clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Healbe's Gobe calorie-counting gadget is based on bad science

New, 12 comments

Too bad it's overpromising

If you buy something from a Verge link, Vox Media may earn a commission. See our ethics statement.

Healbe's Gobe device for through-the-skin calorie counting is based on bad science. The idea is to make it as easy as possible to count calories — but calorie counting isn't a great measure. Worse, when I asked whether the product had been tested, with results published in a peer-reviewed journal (like Science or Nature), George Mikaberidze, the company's managing director, didn't seen to understand the question I was asking.

A self-published study doesn't inspire confidencePeer-reviewed publication is the gold standard for study results in health. Sadly, self-publishing a study doesn't meet those standards; it doesn't inspire much confidence. Mikaberidze was eager to tell me that Memorial Sloan-Kettering in New York  and the Saint Petersburg State Institute of Health’s Medical and Sports Clinic had tested the device. I was referred to the website to see the study and results.

On the website, I saw no indication that Sloan-Kettering had been involved. Only 6 people were involved in the tests — a miniscule number by health study standards. In this tiny study, the calorie counter was found to measure calorie intake plus or minus a 15 percent error rate — a large error margin. There's more hope than science in this calorie counter.

The gadget will ship to Indiegogo backers at the end of the month.

See all the latest CES 2015 news here ›