Twitter says that it now has the ability to censor tweets for specific countries, which allows it to block out content that violates local laws without restricting it to rest of the world. The company says that it will be entering countries that have "different ideas about the contours of freedom of expression" as it expands, and cites France and Germany's ban on pro-Nazi content as an example of the need for such a feature.


Twitter already censors content that violates certain laws — most of them are DMCA takedowns — but until now it had to censor those tweets globally. The company says it hasn't used the new ability yet, but that it will let users know when it does, and clearly mark when certain content has been withheld. It's also expanded its partnership with Chilling Effects, a web censorship watchdog archive, to make censorship actions more transparent.
Twitter says this new tool is intended for "reactive" use, and it's not clear how the company will handle fringe cases where laws may be overly prohibitive, or in circumstances where new laws complicate freedom of expression. Despite the shift in policy, the company stresses that "the tweets must continue to flow," and that it still intends to "defend and respect each user's voice." Of course, local laws may not always do the same, so we'll have to wait and see which laws Twitter thinks are worth upholding.
Update: Twitter just updated its post with a little more detail -- it says that it has no plans to pre-filter content, and that it will only withhold specific content when prompted by what it believes is a "valid and applicable legal request." The company says it will "evaluate each request before taking action," and that any content it removes will be clearly identified for users in the country where it's withheld. It's still not clear what Twitter considers to be "valid and applicable," but we're sure to find out as the new tool is utilized.

There are 32 Comments. Add yours.
So Super-injunctions will now be Twitter-proof, this is a sad day for normal people, but a good day for Ryan Giggs.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 7:00 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 7:02 PM EST reply Recommend (6) Flag actions
I think you mean DMCA
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 7:02 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Whoops!
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 7:09 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
don’t forget the related items tag!
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 8:17 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
great, now twitter is evil to!?!
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 7:04 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
*two
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 7:05 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
*too
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 7:05 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
tout
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 7:06 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
deux
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 7:20 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You*

Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 7:30 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Two words: Streisand Effect.
Anything that’s viewable at least partially, pretty soon will be globally viewable. How does this stop screenshots/videos/audio of the offending tweet being posted to Twitter and distributed to those censored users?
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 7:06 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
It seems to me, that’s a feature, not a bug.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 7:13 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I’m of two minds with this, I don’t want anyone’s legitimate speech to be censored by any government whatsoever, but I do believe in protecting copyright as well as many other laws.
If twitter ends up censoring everything China asks then this is a terrible idea, if its used to stop copyright violators then its not so bad.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 7:14 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Copyright?
I don’t think pirated tweets are a massive problem.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 7:23 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
I guess the Indian government is going to be really happy now. No one’s going to be allowed to smack tweet any politician anymore. Which is what the whole brouhaha has been about anyway (the censor the internet bit that’s been coming up of late).
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 9:57 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
They should censor the spam already. I don’t want the free iPads.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 7:18 PM EST reply Recommend (16) Flag actions
Sucks. I mean, good for Twitter and their ability to exist in foreign countries… But bad for rights in general
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 7:28 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
it’s just great. we thought twitter is the ultimate weapon of revolution. now, it’s another big brother arm
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 8:28 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Won’t be very useful if it’s banned for good. Secondly, I don’t think Twitter ever volunteered themselves to be a tool for revolutions.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 9:08 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
This is all good twitter but you still have to deal with the recent spam going into my DM
_Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 8:46 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
FUCK THIS SHIT!
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 9:13 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I love the header picture.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 9:20 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
people still use twitter?
i suppose too much more of this kind of thing and we can be rid of it for good.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 9:50 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
…what do you have against Twitter dude?
It’s a very good service. Better than Facebook or Google+ IMO.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 6:07 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
…what do you have against Twitter dude?
It’s a very good service. Better than Facebook or Google+ IMO.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 6:08 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Oops, double post. Could a mod or admin or whatever delete this please?
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 6:10 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’m as against censorship as the next net neutrality supporter, but in the case of projecting our views on what these countries feel shouldn’t be said (Nazism support, etc.), I feel they should have the ability to regulate what goes on wherever they hold sovereign authority. It was very open minded of twitter to create a state by state censorship feature that respects local laws, and I don’t feel its a bad thing.
I think many people put the internet above state (sovereign) law a lot of the time, and I don’t believe we should feel responsible for projecting what we believe the internet should be on other states and their respective cultures.
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 10:41 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
That’s a good reason to pay for VPN services…
Posted on Jan 26, 2012 | 10:51 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2012/01/26/twitter-commits-social-suicide/ a good take on the subject
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 5:26 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 6:17 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Wonder how much this has to do with a $300 million investment from a Saudi prince?
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/12/19/saudi-prince-invests-300-million-in-twitter/
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 6:16 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.