Ghost in the Wires
Kevin Mitnick with William L. Simon (August, 2011)
Little, Brown and Company, 413 pages
Kevin Mitnick is a liar. In fact, he wrote the book on lying (well, a book on lying, called The Art of Deception). I’m not trying to call his character into question, but the fact should be noted. In his younger days, Mitnick’s obsession with exploring telephone and computer systems allowed him to maintain a very casual relationship with the truth, one that found him impersonating cops and telephone company employees alike. His hacking was always more than just knowing his way around an operating system and exploiting security vulnerabilities — he could think on his feet and weave fictions out of thin air, which made him a natural "social engineer." He probably spent as much time on the phone talking telephone companies and state agencies out of sensitive information as he did behind the keyboard, exploiting vulnerabilities in software.
While we can’t be certain of the extent of his exploits, an approximate list could include: breaking into computer systems owned by Sun Microsystems, DEC, NEC, Motorola, and Nokia; getting his hands on documents relating to Pacific Bell’s SAS (Switch Access Services, which could be used to wiretap phone lines); and of course a number of crimes related to his being a fugitive (including identity theft). Mitnick has always maintained that he never profited from his crimes — and there is no proof that he ever did. So how did he become "the most dangerous hacker in America?"



Comments
sorry, but the first half of this article completely turned me off. this man is disgusting and I have no interest in learning about him.
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 12:09 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Cue someone to ask why these posts aren’t recorded in 3, 2, 1…
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 12:12 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I’ll bite. PLEASE record them long posts.
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 12:20 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
And the prophecy was fulfilled.
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 12:23 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
he never profited off his hacks…except for the fact that you bought the book hes SELLING.
did you even think before you wrote that line?
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 12:15 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
You might want to brush up on your definition of crime profiting. It doesn’t even make any logical sense. Mitnick didn’t break into corporate networks in order to write a book.
It simply means he did not profit by doing corporate espionage or selling data on the black market throughout his career as a black hat. His intentions were not to enrich himself.
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 12:26 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
how can you say its not profiting when he couldn’t possibly write the book without the crime? what do you call this then?
I guess OJ Simpsons book isn’t profiting off a crime either.
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 12:54 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I didn’t know O.J. was found guilty in a criminal trial…
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 1:06 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Perhaps we should go burn all non-fiction crime books because they’re “profiting” from past criminal acts by merely recounting a story. Your argument is deeply flawed and isn’t very constructive.
Mitnick spent over 5 years in prison. Let it go.
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 1:33 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
because burning books is the same as simply pointing out that he did profit off crimes? what the hell are you talking about? who said he cant write the book? who said he cant profit off it? just don’t say he doesn’t,because he clearly does.
not to mention non-fiction crime books are more often than not written by someone other than the criminal himself, and if you think criminals should be allowed to further profit off their crimes after jail,then theres no sense in discussing it with you.
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 3:28 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
oh yeah and I’m sure you, tim miller, are the foremost expert on Kevin Mitnick’s goals and intentions.
did YOU even think before you wrote that line?
you’re fucking thick in the head man.
Posted on Aug 27, 2011 | 10:08 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
good land ur a dork.. Mitnick is a genius let him enjoy his spotlight he’s earned it.
Posted on Aug 28, 2011 | 12:44 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
good land ur a dork.. Mitnick is a genius let him enjoy his spotlight he’s earned it.
Posted on Aug 28, 2011 | 12:44 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
It would be difficult for me to be happier about the fact that you guys are doing book reviews. I hope this continues.
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 12:20 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
It will!
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 12:44 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Excellent!
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 3:22 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Book eaters make good book reviewers
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 3:34 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
exactly. my three-year-old has consumed at least 10 board books since she got teeth. you could say that she’s given “the very hungry caterpillar” an excellent—and fitting—review.
Posted on Aug 28, 2011 | 11:41 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Wow I am tired after this read. Nice article but it competed with Paul Miller in length.
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 12:30 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Kids today…. you’d better avoid James Joyce, Tolstoy and Tolkien then :-)
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 12:34 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
tl;dr
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 12:47 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Part of the intrigue is that the “authorities” have little clue as to what damage a hacker can do or their intent so they throw the book as well as create new rules. The counter-culture nature of hacking is attractive to many but, like Le Carre’s description of the tedium of actual spying, we tend to gloss over the mundane nature of seeking code vulnerabilities. Mitnick’s skills are also a good example of the fact that the weakest security exploit is usually human. And there’s one of those born every minute.
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 12:38 PM EDT reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Darkside hacker? I like the sound of this
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 1:05 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Darkside hacker? I like the sound of this
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 1:05 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Well written piece this one! Crazy length but it’s nice to see people are still reading (and intelligently analysing) books too. Keep it up TIMN/Verge!
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 1:28 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I agree. I just hope they keep a nice mix of sugar and beef. Engadget has the sugar covered, but the new talent they have has been haphazard as of late.
Posted on Aug 27, 2011 | 1:04 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I agree. I just hope they keep a nice mix of sugar and beef. Engadget has the sugar covered, but the new talent they have has been haphazard as of late.
Posted on Aug 27, 2011 | 1:04 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Greatly enjoyed the article, thanks! For the people who said it’s too long, why not try to get the folks at “The Verge” to do a voice over on their longer articles in much the same way that the folks at NPR or the BBC do?
I know I’d at least appreciate that!
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 1:57 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Glad you guys are doing book reviews, Been reading his The Art of Deception book will probably start reading this after I finish that one.
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 2:33 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
This is brilliant for TIMN/Verge to do book reviews! Keep up the great work!
Suggestions for going forward: any Kevin Kelly books, You Are Not A Gadget, forthcoming Jobs biography or anything by Carl Sagan.
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 2:34 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
It is agreeable that it’s a good idea that this website does
book reviews. This book looks like an extra-ordinary, out of the usual books we
see at a bookstore.
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 3:51 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Excellent review, to the point that it makes me want to read the book. I always really into autobiographies anyway.
Upon viewing prices of the book $14.29 for a “traditional” book, $12.99 for the Kindle edition results in a whopping $1.30 savings.
Nothing was printed, nothing was shipped. It was stored on a hard drive, and storage space is dirt cheap.
I guess I’ll try to find the book locally just so I can donate/give to friend/etc afterwards. I never realized what a crock the Kindle prices were. I couldn’t even give away the digital copy after that. What a load.
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 4:17 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Printing and binding books is the cheapest part of publishing (I moonlight as a publisher, I know). If you want to buy paper, you’d be much better off going to Staples.
Posted on Aug 26, 2011 | 11:06 PM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I enjoyed reading this. More book reviews would be great.
Posted on Aug 27, 2011 | 12:51 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
I was going to read the article but then I decided that it would take just as long to read the actual book.
I kid, I kid.
No seriously, short reviews concerning quality of books and movies are appreciated. Long reviews steal too much of the story from the subject in question. That’s why I even avoid movie trailers anymore.
Posted on Aug 27, 2011 | 10:43 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
In fairness, however, the reason trailers generally spoil the movies they promote has more to do with the shallow nature of those films than anything else.
I do appreciate a good review and I think this piece in particular qualifies as such; I’ll be on the lookout for this book.
Posted on Aug 28, 2011 | 10:34 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Thank you for the recomendation. Downloaded it on Audible and it was super Awesome. Keep up the great reviews!!!!
Posted on Aug 30, 2011 | 6:33 AM EDT reply Recommend Flag actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed