Agreed. Very good post on SearchEngineWorld saying exactly the same thing. This article highlights a very real, very bad thing… which is good. But it then ruins it’s message by barely making an effort to clarify anything. The message is, that if you are a “marketer” that specializes in the “Internet” you are suspect. News flash, marketers should always be suspect. Failing to give people clarity on the get rich quick genre is disappointing. It’s like labeling “spammers” as “email marketers” and making a few distinctions here and there about some legitimate “email marketers”… which aren’t included in your lasso. I think it’s primarily because the author may simply not know much about theose that take the time to manage accounts and provide client accountability in an evolving field that values reputation.
