<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Verge -  Google acquires Motorola Mobility: the full story</title>
  <subtitle></subtitle>
  <icon>http://cdn1.sbnation.com/community_logos/34086/verge-fv.png</icon>
  <updated>2013-04-26T20:33:23Z</updated>
  <id>http://www.theverge.com/rss/stream/2795023</id>
  <link type="text/html" href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/5/19/3030982/google-acquires-motorola-mobility-full-story" rel="alternate"/>
  <entry>
    <published>2013-04-26T20:33:23Z</published>
    <updated>2013-04-26T20:33:23Z</updated>
    <title>Does anyone know why Google bought Motorola?</title>
    <content type="html">
  




  &lt;img alt=&quot;Hed_large&quot; src=&quot;http://cdn2.sbnation.com/entry_photo_images/8103991/Hed_large.png&quot; /&gt;





  &lt;p&gt;Why did Google spend $12.5 billion to purchase Motorola Mobility? It's been nearly two years since the deal was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theverge.com/2011/08/15/google-buy-motorola-mobility-hardware-business/&quot;&gt;announced&lt;/a&gt; and close to a full year since it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theverge.com/2012/5/22/3036049/google-completes-acquisition-of-motorola-mobility&quot;&gt;closed&lt;/a&gt;, and the questions keep piling up while the answers keep getting worse.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The biggest problem is that Motorola's &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theverge.com/2011/08/15/google-motorola-patents-for/&quot;&gt;patent portfolio&lt;/a&gt; doesn't appear to be worth anything close to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theverge.com/2012/7/25/3186036/google-motorola-patents-worth-5-5-billion/in/2795023&quot;&gt;what either company assumed&lt;/a&gt;: the judge in the &lt;i&gt;Microsoft v. Motorola&lt;/i&gt; patent case ruled yesterday that Redmond &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/25/4267830/judge-rules-motorolas-patents-arent-worth-the-4-billion-a-year-it-wanted-from-microsoft/in/2795023&quot;&gt;owes a paltry $1.7 million in annual royalties&lt;/a&gt; for using Motorola's standards-related Wi-Fi and video-encoding patents in every Xbox 360 and Windows 7 PC sold, rather than the $4 billion Motorola had originally demanded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To put that in perspective, it would take 3,235 years for Microsoft's royalties...&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/26/4271432/does-anyone-know-why-google-bought-motorola&quot;&gt;Continue reading&amp;hellip;&lt;/a&gt;
  &lt;/p&gt;



</content>
    <link type="text/html" rel="alternate" href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/26/4271432/does-anyone-know-why-google-bought-motorola"/>
    <id>http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/26/4271432/does-anyone-know-why-google-bought-motorola</id>
    <author>
      <name>Nilay Patel</name>
    </author>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <published>2013-04-26T02:37:20Z</published>
    <updated>2013-04-26T02:37:20Z</updated>
    <title>Judge rules that Motorola's patents aren't worth the $4 billion a year it demanded from Microsoft</title>
    <content type="html">
  




  &lt;img alt=&quot;Motorola-logo-razr-maxx_1020_large&quot; src=&quot;http://cdn1.sbnation.com/entry_photo_images/8098997/motorola-logo-razr-maxx_1020_large.jpg&quot; /&gt;





  &lt;p&gt;A judge presiding over a legal battle between Microsoft and Google-owned Motorola issued a ruling today that valued elements of Motorola's patent portfolio far below what the company felt they were worth &amp;mdash; by a difference of over $3.9 billion a year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The two companies have been locked in a legal battle over Microsoft's use of several Motorola patents that are part of the 802.11 Wi-Fi and H.264 video standards. As such, they're considered standards-essential patents, and must be licensed to other parties at a reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND) rate. According to Redmond's attorneys, Motorola violated that pact by asking far too much to use the patents in question &amp;mdash; its initial request was 2.25 percent of the price of each...&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/25/4267830/judge-rules-motorolas-patents-arent-worth-the-4-billion-a-year-it-wanted-from-microsoft&quot;&gt;Continue reading&amp;hellip;&lt;/a&gt;
  &lt;/p&gt;



</content>
    <link type="text/html" rel="alternate" href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/25/4267830/judge-rules-motorolas-patents-arent-worth-the-4-billion-a-year-it-wanted-from-microsoft"/>
    <id>http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/25/4267830/judge-rules-motorolas-patents-arent-worth-the-4-billion-a-year-it-wanted-from-microsoft</id>
    <author>
      <name>Bryan Bishop</name>
    </author>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <published>2013-04-12T16:05:37Z</published>
    <updated>2013-04-12T16:05:37Z</updated>
    <title>Google deal to sell Motorola set-top box division to Arris receives final regulatory approval</title>
    <content type="html">
  




  &lt;img alt=&quot;Vrg_7737_large&quot; src=&quot;http://cdn0.sbnation.com/entry_photo_images/8023055/VRG_7737_large.jpg&quot; /&gt;





  &lt;p&gt;Google's deal to sell off the Motorola Home cable box unit to the Arris Group has passed its final regulatory hurdle. The Department of Justice has given the acquisition its approval, and Arris expects the transaction will now close around April 17th. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theverge.com/2012/12/19/3786086/google-sells-motorola-home-to-arris-for-2-35-billion-in-cash-and-stock&quot;&gt;Last December&lt;/a&gt;, Google finally found a suitor for the cable box division that was included with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theverge.com/2012/5/22/3036049/google-completes-acquisition-of-motorola-mobility/in/2795023&quot;&gt;its purchase of Motorola Mobility&lt;/a&gt;. The news came after months of rumors that the company was looking to sell off the set-top box unit and focus solely on the smartphone and cellphone business. The deal with Arris was for $2.05 billion in cash and $300 million in stock, and it includes a provision to let Arris license Motorola Mobility patents.&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/12/4217022/google-motorola-set-top-box-division-arris-sale-receives-final-approval&quot;&gt;Continue reading&amp;hellip;&lt;/a&gt;
  &lt;/p&gt;



</content>
    <link type="text/html" rel="alternate" href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/12/4217022/google-motorola-set-top-box-division-arris-sale-receives-final-approval"/>
    <id>http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/12/4217022/google-motorola-set-top-box-division-arris-sale-receives-final-approval</id>
    <author>
      <name>Dante D'Orazio</name>
    </author>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <published>2013-03-13T05:58:39Z</published>
    <updated>2013-03-13T05:58:39Z</updated>
    <title>Mystery Motorola phone leak could point to new Google influence</title>
    <content type="html">
  




  &lt;img alt=&quot;Tinhte_motorola_xt912a-12_large&quot; src=&quot;http://cdn1.sbnation.com/entry_photo_images/7851157/Tinhte_Motorola_Xt912a-12_large.jpg&quot; /&gt;





  &lt;p&gt;Images and video of an unidentified Motorola handset have &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.tinhte.vn/threads/tren-tay-dien-thoai-motorola-la-vien-sieu-mong-co-le-khong-phai-x.1964325/&quot;&gt;appeared on &lt;i&gt;Tinh t&amp;#7871;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, and it looks quite unlike any of the recent Kevlar-coated phones from the Google-owned manufacturer. While there have been rumors that a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theverge.com/2012/12/21/3792974/google-reportedly-working-with-motorola-to-design-its-own-x-phone&quot;&gt;flagship &quot;X Phone&quot;&lt;/a&gt; will come sometime this year, it doesn't look like this device is it &amp;mdash; as per Google's comments about upcoming Motorola devices, the 720p AMOLED display is unlikely to make anyone say &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theverge.com/2013/2/28/4040348/google-cfo-products-in-motorola-pipeline-arent-wow-by-google-standards/in/2795023&quot;&gt;&quot;wow&quot;&lt;/a&gt; like we'd hope from a true collaboration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/13/4097778/motorola-google-phone-leak&quot;&gt;Continue reading&amp;hellip;&lt;/a&gt;
  &lt;/p&gt;



</content>
    <link type="text/html" rel="alternate" href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/13/4097778/motorola-google-phone-leak"/>
    <id>http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/13/4097778/motorola-google-phone-leak</id>
    <author>
      <name>Sam Byford</name>
    </author>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <published>2013-03-08T05:22:16Z</published>
    <updated>2013-03-08T05:22:16Z</updated>
    <title>Google's Motorola to lay off a further 10 percent of its workforce</title>
    <content type="html">
  




  &lt;img alt=&quot;Motorola-droid-4-stock-1024_large&quot; src=&quot;http://cdn3.sbnation.com/entry_photo_images/7829279/motorola-droid-4-stock-1024_large.jpg&quot; /&gt;





  &lt;p&gt;Following its acquisition by Google, Motorola Mobility &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/13/3238920/motorola-job-cuts-20-percent&quot;&gt;announced sweeping layoffs&lt;/a&gt; last October with about 4,000 people &amp;mdash; 20 percent of all employees &amp;mdash; losing their jobs. It seems the restructuring didn't go far enough, however, as &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324128504578347311150486142.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the &lt;i&gt;Wall Street Journal&lt;/i&gt; reports&lt;/a&gt; that the unit will make a further cut of around 1,200 people, or over a tenth of the workforce, in the US, China, and India. A Motorola spokesperson said:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/8/4077904/googles-motorola-to-lay-off-a-further-10-percent-of-its-workforce&quot;&gt;Continue reading&amp;hellip;&lt;/a&gt;
  &lt;/p&gt;



</content>
    <link type="text/html" rel="alternate" href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/8/4077904/googles-motorola-to-lay-off-a-further-10-percent-of-its-workforce"/>
    <id>http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/8/4077904/googles-motorola-to-lay-off-a-further-10-percent-of-its-workforce</id>
    <author>
      <name>Sam Byford</name>
    </author>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <published>2013-02-28T18:01:36Z</published>
    <updated>2013-02-28T18:01:36Z</updated>
    <title>Google's CFO says Motorola's products aren't 'wow' by Google standards (update)</title>
    <content type="html">
  




  &lt;img alt=&quot;Razrhd-razrhdmaxx-555_555_large&quot; src=&quot;http://cdn2.sbnation.com/entry_photo_images/7785975/razrhd-razrhdmaxx-555_555_large.jpg&quot; /&gt;





  &lt;p&gt;If you were hoping to see a revelatory smartphone from Motorola in the near future, you might want to tone down those expectations. Google's Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President Patrick Pichette today said that products in Motorola's pipeline are &quot;not really to the standards that what Google would say is wow &amp;mdash; innovative, transformative.&quot; The surprisingly honest admission came during Pichette's session at the Morgan Stanley Technology Conference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When questioned on where things stand with Motorola at the moment, Pichette didn't mince words. &quot;We've inherited 18 months of pipeline that we actually have to drain right now, while we're actually building the next wave of innovation and product lines,&quot; he said. Google...&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theverge.com/2013/2/28/4040348/google-cfo-products-in-motorola-pipeline-arent-wow-by-google-standards&quot;&gt;Continue reading&amp;hellip;&lt;/a&gt;
  &lt;/p&gt;



</content>
    <link type="text/html" rel="alternate" href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/2/28/4040348/google-cfo-products-in-motorola-pipeline-arent-wow-by-google-standards"/>
    <id>http://www.theverge.com/2013/2/28/4040348/google-cfo-products-in-motorola-pipeline-arent-wow-by-google-standards</id>
    <author>
      <name>Chris Welch</name>
    </author>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <published>2013-01-31T19:07:28Z</published>
    <updated>2013-01-31T19:07:28Z</updated>
    <title>Motorola job listing confirms 'X-Phone' project in the works</title>
    <content type="html">
  




  &lt;img alt=&quot;Razrhd-razrmaxxhd-review-10209_1020_large&quot; src=&quot;http://cdn2.sbnation.com/entry_photo_images/7614183/razrhd-razrmaxxhd-review-10209_1020_large.jpg&quot; /&gt;





  &lt;p&gt;Late last year, &lt;i&gt;The Wall Street Journal&lt;/i&gt; reported that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theverge.com/2012/12/21/3792974/google-reportedly-working-with-motorola-to-design-its-own-x-phone&quot;&gt;Google and Motorola were working on a new phone and tablet&lt;/a&gt; with the code names &quot;X Phone&quot; and &quot;X Tablet.&quot; These devices were said to be the first true collaboration between the companies since Google purchased Motorola Mobility earlier in the year, and allegedly focused on superior cameras and incorporated bendable screens and ceramic materials. Today, a job posting for a &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.linkedin.com/jobs?viewJob=&amp;amp;jobId=4743371&amp;amp;srchIndex=7&quot;&gt;Senior Director of Product Management for Motorola on LinkedIn&lt;/a&gt; more or less confirmed that the company is working on something called an 'X-Phone.' The listing, now removed, detailed the duties of the position, which would oversee the launch of a new device and deal with carrier relationships when bringing it to...&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/31/3937810/motorola-job-listing-confirms-x-phone-project&quot;&gt;Continue reading&amp;hellip;&lt;/a&gt;
  &lt;/p&gt;



</content>
    <link type="text/html" rel="alternate" href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/31/3937810/motorola-job-listing-confirms-x-phone-project"/>
    <id>http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/31/3937810/motorola-job-listing-confirms-x-phone-project</id>
    <author>
      <name>Dan Seifert</name>
    </author>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <published>2013-01-22T23:48:05Z</published>
    <updated>2013-01-22T23:48:05Z</updated>
    <title>Google points to future devices for still-unprofitable Motorola</title>
    <content type="html">
  




  &lt;img alt=&quot;Razrhd-razrmaxxhd-review-10209_1020_large&quot; src=&quot;http://cdn1.sbnation.com/entry_photo_images/7562251/razrhd-razrmaxxhd-review-10209_1020_large.jpg&quot; /&gt;





  &lt;p&gt;Motorola has been both a promise and a problem for Google since the $12 billion acquisition in May 2012.  For the last three quarters, Motorola has delivered a modest boost to revenue (at Google scale) and a large drag on profits. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/22/3904350/google-q4-2012-earnings&quot;&gt;This quarter&lt;/a&gt;, Motorola is a particularly thorny problem for Google's accountants.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In December, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theverge.com/2012/12/19/3786086/google-sells-motorola-home-to-arris-for-2-35-billion-in-cash-and-stock&quot;&gt;Google sold the Motorola Home division&lt;/a&gt;, makers of cable boxes, routers, and other non-mobile hardware, to Arris for $2.35 billion in cash and stock, laying off several thousand employees. This means Google had to issue two sets of revenue and profit numbers, one including Motorola Home, and one without.&lt;/p&gt;

  &lt;p&gt;
    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/22/3904942/google-points-future-devices-still-unprofitable-motorola&quot;&gt;Continue reading&amp;hellip;&lt;/a&gt;
  &lt;/p&gt;



</content>
    <link type="text/html" rel="alternate" href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/22/3904942/google-points-future-devices-still-unprofitable-motorola"/>
    <id>http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/22/3904942/google-points-future-devices-still-unprofitable-motorola</id>
    <author>
      <name>tcarmody</name>
    </author>
  </entry>
</feed>
