA+ and is called the “MyTouch 4G Beats Ultimate Lucky Fun Wonder Panda”…
Sprint would call it the EVO Extreme 4G and tweak something else…
..and don’t get me started on the regional carriers..
This is how the jacked up mobile industry works in the world’s largest market for smartphones, and HTC is high and drunk if they think they’ll just be able to rise above it all.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 10:18 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Hmmm a company that doesn’t release a million small variations of the same product but focuses on doing several well. Nope, can’t say that’s worked well before at all. If I were them I’d stick with re-releasing the same phone several times with a .1GHz speed bump each time. Oh yeah, and more Beats audio please. The average consumer can reallllllly tell the difference.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 3:41 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
The average consumer can tell the difference between a phone branded with Beats audio and one branded without it. That’s all that matters, and has been proven true by the Beats headphone line.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 3:53 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I’m not so sure that Beats audio is an asset to HTC after all.
Before the Beats models, HTC could hardly keep up with the demand for their phones and had one record sales quarter after another. Since they included Beats audio and focussed their marketing on that, their sales have tanked dramatically.
So maybe the Beats audio thing was a mistake?
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 6:58 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Nah, I’m pretty sure it was saturation. That and that their phones haven’t reviewed as good as GSII.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 8:47 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Beats hasn’t done a thing to help HTC. (or vice versa)
Nothing.
It’s basically the equivalent of acer’s “Ferrari” laptops -a shallow transparent co-branding effort which provides nothing of real value to the consumer. Usually consumers are stupid and they’ll eat it up.. Not in this case.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 1:28 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It is about damn time HTC.. I used to love HTC Phones. Used to own several of them, but you dropped the ball big time. I hope you guys get your act together and innovate once again. Looking forward to some great 2012 devices. Hopefully SENSE can be toned down… please ? awesome
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 3:54 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Good move. No one wants to buy a phone that’s sure to be obsolete in 2 weeks —courtesy of the manufacturer you just paid.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 3:59 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Probably the consumer’s reaction to multiple models of the same phone, with minor changes and increments, or design changes simply for different carriers. The 2011 Android line-up for HTC was the Sensation, EVO 3D; and Incredible, Desire, and Wildfire S models. The Explorer then replaced the Wildfire S and they introduced the 4.5" Holiday. So that’s 7 phones they had released (I count the XE and XL as a model and not brand new phones). Shame they didn’t just release them universally instead of introducing 25+ models of those phones.
This year I would suggest 6 phones. One 3.2", 3.7",4.0",4.3", 4.6" (I believe 4.5" and 4.7" phones are just unnecessary. A 4.6" phone is the sweet spot.), and one with a keyboard and a determinable screen size. Make WP7 models of out the latter 5, and there’s your 2012 line-up. Don’t change names and alter the look of the device just for the carriers. And finally, add a bit of longevity to these phones. This lineup should be yearly, not every 7 months.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 4:16 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
hope you’re listening, samsung.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 6:36 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Hopefully this translates into “world radios” making their way into the market for all carriers, including those that do not tend to play well with GSM frequencies. . . yeap, I’m looking at you Verizon.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 6:43 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
TO me if the Android Army does not get its house in order pronto they are asking to be killed by Win 8.
Too many models, too many products left to die in the cold. Who would want to buy a $400 device and not be sure there is going to be support 2 years down the road….
My 8 year old laptop can take an upgrade to Window 7, why cant a 1 year old phone be supported for ICS>
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 7:09 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
These guys talking about this might make sense at first blush, but how will they really be able to pull this off?
They aren’t Apple.
Samsung – the only company that’s really winning in this race – is doing so with the shotgun approach, and it’s working for them because the reality is that carriers want a diverse product line – both in hardware, pricing and software.
If HTC whittles down their product offering to just three or four phones – even if they’re great – they’re essentially getting into a hit making game and that’s Apple’s territory.
HTC needs to be able to go to a carrier and say “here’s our catalogue of phones, if you don’t like them, we’ll tweak something, add your bloatware, silkscreen your logo on it.. whatever it takes” – that’s how it works.
That’s the reality that they live in and in the near term it’s not going to change. Verizon doesn’t want to sell the same phones that AT&T does – they want a unique phone that you can only get on their service.
The only time they’re willing to make exceptions is if you can deliver the sheer demand of an Apple product and HTC can’t.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 8:22 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Which is complete bullshit. I want my phone the way I want my phone, carrier be damned.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 8:27 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
yes it is.
..but it is the way of things – in the US anyway.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 10:05 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Now for the rest of Android phone makers to do this.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 10:09 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
HTC can call it what they want … I call it “consumers speaking with their wallets”.
I’m sure RIM could find a way to show that not selling any playbooks was their idea too.
HTC needs to really scale Sense back, and stop making their phones out of concrete. Just because apple says thick and heavy is an option doesn’t mean you should do it.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 12:23 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
HTC has been lackluster this year, and there locking down of all their software made it even worse!
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 2:07 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.