Skip to main content

iPhone 6S review

Apple presses forward

Share this story

If you buy something from a Verge link, Vox Media may earn a commission. See our ethics statement.

Big screens won.

For the past three years, the most meaningful change to the iPhone has been the size of its screen. After years of sticking with a 3.5-inch display and watching Android-powered competitors bite off a piece of the market with ever-larger screens, Apple relented ever-so-slightly with the 4-inch iPhone 5 and 5S, and then finally gave in to obvious trends with the much larger 4.7-inch iPhone 6 and massive 5.5-inch iPhone 6 Plus.

Big screens are all people really wanted in a phone; when they couldn’t get big screens from Apple, they bought big screens from Samsung, and when Apple finally put out big screens, Samsung’s sales tanked.

So now we have an iPhone with a big screen, with skyrocketing sales. There’s no obvious reason to make it better; almost every major competitor has actually put out multiple high-end phones this year in an effort to compete and it still hasn’t been enough. What’s Apple’s next move?

Turns out that the answer isn’t a taller or wider display — it’s a deeper one.

This is an S year for the iPhone, which means the basic physical design of the phone has remained the same while the internals have been substantially revised and made faster. S iPhones may lack the punch of a new design, but Apple says they actually sell better and last longer in the marketplace than non-S iPhones — these are the phones that stick around. This year there are also two changes to the exterior: the glass screen is now stronger and more shatter-resistant, and the case is made of a tougher aluminum that will presumably be less prone to bending.1

Last year we reviewed the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus separately — the notion of a giant iPhone was novel enough to warrant an independent review. A year later, and the novelty has worn off. The Plus-sized phone is very much just an iPhone with a bigger screen. The extra space allows for an optically stabilized camera that performs slightly better in low light and a more capacious battery, but there are few particularly notable apps or features that rely on the bigger screen, even though Apple made kind of a big deal about it last year. And there's nothing in iOS 9 or this refresh that affects the phones differently, so we're reviewing them together this year.

These are welcome tweaks, but it’s too bad that the iPhone 6 design remains Apple’s least elegant design since the plastic blob of the iPhone 3G and 3GS, thanks to its slippery shape, camera bulge, and weird antenna lines. The 6S Plus feels particularly surfboard-y in comparison to the Galaxy Note 5, LG G4, and Moto X, which all manage large screens in less ungainly packages. You get your choice of silver, space gray, gold, and now a very pink rose gold iPhone, but it feels like these phones were designed to be put in cases no matter what color they are.

Almost designed to be put in a case

Both the iPhone 6S and 6S Plus are both tangibly heavier and thicker than their predecessors. If you’ve spent any time handling the older models you will feel the added heft. It’s nothing major — I actually think the extra weight makes the 6S feel more substantial and easier to hold than the whoops-there-it-goes iPhone 6 — and what you get in return promises to make up for it.

That extra weight comes from 3D Touch, which is the highlight feature of the iPhone 6S. 3D Touch makes the iPhone screen pressure-sensitive, literally adding a new layer of interactions and information to iOS. The iPhone 6S is the third major Apple product line to gain pressure-sensitive touch after the Apple Watch and MacBooks introduced Force Touch, and it is by far the most successful at integrating the feature into the natural flow of the interface.2

Also, how much better of a name is 3D Touch than Force Touch? Force Touch was the nadir of Apple's stream of uninspired branding around the Apple Watch; we can only hope 3D Touch overtakes it across Apple's products in due time.

So what can you do? On the home screen, app icons can show quick actions when you push them. Pushing on a calendar entry shows you more information about it, and pushing on a map pin lets you jump straight to directions. Pushing on a message in Mail opens a preview that you can slide to either side to delete or archive, and pushing harder opens the message. It's the same in Safari: pushing lightly on a link opens a preview, and pushing slightly harder actually opens the page.3

I would pay to watch webcam footage of Apple's designers debating whether to open peek-and-pop Safari windows in the same tab or a different tab. Blood had to have been spilled.

That preview-and-open dynamic — what Apple calls peek and pop — is really the key to 3D Touch. It does far more than just turning pixels into buttons — it turns them into dynamic objects. The entire system is the biggest step along a path Apple’s been on since iOS 7 — the idea that the interface should be about abstract layers of information, not simulations of physical objects. It’s not some insane lightning bolt of inspiration; Google is doing something very similar with Material Design, and Microsoft has been sliding things all over the screen since someone was drunk enough to approve the name “Windows Phone 7 Series.” But 3D Touch is by far the most aggressive and interesting step in this direction anyone has ever taken.

From a technology perspective, the main part of 3D Touch is a network of sensors under the screen which track the distance between the cover glass and the backlight.4

Aside from the slight increase in weight and thickness, there’s no real difference from previous iPhones — screen overlays that follow Apple’s guidelines will work fine with 3D Touch, and screen replacements will run $129 for the 6S and $149 for the 6S Plus, or $20 more expensive than the 6 and 6 Plus.

When you push down on the screen, the distance between them changes, and the phone can do things based on how hard you press, with precise bits of haptic feedback from Apple’s Taptic Engine vibration system. Apple won’t say exactly how many levels of pressure-sensitivity there are, but it’s definitely so many as to feel almost analog, like the interface is reacting in real time to physical pressure — the homescreen blurs in and out in response to how hard you press on an icon, for instance. Perhaps most impressively, 3D Touch has accessibility built in — it can be activated by Assistive Touch, blind users can have VoiceOver read peek previews and quick action menus, and the force needed to activate it can be set to light, medium, or firm. This sort of impossibly tight integration of hardware and software is what Apple does best, and it is ridiculously impressive in action.

Watching developers experiment with 3D Touch is going to be really fun

In actual use, though, it’s kind of easy to forget about 3D Touch, because only a selection of Apple’s apps support it right now. It’s kind of like right click on OS X — the interface is designed to be used without it, but once you realize it’s there, it’s incredibly useful, and you want every app to make solid, consistent use of it. In that sense, 3D Touch won’t really be that useful or revolutionary until third parties really grab onto it. It’s a feature that will be most useful to power users at first, and Apple’s apps and services are the weakest part of the iPhone if you’re a power user. Google’s Inbox and Microsoft’s Outlook are light years ahead of Apple’s Mail app, Sunrise and Fantastical are far superior to Calendar, and Google Maps still wipes the floor with Apple Maps. If you’re like me and the first thing you do with a new iPhone is hide all of Apple’s apps away in a folder, it’s going to be a minute before 3D Touch really does anything for you.

That also means what 3D Touch actually does in various apps will be all over the map as developers try it out, because there aren’t a ton of rules for how anyone should use it outside of the peek and pop and quick action APIs. It’s a wild new interface paradigm with a ton of potential, and that means developers are going to have to experiment before settling on a common language. I think that process is going to be really fun, just like developers using multitouch for the first few years was really fun.

Even still, 3D Touch already feels much more natural than Force Touch on the Apple Watch, and companies like Pinterest and Instagram and Dropbox are already showing off interesting demos. (I'm sure 3D Touch-enabled apps will be in the App Store the second the phone actually goes on sale.) And the potential for pressure-sensitive gaming is off the charts; 3D Touch might make gaming on a iPhone something much more interesting than furiously swiping on the screen.5 There are a lot of things that have to fall into place, but 3D Touch overall feels like one of those ideas that only Apple can push into the mainstream — if Samsung or Huawei had delivered a similar feature, it would almost certainly be a gimmick. But the foundation for 3D Touch is solid and well-considered, and it’s easy to see how the latent potential can turn into reality.

Game Center is 3D Touch enabled. Game Center still exists!

The only other changes to the iPhone 6S really and truly worth discussing in detail are the cameras. I’ve been interested in switching to Android for the better part of a year now, but there isn’t a single Android phone that consistently takes great photos the way the iPhone does. Some take great photos — the Galaxy S6 and Note 6, LG G4, and Sony Xperia Z4 all have excellent cameras — but it’s the consistency that matters. The iPhone takes excellent, realistic photos in virtually every situation, and no other phone comes close.

So the new cameras on the iPhone 6S — a new 5-megapixel front-facing camera, and a 12-megapixel unit on the rear — are a big deal.6

Look for our full-on camera shootout between the new iPhones and the other flagship smartphones on the market later this week.

Let's be real for a second: the front-facing camera upgrade to 5 megapixels from a paltry 1.2 on the iPhone 6 is the biggest news here. Selfies and Snapchats and video chats are part of the fabric of modern communication, and Apple's been way behind the curve with its front-facing cameras. The improvement in quality from the iPhone 6 to 6S when using the front camera is just tremendous; it takes realistic and usable photos now, not just pixelated approximations of moments from the past.7

It would have been nice if the company had gone even farther; there's a real argument to be made that the front and back cameras on any modern phone should be exactly the same.

Apple’s also taken a great idea from Snapchat and improved it with a feature called Retina Flash: the entire screen blinks white when you take a selfie in low light, serving as a makeshift flash. Apple says it’s tuned the screen backlight to go three times brighter than normal when it’s flashing in this way, and it even looks at the color temperature of the scene to color-correct the screen flash in the same way the two-color LED flash on the rear of the phone works. It’s neat, and it works well. You will be the monster taking selfies with a flashing white screen in the bar, but you’ll be the monster with usable pictures the next day.

Both cameras have more megapixels, but it’s the one in the front that matters more

The resolution of the rear camera is now 12 megapixels, up from 8, and it can shoot 4K video. This is a pretty mild update. The actual photos from the iPhone 6S aren’t dramatically better than the photos from the iPhone 6 — they’re better, but not so much intensely better than you’ll notice a difference if you’re just sharing them on Facebook. I noticed slightly better macro performance and slightly better bokeh in a few shots, but Apple’s been taking iPhone 6 photos and blowing them up to put on billboards for a year, so the bar is pretty damn high. Let’s put it this way: the iPhone 6S is the best camera most people will ever own, but it’s not going to keep anyone out of the market for a mirrorless rig.

iPhone 6S Plus slider photo
Iphone 6 Plus slider photo
iPhone 6S Plus on the left, 6 Plus on the right. Images cropped and aligned.

Both cameras can take Apple’s new Live Photos, which are fun, if a little gimmicky. Nokia and HTC have released similar ideas, but Apple’s implementation is the most seamless: when you press the shutter button, you’ll see a little Live indicator pop up, letting you know that the phone is recording 1.5 seconds of action before and after your shot. Later, in your camera roll, you can 3D Touch the photo to play back the short audio and video clip you’ve captured — the shots animate slightly as you swipe through the camera roll to indicate which shots are live photos. It’s neat, but you’ve got to remember to keep your camera pointed at your subject after you’ve taken a photo — I have a lot of Live photos that are mostly me putting the phone back in my pocket. Apple says a forthcoming update will sense when you’re moving the phone and cut off the Live recording, which will be a welcome fix. And I found that I needed to have the camera roll open for a few moments before the system started recognizing my Live Photos by animating them slightly as I swiped through my shots; a little visual indicator would be much more useful.

Apple CEO Tim Cook says he thinks Live Photos will be "a new form," but more people will have to be able to watch them before they can blossom as an entire kind of media. Right now, you can share Live Photos with anyone using iOS 9, WatchOS 2, and OS X El Capitan. Apple also says it’ll put out an API to let Live Photos work in third-party apps and on the web (Instagram is already signed up), but I’m not really holding my breath for them to take off. If you want to record short videos, apps like Vine and Instagram already work great, and work everywhere, including Android phones.8

Actually, when you just dump the iPhone 6S camera roll to a Mac, Live Photos end up as a regular .jpg and a .mov file — they just get stitched together in iOS 9 so the .mov plays when you press on the .jpg. Clever!

Having every photo include a short video seems like overkill

And Live Photos take up double the space of regular photos, so having every single photo you take include a short video seems like major overkill. I would play with it for a while then flip it off and turn it on when you need it. (It would be super rad if the iPhone intelligently turned Live Photos on when the camera detected a face in the scene and turned it off when it didn’t. I have too many Live Photos of whiteboards, and not enough of people.)

It shouldn't be any surprise that 4K video looks great — it's way higher resolution than what you're used to from a phone, and Apple is very proud of the fact that the iPhone’s A9 processor can do all of its stabilization and processing magic while shooting 4K. It's not a RED, but it's not too shabby either. If you're a video nerd, you're going to have fun with it — the 6S is even powerful enough to edit 4K video in iMovie. But 4K video isn't actually turned on by default — you have to very deliberately flip it on. In fact, Apple's taken resolution settings entirely out of the camera app and moved them into the Settings app, which seems awfully like the company doesn't want people with the 16GB iPhone 6S to easily flip the video camera to the 4K mode that eats up 375MB of space per minute.9 That's probably fair, since most people don't have 4K TVs or ultra high-res monitors, but between 4K video and Live Photos that eat up double the space of regular photos, it would be better if the richest company in the world took a little loss on its profit margins and sold phones with a reasonable amount of base storage.

Once you’ve got 4K video recorded, there’s no particularly fast way to get it on a 4K TV — Apple’s assumption is that people will just upload everything to YouTube and other video sharing services. But you can plug your phone into your computer to grab files that way, and Lightning-to-HDMI cables that support 4K can’t be that far off.

Speed speed speed. Talking about the faster processor in an iPhone is a now yearly ritual — Apple loves to tout how insanely fast and powerful its A-line of chips has become, and the A9 in the iPhone 6S is no exception. Apple says it’s up to twice as fast as the A8 in the iPhone 6, and it’s obviously the fastest iPhone I've ever used. Apple won't confirm a specific increase in RAM, but the reported boost from 1GB to 2GB is pretty obvious once you start using the thing. Web pages in Safari reload less often, apps switch a little faster, and the entire phone feels lighter on its feet. Even TouchID has been improved for faster recognition — it's fast enough to recognize your fingerprint and unlock the phone in just about the time it takes to click the home button and wake the phone up, which means it's almost invisible if you get the motion down just right.10

Apple has been using the same TouchID sensor across all of its products since the iPhone 5S came out; this is the first new version.

But the relative speed of the newest iPhone is a tricky thing to really talk about now — the major US carriers are all pushing payment programs that let you upgrade your phone every year or so, and now even Apple's gotten into the mix with its new iPhone Upgrade Program. If you're the sort of person who's going to actually take full advantage of the enormous amounts of power that the iPhone 6S offers, you're probably the sort of person who'll be upgrading to the newest most-powerful-iPhone-ever next year. And app developers still have to contend with the millions of older iPhones on the market, so few apps will really push the phone as hard as it can go.11

Of course, Apple still sells the older models of its phones for a couple years after they debut, and there’s a big market for used and refurbished devices. It’s interesting how iPhones tend to float around for so long. Someone should track the complete story of a single phone from factory to landfill one of these days.

It all adds up to what seems like a unique inflection point in the history of computing: Apple’s shipping the most powerful processor ever in a smartphone, and it kind of doesn’t matter. The upgrade cycle has gotten so accelerated that by the time developers make full use of the A9, everyone who cares will have a much more powerful phone. That’s kind of crazy and wonderful; it speaks to Apple’s unique ability to push cutting-edge technology out to a huge market in a fairly natural way.

The most powerful processor ever in a smartphone, but it kind of doesn’t matter

We have a much more complete iOS 9 review here, but it’s worth taking a moment to talk through how it changes using the iPhone 6S. iOS 9 feels a lot like iOS 8 at first glance, but little changes like the revised reverse-chronological notifications, the much improved search, and always-on Hey Siri command all add up into a seriously enhanced experience. Apple’s also clearly taken the time to think through how to streamline navigating between apps, making it easier to flip between apps with breadcrumb links at the top of the screen, and creating a new (very Android-like) app switcher that seems like a huge mistake until you realize that pushing on the left edge of the 6S screen and swiping brings you back to a previous app. It’s great. It’s also too bad for anyone using an iPhone without a 3D Touch display.

iOS 9 also offers Apple's most comprehensive update to how the iPhone manages battery life. In my testing, I was routinely able to use the iPhone 6S for a full day under normal circumstances. And I could push even farther by turning on the new low power mode, which cuts performance, minimizes animations, and turns screen brightness down. Of course, every new iPhone gets great battery life for the first few months and then starts to fade, so don’t get too excited. My guess is that the iPhone 6S won't offer you a power experience wildly different than previous iPhones you might have owned and used in your particular life / work patterns. Apple is very much just holding serve here, and if we’re going to eventually use our phones as our wallets and keys and everything else, they need to start lasting much longer.12

Phones are now playing so many tricks to extend battery life at the end of the range that it’s actually kind of hard to run a straight battery test that means anything to regular people. What does it mean for a phone to get 10 hours of web browsing battery life and 14 hours of talk time? Is that useful information? I don’t know anymore.

This is a weird year to be reviewing an S iPhone, because this is the year that the two-year phone contract appears to finally be dying out in favor of leasing programs that allow you to get a new phone every year. I know lots of people who are proudly on the S cycle, happy to wait out the excitement of a new iPhone design for the perfected and improved second edition. But Apple and the carriers are making it much easier for us to all pay $27 a month for the rest of our lives to get a new phone every year, obsoleting the entire notion of an S cycle. Now you’re just on the iPhone cycle, and it’s going to be fascinating to watch that reality change how fast Apple and the rest of the industry change their products over time. It’s a new world.

The future is here. Face it with a gigantic screen

So I’m just going to put this out there, and then we can all handle the emotional consequences together: if you are thinking of buying a new phone, and you have anything older than an iPhone 6, you should buy an iPhone 6S Plus. It is the best iPhone ever made, and it is right now the best phone on the market. If you’re upgrading from an iPhone 5S or anything older, it will blow your mind. There just aren’t other companies that can roll out a feature like 3D Touch and make it work in a way that suggests the creation of entirely new interface paradigms, and every other phone maker needs to figure out exactly why Apple’s cameras are so consistent before they can really compete.

Note that I said the 6S Plus, not the 6S. I am convinced that in another year or so every phone will be the size of the 6S Plus, so if you’re going to jump in, just go all the way. You’ll get a slightly better camera and a little more battery life out of the deal as well. The future is here. You should face it with a gigantic screen.

But if you have an iPhone 6 or 6 Plus and you’re not ready to sign up for a yearly phone upgrade program, you might not feel the usual pull to get a new iPhone unless you really want a better front-facing camera. The speed improvements are incremental, the battery life is about the same, and it’ll take a while for developers to really make use of 3D Touch. And by the time that happens, it will probably be time to buy an iPhone 7.

The Breakdown

More times than not, the Verge score is based on the average of the subscores below. However, since this is a non-weighted average, we reserve the right to tweak the overall score if we feel it doesn't reflect our overall assessment and price of the product. Read more about how we test and rate products.

  • Design 8
  • Display 10
  • Camera(s) 10
  • Reception / Call quality 8
  • Performance 10
  • Software 9
  • Battery life 7
  • Ecosystem 9