Android Army
Are you in the Android clan?
1 posts
Are you in the Android clan?
1 postsAll things Apple
0 postsThe Verge Book Club!
0 postsLet's talk about The Verge
0 postsLet your Microsoft flag fly
0 postsCalling all photo junkies
0 postsRec
Recommended vrg.srnm's comment in TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage
about 21 hours ago
Rec
Recommended jongiambi's comment in TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage
about 21 hours ago
Rec
Recommended MrNomNoms's comment in TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage
about 21 hours ago
Rec
Recommended Dan Gleibitz's comment in Really, guys? This Samsung Ad? What is this?
about 21 hours ago
Comment
*criticism(s)
about 21 hours ago on Really, guys? This Samsung Ad? What is this?
Comment
That’s basically what I said before my comment was deleted.
Guess critisim is tolerated exactly as much as I expected. When do the rest of the critisms get deleted?
about 21 hours ago on Really, guys? This Samsung Ad? What is this? 1 reply
Rec
Recommended caramelpolice's comment in Really, guys? This Samsung Ad? What is this?
about 21 hours ago
Comment
I think both the 65% and equal nits test are poor judgments of use.
A vast majority of people just turn on auto brightness and leave it alone. That is what they should do in the test. Use it in a variety of situations and conditions. The whole full-blast-constant-use test is also not indicative of real use. Standby battery life is an important and variable aspect of battery life.
Unfortunately that kind of test is harder to create and control for fairness … But, that’s why they earn the big bucks. Testing over a week instead of 12 hours is a better result, but won’t earn you the spot of first review they obviously want.
2 days ago on Stop running battery tests at 65% brightness and actually measure the brightness of the screen 1 recommend
Rec
Recommended cjschris's comment in Really, guys? This Samsung Ad? What is this?
2 days ago
Rec
Recommended UrinalMint's comment in TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage
2 days ago
Rec
Recommended Dan Gleibitz's comment in TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage
2 days ago
Rec
Recommended Dan Gleibitz's comment in TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage
2 days ago
Rec
Recommended DrBrad's comment in TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage
2 days ago
Rec
Recommended willizen's comment in TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage
2 days ago
Comment
“We’ve upped our standards, up yours”
2 days ago on TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage 1 recommend
Rec
Recommended catonkatonk's comment in TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage
2 days ago
Rec
Recommended Driftingashore's comment in TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage
2 days ago
Rec
Recommended steakwich's comment in TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage
2 days ago
Rec
Recommended UrinalMint's comment in TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage
2 days ago
Rec
Recommended willizen's comment in TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage
2 days ago
Rec
Recommended clearzero's comment in TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage
2 days ago
Rec
Recommended Boringoldchelsea's comment in TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage
2 days ago
Rec
Recommended ryallen23's comment in TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage
2 days ago
Rec
Recommended TigerMSTR's comment in TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage
2 days ago
Rec
Recommended iWebDroidBerry8's comment in TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage
2 days ago
Rec
Recommended aberaf's comment in TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage
2 days ago
Rec
Recommended aThingOrTwo's comment in TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage
2 days ago
Rec
Recommended Trinkwasser's comment in TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage
2 days ago
Rec
Recommended Hello.'s comment in TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage
2 days ago
Rec
Recommended RedR's comment in TheVerge’s pathetic WWDC coverage
2 days ago
