Motorola Mobility, which manufactures the Droid smartphone line and Xoom tablet, has just announced flat fourth-quarter sales and "modest profitability." According to preliminary reports, the company took in $3.4 billion in sales. A total of 10.5 million mobile devices were sold, including 5.3 million smartphones. That's a slight uptick in smartphones compared to the 4.9 million sold in the fourth quarter of 2010, but a lower total than the 11.3 million total handsets sold in the same period.
Motorola says its earnings "were impacted by the increased competitive environment in the Mobile Device business and higher legal costs associated with ongoing Intellectual Property (IP) litigations," possibly including its ongoing suit against Apple, the contentious case with Microsoft, and litigation by Intellectual Ventures. The company also brought up its upcoming acquisition by Google, which it expects to be completed early this year.

There are 44 Comments. Add yours.
The RAZR effect is real
Posted on Jan 06, 2012 | 8:32 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The Droid RAZR was the best selling Android phone over the Christmas holiday. I think for good reason =o)
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 12:26 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Any actual evidence for that?
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 7:38 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Droid RAZR best selling phone over the Christmas season
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 1:33 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
So the RAZR was the best selling phone for Amazon Wireless. Big difference between that and the “best selling Android phone over the Christmas holiday.”
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 3:11 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Also, Verizon is marketing the hell out of it. I’ve seen two Galaxy Nexus ads.
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 3:15 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You can tell by the reviews on the Verizon Wireless website that the RAZR is also their most popular phone.
The RAZR also sells overseas and Moto is one of the biggest smartphone OEMs.
Posted on Jan 09, 2012 | 2:27 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The majority of Droid phones are Motorola but the Charge, Incredible, Incredible 2, and the Droid Eris are not.
Posted on Jan 06, 2012 | 8:38 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Exactly, “Droid” is actually a Verizon (licensed from Lucasfilm Ltd) brand.
Posted on Jan 06, 2012 | 8:52 PM EST reply Recommend (7) Flag actions
my thoughts as I read the first sentence in this article also.
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 11:11 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Don’t call it a comeback!
Anyway, I can’t wait to see the metamorphosis of Motorola once Google completes the take over. Motorola has been floundering lately and that isn’t going to sit well with Google. Despite all of the news you hear about Motorola being treated as a separate company I don’t believe it for one second. Google didn’t buy Motorola to have them continue as a mediocre Android phone manufacturer. They bought Motorola to complete their vertical integration in software and hardware and unlike Apple Motorola actually owns manufacturing plants.
Posted on Jan 06, 2012 | 9:15 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
But if Motorola already has its own manufacturing plants, and they aren’t helping now, why should that make any difference (vs Apple, your example) if Google acquires their mobile division? It’s not like Google is going to provide any special expertise in that area.
The general consensus seems to be that Google bought Motorola to get a patent portfolio. If they try to compete directly with the other Android OEMs I guess you can say goodbye to everyone else besides Samsung.
Posted on Jan 06, 2012 | 9:46 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Motorola is going to be gutted by Google as Google only keeps the best and brightest. It’s difficult yo become a Google employee and just because you were acquired by them doesn’t automatically make your one – you will still have to interview. In addition to the obvious patent play, Motorola is a very good hardware OEM, but their software side becomes irrelevant once the take over is complete as that will be handled by Google. So Motorola will eventually become the standard for devices that offer the true Google Android experience. And any consumer that is frustrated with updates or skins will run to Motorola and buy a true Google phone.
Posted on Jan 06, 2012 | 10:34 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
“The best and brightest” apparently includes the morons who coded Android, which currently drains 50 mA on standby on my Droid Charge and is a terribly bloated and inefficient OS. Consumers don’t know what a “true Google phone” is, given the Nexus brand keeps changing names. Nexus One, Nexus S, Galaxy Nexus… wth?
Google had the opportunity to rewrite Android and eliminate its ugly Dalvik foundation with ICS 4.0. They chose against it b/c they don’t care about the end user experience.
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 12:05 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
cool story bro
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 1:04 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Why do you persist, you little WP7 troll? Don’t you know you just end up giving everyone who supports your platform a black eye due to your constant trolling and negativity.
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 1:24 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
WP7 troll? Lol what???
Posted on Jan 08, 2012 | 1:20 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
They bought Motorola for the patents and frankly it’s really a ‘heads they win. tails they win’ scenario for Google..
If Motorola continues to stumble along making indistinguishable Android handsets at the behest of carriers.. great – more Android for everyone.
If Motorola s**ts the bed and, for one reason or another, fails.. Google doesn’t miss a beat. They keep the patents and the business Motorola leaves behind is instantly devoured by Samsung, LG, Sony, HTC and whoever else decides they want to crap out a few phones – again.. more Android for everyone.
Posted on Jan 06, 2012 | 10:13 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
“More Android for everyone” is about to blow up on Google given Android’s massive fragmentation and lack of profitability for developers.
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 12:03 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Ohh yes that is true, too bad because we like Motorola now as they are.
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 4:00 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Firstly, the larger and larger Android’s market share becomes, the greater likelihood of more and more conditions being placed upon Google should the proposed acquisition be approved, simply because such a merger could give Motorola a hugely unfair advantage over other phone manufacturers using Android. So let’s see if the acquisition actually happens, and if it does, let’s see under what conditions it’s allowed to happen under.
Second, Google have nothing to bring to the consumer product table, their expertise is in selling advertising using data garnered from their web search and cloud solutions. Even their software is middling at best, so the only tangible thing they’ll bring to Motorola is money. If Motorola, a company who’s been producing mobile communications devices for 30+ years, can’t work out what constitutes a decent product, Google sure as hell can’t provide any insight.
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 5:43 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Exactly. The Android user experience is painful, laggy, confusing, and frustrating, and Google doesn’t understand why. Take text resizing on Chrome. Removed years ago, and never added back despite people’s complaints. Their developers are arrogant and apparently incompetent given the amazing job done at Apple with iOS.
Posted on Jan 08, 2012 | 1:23 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Android is winning! Yay!
Posted on Jan 06, 2012 | 10:34 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Not to us we have a version of Windows, Android, Apple and Motorola in house, we’d have WW3 here if we started hating each other for our devices! LOL
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 4:01 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Hard to tell if that’s sarcasm or not. Android sure is doing well in market share, but most of companies selling Android-based devices aren’t doing great with profit from those devices.
Maybe somewhere along the line we changed the definition of success, but market share does not keep a company running, profits do.
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 5:46 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
It was sarcasm. ;)
Posted on Jan 11, 2012 | 12:02 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Samsung is winning
Google is winning
HTC is losing
Motorola is losing
SE is losing
LG is losing
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 5:49 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I’m not sure Google is winning.
Posted on Jan 11, 2012 | 12:03 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It’s like the PC market, but worse.
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 10:14 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
And Future is Motorola, believe me guys….
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 3:49 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 5:48 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Got to love a Baghdad Bob pic.
Posted on Jan 11, 2012 | 12:03 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Wish Motorola Mobility well and can’t wait for their Google phones to churn out ICS goodies.
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 4:36 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You’re going to have to wait, and maybe quite a while. Motorola made this blog post on their official site about the hurdles required get ICS on older handsets.
Sony Ericsson made a similar statement on their developer site which explains the same problems (but much better IMHO), the key difference is SE have at least committed to bring ICS to all of their smartphones released in 2011 and to the Xperia line specifically in March/April 2012
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 5:55 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
As of right now, Liberty Rom and Cyanogen Rom are more functional than ICS imo. After having the Gnex for awhile I returned it becaused I HATED the new multitasking.
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 1:35 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Can hardly be seen as a success when they miss their estimates by half a billion and grow their smartphone business by 8% when Samsung grow it by 300% and their overall “sales” (actually shipments) are down 8% in a market that grew 11%.
A lame duck and Google only bought it to pluck its few shiny feathers.
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 5:46 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
To be fair it wasn’t their estimate, it was the analyst estimate. If they had missed their own guidance that would have been a bigger deal.
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 7:57 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Envision phones with Motorola’s reputation for quality (and tech like the Razr) coupled with the best and brightest un-skinned Android OS.
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 12:40 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Motorola posting ANY profits at this time (bad business environment, looming purchase, competition from Samsung) is a
goodremarkable thing.Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 12:43 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You can’t blame their terrible performance on the looming purchase. In fact quite the opposite, the purchase is a result of their terrible performance. If the problem is Samsung then presumably they’re screwed because Samsung aren’t going to suddenly start competing less.
There’s nothing remarkable about Moto’s numbers, they’re exactly as bad as they have been for years.
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 1:09 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Please just give us ICS! And the Droid 4. Please?
Posted on Jan 07, 2012 | 3:59 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.