The Numerous Legal Holes in the Apple v. Samsung Verdict
There's a list of very strong legal concerns about the verdict.
Most notably that one device was not found to have infringed the patent but Apple was still awarded $2 million for it.
And that one juror said that they wanted to punish Samsung for copying when in fact the jury instructions said damages were to compensate for losses only.
What do you think of these holes?
Do you know of any more?