Workers in Silicon Valley no-hire scandal granted class-action status


Programmers and other technical employees whose wages were allegedly kept artificially low by widespread no-hire pacts between Apple, Google, Adobe, and Intel are being granted class action status. California district court judge Lucy Koh ruled that the antitrust concerns of the "overarching conspiracy" between 2005 and 2009 warranted trying the case en masse. According to a lawyer representing the plaintiffs, over 64,000 employees who worked at the four companies are potential class members. Intuit, Pixar, and Lucasfilm had been named as defendants in the original complaint, but have reached tentative settlements with the plaintiffs totaling $19 million, Bloomberg reports.

Judge Koh declared the defense's criticisms "unpersuasive."

As evidence of the impact to wages that the no-hire pacts are believed to have created, the plaintiffs relied on expert opinion from a pair of respected economists who cited "economic studies and theory, documentary evidence, and statistical analyses." Opposing experts tried to poke holes in the models presented to the court, but to no avail — judge Koh declared the defense's criticisms "unpersuasive." The defense further tried to show that individual managers had broad discretion for setting employees’ wages, but their contentions ran counter to the statistical evidence furnished by the plaintiffs, namely that "in 97 percent of class member employee-years," pay was within a range prescribed by the companies. In other words, individuals’ salaries showed little evidence of competitive bidding between would-be employers.

The judge also cited the abundance of documentary evidence, including statements from executives like senior Google VP Alan Eustace that the "long-term… right approach is not to deal with [solicitation of Google employees] as one-offs but to have a systematic approach to compensation that makes it very difficult for anyone to get a better offer (emphasis in original)." Earlier this year, email exchanges involving former CEOs Steve Jobs of Apple, Eric Schmidt of Google, Paul Otellini of Intel, and Ed Colligan of Palm showed ample evidence of exactly how the "systematic approach" to protecting employees from poaching actually played out.

More from The Verge

Back to top ^
Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new Verge username and password

As part of the new Verge launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to Verge going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new Verge username and password

As part of the new Verge launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to Verge going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.



Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.