HELLOSIR. I AM SENDINGYOUTHISTEXTMESSAGE TO INFORMYOU OF A FABULOUSBUSINESSVENTUREOPPORTUNITY. I AM PRINCEJONATHANLUOADEBAYOAND MY FAMILY IS(1/7)
RECENTLYEXILEDFROMTHECOUNTRY. HOWEVER I HAVE A SUM OF $1.300.000.000 AND 00 CENTSUSDHELD IN BANKACCOUNT (ONEBILLIONTHREEHUNDREDMILLIONDOLLARS (2/7)
USDAND NO CENTS) AND I SEEKYOURASSISTANCE IN RETRIEVINGTHEMONEY. AS REWARDFORYOURASSISTANCEYOUWILL BE ENTITLED TO AN AMOUNT OF TENPERCENT (10%) OF(3/7)
THETOTALMONEYSRECOVERED. I REQUIREUSE OF A BANKACCOUNT IN THE US TO MAKETHETRANSFER AS THEGOVERNMENT OF MY COUNTRYWILLNOTPERMITTRANSFER TO ME(4/7)
HOWEVERTHEYALLOWTRANSFER OF FUNDS TO A THIRDPARTY. I WILLDEPOSITTHEMONEYINTOYOURBANKACCOUNTANDYOUWILLTRANSMITTHEFUNDS BY WESTERNUNION
TO ME, LESSTEN (10) PERCENT (10%) FORYOURTIME. I PRAY TO THELORDYOUWILLRESPONDANDLOOKFORWARD TO YOURPARTNERSHIP IN THISPROPOSAL. GODBLESSYOU. (6/7)
PLEASERESPOND TO ME AT PRINCEADEBAYO@YAHOO.COM IF YOUACCEPTTHEPROPOSAL. GODWILLING. PRINCEJONATHANLUOADEBAYO.(7/7)
While it raises concerns – valid ones – in a sort of future-of-the-concept way, I’m not sure Glass is some kind of breakpoint. It’s a fairly prominent device that wraps around the face and extends off to the side a bit with all the hardware there. The lens is on the front. It’s sort of hard to really get past the typical SCOTUS definitions of reasonably expected privacy (such as in your house, behind a fence or wall, etc) when your camera is limited to your field of vision. It may not be a neon sign attached to your scalp, broadcasting your possible intent to photograph and/or record, but it sure as heck is in plain sight to all but the blind.
As for the concerns about having a web-connected device that is open to being compromised remotely and used without the owner’s knowledge, those are rather old and don’t really get "raised’ by Glass. That, however, doesn’t mean those concerns aren’t valid either.
I feel like I should bold those parts saying the concerns are valid. Should I bold those parts? We’ll see in the replies!
