%2Fcdn.vox-cdn.com%2Fuploads%2Fchorus_asset%2Ffile%2F10956249%2F_MFC9096-hero.0.jpg&w=2400&q=75)
Instagram announced some changes to its privacy policy that had users concerned it would be selling their photographs — even though some of the changes were actually improvements. The company backtracked, setting the stage for future tweaks but arguably leaving users worse off in the meantime. Catch up on all the details right here.
- Dec 28, 2012, 4:15 PM UTC
Did Instagram actually lose a quarter of its users last week? (update: Instagram says no)
Analytics company claims users of the service fled after terms of service debacle
- Dec 21, 2012, 6:15 PM UTC
Why the Instagram debacle just taught every tech company to be shadier than ever
By Nilay Patel
- Dec 21, 2012, 3:28 PM UTC
Social advertisers spooked by Instagram backlash
The big backlash highlights the stakes, and is catching marketers by surprise
- Dec 21, 2012, 12:33 AM UTC
Instagram reverts terms of service after public outcry, makes them arguably worse
By Bryan Bishop
- Dec 18, 2012, 7:33 PM UTC
No, Instagram can't sell your photos: what the new terms of service really mean
Turns out no one really trusts Facebook after all
By Nilay Patel
- Dec 17, 2012, 1:47 PM UTC
Instagram debuts new privacy policy, set to share user data with Facebook beginning January 16th
By T.C. Sottek
