awesomerobot

Man, this guy manages a business like a person who has no formal education in business.

I’ve jumped out of a plane with glasses on, so I’m going to go ahead and say yes.

Everyone already carries a camera on them at all times — what privacy is this encroaching upon that a cell phone doesn’t?

Are you put off when you talk to someone wearing sunglasses?

Probably should have compared it to something that people don’t hate the shit out of, like Spotify or something.

Can 4.0 even run on 256MB of RAM?

I’m guessing this is coming from the influence of the Raspberry Pi? Nice little spec + price bump by comparison.

Well, I hear Europe is nice.

The entire car stereo head unit business completely baffles me. Hell, with something like a Raspberry Pi and a cheap touchscreen you can have a full on computer in your car for under $250.

I guess this makes sense if you’re controlling music from the backseat? Otherwise why not just use a cord and not worry about charging this thing?

Though, who the hell buys Chinese bootlegs these days? It’s the internet, man!

Guys it’s a trap, this guy is clearly a wizard.

because no one knows what this stuff is

Any information I can find on any tests seems incredibly vague; it’s incredibly weird for something that’s apparently been around for decades.

They could, but no one except this guy’s family has any idea how it works.

It seems like there’s a great possibility that Starlite is a complete hoax.

PEBKAC

If Gizmodo always had content like this I would actually read Gizmodo.

I understand your sentiment, but it’s also the version of Android used by the majority of people.

Due to having so many active widgets showing the NERV phone also gives you about 5 minutes of battery life, just like a real EVA!

Color: The little engine that can’t.

I’d recommend people to install this, if not just to write a review and complain about the inability to follow Android design guidelines. The assets are freely available and well documented; there’s no excuse at this point.

music.zip.zip

music.zip

but nice! don’t get me wrong

Photoshop, and the entire Adobe suite, is a clusterfuck. It’s 10 years ago software design that gets a new splash screen and a few more 5px by 5px buttons every year. They need to take a seriously look at the UI in relation to how people work, instead of using the UI to drive how people work. This is coming from a person who uses their software nearly 8 hours a day.

I’m glad we’re starting to see some competition to Adobe’s stranglehold on the entire industry, but it’s been slow going and Adobe has a good 20 year head start. The desktop landscape has changed so drastically over the past 10 years, but Photoshop just kind of wanders into the room singing Who Let the Dogs Out.

Yeah, why can’t that thing that the article addresses directly?

The author concedes that the two pieces of software “reside in two different universes with two entirely different motivations.”

Looking forward to this. The team behind it seems to have a really solid of idea of what they’re doing, plus if the software sucks someone else can build their own!