When Poland signed the controversial Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement yesterday, lawmakers from the left-wing Palikot's Movement showed their dissatisfaction in an unusual way: by donning the Guy Fawkes masks popularized by the group Anonymous. Besides their association with a group known for protesting censorship and anti-piracy laws, the printed masks — which are ironically counterfeits of a design owned by Time Warner — are also a symbol of the kind of expression critics fear ACTA would suppress.
These politicians aren't the only ones in Poland protesting the decision. Poland was among the 22 European countries that signed the treaty yesterday, and dissent over ACTA has been widespread, with thousands of protesters taking to the streets in Polish cities and citizens raising fears that the treaty's broad anti-piracy statutes will lead to sites or information being blocked online. Anonymous itself has also joined the protests, rending Polish government websites unreachable for days with DDOS attacks. Although the Foreign Minister has defended the decision to sign, Poland's largest opposition party has called for a referendum on the treaty, making Poland's continued support of ACTA far from certain.
Image Credit: Daniel Molkentin (Twitter)

There are 27 Comments. Add yours.
That one guy phoning….
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 9:08 AM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
“Yes hi, I’d like one Anonymous Guy Fawkes mask to go. Rush delivery please.”
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 9:23 AM EST reply Recommend (16) Flag actions
Our MPs will never be as awesome as these guys. :(
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 9:11 AM EST reply Recommend (9) Flag actions
That’s something you’ll never see in the US, politicians standing up for the people. Everyone over here is in the pocket of the media companies. If it wasn’t for the huge public out cry SOPA would of been a done deal.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 9:33 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend (9) Flag actions
Its very easy for the opposition government in any country to make a stand and always say the popular things because they’re not currently in charge but want to be. You’d be very naive to take this as much more than a publicity stunt to highlight the current government as being out of touch with the wants and needs of modern Poland.
Or maybe im cynical!
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 10:53 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Both of you are right:
Yes, it’s a PR stunt.
And yet, it’s very important that opposition parties support the anti-ACTA movement. If it makes such cynical political sense to oppose current government on this topic, then why it doesn’t happen in other countries? Someone has deep pockets and influence and made sure the wider public is unaware of ACTA.
But then came Poland and kicked their ass real hard.
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3502200
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 11:30 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
But the y have with the Net Neutrality bill that was opposed by Democrats by a slim margin, or by a LOT of other political moves. However if you mean the mask wearing, then you maybe right.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 11:34 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Ummm popularised by Anonymous? What kind of geeks are you guys? – the mask was popularised by Alan Moore’s graphic novel V for Vendetta. insert comic fanboy rant here Good article here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-15359735
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 9:48 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Do you know what the word popularized means? It isn’t the same word as originated. The graphic novel was completed in 1989. Please show us examples of people using the Guy Fawkes mask en masse from 1989 to 2006 (when the movie was released).
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 9:52 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Surely the point is that the masks were popularised by V for Vendetta (graphic novel or movie) and NOT by anonymous.
For what it’s worth I’d say the movie made the masks popular.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 10:51 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
but i didn’t.
while after te novel a handful of ppl would use the mask for costume parties (nunmbers probably raised a bot after the movie), it’s the use of the mask by anonymous that made the mask real “pop-culture” material … the term
“popularized” is used very apropiately here … nobody would’ve used the mask without seeing the comic/movie before anonymous started using it … now, alot (if not the majority) of ppl use it without knowing about the comic/movie … that is exactly what the term / statement “popularized by anonymous” implies …
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 11:06 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
There was an element of irony and tongue in cheek with my original comment (I’m British). To be honest it was simply a good opportunity to throw some kudos to a great graphic novel, a great writer and an interesting article on the Beeb. But I will say the terrible Natalie Portman film had a lot to do with popularising the mask.
Some spell trolling here but the correct spelling of popularizing is popularising. FIGHT!
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 11:13 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
@ Manners, I agree: too many ’z’s and ignoring the letter ‘u’… smells like “American English” to me…
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 12:13 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You can’t really get too upset with people for using the American spelling of a word on an American website..
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 11:34 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
lol
Posted on Feb 13, 2012 | 7:16 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You’ve missed my point.
I argue that the movie made the mask popular to a wider audience than a) the graphic novel and b) the hacker group anonymous; because “average regular people” have seen the movie.
No one here is an “average regular” person because we’re geeks and nerds and interested in this stuff. Even with the increase in media attention due to wiki leaks and some big hacks I’d stil argue that the average man on the street is unaware of Anonymous and/or their mask.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 12:10 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
We can always use a good comics thread. Moore’s own quote on the subject:
The big breakthrough was all Dave [Lloyd’s], much as it sickens me to admit it. More remarkable still, it was all contained in one single letter that he’d dashed off the top of his head and which, like most of Dave’s handwriting, needed the equivalent of a Rosetta Stone to actually interpret. I transcribe the relevant portions beneath:
“Re. The script; While I was writing this, I had this idea about the hero, which is a bit redundant now we’ve got [can’t read the next bit] but nonetheless… I was thinking, why don’t we portray him as a resurrected Guy Fawkes, complete with one of those papier mache masks in a cape and conical hat? He’d look really bizarre and it would give Guy Fawkes the image he’s deserved all these years. We shouldn’t burn the chap every Nov. 5th but celebrate his attempt to blow up Parliament!”
The moment I read these words, two things occurred to me. Firstly, Dave was obviously a lot less sane than I’d hitherto believed him to be, and secondly, this was the best idea I’d ever heard in my entire life. All of the various fragments in my head suddenly fell into place, united behind the single image of a Guy Fawkes mask.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 12:08 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Hey Adi, could you source that in any way?
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 7:59 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Anonymous would be proud.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 9:50 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I think you mean “appropriately” not “ironically”.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 9:51 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Thanks, that always bothers me.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 2:51 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
This bill is about as bad as SOPA or PIPA, excel that it is a global bill. President Obama signed it in October.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 10:46 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
The sad part is, in EU at least the parliaments have to ratify it.
In US, the Obama administration said that because ACTA doesn’t change US law, Congressional approval is not required. Obama will make it law by executive order.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 11:40 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
There they are!
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 11:32 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It’s sadly ironic. When watching the film V for Vendetta, you say to yourself while watching, “My country would never go this far. This could never happen”. And yet, here we are, watching as bribed politicians who have forgotten who they serve strip our rights away, week after week. Makes me wonder if they would ever go as far as they did in the film. Your first reaction would be, well no, but then look where we’re headed. We’re not that far off. Politicians already want to tell us who we can marry, if we can have abortions, etc. Pretty much just like the film.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 11:41 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
No polish jokes yet?
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 1:22 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
read this:
http://wiadomosci.gazeta.pl/wiadomosci/1,114884,11046835,Ambasada_USA_monitoruje_dzialania_komisji_sejmowej.html
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 7:23 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.