Make clear somethings about HTC and Nokia
I have become increasingly annoyed by some people that dont have all the facts, but treat their statements as facts. Their are 2 that keep coming up.
The first one is HTC and beats audio. Its not like Nokia left audio lovers in the dark. Nokia has enhanced their phone with Dolby audio.And although Nokia has enhanced their phone I dont think anyone has brought up that point. And not to criticize anyone who is a Beats audio fan. What is beats audio besides a fancy name a marketing and how much better could it be than Dolby. http://www.wpcentral.com/comparison-htc-8x-samsung-ativ-s-and-nokia-lumia-920
Secondly, apparently everyone is a financial expert now. I dont know how many times Ive heard "its ok for Microsoft to help HTC, with their current financial problems and all." Guess what HTC just made $257 million dollars last quarter. That means their still profitable. http://www.ubergizmo.com/2012/08/htc-q2-profit-down-60/ Nokia is in worst shape. They posted $1 billion loss in operateing income. But between Microsoft paying them and patent royalties they made $125 million. So they arent profitable at all. Who do you think needs more help Nokia or HTC? I think we all know the answer. http://www.theverge.com/2012/7/19/3169140/nokia-q2-2012-financial-report
So now that everyone knows if you see someone say this please correct them.