You may or may not have heard of Microsoft's Windows Phone "Tango" update, but it's the rumored codename for the company's next version of the software. Previous reports suggested that the update is designed to drive down the cost of manufacturing Windows Phones, but how does Microsoft plan to achieve this? We have heard that Microsoft's biggest work with Tango is reducing the RAM requirement for Windows Phone. We have been informed, but cannot immediately verify, that Microsoft will actively support just 256MB RAM, from the standard 512MB found in today's devices. Although this is a current hardware requirement, most devices use 512MB of RAM.
This alleged engineering work could indicate that Tango is designed specifically for low-end handsets, and that the update might not make its way to all devices. However, Michael Gillett, a Microsoft enthusiast in the UK, revealed this week that he has been tipped that Tango will include Start Screen folder support and a revised UI for the built-in media controls. Gillett claims the media controls will take up less space at the top of the screen to look like a notification. As a result, we would expect to see these type of changes for all Windows Phone users.
A leaked Windows Phone roadmap implied that Tango will arrive in Q2 of 2012, a date range that appears to be accurate. Coupled with Microsoft's plans to allow OEMs to support new chipsets, and the alleged 256MB memory requirement, we're hearing there will be more details on Windows Phone updates at Mobile World Congress next month in Barcelona.
Update: We have updated the article to link to the current hardware requirements of Windows Phone.

There are 96 Comments. Add yours.
WINNING
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 1:47 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
To me it sounds like that have tweaked the OS to work on even lower requirments with no negative affects to the customer. Optimizing the OS to be silky smooth on any phone. Sounds great to me.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 1:56 PM EST reply Recommend (27) Flag actions
Yes, this is going in the right direction, 256mb really ought to be plenty enough for most people (no Bill Gates mis-quotes please!) on a phone. Having worked through a 64k Commodore 64, 512k – 16mb Amigas, 96mb PC – 8Gb Macs, the resources we have in phones now is crazy generous.
Yes, more memory is useful with things like productivity apps – thinking iOS iWorks (Pages, Keynote, Numbers), GarageBand, iMovie and so on, or a bunch of concurrent apps needing to all be in memory at once, or lots of pages open in the browser but how many people really need to do that?
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 2:26 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Considering phones are starting to have the same resolution as many laptops from several years ago, I’m not sure 256MB could be considered “enough”.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 2:47 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Its magic!
Seriously Microsoft, I would love a cheaper Zune pass enabled PMP that has 3G functionality and a 3.5 inch screen. I don’t give a poop how much RAM it has.
Make it happen.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 2:50 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
buy an unlocked optimus 7 and give simple mobile a call?
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:42 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Indeed.
Except I live in Canada and Simple Mobile here is called Wind Mobile. Wind works on Tmobile AWS frequency.
So my devices are limited to Tmobiles unlocked HTC HD7, Dell Venue Pro, HTC Radar and Nokia Lumia 710.
Nokia Lumia is the best PMP option here, followed closely by Radar, however both are 300 bucks +. Something for $199 would be nice…
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 4:10 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’ve got an unlocked DVP that I’ve been trying to get rid of. Dell sent me the one with the T-Mo compatible antenna, then “replaced” it with the right one, but don’t seem to want the old one back lol. AND they tried to get me to take both devices for an extra $100 lol. It may be a better bargain than you’re anticipating!
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 8:19 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Exactly how large do you think the video frame buffer is?
Phones are now just reaching s screen resolutions from fifteen years ago. My 1996 96mb Windows98 PC ran in 1280×1024
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:14 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Your 1996 PC had 96 mb of ram and ran Win98 huh?
More likely it had 4 mb of ram and ran Win95, unless you had both the PC with the most ram in the world and a time machine to obtain OS’s that hadn’t been released yet..
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:27 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
it could have been a machine built in 1996 but had win 98 installed on it in 98 99 2000…..
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:31 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
No it came with 98. I waited for it hoping all the USB auto config problems of 95 would be fixed.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:39 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Oops yeah, complete logic fail. It was 98/99 – I was trying to remember the year I got by from where I was working at the time.. Gateway GP-400. PentiumII 400mhz, Nvidia Riva128 GPU, 64mb stock RAM, bumped to 96mb. 1280×1024 17" monitor.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:38 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Back in 96 I bought a Pentium 100 and I remember my 32MB upgrade costing 400 bucks…and that was a good deal haha.
Posted on Jan 21, 2012 | 1:08 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
my 1996 machine was a pentium pro with an awesome 32mb ram, I upgraded it to a voodoo in 1997, and put windows 95 on it (it ran os/2 warp!). and I had a sound blaster awe64 gold card (which I still have) and the full sized wheeled chassis held multiple hard drives, including an amazing 1GB SCSI drive from 1993 that a family friend who was “into computers for the government” gave me for my 9th birthday. I wish I still had that computer….
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 1:09 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
This is a change aimed at lower priced hardware, you don’t find hi-res displays in budget devices.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:55 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yep. But freeing up all that ram still holds out some hope for Apollo and new resolutions.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 8:22 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Tango seems to be mainly focused for the WP7 handsets to be released in India / China. Makes sense
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 1:49 PM EST reply Recommend (6) Flag actions
yes this is mainly to help them gain marketshare in those markets.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 2:09 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
something nokia is good at
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 2:10 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
Ya, may be. But I don’t see WP7 succeeding like android unless they bring USB Mass storage option and don’t make Zune mandatory to connect the phone to PC.
I mean Zune might be good and all, but it restricts the way we use the phone too much. I mean I cant even copy a photo from my friend’s PC unless I install Zune there, which is ridiculous.
We cant even upload pdfs unless I mail it to myself and download it using phone (which requires good internet connection). And internet is not that cheap in Developing countries and people don’t have that much money to spend on internet connection and hence most cant use Skydrive or internet streaming as easily as developed nations.
I love WP7, but I have hard time convincing my friends to buy Lumia 710 or Omnia W. They just go for Android because they can use their phones like pen drive, share files via bluetooth, directly sideload videos downloaded from you tube to phone, sideload the pdfs given by pofs in college etc.
Yes, Fluid user experience matters, but If I have to live with all these restrictions+Fluidity, I would rather select not so fluid+No restrictions.
This is why you cant find iPhone in India. High price+restrictions+Internet needed for everything.
I hope MS understands this soon and will lift those restrictions.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:37 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
And the launch of the xiaomi m1 and meizu mx android phones in china had lines almost as long as iphone launches.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 7:55 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
What average consumer actually says " oh am not gonna get that phone it doesnt have USB Mass storage and it uses Zune" no one says that most people dont even know Zune exists on the PC.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 10:16 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
They may have a friend telling them not to buy it because it’s a “b1tch to use”, and telling how a friend of that friend could not get his photos from the phone to the PC/Mac…
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 10:52 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
zune is the simplest thing to use its the first metro app ever. Its basically the xbox dash. Also i just said hardly anyone uses zune so the probability of some one telling them not to use it is slim.
Posted on Jan 21, 2012 | 8:20 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The first one might buy a windows phone. Then he will see that he cant plug into any PC without zune and he cant transfer anything other than Music, .mp4 video and jpeg photos, while his fried who has android can do anything with his cell. Then he wont recommend that to his friends. Do you think average consumers know about video formats and encoding them to mp4? And as I have told most people don’t have extra money to spend on internet here. So all the novelty that comes with WP7 will not be used by most of them. And I am talking abt India, not USA. I know how it works here.
Posted on Jan 21, 2012 | 1:27 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
thats funny because the other day i overheard some people in my college classes complaining that they had to do everything on an android phone and that the iphone can sync using itunes and these people arent even techies. Also what are you talking about you can download music right on the phone and pictures you can even store and use stuff from skydrive. Just because google music sucks doesnt mean you have to complain about others.
Posted on Jan 21, 2012 | 8:17 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Good points. I completely agree.
In India it is Price, Flexibility (the post above) and Languages and in that order. Google knew that and had her priorities straight.
Android allows screen resolution as low as 320×240 which leads to a no-contract price of lowest cost Android phone in India to Rs. 3,500 ($70).
Now, to penetrate below Rs. 3,500 ($70) Android will require languages among other requirements (multi-sim comes to mind). Which Google may or may not choose to do.
In addition to 256 MB RAM and Langauges, Microsoft should allow lower screen resolutions, otherwise she will never drop below Rs. 10,000 ($200) in India and all their languages effort will go in vain.
Posted on Jan 30, 2012 | 8:06 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I hope so, the folder support would be awesome. Especially if it looks like the People hub tile. I’m okay with the controls as they are, they just need to put the time back in them. Hopefully you’re right about more details at MWC. I hope there’s a decent sized spring update coming. Preferably with a little more in it than NoDo had.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 1:52 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Folder support sounds good anything to get the homescreen more efficient..
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 2:06 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It would be nice if they find a better way to organize the app list besides it being alphabetical and tiny. Folders there too. Fingers crossed :)
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:09 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
whats wrong with the search?
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:32 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
How the hell else do you want to organize the list? Alphabetical makes perfect sense. Plus, as mentioned, there is a search button on the app list.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 6:02 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I love WP7.5 but I’d definitely appreciate more discoverability of apps. I think excluding games from the general app list is a mistake, I always forget that Wordament and Wordrix aren’t in the alphabetical list and have to go to the XBox Live hub to find them, it’s the only reason I’ve pinned them to the homescreen.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 8:05 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I’m really skeptical of how weil this approach is going to work in the (rumored targeted) developing markets, unless MS is prepared to offer the licenses for next to nothing.
The specs on the first-gen Windows Phones will be fairly low-end (though not sub $100) by the time this update hits the streets.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 1:54 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
daninbusiness- unless I misunderstand your comment, The Samsung Focus is currently $49.99 w/contract on AT&T. well under $100.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 6:01 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
IN AMERICA
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 8:06 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
ffs
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 8:06 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
makes sense, but please don’t go lastgen, and do fukin not dig your own grave mr ballmer… :((
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 1:54 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
WP7 already needs 256 MB RAM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP7S#System_requirements
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 1:56 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Yes but most devices do not use 256MB RAM
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 1:57 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
But didn’t you write “Microsoft will drop this requirement to just 256MB RAM, from its current 512MB”?
I’m confused!
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 1:59 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Yes sorry the wording is off there, I updated the article to reflect that. Thanks :)
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 2:01 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Pure speculation here, but Microsoft could set the maximum number of multitasked applications based on the amount of installed RAM. For example, today’s 512mb phones support 6 concurrent apps…this could go to 3-4 concurrent with 256mb and 24 concurrent with 1gb.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 2:43 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Sounds like an extremely incremental upgrade. Guess I should really care about Apollo.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 1:58 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Definitely. Apollo sounds like it’s where they will make the most changes – especially with Skype.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 2:07 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
MS always said that Tango would be about low end phones. All in all, sounds like OEMs should be pumping out some low end phones for LDCs in no time that will still provide and smooth and consistent UI with all of the core features.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 2:30 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The only thing that Microsoft officially said is that “Tango” is a great name and that it ends with an “O”. (In a Verge interview)
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:22 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
And it the very same interview he said they’d rather work on stuff until it’s really finished and only then present it to the public. So of course he wouldn’t talk about Tango, but there seem to be a lot of sources – WMPoweruser wrote about it like 6 months ago already.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:40 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
damnit… should’ve been “in the very same interview”
really looking forward to that edit function, Verge!
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:41 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
It sounds a bit like moving backwards. It is really minimal update, and it is to the wrong direction.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 2:14 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Microsoft said in the past that, for Windows Phone there will be big updates and small updates between each big update. Tango is this year’s Nodo update just as Apollo will be this year’s Mango. Tango is not meant to be a big overhaul, it’s a few tweaks to prep for Apollo. And plus, an update that adds a wider range of compatibility and folder-like features is better than no update at all. :D
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 2:25 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
If you have a WP7.5 device that runs snappy on 512MB RAM (as they pretty much all do), and MS releases an update that makes it snappy on half of that, that’s a pretty good indication of how much more efficient your existing device will become, no?
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 8:08 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
That depends on how this is achieved.
Optimization, restriction or combination.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 8:55 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The next Billion…
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 2:28 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Insane that the smoothest OS needs the lowest requirements. More budget handsets please!
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 2:37 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Best guess? Hello, Virgin, Boost and all other low cost prepaid carriers. Might be a good shot.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 2:46 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
WP7 on Virgin? Sounds good to me.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:24 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Or Straight Talk®
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 5:15 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
METRO PCS if they had a windows phone that would be the end of android just saying.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 10:18 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It might be one of the main reasons stopping the move to date. I would buy a Windows Phone on Virgin Mobile right now today for anywhere in the $150-$300 price range.
Posted on Jan 23, 2012 | 4:22 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
What is a senior UK Microsoft student partner and MVP?
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 2:57 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
When you are certified by Microsoft to know about what your talking about. Usually they have a subtitle for Connected Home (Media Center) or Mobile, etc.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:11 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
afaik you get the MVP status when you’ve helped a lot in Microsoft forums and have proven to know MS products inside out.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:43 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
So they are changing media controls BACK? Damn..
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:07 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
What’d they look like before? I like how they are now!
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 6:04 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
They used to take up the same space as a notification. Then they changed it to the current expanded panel. I guess they’re reverting that change…
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 9:55 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Windows Phone racing to the bottom, hardly surprising!
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:14 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
at least it won’t require a quad-core and a 1GB of Ram to scroll smoothly ;P
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:39 PM EST reply Recommend (14) Flag actions
Trollololol
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 8:09 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
256 million bytes of RAM is cool and all, but I hope thet get around to the version that supports 256 million customers. ;-)
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:14 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I thought that most consumers consider more RAM to mean a better phone. Although my Samsung Intercept with 2.2 runs just terrible.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:33 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
This is for developing countries. 256MB ram will not see most 1st world or developed countries marketplaces.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 4:56 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Hmm, if the user experience is the same across this lower end handset or at least if the UI is just as smooth, then I’m all for it. Defined tiers are better for everyone. Low end shouldn’t just be last years mid-range devices struggling mightily to run this years OS. Amirite 3GS owners?
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:36 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Please do not add support very low end devices.. this will hurt the whole platform and the quality of phones and apps!
WP7 hardware is already mid-range.. you need to expand upwards not downwards!
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:43 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Ever used a WP7? “Mid-range” is relative to the OS running on it. A Formula 1 car has an engine half the size of an Indy car, and yet craps all over Indy cars when it comes to performance
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 8:11 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
It is actually better engineering to optimize your current software rather than throw more hardware at it. Once you’ve got the software optimized to bare minimums, expanding would be a piece of cake.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:45 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
I guess I’m missing something here. How is lowering RAM requirement (and the impact it will have on perf) supposed to make the product more attractive to end consumers, let alone handset manufactures. Android will always be ahead in that game. If T-Mo can’t move 710’s for free at wal-mart and costco, then it’s pretty much game over. It’’s not like things get better than that with less ram.
How about lowering the licensing fee? That at least makes a difference for the nadset mfgrs, and doesn’t screw the end user. If you’re going to burn money to build mkt share, what’s a few million more?
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:46 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
It’s of benefit to to MS if they can entice the makers of budget handsets to get into the WP7 game by helping to lower the cost of manufacturing. One of the things that’s helped Android in the UK with people who may not ordinarily have cared about smartphones is the proliferation of dirt cheap Android phones on PAYG; if there’s a similarly priced WP7 option, it makes the competition slightly more even.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 5:20 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yep, you are missing something, sadly so are most people. The phones will run better than an Android phone with 1GB of RAM with just 256MB. If you look at specs you get the wrong picture, one MS need to work harder to educate people about.
They need linpack or one of those speed tests that people use to rate Android phones to run on a Windows Phone, so people can see that a lower specc’d Windows Phone runs faster than a more expensive Android phone.
And yes if it costs the manufacturer less then they can pass that saving to the end user.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 9:56 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
“Windows Phone 7: Yesterday’s technology today!”
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 3:54 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
For the millions (billions?) in the developing world stuck on last week’s technology? Yesterday’s technology would be a godsend
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 4:05 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yep, yesterdays’ technology outrunning todays.
Sadly you are right, what is an improvement to the OS most people will see as a weakness. Running better on less RAM is great, but people will just compare specs; 256KB vs 1GB and assume the Android is better, when it’s just inefficient.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 9:52 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Still waiting for VPN support.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 4:22 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
i like folders
but lower ram :/
the focus flash is already 1$ on contract
we dont need cheaper ones
support 1 gig i think it should
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 5:08 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Many parts of the world don’t have the contract system….
It will lead to cheaper priced unlocked phones for them….
Posted on Jan 30, 2012 | 12:04 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Welcome to the shallow end. No diving please.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 5:30 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Isn’t this a good thing? I mean think about it, lower ram requirements for the system means more usable ram for everyone with 512mb ram. If they’re going to lower the requirements, it also implies that we will be compatible for the Apollo update because our 1st and 2nd gen phones are already over the requirements for Tango. Unless Microsoft decides to not give our generation Apollo, then we would be screwed because we’d be stuck with older phones, and Microsoft would be screwed because it lost it’s whole userbase.
TL;DR Don’t buy a low end phone.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 6:05 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I think MSFT are going to give each device 2 major update so 1st gen get Mango and Apollo.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 9:32 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Much as this update will be welcomed by anyone using or considering a Windows Phone, for everyone else it’s the wrong way to go and instead of winning Microsoft new converts will just push people away. They will come out with phones that run great on 256kb, kill the Android competition on price and speed (and as an OS) – but all you are going to hear is “they are cheap, they only have 256kb of RAM, why get that shit when you can get an Android superphone with 1GB of RAM”. Too few people care about efficiency these days, it’s all about chasing specs (the same way the camera industry chases megapixels) – it might not give you a better product, but people are ignorant and think big numbers = better.
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 9:48 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
They have efficiency in UI and OS… but these kind of specs will not allow for great games or for heavier professional applications (still loving my Atrix’s lapdock :) )
Posted on Jan 20, 2012 | 10:57 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Wait what? When they discussed the design philosophy they stressed out how folders would be going away from the metro-philosophy. That’s why they went with the more flat, non-heirarchy way of going about. This can’t be right or they changed their minds from massive input
Posted on Jan 21, 2012 | 12:13 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Well I think there needs to be some way to organize Start Screen tiles. Otherwise you just restrict the amount of them or don’t use the ones at the bottom of the screen.
Posted on Jan 21, 2012 | 6:07 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Only a poorly written OS or an app needs more RAM. Until few months, Symbian ran on 128MB RAM and it still manged to do MORE than any of the latest crop of OSs.
Note: I am not talking about UI’s (sadly, the only thing that matters these days) here.
Posted on Jan 21, 2012 | 6:33 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
I don’t like the idea of SMALLER media controls. Why!?!?!?
Posted on Jan 21, 2012 | 11:49 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
if i’m not mistaken, i think the dell dvp is the only device that currently has 256mb ram. also the os supports 256mb ram since v1.0, again, if i’m not mistaken!! so that rumor is inaccurate
Posted on Jan 22, 2012 | 9:19 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.