bl0wf1sh

That makes no sense at all… none of these are technically inclined, the lawyers made sure of that.
Oh well, cannot reason with trolls I guess ;-)

Not sure if worth explaining, but here goes…
1) People buying from Amazon are most likely the minority of smartphone buyers; most will upgrade via carrier directly.
2) ATT is only one carrier in the US, and the US one mobile market among many – neither the largest nor the most advanced
3) “Out of stock” sounds interesting, but it all depends on how big the stock was to begin with.

???

Well, they originally claimed $6 billion in this trial, so, more like 80%

Probably WP7 does not leave enough free RAM for apps, unlike Symbian which was quite efficient that way.

Hmm, just want to point out that there is a big insecurity about upgrade to WP8, the next version… but you got a point on Android, app developers still need to target 2.2 at a minimum (should be possible to move to 2.3 very soon though).

Btw, Google admitted copying those 9 lines of code, and did not contest it afaik. Same for the “test files” – they just deny there is any damage, because, well, there really isn’t.

Trying to force such a radically different interface on the office crowd could be difficult.

Actually, Windows 7 is pretty nice. (Vista not so much.)

They are free to develop IE for Android, yes. The question is, who would want to use it?