Nokia is still the "undisputed leader of total mobile phone shipments," according to Q4 2011 and yearly figures released by the International Data Corporation (IDC) and Strategy Analytics. While shipments in Q4 were down by about 10 million units year-on-year, a decrease of 8.2 percent, the Finnish manufacturer managed to stay on top with 26.6 percent of the market share and a total of 417.1 million phones shipped in 2011, 7.9 percent less than the previous year.

The other big winners were Samsung and Apple, which captured 22.8 percent and 8.7 percent of the market respectively, after both seeing outstanding quarters — Samsung shipped over 90 million phones for the first time, and Apple's year-on-year market share jumped by 128.4 percent. While IDC and Strategy Analytics' figures largely matched up, the latter firm estimated 2.5 million less handset shipments from Samsung. LG saw declining shipments for a third consecutive quarter, with its share declining 42.2 percent year on year, but also managed a return to profitability.
IDC's figures refer to the mobile phone market as a whole, but unsurprisingly smartphone-only figures tell a different story. A report by Strategy Analytics reveals that Apple is now the world's largest smartphone manufacturer, overtaking Samsung in the last quarter to grab 23.9 percent marketshare. Samsung still has 23.5 percent, and Nokia fell all the way to 12.6 percent. IDC notes that while smartphones are growing fast in popularity, feature phones still make up the majority of mobile shipments worldwide — Strategy Analytics says 155 million smartphones were shipped in Q4, against IDC's figure of 427.4 million phones in total. It's worth noting, though, that "smartphone" is a fairly nebulous concept, and the line is likely to get increasingly blurry as penetration grows in developing markets.

There are 78 Comments. Add yours.
Apple is doing really well I must say, considering they only release 1 flagship device in a year..add to the the older generation iPhones, but still iPhones are still quite expensive specially in other parts of the world.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 6:23 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
The 3Gs is free on contract.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 7:29 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
That’s kind of irrelevant. What he was saying was that the iPhone is extremely expensive compared to lots of feature phones and budget smart phones in developing countries, which is the market in which Apple aren’t competing and the market in which Nokia manages to sell a fair chunk of that 113.5 million.
Also for what it’s worth the iPhone 4s is free on contract in pretty much every country outside of North America.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 8:05 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
the world isn’t america ryan.’s
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 10:20 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I heard a nice analogy recently and I think makes a lot of sense.
In US, people live of credit when you buy the phone on contract, phone company is trusting your credit and recovering the cost of the phone via monthly bill payments.
In Asia, people live of savings not credit. Phone companies don’t trust any’s credit and expect cash before delivery. So that’s in Asia, mostly you have unlocked phones without contract. Its also in Asia, example in Singapore, you can buy let say a galaxy SII for 200SGD on monthly plan of 35SGD over 2 years or for 100 SGD on monthly plan of 55SGD over 2 years, so the cost is subsided very visibly.
So for US living on credit, a 200USD phone sounds cheap! but in other place the same phone needs to be bought without credit and with your savings for 600 to 800USD depending on memory size.
So nothing is free!
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 11:27 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
1. Kill Symbian
2. Become no. 3 instantly.
3. Pray for money to MS to stay afloat.
Nokia’s guide on how to lose marketshare and profits.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 6:32 AM EST reply Recommend (7) Flag actions
Although it can always be worse: refer to LG and Sony!
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 6:33 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Samsung is probably the only Android OEM doing well.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 7:08 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
ZTE are in the position HTC were a year or two back. It will be interesting to see how they progress
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 7:23 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
zte is chipping away @ nokia in China it should be very interesting
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 10:21 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
HTC are much more profitable than ZTE though, even now.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 2:11 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It’s an appealing but quite an ignorant world view.
What happened in reality is that most of the established players in the market missed the revolution iPhone brought in 2007. It’s a common situation, big players have too much trust in themselves. In fact all the products they had by 2007 become obsolete in just one evening, during one keynote. Once iPhone was shown, RIM OS, Palm OS and Symbian were done. Since then these products were loosing the customers quite rapidly, Symbian is still noticeable only due to two factors:
- its initial market share was enormous
- it is often used to power the feature phones nobody uses as Smartphones, but still agencies tend to count them in this category since they have an OS
Big players possessing mentioned products reacted way too slow, by the moment they realized something has happened (and I’m not sure RIM did realize that even now judging by their stupid speeches) they were already wounded and bleeding. Still they were too slow to do anything.
One company – Palm – reacted too late, when they actually didn’t have resources to save themselves. They managed to put together a rather good OS but it depleted the company, they had no funds left for marketing/partner push and went toast.
The other company – Nokia – reacted quite late but probably still on time to save itself. Don’t be fooled by the huge numbers, Symbian would die even if Nokia would continue pumping money into it, the technology is way too outdated in many aspects, only this death will be slow and it will bury Nokia too. It’s actually a big plus for Nokia they realized that and found power to coupe with that and switch the strategy. They are shrinking, they will shrink for several years probably but at least their current strategy gives them a chance to survive with a few good products in the pocket and then start growing again.
Now about RIM… It’s a sad story of the delusional pompous smugs hallucinating about their superiority… I can’t really talk about that ’cos it makes me cry so much (
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 7:26 AM EST reply Recommend (6) Flag actions
So where are the low-end devices for Nokia in 2015 coming from then? All WP? There is no way that will work unless they want to give up all low-end smartphones to Android. I really think they should have kept Symbian at least until they succeed with WP and then announce they will no longer support Symbian instead of going all-out on WP and killing both MeeGo and Symbian, leaving nothing in-house that can be used for the lower segment. As things stand now Lumia 710 is about as low as you’d get with WP. I guess they want to copy the Apple model of having 1 flagship, 1 mid-tier and 1 budget device all the time, but Nokia’s customer base is different from Apples – we like variety of shape factors and budgets – business QWERTYs/convertables, cheap candybars (with additional touch like BB), consumer touchscreens, etc. It is really hard to imagine how they manage to cover all segments with a single OS with no sacrifices – I am sure many Symbian users don’t favor WP and would prefer an Android OS to WP as it is closer to what they are used to.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 7:59 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
They have series 40 that is quite successful. Plus dumb phones that are actually fantastic considering the price.
Symbian is not a solution for the low segment. As much as I hate laggy 200-dollars Androids Symbian is much worse in terms of UX. So in my opinion they are doing what they should.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 8:02 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Why not use Symbian instead of S40 (which is based on Symbian anyway…) for lower segment?
I am sorry but cheap Androids are in no way quicker than cheap Symbian phones. Not from my experience at least (talking about Symbian Anna/Belle, not old versions which were terrible).
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 8:07 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It’s not so much about speed but about UX. Even lagging cheap Androids are easier to use in the modern scenarios then Symbian.
S40 is better in this aspect then S60 too, when we are talking about feature phones of cause.
The whole point is almost nobody was using S60 as a smartphone. People don’t install apps, developers don’t write them.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 8:09 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
PS. From the other side, S40 is probably much cheaper for Nokia to support. It’s a factor now.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 8:11 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
This can be the only reason for me…
…but there are plenty of apps for Symbian 3 already (at least enough to satisfy basic needs of a budget cellphone). So why not keep it? It is already developed, it is already well known, many people are used to it and are happy with it, there are enough apps for basic use…surely keeping it can’t be as bad as they make it look.
I am not saying don’t focus on WP…but WP alone can’t address all market segments, it simply isn’t customizable enough to satisfy all types of customers – it is entertainment-driven (in its current form) and it is hard to convert it to a business phone.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 8:15 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I may only recall what Jobs did when he was called to save Apple. Cut the product line to a minimum focusing only on those products that have future and limit their number to keep focus. No matter what Symbian is dying. It’s 80th technology, EPOC32 kernel, it’s a pain to develop for, it’s a pain to use. It’s future is a graveyard anyway.
They decided to free the resources out of it to reduce expenses and focus on something that has a future. It’s a tough decision but I’m not sure they had other way considering the fact they need to cut costs.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 8:18 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
As I said..Nokia’s customers are very different from Apple’s that is why I try not to compare the two as it gets ugly. Well, I do hope it is the right move for them, time will tell…but for me killing Symbian before seeing ANY results from WP sales is a major risk that may lead to bankruptcy. I’d have waited until at least Autumn 2012 to see how WP7 is going and if it is OK, then announce you are killing Symbian and then outsource it. I realize this is more costly as it is 1 more year of in-house support for an old OS but at least you are not risking absolutely everything.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 8:24 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
From what I understand they simply had no luxury to keep Symbian. They needed to cut costs. It’s better to amputate the rotting hand before you die of sepsis.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 8:30 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Btw, Android works for all segments as it is customizable. That is its beauty. And even then Samsung has its own budget OS with a separate line-up.
WP is not even close to that level of market-coverage on its own.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 8:19 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Well, you know it would be a long conversation if we start… The reason multiple rather similar products exist in the market is their difference in details, in particular – in the market strategy. Android is jack-of-all-trades already. It’s mediocre for everything and goes everywhere. It’s almost obvious only one such product may exist in the market at the same time.
I don’t say MS doesn’t target this position (they are doing it with Windows anyway) but they simply not ready to challenge Android upfront yet. I’m sure they will go for it later but now they are trying to increase market presence and awareness in a certain niche, to get a foot in the door. It’s also quite understandable.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 8:22 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Well if you are not targeting:
1. Android – as it is more developed and flexible.
2. IPhone – as it is a superior product and has loyal customer base
3. Your own customer base that is used to more business-like (although pathetic by modern standards) and customizable Symbian.
Who are they targeting then with WP7 only strategy…a little from all of the above? The way I see it in order to cover any of the three above you need to cut down on prices as otherwise the user is going to find something more suitable to him. And if you cut down prices, your profits are gone…so killing Symbian might end up more expensive then keeping it to at least address the current customer base and with WP7 focus on just 1 and 2. It seems much safer bet, although it might cost them a bit more in the near term.
Anyway, it is already done so not much point arguing about it…
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 8:29 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
They are targeting mid-range customer who wants a better UX then Android and for a cheeper price then Apple. They don’t go up or down yet. The focus is pretty clear.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 8:31 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Exactly my point. It is not a very broad target group. So why not delay the killing of Symbian non-sense for one year (not saying don’t do anything to cut costs, but at least they go into the public and say it) and if you are successful with the current target group, then expand to other target markets and if necessary kill Symbian.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 8:34 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
That’s what they do. They still produce Symbian phones, they just don’t develop it any more.
If you are asking why they announced they kill Symbian… Apparently Elop decided that the signal he will send to the market with the regard of the ability of Nokia to change rapidly is more important then negative reaction from killing the popular platform.
I support him on that, but the decision is controversial indeed.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 8:43 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
the N95 still outsold the iphone…. so your view is flawed and saying Symbian^3+ is outdated is absurd…
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 10:23 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Quite contrary you didn’t get any of what I’m saying otherwise you wouldn’t try to use the argument you are using, it is quite irrelevant by now.
I’m afraid my language command is failing me again thus I cannot express myself in a way you can understand it. Forgive a poor foreigner please.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 10:27 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
It’s a little bit of an exaggeration to say that all the world’s smartphones were rendered irrelevant the day the iPhone was announced. We tend to forget that the original iPhone was $600 on contract and it had no apps, no exchange support, and was exclusive to one carrier in one country. It really wasn’t in direct competition with existing smartphones because there was almost no overlap in features and it was targeting a completely different market.
Yes, it was a big deal and it was clear that it was going to change the industry in some way, but the original iPhone that Apple released was a very different product than the one they’re dominating with today. It’s easy to say in hindsight that Nokia, RIM, and Microsoft should have gone back to the drawing board immediately, but it wasn’t necessarily obvious at the time that Apple would be going after their market directly.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 12:16 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
You are right Chefgon, saying that all phones were rendered irrelevant or obsolete when the iPhone was introduced. However this is what a number of people believe due to Apple marketing and the willingness of a vast number of people to believe it.
It is the same that occurs once a year when Apple tells its followers that their newest phone “changes everything again” and that its a must have. Its the same thing that has occurred with people being sold the idea that iOS is more user friendly than anything else. It is user friendly but I can’t find my way around an iPhone like I can my G-Nexus. But that is just me.
The point is that marketing isn’t taken with skepticism by too many people. When a company, whichever it is, tells you that what you have is not good enough anymore, they are trying to sell you a new requirement not a new product.
Do I really need to be able to check the internet on my phone, or email etc? No, I could do it on a computer with not much more headache.
Advanced tech is a luxury, not a necessity.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 2:28 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
We have an objective criteria here. All popular pre-2007 systems died a quick death.
Isn’t it a proof?
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 4:53 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You do realize that they lost this marketshare with their Symbian devices? If any this shows they made the right decision to ditch it!
If WP7 will be their savior is in the stars though…
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 7:30 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
When they announced they are killing it they had something like 35% market share based on Symbian only. The problem with Symbian is not market share but profit margins. However, for the price-concious and business users there is nothing wrong with Symbian (especially with an up-to-modern-standard Symbian Belle) .
Problem is Nokia can’t address the high margins of the power-user consumer segment where Apple makes most of its money and where HTC and Samsung are strong with Symbian. That is why you introduce WP, but why on Earth kill Symbian so early when you have no good alternative for the lower and business segments?
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 8:04 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’ve had 5 Symbian devices, including the legendary E71 (and the not so legendary successor E72) and bought Lumia 800 last week. I must say WP7 ecosystem is already far beyond Symbian and it’s getting better everyday. Nokia should concentrate on WP7 Apps, which are distributed exclusively for Nokia WP7 devices and keep on building nice phones. I mean there is still no phone on the market, which looks sexier than an E7. Imagine that with the beautiful WP7 and relax. Symbian is dead, but Nokia not.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 8:02 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Well, I just bought an E7 :) But…yes it would work with WP7, but WP7 is not designed for business users and thus for business phones like the E7…so it is hard to imagine. If WP was something closer to Windows 8/Desktop, then I’d happily imagine it (and probably buy it when it comes out).
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 8:09 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
What sort of business things are you not able to do with Windows Phone? I happily use it daily. Love the Sharepoint/Office integration. Nobody else out there can touch that!
Or, does your company mandate a specific device?
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 11:25 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
How Apple are doing this without cheap, throwaway phones is amazing. The rest of them have had plenty of those phones that work but no one would really want to claim.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 6:42 AM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
Brilliant marketing besides the good product that the iphone is. Remember, people hold the iphone as a status symbol and sell their kidneys for it down in China(or that was the ipad). So the iphone is not just another smartphone, it is THE smartphone.
Posted on Feb 03, 2012 | 7:11 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Correction – Vendor not same as Manufacturer. Nokia is actually a manufacturer.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 6:43 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Interesting way to look at it, and I think you are right…
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 7:32 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’m very curious about the future of Nokia’s not-so-smart phones. To what direction will Meltemi blow?…
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 6:46 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
Why are LG which is just another android OEM falling so bad?
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 6:49 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
That collapse in sales includes dumb phones remember.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 2:15 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Title “Nokia still world’s largest mobile phone manufacturer, with Apple in hot pursuit”
Data in article
Nokia 114 million (10 million less than 2010)
Samsung 98 million (17 million more than 2010)
Apple 37(11 million more than 2010)
so HOW IN EARTH could you consider Apple being in hot pursuit???
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 6:54 AM EST reply Recommend (11) Flag actions
At this rate, Samsung will be the largest in 2012 (115 million) followed by Nokia (104 million) and at a distance Apple with 48 million
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 6:56 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
More importantly his maths are wrong, Apple gained 21million, not 11million.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 3:09 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Apple’s growth is far and away the fastest by proportion, and it’s number one in a category (overtaking Samsung) that has a good chance of overwriting much of Nokia’s traditional space in the next few years.
I wanted to get Samsung in the headline too, as they’ve also had a really impressive quarter, but I had to cut for the sake of brevity. So, those guys got the pullquote instead.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 7:00 AM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
You lot me at “in the next few years” – nobody knows what’s happening.
I agree that “Apple in hot pursuit” is exaggerating. If anyone Samsung and not Apple will be next leader.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 7:36 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
*lost
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 7:36 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
So basically you wanted to tell the truth but you put something else first instead
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 7:52 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
If your talking of just pure proportion, I could go from selling 2 to 10 cell phones and I would have an increase of 500%. Hardly a strong point when they are trailing by such a large raw number of units.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 9:12 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
…And even in the pullquote, Samsung somehow gets pushed to a third position. I’d rather have three words (“Samsung close second”) added for precision’s sake than remove them for brevity. As it reads, the headline implies that Apple is now the second larger manufacturer in the world, and very close to Nokia. Both implications are false, so that’s a pretty misleading headline. These are the kind of things that really don’t help with the assumption that The Verge has an Apple bias.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 10:31 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
My mistake about the pullquote. I was wrong about that bit.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 10:35 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The rate at which people are adopting smartphones probably has something to do with it. The majority of Nokia’s phones are still dumbphones. Same with Samsung. Apple makes none. If the trend away from dumbphones continues, and stategies dont change, Nokia’s and Samsung’s numbers could rapidly fall.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 7:01 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
This is also true, though it’s interesting just how close Apple and Samsung are in smartphone shipments (37m vs 36.5m). Samsung would be much better placed than Nokia if the entire world switched to smartphones tomorrow.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 7:04 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Might have something to do with their newest model being released in Q4? I expect a similar headline when Samsung releases GS3 “Samsung overtakes Apple to reclaim smartphone crown” – deal?
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 7:42 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Samung’s strategy has changed towards smartphones. This is the first quarter since Q3 2010 that their rise in smartphones has not been offset by an equal or greater fall in dumphones.
They are flooding the market with smartphones in all segments.
Interestingly though, here in the UK is is ZTE that are starting to do to Samsung what Samsung did to HTC and Nokia at the low end
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 9:56 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
That other number you curiously omitted: 128% year-over-year change.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 7:04 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Impressive yoy growth, but I think the rest of the data indicates that the headline is rather misleading and probably falls in category of baiting a reader.
However it is a nice looking two deck headline.. Lines up nicely.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 7:14 AM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
You can’t see it right now because of the front page placement, but my pullquote for this article is “Nokia in danger of getting Samsunged”. Just for the record! I stand by leaving Apple in the headline, though, based on their astonishing growth and overtaking Samsung in the smartphone market.
I promise you I wouldn’t want to bait any of my readers, I like having fruitful discussions with them (like this!) a lot more than rabid hatred.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 7:32 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Impressive, absolutely, but it´s still far from being on the tail of Nokia, or Samsung. Those numbers are due to more people upgrading to the smartphone category (which naturally affects the numbers of Apple more, since that´s the only category they´re in). Don´t expect an increase like that every year, not everyone can afford a smartphone.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 7:31 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The 3Gs is free on contract, in a year that may be the 8GB iPhone 4.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 7:34 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Oh, yay, you´re playing the “it´s free” card and make it sound positive. Meanwhile, iPhans like to point out that the reason Android is number one in phones is because there are more cheap and free, like it´s a negative thing. What´s it gonna be? Guess what? Free never means free, you´re still on contract, obligated to pay a certain amount every month. That´s just postponing payment.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 7:39 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Your maths are not our maths are they?
Nokia 114 million (10 million less than 2010)
Samsung 98 million (17 million more than 2010)
Apple 37( 21million more than 2010)
So not only did Apple gain the most handsets in terms of percentage growth, they gained the most handsets since 2010Q4 in absolute terms also.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 2:17 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
If you consider that Nokia is falling and that Apple is rising, then Apple gained on them by 21 million with only smart phones.
Looking at the trends since Apple entered the market, it’s likely they’ll continue to progress and Nokia will continue to fall.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 5:23 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Hear that Flash , we’re in hot pursuit !

Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 7:25 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Fire Elop.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 8:49 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Apple is hot pursuit? it has only 8.7% market while Samsung is at 22% and is closing the gap.
Shouldn’t it read Samsung in hot pursuit?
and people wonder why other people point out the Apple slant on articles and blogs.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 9:49 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Thought the same thing when I saw the chart numbers.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 10:22 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
probably because Apple has a huge 128% YoY growth.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 10:31 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yeah, but that’s like saying that an F1 driver is in “Hot pursue” of the lead because he finally started his car’s engine while the lead is already two laps ahead.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 10:39 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
ehhh that’s more word gymnastic games usually used to paint a larger picture than reality.
If sold 10 box of cookies last year and then sold 20 boxes this year, I’ll havea 100% YtY growth but if my compeitior is still selling over 1,000 boxes, I’m not in any sort of HOT pursuit.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 10:45 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
if the lead is slowing down while you’re speeding up, you’ll eventually catch him. All it’s saying is that Apple sales grew the most of these top companies, I don’t think they were implying that Apple is second in market share.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 11:07 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
the lead isn’t slowing down, only the leader, Apple remember is still WELL behind Samsung and they too have seen YTY growth.
basically what we are saying is this is nothing more than a blog to keep postive apple new going.
In reality it really should have said Samsung is in HOT pursuit since it really is nipping at Nokia’s heels and is poised to take over. Apple is a far distant 3rd.
just another unnecessary piece to contiue to glorify Apple.
let’s be honest here.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 12:40 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I just didn’t interpret it that way though.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 2:14 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I think the phone in the front is sexier than the one in the back.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 12:57 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Oh, HTC, where art thou?
Posted on Feb 03, 2012 | 1:51 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.