XorpiZ

Would be easier for us, if you posted the models you looked at :-)

I think that’s the first time I’ve been called a sheep for owning a Windows Phone.

Actually feels kinda nice! That you’re wrong in most ways imaginable is not that important.

Plenty of lag in that video. Not sure how you could miss it.

Next time I’ll add a /s to my post. Apparantly it wasn’t clear enough that I was making fun of LtRaziel.

If I know jaywontdart “What do you mean by "mostly comparable" though?” probably means “iPhone copy”.

No argument will ever convince him that anyone could’ve made an “iPhone level” phone.

Welcome to The Verge. I must say, your first post shows signs of a great future.

Out of curiosity. Which screen would you suggest is better? iPhone 4S? Galaxy S3?

I don’t need to believe anything. I have all the evidence I need.

Same trend in every single thread that has anything to do with Nokia or MS. I wonder why he bothers. It should long have occured to him that noone believes him anyways.

Go get it yourself or accept the results.

As of right now, the Lumia 900 is the best smartphone in the world in that regard.

Useless homescreen? Talking about Android now?

Wouldn’t you say it’s a matter of preference?

Until proven otherwise it’s obviously the best in the world. No phone has beaten it.

If you disagree with the source, prove it wrong. It shouldn’t be too hard.

You should follow the source. It’s the best smartphone of the bunch.

If you disagree with the test, feel free to produce evidence to prove it wrong.

Rumours are that the update is finalized and should start rolling out soon.

What “soon” means exactly, I have no idea.

It’s true though, what is written.

I’m guessing you’re running the newest Ivy Bridge CPU, the newest nVidia GPU and 32 GB DDR3 RAM right?

Also, you can’t possibly have anything less than a PCI-Express controller with built-in SSD for systemdrive (and storage of course). As you’re saying, last generation sucks and is outdated crap.

Sigh.

Clearly you live in a black and white world. Either the hardware is OMG AMAZING or it sucks apparantly.

And by that definition any PC older than 2011 sucks.

I hope you realize how silly that is.

You should start, you posted first.

Although I’m guessing your reasons are something like “lol, it’s only singlecore and only has 512 MB ram!!111 SUCK AND FAIL”.

But please, humor me!

Just get an x86-tablet and all is good :)

Except it doesn’t.

There are more clicks in a WP-article. The trolls come flocking and us fans try to shoo them away. That’s how it goes around here.

Or that Android-phones still can’t compete with Nokia when it comes to displays.

Don’t waste your breath on LtRaziel and etwashoo. They have a tendancy to stalk any WP-thread and come with false accusations for some reason.

Some day you should start posting sources for your wild claims. Right now it’s just hilarious to watch your claims, that has no basis in real life.

Furthermore it adds to the fun, that you have absolutely no idea about the batterylife, and even then you claim to have all the answers.

There’s a word for people like you. I’m sure you know it.

Yes, it’s all down to the amount of RAM in a console.

I’m not sure why people with no technical knowledge starts talking about technical stuff.

It’s hard to give an actual example, when it’s a hypothetical situation.

The first iPhone was a feature-phone. There were thousands of feature-phones on the market. Only difference was the OS and the touch-screen.

If you don’t like the answer, don’t ask the question.

And yet they are 5x smoother than anything Google has to offer.

Makes you wonder, doesn’t it?

Have you tried it, or are you still just pretending to be Mr. Know-it-all?