The publishing industry is in the midst of a massive decline, with sales of physical books dropping year after year, and Borders, the second-largest bookstore chain in the US, closing its doors last summer. The rise of ebooks — and Amazon's Kindle, in particular — has been a major contributing factor, but it's the maker of a popular e-reader that publishers are now pinning their hopes on: Barnes & Noble. In a profile on the company's CEO WIlliam Lynch, the New York Times examines the dynamic currently in play between traditional publishing houses and the retailer. It all comes down to bookstores: publishers view the experience of browsing in a physical location as vital to their future success, and B&N is one of the last major US chains left. "That display space they have in the store is really one of the most valuable places that exists in this country for communicating to the consumer that a book is a big deal," Random House's Madeline McIntosh told the Times. Perhaps even more importantly, it allows publishers to maintain the perceived value of a physical book over the often dramatically discounted prices Amazon and other retailers offer on digital titles.
Lynch agrees on the importance of brick-and-mortar locations, telling the paper that "our stores are not going anywhere," although its unclear what he truly sees as the company's long-term prospects. Lynch was the driving force behind the development of the Nook in 2009, and although Barnes & Noble reported a four-percent increase in physical book sales over the recent holiday season, the CEO has also floated the idea of spinning off the Nook business into its own division. Publishers confirm the Nook currently holds around 27 percent of the ebook market, compared to the 60 percent minimum Amazon garners, and B&N anticipates Nook content sales to become a $750 million business by the end of this year — with international expansion on the horizon.
This all comes amidst increasing pressure from Amazon, whose Amazon Publishing imprint has been signing exclusive deals with the likes of Penny Marshall and basketball coach Bob Knight under the stewardship of former publishing executive Larry Kirshbaum. Barnes & Noble has vowed to not carry any books in its physical locations that it can't also carry in the Nook store — an issue that came to a head last year with the Kindle Fire's exclusive with DC Comics — but should Amazon continue to gain traction, the stance will likely only dampen physical sales for B&N. That's not to say the company isn't continuing to fight on all fronts: it's currently putting the final touches on an upcoming fifth Nook device, scheduled to be released this spring.




There are 75 Comments. Add yours.
Physical books. Well, I never!
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 2:12 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I really, really want to see them succeed. Otherwise the lack of competition will hurt us all.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 2:16 AM EST reply Recommend (9) Flag actions
I really don’t think the publishing industry has the consumers best interest at heart here. I see an industry that refuses to get with the 21st century and give people what they want. A library of books they can fit in their bags.
Publishers are scared shitless because they’ll no longer have a need to exist. E-ink screens completely fill the void that would be left by them.
No different than the labels and CD sales.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 3:19 AM EST reply Recommend (18) Flag actions
Is that what people what, a library they can fit in their bags? I for one don’t. I want affordable physical books.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 9:58 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Yes. Obviously it is. I and my family want to take our books with us without breaking our backs. I am glad Amazon has made reading more affordable and accessible. My whole family is reading 2 to 3 times as many books as before. That is a good thing.
Borders and the other superstores put most small booksellers out of business. The stores are impersonal and searches there rely on their computer database instead of knowing my family.
Amazon knows what I like, makes it affordable, and delivers it without burning gas.
Its not about maximizing publishers’ profits, its about us having access to and reading good books. Thank you Amazon. Good riddance to publisher price setting.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 10:51 AM EST reply Recommend (17) Flag actions
Where are you travelling that you need to take a wheelbarrow full of books or have ample time to read so many books?
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 12:17 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Where are you travelling that requires more than a Case Logic case with 12 CD’s in it? Oh, so you want your entire music collection with you? Makes sense.
Books are no different. I carry like 50 books on my Kindle while I travel around the world. It’s not just because I can, it’s because it’s really convenient. Physical media and books are dead, man.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 3:16 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
It’s not that I necessarily need “a wheelbarrow full of books” but I typically take more than one with me. With a Kindle I can take as many books as I want along with magazines and other content I’ve put on my Kindle (I’ve read more issues of The Walking Dead on my Kindle that I have in any other format) and it weighs no more and is no bigger than if I had only taken one book. And all of this comes on top of me replacing my physical books with digital copies and making my wife happy that the books aren’t taking up so much space in the house.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 3:25 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
When I travel, I like to have a choice of what I want to read. Sure, I could take five books, but considering most things I read are at least 500 pages, that’s a LOT of bag room.
Alternatively, I could take 50 books with me, in a device that’s extremely small, comparatively. Heck, with Amazon’s store (and maybe B&N too, but not sure), I can read the books I buy fo r this devices on my phone too, which is even smaller than the e-reader.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 8:26 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The problem I have with ebooks and ereaders is that when I travel I can’t use them until the plane is over 10,000 feet so that automatically chops off 20 minutes of my flight. Since I live in the middle of the USA, most of my flights are 90 minutes. Also, if I break my iPad I’d have to restore those books from a backup. I’m also reliant on battery life, although not as bad as it used to be.
Posted on Jan 30, 2012 | 12:42 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Dont you worry about flying on a plane that will fall out of the sky if you turn your e-book on before you reach 10,000 feet?
Posted on Jan 30, 2012 | 12:20 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Have you thought of the possibility that people may want options? Sometimes, I start reading a book and GASP decide not to finish it and pick up another book instead!
Posted on Jan 30, 2012 | 7:21 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I agree. I was an avid reader when I was a kid, and then it kind of fell by the wayside as I got older and more interested in technology. Now that I have an iPad I use the Kindle app constantly. I really enjoy reading on the device. I’ve read more in the past year then the past 10 combined because of it.
Strangely, I bought one of the first eBooks I didn’t find elsewhere online yesterday from Amazon, and felt like I was missing something without getting an actual physical copy.
In all honestly, what I’d like to see the publishing industry do is similar to what recording industry artists do now, include a digital version. It’s happening with CD’s and Movies, you buy the physical copy and you get a digital copy for free, because it costs them nothing to give it to you. If books would do the same, I’d still buy physical copies to keep in my library, and read them on my iPad. Something to think about book industry.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 2:33 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Good luck with that. Paper is unfortunately far more resource intensive than, say, an eBook. If people buy like ten books on their one eReader, it basically defeats the need for paper.
Simply from logic, paper will inevitably die out, as long as Earth is the only planet with trees that we have access to.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 10:29 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
My paperback doesn’t have DRM, I can read it anywhere there’s a light source, it was cheaper than the ebook version, and I can do whatever I want with it when I’ve finished (I give mine to the local charity shop). I’m not prepared to compromise on all those things just to have the limited convenience of an electronic device. Please don’t assume that just because more people are buying ebooks that the printed word will die out by logical extension.
Posted on Feb 01, 2012 | 6:55 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Physical books are already affordable, its e-books where people are being ripped off. I’m not sure what you’re complaining about nor what your point is. Also, ebooks aren’t about how many books you can fit on your device, its about the functionality of reading on a device. I for one prefer reading complex books on my ereader because of the built in dictionary, built in citations, built in sharing, built in search, built in jump, built it bookmarks, tagging, research and annotations.. But hey, we can just plug our ears and yell lalalalala because we think the world just wants a vast library in their hands rather than price equaility.. and hell, some of us just want to save trees and not move around so much crap
Posted on Jan 30, 2012 | 8:19 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
The go to Goodwill. We’ll send you a postcard from The Future.
Posted on Jan 31, 2012 | 1:23 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
BREAKSCLUSIVE: Barnes & Noble to release the “Cranny”, a companion device to the Nook!
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 11:59 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
I don’t. The last thing I want is to have a situation like we do in the film business, where films are released on certain devices but not others.
Already it’s problematic to switch from one ereader to another. I had to buy an unlocker to get my old legally-purchased Sony reader books onto my new Kindle
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 3:48 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Guess what, when you buy a paper book, you can only read it on that book.
When you buy an ebook – B&N or Amazon, you can read it on ANY PC or Mac, on most smartphones, or on an ereader. It is much more flexible than a paper book.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 10:54 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
It is much more flexible for you to read, but with an ebook you can’t share it with however many friends you want after you buy it. You can only read it on your device or (at least with Barnes and Noble) share it once.
Posted on Jan 30, 2012 | 9:29 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
No you can’t. Certain titles are only available to be read on certain devices. Lock-in is a very real concern. Textbooks produced for iBooks will only be readable on iDevices because of a new locked-down ebook format Apple have created. Likewise, certain content is not transferable from device to device. Why should people have to own multiple devices and browse multiple online stores to access all the content they wish to purchase?
Posted on Feb 01, 2012 | 6:58 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Maybe it’s an issue with my book’s bootloader, but I can’t seem to read Game of Thrones in my Harry Potter book…
Posted on Jan 30, 2012 | 7:23 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Then buy a Nook Simple Touch. It’s a great little device, simpler and more comfortable than Kindle.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 7:49 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Sigh. I hate to agree, but the Nook Simple Touch is 1000000x more comfortable to hold than my Kindle Touch. Amazon dropped the ball this generation on the hardware. I should have just bought the Kindle Keyboard, which a bunch of my friends have and is very comfortable to hold. Oh well.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 11:29 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
i third this. the barnes and noble leaped ahead in the hardware department. i actually prefer it now to my old kindle keyboard.
Posted on Jan 30, 2012 | 3:18 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’ve tried the Nook (I bought one of those first) and the ecosystem and support for the device just aren’t as good as what the Kindle offers. I’ve not compared the comfort of the Nook Simple Touch to the Kindle Touch but I really like the Kindle Keyboard. Plus I like the “special offers” the Kindle has which I opted into.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 3:28 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
This massive shift from physical books to eBooks is a good thing in the sense that you can buy and read books much quicker. What’s more, I think Amazon’s services allows writers to reach a broader audience and therefore sell more books.
That said, I feel bad for the people who work for publishers and might lose their jobs.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 3:35 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
But don’t you feel good for the people who work designing, assembling, and marketing e-readers? :)
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 9:58 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
That’s OK, the people who manufactured, sold and serviced typewriters when the PC came to prominence found other employment.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 3:29 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I don’t understand how you can read more quickly. Yes you can access books more quickly but I don’t get your comment on reading more quickly.
Posted on Jan 30, 2012 | 12:35 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’m perfectly happy having some physical books and some ebooks myself. Shopping online for books can’t replicate the browsing experience of a book store. Most of the ebooks Ive purchased on my nook or my kindle app were spurred by seeing the book in the store but not being able to pay hardcover or premium paperback prices. I miss enough really good stuff as it is, and if I didn’t have book stores to browse I wouldn’t find even as much as I do.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 4:06 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I find exactly the opposite.
Shipping at B&N or formerly Borders, you have the books that the publisher is pushing thrown in your face at the entrance. You have to hunt for books you may like. Even when you find some, there are no reviews there and the staff knows nothing about most of the books in their stores.
At Amazon, books are recommended based on your feedback. You can still browse through and even start reading most books before buying, and can read the reviews.
And, you are not burning $10 in gas in your SUV to go to the bookstore!
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 10:58 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Borders was the worst because they would carry far less in the stores than B&N did and the billions of coupons that Borders sent out were never valid for items shipped to your house. Then again B&N always played a variation of a shell game with their discount membership. Ultimately I like my Kindle so much I’ve lost my interest in going into a B&N any more because I can browse books anywhere I like at any time.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 3:32 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I agree c. hacks. Every time I go into B&N 1/2 the time they do not have the book title I am looking for despite it being from a world-renowned prolific writer (sometimes actually had to go to a competitor Books-A-Million at times) which is another reason why I either get my books from Amazon or ebay. There are a lot of out of print books that publishers will not reprint or release in ebook format that I would like to see, namely some of Taylor Caldwell’s older novels instead of books about Justin Bieber and the Kardashians.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 6:55 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Agree wholeheartedly. I loved the local Borders and was very sad to see it close. It was a very comfortable place to go and read while enjoying a hot beverage. I would often go there and just chill for a few hours reading and sipping, and I would always leave with a new book in my hand even though I have and love a Kindle. The local B&N branches are nowhere near as inviting and comfortable, something that seemed to be unique to my area because every time I tell this story, I’m inundated with responses from people with the exact opposite experience.
My problem now is that I have a huge backlog of both ebooks and print books that I have yet to read… and I’m still buying both! I need to win the lottery so I can just read all day.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 11:34 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Careful watch you wish for, a certain Twilight Zone episode may put things into perspective for you…Time Enough at Last.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 12:52 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
I agree… Borders had awesome stores to just go and hang out in, read a magazine, browse books and movies, etc. B&N has horrible stores.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 2:36 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
What kind of Borders did you visit, Borders Taj Mahal? All of the ones I ever visited (the three near me and a few others I visited when travelling) were never as nice as any B&N I visited. The comparison for me was would I rather visit McDonald’s or Chili’s? Neither one is great but all else being equal I’d rather visit Chili’s.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 3:36 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It was a new building, built around like 2002. It was really nice. I would go there between classes sometimes just to use the bathrooms.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 3:51 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
If you want to visit a bookstore for good recommendations I recommend finding an independent bookseller. I think B&N edged out Borders in employee recommendations but neither holds a candle to an independent bookseller. Heck, I’d be willing to bet that the library would have a person or two who could make a recommendation.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 3:37 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I see the ebook reader as a great device. The next best thing. I got to the store, see it on the shelf, then check if it’s on my ereader. I’m at home, I browse amazon or BN and find a book I like, I check if it’s available for my ereader. On Amazon, I can look up if books are available for lending and take advantage of it if available. Often times if it’s a series, I’ll borrow the first and buy the rest since I can read it much faster than the month is over.
Publishers should keep their ability to publish works. They should reinvent themselves in this digital age with new digital contracts. Ereaders reach a new audience and some will convert from paperback but there can be two.
I’m sorry if I can’t be bothered to carry paperback around, and I always hate keeping a book at home because I can’t finish it. With the ereader or tablet, I can take it with me, not one but many books. I Love it. It’s literally a library in my pack everywhere I go. A perfect friend to the music I listen to while traveling.
The ereader might not smell like paper, or fold, or pick up stains or crease but it’s a part of my travels and who I am just the same. People see my ereader and they still think I like to read, just the same as when I carried a paperback with me. Not only that but I can offer to show them my library on the spot and they show me theirs and we can rediscover our reading pallet.
Books have never been convenient, so I suspect that now it’s hard to address this from a publishers perspective. It’s too convenient. People had to move around and make an effort, now it’s super easy. They don’t understand what this means. What’s the value of easy ? Does it mean less cost? More cost? Can we drive easy to mean better value? Many questions that need to be addressed by publishers.
I hope BN succeeds, sadly though, it won’t make me buy more paperbacks.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 5:53 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
I believe B&N should rethink their shop spaces. Just using them to showcase dead trees is not going to get them anywhere in the long term. I could imagine adapting those shops to be cool and comfy places to actually enjoy books, maybe socialize a bit, take ones Nook and whichever mobile device, to enjoy access to the full B&N library while there. Some may wish to take books with them, others will spend money on, ideally, excellent coffe, and most of them will return. This, selling a good time, which is inextricably linked to what books can do, is something Amazon can’t.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 6:06 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Great idea. I started noticing that in some BN, they took away benches and made it even harder to “chill” in the store. Short of forcing you to pick a book , decide to buy or not to buy and keep moving. It’s turning less and less into a place to discover books and discuss books. I don’t want it to turn into a library but having more of a social aspect seems like a great idea.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 6:21 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Publishers needn’t worry, between themselves they have colluding mechanisms and can force pricing equality among all platforms.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 7:01 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Amazon allege and the publishers are currently being investigated for colluding with Apple
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 7:36 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
B&N = US Only
Amazon = Global
Aint gonna happen
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 7:09 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The most exciting part in the post.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 7:22 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
4 percent increase during the holiday season compared to last year? Without Borders to compete with? How sad. B&N should have seen a much bigger bump.
OK, B&N, I hate to say this, but your goose is cooked. Your best hope is to be bought out by Microsoft or Google, to be used as a parry against Amazon and Apple.
Actually, the next-generation Nook running a stripped down version of Windows doesn’t sound so bad. Sort of a netbook-equivalent of a Windows tablet.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 7:52 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Come on, expand overseas, Scandinavia is ripe for the taking!
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 8:11 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I want Barnes & Noble. I’ve wasted so many hours at that store, that if I ever heard of a local one closing down, I’d organize a protest and get everyone to buy stuff. I never want B&N to leave, it’s something I’ve done since I was tiny, and want my kids to experience too.
Well, if it closes, there’s still Hastings to be nostalgic about. And that I will not let close. Brick and mortar stores with so much awesomeness in one place cannot be allowed to die.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 10:35 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
i agree. that’s why I’m glad that writers made Wrightspeak—it’s all about bringing writers groups and book clubs to the bookstores that need the support right now. and that includes B&N.
Posted on Jan 30, 2012 | 11:51 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It would be excellent if they spun the nook brand off. Their market share would surely increase if they offered the same support services and book browsing options in other physical retailers. I don’t have a Barnes and Noble anywhere near where I live but there is a very healthy books a million. I would own a nook if I could go in the books a million and browse through titles.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 10:39 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Has their been any news on how iBooks is doing? I own a kindle and iPad. I find myself reading on the iPad more now since it is closer to grab more often. The screen doesn’t really big me. I use the kindle app, but if I didn’t have a kindle also I would buy from iBooks since I like the app better. What I really want is drm free books. Books are so easy to pirate since they are under a meg that I don’t think going drm free would really affect them at all. It would be great for consumers since they could swap devices. What the publishing companies should really do is mandate drm free so all those people locked into amazon could buy a nook if they wanted.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 11:26 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
If pirating them is so easy then why not strip the DRM off the books you buy? I do it for mine so that I have a copy just in case I decide to leave the Kindle for something else one day.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 3:41 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’m saying the book publishers need to push this for average users. Hole at first it seems like drm free is the last thing they should want, it would really help competition. It would allow a company like b&n to gain more market share. Currently I couldn’t tell you anything about a nook device because they simply are not an option for me.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 5:27 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
When discussing e-readers and the publishing industry, you need to be able to distinguish between the publishing industry per se, and writers.
It’s definitely a time of turmoil and confusion for publishers; in comparison, it’s probably a great time to be a writer, as you now have a new, vastly growing, new venue to sell your products. I’m sure big name good writers aren’t sweating. Stephen King, as one example, can sell his fiction in any format, hardcover, paperback or ebook.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 12:42 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Much like music going digital. Especially since radio is essentially dead in the US thanks to deregulated media ownership rules I now enjoy how easy it is for bands to get their music to people without being required to land a big label contract first. I think the same thing can be done for the written word with the trend of it going digital.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 3:44 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I have a Nook Simple Touch, but it is a terrible pain to read anything that isn’t best served by reading straight from pg 1 to the end. By which I mean literature that necessitates flipping back and forth a bit to savor the details, or even figure out the plot fully. I may be a sad former English major in a sea of techies (of which I am one as well), but I wonder if the future of ‘literature’, not pop novels or nonfiction, is going to shift in the wake of technology that makes a traditional, absorb-and-redo method of reading rather difficult.
I like to shift the typeface on my e-reader depending on the book, but this makes it so I can’t remember specific details on what page/where on the page it was since an e-reader page doesn’t hold as much text, generally, as a physical one. Perhaps people who remember things photographically will have to change their method of absorption, then. Seems a little depressing.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 12:59 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I don’t know how it works on a Nook because I haven’t owned one for quite a while but I do a lot of highlighting and note taking on my Kindle and that helps me get back to important passages much easier than trying to flip around like I would with a physical book.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 3:46 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’m a huge Tech person… I’m the person people go to when their computer fails. I’m pretty platform neutral owning a WebOS Phone/Tablet, Macbook Air, HP Envy, and a homebuilt Desktop.
So… I’m also a designer in Architecture school. While it may decline the physical book world will never win out completely. There is always going to be a market for the physical. The reason I buy physical on anything other than periodicals is the easy with which I can compare. I can’t do a side-by-side. The quality of a photo is lost a bit on a screen. When you have to make for different displays, layout is compromised. ETC…
They simply have to adapt to a changing market. The #1 reason I’ve been turning myself to Amazon is selection. I don’t have to worry if they’ll have it. If I go to a book store I have real doubt whether they’ll have an art/achitecture section, or anymore than one style printing of the book, etc… If they don’t have it. They should be able to order it, and get it to me in two days. They’re a company the specialize in books… throw it on the dang truck that should come every other day. Amazon can get me my book in two days without charging an arm and leg, why can’t they?
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 1:11 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I’m just like you in that I have a ton of different stuff with no clear ecosystem. Windows Phone, custom desktop rig (Windows), Canon t3i (and bunch of lenses), Macbook Air and Mini (server), Touchpad, Kindle.
Product diversity FTW!
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 4:48 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Is exactly why these publishers deserve to die out. They’re simply refusing to evolve to a new content distribution method solely on the basis of a lower profit margin.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 1:56 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Publishers: Keep holding onto that old way of business, that cash cow that has worked so well in years past: “it all comes down to bookstores”. Keep dismissing that already-disruptive ebook strategy. There must have been something seriously wrong with Borders, B&N can do better, I’m sure. Don’t think of Borders’ folding as being a sign of the times. Keep believing and dismissing and keep suppressing the voice in the back of your head, the one that is concerned about your future. And it definitely sounds like a good strategy to partner with B&N; that way you can really be left out when Amazon and Apple battle it out. And keep remembering that ‘we are different’, you aren’t like Newbury Comics, Strawberries, Blockbuster or Borders.
Publishers: My advice is to start with a different frame, something other than “it all comes down to bookstores”. The publishers that begin with a different frame will have the best chance.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 2:14 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
I bought a Nook Tablet for Christmas and I really really wanted to like it. It is superior to the Kindle Fire in terms of hardware specs, and the idea of expandable storage seemed smart for a device that can double as a nice PMP. I’m not super invested in Amazon’s ecosystem yet, and have some sympathy for B&N’s position.
However, I found the device frustrating to use for lots of little reasons that, taken together, caused me to return it for a Kindle Fire. For example, in the Web browser, all the navigation controls scroll with the page, so after reading a long post there is no way to navigate back without returning to the top of the page (WTF?). Also, I found the audio quality thin and uninvolving, ruining the PMP usage scenarios for me—which is a shame, given how good the screen is. Finally, there is no Nook client for Windows Phone, and given the legal squabble between Microsoft and B&N, there is unlikely to be one any time soon. Since there is a nice Kindle app for Windows Phone, this kind of sealed the deal on the Fire.
I do hope they find a way to compete, as Amazon should not ride roughshod over the publishing industry. Nor am I super keen on the idea of proprietary ebook formats (Kindle), which smacks of the early iTunes DRM music that could only work on Apple devices.
For now though, I do think Amazon has made the Fire a much more pleasurable device to use, even though it suffers from a non-descript hardware design.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 2:47 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Thank you, Amazon, for shaking up the publishing industry the way Apple shook up the music industry.
It’s 2012 folks. I haven’t bought a CD in over 12 years and haven’t bought a physical book/magazine in over 4 (owned the original $400 Kindle). Life is good.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 3:19 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I have read more books in the past year than I have in my entire life and it was all thanks to Amazon. I have no problem with the DRM on Kindle books because I am able to read what I buy on nearly any device.
I have no interest in purchasing from iBooks because you can only read on an Apple device.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 10:02 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I picked up my Kindle Keyboard Wifi back in August and I can also say that I have free read (I’m a college student w/ a heavy reading load) more in the past 5 months than I had previously my entire life (I’m 22). I know that may come off as sad, but the medium has worked incredibly well for me, and I have thoroughly enjoyed the 10+ books I’ve read so far.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 11:12 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Wow, the NYT has had a really great string of in-depth tech articles recently – Apple’s manufacturing practices, and now this.
Even though I bought a Kindle Touch, I’m rooting for Barnes and Noble’s Nook to do well. Competition is always good for the consumer.
Posted on Jan 30, 2012 | 2:52 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
As a publisher, the Nook program is much better than Amazon’s Kindle program for uploading, managing,and receiving reports. However, they fall way, way behind in aggressive marketing and using the opportunities they have to actually help people make the transition from print to ebook. B&N has this capability but they blow it by not utilizing their stores for better promotion. For every book sold in the Nook market we sell about 200 on Amazon. A steep contrast to overcome now. At this time last year the two were neck in neck for our sales and I know our sales reflect the market pretty accurately.
Posted on Jan 30, 2012 | 9:49 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
“B&N has this capability but they blow it by not utilizing their stores for better promotion.”
Not sure what you mean here. Our store has the all the Nooks featured front and center as soon as you walk in the door. There is generally someone there in that space answering questions when people stop to look at the ereaders. Maybe not all B & N have that kind of set up.
Posted on Jan 30, 2012 | 3:34 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I agree. They’re doing pretty well promoting the Nook in-store and I think it’s the best approach they can take.
Posted on Jan 30, 2012 | 4:05 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Same. My B&N stores feature the nook right at the front of the store with plenty of accessories.
Posted on Feb 03, 2012 | 6:35 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I can’t believe all the people here who blindly jump on the “e-books are better than paper books!” for everything here. The WORST part of an e-book is that you don’t actually buy it, you only lease it. You cannot sell, loan, or give an e-book but you can with a paper book. No First Sale concept with an e-book. You can’t buy a “used” e-book for cheaper. I am not against e-books as they do have many qualities in their favor. (Although anyone who cites “price” is an idiot.)
Posted on Jan 30, 2012 | 5:56 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Some people don’t care about any of that stuff. Minimalism is a growing trend. Folks like me prefer to carry and/or own as few physical objects as possible.
Posted on Feb 03, 2012 | 6:34 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.