kartikthapar

Oh, like how they tried to copy Hangouts with their fail Skype integration?

You people are really funny. You could claim everything was a copy even if it was only 1 bit similar. Facebook is all about connecting people. Skype integration or yahoo video or maybe Facebook video chat integration was the next step anyway. Just because Google came up with video chat first, in a social network doesn’t mean they own the idea of using video communication over the internet.

Such baseless claims are horrible.

Facebook is already cluttered

Huh?

buggy

You can say that about the Android/iOS apps but not about the web interface. It’s simply brilliant.

you really think they going to pull-off a 10 people video chat? HA!

Yeah? It doesn’t mean they cannot do it if they haven’t implemented it or don’t wish to implement it or whatever.

Just funny.

They bring this closed, user-hostile approach to pretty much… well, EVERYTHING they do.

Oh! Please elaborate. What is the user hostile approach they are dealing with? Or is it just their business model that doesn’t make sense to you.

We can argue about the ways in which Google itself may be evil.

We can definitely do that.

but it should be pretty obvious to everyone that their business practices are LIGHTYEARS ahead of Facebook.

I’ve no idea about that. I would like to see you discuss some of that.

Facebook been around for several years now, and it took some time to overtake MySpace as the social king.

But why would you wish Google+ to kill Facebook?

It’s as if you people have something against the company.

IBM apparently worries that spoken instructions to Siri might be stored on external servers, something that could have security repercussions if users dictate messages through it.

Do they talk on telephone there? Who knows if the calls are being recorded?

Fun apart; I do not see this being an appropriate move. There’s got to be some leverage. But given that dictating messages is no big deal and there are other ways possible, people have to be fine that.

I fail to understand how you people adopt this idea of OS X having less feature per update.

Should I quote the feature development from 10.1 to 10.7? What were the user-facing features from Vista to Windows 7? And how about Windows 7 – Windows 8?

I agree that there are a lot of features added to Windows 8 but unless and until there is a drastic change in UI, people don’t really see how the system has changed or what features have been added. Even if Windows 8 was featureless, one would claim that it’s the biggest update ever because the entire user-interface changed.

You people need to get over with that.

Windows is on a three year cycle and the changes made with each upgrade are usually more substantial than the many iterations and smaller improvements style that Apple has adopted.

Try making a point with sufficient facts or it’s just baseless.

There are people who don’t need a qualification or a degree or engineering skills to solve something.

Their vision is utmost and beyond everything.

Steve Jobs was one of his kind and his contribution to technology and science beyond conceivable. Anything said otherwise, shows how much people really understand Apple and Steve Jobs in retrospect.