Bill Gates revealed the details of an intimate letter this week that he sent to Steve Jobs shortly before the Apple co-founder passed away in October. In an interview with The Telegraph, Gates says he learned of Jobs' medical condition and wrote him a letter, one that Jobs later kept by his bed. "I told Steve about how he should feel great about what he had done and the company he had built," said Gates, discussing Jobs' children in the letter too. He also dismissed Jobs' critical comments about him in the recent Steve Jobs biography:
"He spent a lot of his time competing with me. There are lots of times when Steve said [critical] things about me. If you took the more harsh examples, you could get quite a litany."
Gates describes Jobs as an "incredible genius" and praised his work on the Mac, iPhone, and iPad, in spite of his own work at Microsoft. "We made great products," said Gates. "It’s quite an achievement, and we enjoyed each [other’s work].” Despite the obvious competition, it's clear there was a great amount of mutual respect between the pair — something that Jobs' wife claimed was not portrayed in his biography. "We were not at war," says Gates. "Competition was always a positive thing."

There are 83 Comments. Add yours.
Say what you want about Microsoft, but Bill Gates is a class act.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 4:48 PM EST reply Recommend (237) Flag actions
Nice of Bill to remain cool despite all opposition. He is a matured guy and deserves a lot of respect. The respect not afforded him by all the haters out there who cannot separate their feeling from their work. I am talking of Tech Journalists and Writers as haters. The fact that Job’s wife objected to not mentioning the mutual respect Jobs has for Gates in his autobiography tells me the Writer is a hater who left anything positive about Microsoft and Bill Gates out intentionally. Haters will always hate!
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 5:53 PM EST reply Recommend (19) Flag actions
He’s a class act, matured, etc. because he has perspective on what matters in life. He accomplished everything you could possibly hope for in the tech/business world and has graduated and moved on to focus on something much more important. If he had taken any criticisms to heart then he would have been foolish.
A legacy of eliminating diseases and saving millions of lives is far greater than anything anyone in the computer industry could leave behind. I’m sorry that Jobs died early without ever obtaining any perspective and remaining petty and small to his final days. The fact that he cut off all philanthropy at Apple upon becoming CEO and never resumed any despite creating the most profitable company in the world speaks volumes about his character or lack thereof.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 9:48 PM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
You should read the book before you assume so much.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 10:10 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Walter Isaacson’s book isn’t a terribly flattering portrayal of Steve, something Mrs. Jobs insisted was necessary in order to produce a more accurate picture of the man. Gates, on the other hand, was described as the “other wonderkind” of silicon valley, suggesting that the two men were equals.
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 2:45 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Have you read the book? While it may or may not have portrayed their relationship entirely accurately, it did include quite a few positive things, and did talk a little about their mutual respect. I don’t think Isaacson’s intent was to deliberately misrepresent the relationship. Or, at least, I don’t think you can conclude so categorically that that was his intent.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 6:34 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yeah. the real problem with MS is Monkeyboy Ballmer. Gates was an absolutely vicious, ruthless businessman when he was running MS, but outside of MS he is a genuinely good guy. All his philanthropic work and his respect for his biggest competitor proves that. He’s also not an idiot, something Jobs respected. I don’t think Jobs ever had any respect for the Monkeyboy.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 6:05 PM EST reply Recommend (15) Flag actions
I would hold off praise of Gates if you’re comfortable with labeling Ballmer a “Monkeyboy.” Gates personally hired Steve in 1980 as one of only 30 employees at the time. Gates then went on to watch Ballmer mature through the company for 19 years before handing over CEO duties to him. And as much as you claim Gates to be an absolute vicious, ruthless businessman, under Ballmer Microsoft has nearly tripled revenue and more than tripled profit. Ruthless or not he’s producing results. Respect or not, he’s still producing results. So it would seem either Gates was an idiot for hiring and promoting a Monkeyboy that YOU THINK is the problem with Microsoft, or he was a visionary who handed over a company to man who has almost tripled it’s profits.
Lets please put things into context before we start hurling insults and unnecessary name calling.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 6:40 PM EST reply Recommend (24) Flag actions
Triple revenue and triple profits…. in 12 years! In the same amount of time Apple went from being almost bankrupt to the most valuable company in the US. Google was brand new and Facebook and Twitter didn’t exist when Ballmer took over. 300% growth may be good for some businesses, but a technology company in 2000-2012 could do a lot better then 300% increase in profits and a steady share value.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 7:54 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
When you’re already on top, as MS was 12 years ago, its hard to keep going up.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 8:26 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
as MS was two years ago, at least in value
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 9:17 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yeah, when you only have two products. Ha. What a torrent of Innovation.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 11:16 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
MS was seriously handicapped for 10 of those years by the DOJ. How easy people seem to forget that.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 8:57 PM EST reply Recommend (10) Flag actions
Exactly~ How do you think they plan to ‘Win’ with BING… by leveraging their Monopoly position… Windows..IE..etc. Some habits never change.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 11:17 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
What are they supposed to do? Not include a browser with the OS? Btw when I got my new PC I got a prompt to choose a browser.
Macs have Safari, iTunes installed. No way around this either when you want to run OS X.
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 6:05 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Well Apple doesn’t have a monopoly. MS did. If Safari had a monopoly I’m sure it’d have the same judgement passed.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 8:52 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
It’s not like Apple is incapable of having a monopoly – if they grew to hold as much as the market share as Microsoft did they’d likely run into the same issues.
Posted on Jan 30, 2012 | 8:44 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You clearly don’t understand economics very well. Nor law.
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 6:20 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Oh, you wanted context? I’m sorry, let me be more clear: Ballmer is a complete fucking idiot. Is that better? Ballmer did nothing – NOTHING – to triple profits at Microsoft. Their profits were tripled on sales of products Microsoft was already making BEFORE Ballmer took over. Office and Windows.
Does it take a god damn genius to continue selling Windows and Office? No, as Ballmer has proven without any doubt. It’s a miracle Ballmer hasn’t managed to screw that up as well. Monkeyboy does not deserve any praise for anything. All the products that came out under his time at the helm have been absolute miserable failures with the exception of the Xbox, and even that was already in development by the time Gates left.
Is that enough context for you?
Posted on Jan 30, 2012 | 4:15 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The only mistake Microsoft has done in recent years is that it has not been as awesome as Apple.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 7:05 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
No, the only mistake they made was sit on their backside and watch Apple destroy their reputation with the Switcher Ads, now they are wondering why everyone hates them. Apple was telling the whole world for 4 years that Microsoft is uncool before they woke up, now its too late.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 7:47 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
There’s a difference between sitting on your backside and being pinned to your chair. I’d say the DoJ was a bigger problem than the switcher ads. After 10 years of the DoJ, it’s only in the past 10-12 months that they’ve started unifying services, which is no easy task.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 9:36 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I’m pretty sure the Switcher ads made Apple look like snobby hipsters. They were running ads that said Macs are all about “fun things” when all the best games are on Windows. Yes some games eventually converted over for Apple about 4-6 years later but they run at a 15-30% frame rate drop.
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 3:58 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You’ll see that the popularity of Apple is now on the top and i going to be reduced. That is because these things are going into waves. Over e few years Microsoft is more popular aigan.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 8:09 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Their biggest mistake was letting Apple live. Should have fought them to til the end
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 2:44 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I think the “monkeyboy” is a really good seller and a man who can motivate his employees. He can run Microsoft, and he does it with passion. He really loves Microsoft, and also that is really important for a good CEO.
I think that people think that Ballmer is a bad CEO because of a few mistakes he made in the past like Vista, the KIN and maybe a little bit the Zune media player. But people are forgotten what he did very well: he brought Windows XP, Windows Live with less advertising and more productive, faster, he brought Windows 7, the Ribbon UI and, for god’s sake, the slick Metro UI. He brought really nice products for companies, and new products for them like Office 365. He brought the Xbox and the Xbox 360, world’s most popular gaming console. Without Ballmer, where do you think we would be right now? Microsoft is not only Windows. Microsoft is a lot more.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 8:04 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
You don’t know business if you hate Ballmer. There are a lot of things happening within MS that’s restorative of Gates’ excesses. Their portfolio has diversified, cronies kicked, products have become more responsive to demands, and overall greater transparency. Yes MS is still a domineering business, but many tech companies can learn from these best practises.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 8:38 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Good Guy Bill Gates.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 7:28 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
He’s been all over uk media for the past few days… He was guest, co-hosting my favourite radio show, BBC – World Have Your Say.
Amazing that someone who’s changed the world twice, is incredibly wealthy and intelligent would spend an hour talking with kids about issues in their part of the world.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 7:33 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
I wouldn’t call him a class act, but I would call him rich. The way he got rich is… ugh.. very slimy.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 11:18 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Agreed. Particularly surprising in an industry full of planet-sized egos.
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 8:38 AM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
Both Jobs and Gates changed the world with their work. Whatever your preferences are when it comes to computing, both deserve a lot of respect for what they accomplished.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 5:47 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend (19) Flag actions
I find it very interesting, that despite his personal contributions to technology, Bill Gates chose to write a letter. Not an email, not a text, but a letter. I bet it was hand written.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 6:59 PM EST reply Recommend (24) Flag actions
It’s the most personal one can get today.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 8:07 PM EST reply Recommend (14) Flag actions
definitely…if i was dying, and someone wanted to get in touch w/ me to say some last words, i would definitely appreciate a physical letter more than a email, or text message.
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 1:03 AM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
The article states that Jobs kept Gates’ letter by his bed, clearly shows the respect that these men had for each other, despite being incredible rivals.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 5:47 PM EST reply Recommend (39) Flag actions
I don’t anyone was in a better position to understand what the other was going through and dealing with than these two men. They basically created the face of modern computing in this day and age be it pc’s games or phones they have both shaped these products and their following is massive and global. It’s mac or pc for the masses. Please don’t comment if your going to tell me about xerox etc…. I already know.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 5:52 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
But… but… we NEEEEED to rehash the old Xerox again, because it’s AWESOME. ;)
Seriously, I agree your main point. Through their respective companies, they really did more to bring computing to the average person than anyone else.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 9:40 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Bill Gates is a pretty awesome guy.
We see so many examples these days where money turns people into disgusting, narcissistic, greedy jerks. It’s really refreshing to see somebody for whom that is not true at all. Gates clearly loves people and loves humankind and he’s taken the gift of success and made it his responsibility to give back and make the world a better place. This story is another example of his compassion really shining through.
Stuff like this helps restore my faith in humankind.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 5:57 PM EST reply Recommend (23) Flag actions
I think it’s eve n more amazing when you consider that 20 years ago, Gates was a narcissistic, greedy, (monopolistic) jerk. Look at how much he has changed.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 7:51 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Everybody is jerk in business on their way up, they only become nice on their way down. It is called capitalism. The mistake he made was he didn’t know when to stop being a one. He should have stopped after his first billion.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 7:55 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
20 years ago, I was 6 years old. Things have changed, the world has changed, and being one of the richest people in the US changes you. Now that he’s out of Microsoft, he’s an awesome dude.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 9:24 PM EST reply Recommend (4) Flag actions
I think the term for the specific quality he has is “magnanimous”.
When he got to the top and accomplished everything he ever hoped in the business world, he became this.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 10:35 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
It’s awesome to see that Steve Jobs and Bill Gates were not so arrogant and blinded by their own successes to recognize and respect brilliance in their business rivals.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 6:01 PM EST reply Recommend (5) Flag actions
Bill Gates, always a class act.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 6:08 PM EST reply Recommend (15) Flag actions
Bill Gates has saved 5,812,000 lives
“Redefining Action Hero: Bill Gates is Better Than Batman”
http://frugaldad.com/microsoft/
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 6:11 PM EST reply Recommend (17) Flag actions
“Any man can stand up to adversity. If you wish to test a mans character, give him power”
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 6:19 PM EST reply Recommend (8) Flag actions
My favorite Gates and Jobs moment.

Old but still good. :D
two more at http://www.goospoos.com/2010/05/funny-conversation-bill-gates-steve-jobs/
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 6:26 PM EST reply Recommend (34) Flag actions
wtf?
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 7:09 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 7:16 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Steve Jobs changed the entire world with his visionary outset and revamping of wireless media and communications. He’ll be a name which rings out through history for evolving the way we live, share and communicate. I was compelled to create a portrait of him, now In Memoriam on my artist’s blog at http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2011/08/end-of-era-steve-jobs.html
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 7:26 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
No, Steve is a good Salesman who would sell you stone for diamond and have you panting for it. He may be a visionary to some, but he is also a ruthless guy who is hard to work with. Ask anyone who got closer to him. No, he only knows how to get into people’s head.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 7:52 PM EST reply Recommend (11) Flag actions
keep telling yourself that
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 8:29 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Won’t make those 200 patents with his name on them any less real.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 8:45 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
200? lol
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 9:56 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
200+. lukeskymac wasn’t in it for the lulz.
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 9:00 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
:Looks at avatar: Well you’re one to say, being in love with one of the most obvious pieces of vaporware in recent history!
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 9:13 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
However still a damn good concept, a tablet capable of media creation not just consumption.
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 1:36 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Why do people blame Bill Gates for basically having a monopoly???
Because he was an incredibly successful business man?
Because his products were so much more superior to the competition that EVERYONE bought them?
I just dont get it.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 10:05 PM EST reply Recommend (3) Flag actions
Because he used illegal methods to obtain the monopoly, then used additional illegal methods to use that monopoly to crush competition.
Illegal here meaning against the laws of the US, of which MS violated several as determined by multiple lawsuits in the 90s by the Department of Justice.
The success of Microsoft in the 90s had very little to to with the quality of their products (a highly subjective measurement anyhow). In the 80s, they were very innovative, and some of that kept up into the 90s. Then they got smacked hard for their actions, had to compete again in some areas, and innovation at MS picked up again over the past decade.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 10:44 PM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
The monopoly was well in place before using it to gain success for other MS products. That is all because Windows was the only OS that you could buy that would work on a standardized platform. All other companies stuck to their own combo of architecture and OS.
MS may have lost that lawsuit but reading the wiki page on that, there was at least a Nobel laureate that did not agree with US Government’s legal action against MS.
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 9:32 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
There’s also Nobel laureates who think climate change is not happening and who think that prayer will heal you over medicine. Doesn’t mean so much. MS used their monopoly in one area to crush competitors in others. They also used their monopoly to threaten OEMs who were going to use non-MS OSes and products on their hardware. These are findings of fact.
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 12:55 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
Still that says nothing about the way they got to monopoly status, which is what I am arguing. The previous user accused MS for creating their monopoly in an unlawful manner. It is not the case. MS did try to force OEMs to ship only with Windows by default seeing as they already had a monopoly but legal threats forced them to back down. That still does not make their monopoly unlawful. They won the desktop front fair and square.
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 5:01 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Those deals were going on before they got caught and helped to cement the position. And if you look at the history of what happened there were some shady practices going on as well as some luck.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 12:45 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
There were some shady moves against DR DOS even relatively early in the life of Windows. But certainly the Desktop monopoly has never been found to have been acquired illegally, so it is presumed legal. The problems are what they subsequently did with it.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 1:16 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
The deals were in place against a few OEMs for long enough to do damage. Those deals were part of the initial FTC investigation in 1991. DOJ stepped in later, and also investigated. Various states were also investigating. It all eventually came under the full lawsuit the DOJ lead in the later part of the 90s, combining many aspects into one case.
MS did continue to push some of these “You must ship Windows on every box out the door” agreements even into the late 90s, later reframing it as a “fix for piracy”
http://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/f3800/msjudgex.htm#iiie
Posted on Feb 01, 2012 | 4:35 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Microsoft is a far cry from what it used to be. However, since a lot of people either are have short memories or are simply too young to remember, you might want to look up the phrase “embrace, extend extinguish” and that might shed some light on things for you.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 11:21 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Like what they tried to do with Java, javascript, and kerebos to name three technologies. Also the way they went after Quicktime which ended up in lawsuits and the settlement that everyone says saved Apple.
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 12:56 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Ha…nice spin. The “settlement” that saved Apple was not a “settlement”, it was an investment; settlements are announced during verdicts or after.
Jobs just arrived at Apple and negotiated a life support deal with Gates. Gates saw the opportunity to clean MS’ litigious image agreed to help Apple. And it is nothing wrong in admitting that; Gates and Jobs were real friends once upon a time.
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 5:06 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You mean the $150 million? It didn’t save Apple. What did more for Apple was the commitment on Office. Also MS needed Apple around to stave off anti-trust. Looking back I don’t think either really saved Apple in the way most think it did.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 12:47 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I don’t dispute that…just that it was not a settlement. But I always see people getting sore trying to diminish this and making it sound like Gates was forced into paying Apple. It is like they don’t want to admit that MS helped Apple when it could easily choose not to.
Gates appeared on the screen during a media covered keynote and pledged support and investment in Apple. That must’ve been worth something when Apple was ailing and MS was the hot tech company(soon to be sued into oblivion by the US government).
Posted on Jan 30, 2012 | 8:43 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
May nt have been more genius than jobs but he is pure class of a human being.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 10:55 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Except for the whole, getting a prototype Mac to work on MS Word, and then stealing Mac OS GUI thing.. but yea, I take your point. Ahem.
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 11:14 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yes because Steve did not steal it from Xerox or is it that when Jobs steals it , its inspiration when Microsoft does it , it’s because they have no class.
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 4:55 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Ahh here we go. Xerox Parc. You know Apple paid for access and told them what they wanted to do right? Xerox made a tidy sum of money off the deal for a technology that they had no interest in using.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 12:48 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Apple wanted exclusivity of Word and Excel, but couldn’t get their product out in time.
Otherwise, we’d be having the monopoly debate about Apple.
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 9:02 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Sent from my iPad
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 11:13 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Ugh…It was MS that gave a common OS to the computers that you use today. I’d say that Apple is the one with monopoly…it dosen’t sell its OS to any other company. If you have to use Lion, Snow Leopard etc. you’ll have to buy a Mac. But, if you want to use Windows, you can buy any machine that suits your choice…and if you don’t want Windows…you can simply install Linux or any other OS…but not Lion etc.
Apple is only famous in the United States…for rest of the world…Microsoft is the company that gave us the personal computer…not Apple.
And still people choose Windows as an OS…not Linux. Linux is for develpoers, programmers, hackers and geeks…but many people don’t belong to these categories…and they choose Windows!
Posted on Jan 27, 2012 | 11:46 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend (9) Flag actions
“Apple is only famous in the United States”. No.
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 3:20 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yes
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 1:38 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Look at China riots to get the new iPhone 4s. Isn’t that made by Apple? So again "Apple is only famous in the United States". No.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 7:04 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I’m talking about a computer…not a dumb iPhone!
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 10:34 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
Apple computers are featured in almost every movie/tv show. Those shows and movies are watched worldwide. Their logo is one of the most famous and recognized. It’s really silly to think they re only famous in the US. They re famous everywhere.
Posted on Jan 30, 2012 | 5:23 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
You know what else people have a choice in? Not abusing the ellipsis.
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 10:06 AM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
“The ellipsis can also be used to indicate a pause in the flow of a sentence”
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 10:37 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
I said abuse not misuse.
Posted on Feb 02, 2012 | 2:58 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Apple has a monopoly on it’s own hardware? Of course they do because it is their hardware. They sell what is called a turnkey solution. I think you need to look up the definition of a monopoly, you also need to understand a monopoly is in and of itself not illegal. It is how you use the monopoly.
Your statement is like saying that Sonos has a monopoly on their wireless speaker system or that Coke has a monopoly on selling Coke…
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 12:59 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
People don’t choose Windows, companies choose Windows. People want Macs.
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 11:25 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
21tiger said [quote] People don’t choose Windows, companies choose Windows. People want Macs. [/end-quote] They have great hardware, and now it is even better with it running Microsoft Windows. Need I remind you, Apple is no longer in the operating system business? They did try going the route of Linux, that didn’t pan out, now they are with HP, Dell, Gateway, etc. WELCOME to the world of Windows, Apple Computers.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 6:43 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Yup! I want a Mac so that I can put Windows in it. (Macbook Air 13)
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 10:39 PM EST via mobile reply Recommend Flag actions
I agree with you to a certain point Bharat, that was until now! Have you taken the opportunity of looking at Windows 8 DP yet? Even RIGHT now, just in the Developer’s Preview you can run Linux apps natively, and Microsoft is giving anyone that wants to write their own app the ability too with built in tools. People even talked about the ipad here WELL you can run Windows 8 on an iPad, and EVEN write your own apps too for it. message to all the MS Windows haters here; YOUR running out of choices for Operating Systems, and don’t blame Bill Gates about it, he is no longer running MS, as he is just a figure head there. And if you go to Linux.org you will see the many topics about Windows 8 being the next great thing out there, they even have a cute video about Windows 8, doing a slam on it. Usually when people are nervous, or scared they use insults instead of fact to try and get their point(s) across. Mac O/S was great till they tried the Linux route, and I was lucky to be able to sell my iMac before the bottom fell out on Apple’s Mac O/S.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 6:59 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Both Jobs and Gates are/were great innovators, entrepreneurs, business leaders.
Bill Gates matured to become a great man.
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 12:16 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
Bill Gates what a class act. Even with all of the competitveness he still holds his head high. It just goes to show with all the fanboism that he’s higher than that. Jobs and Gates fed off of each other and respected one another even with Steve getting a bit immature Bill kept his head high.
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 1:15 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
bill gates is a genuinely nice person….
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 1:29 AM EST reply Recommend (2) Flag actions
people, stop replying to/arguing with trolls! ignore them!!
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 1:45 AM EST reply Recommend (8) Flag actions
I can’t believe I went through this whole thread and this is the first post that has so much common sense in it in such a few words.
I applaud your vocal mind.
Also, Jobs and Gates were the most awesome rivals the tech industry ever had… we’ll never to see that again.
__;Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 1:58 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
bring bill back, dump ballmer.
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 2:14 AM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
I think Bill Gates is looking beyond any company. He cares more about people. I think his visibility in the last few months following Jobs’ death shows that he isn’t really concerned with Apple, Microsoft or any particular company. He is only concerned about his charity and giving back.
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 2:34 PM EST reply Recommend (1) Flag actions
I’m gonna clear some thinsg up with a quick history lesson. Back in the day, everyone made their own computers running their own OS. If you made software you had to make multiple copies of the same program. This drove the production price up.
Microsoft was the first commercial company to take all the diverse hardwares and unify them under a single OS: Windows. Linux is basically the same thing, and competes indirectly with windows (lack of user friendliness limits it’s success), and MacOS. The OS acts as a go-between for the hardware and software, as the OS deals with the hardware, not the application.
Some say this is a dirty move on Microsoft’s part, but bottom line, without a unified OS of some kind, buying a computer was Russian Roulette. How would you know if Packard Bell and their OS would be around, and if it went out of business, you were stuck with a useless computer you couldn’t get anything for.
My argument is that a single dominant OS was needed for progress, and you can get a Mac, get a windows PC, or make/buy a linux machine.
I made my neutral comment.
As far as monopoly, Apple is suing and suing “competition” in the mobile market. Even if the company did nothing wrong, they can only survive the legal onslaught for so long. This is a bully move and must be dealt with as MS was.
Competition brings better products. If you are indeed master of a concept, the competition shouldn’t concern you one bit.
Posted on Jan 28, 2012 | 11:59 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Bill Gates, classy as usual.
Posted on Jan 29, 2012 | 3:59 PM EST reply Recommend Flag actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.