Skip to main content

Where does Uber’s $35 billion deal with Didi leave Lyft?

The sorrow of being Number Two

Share this story

lyft

Uber used to have a big problem in China: it was hemorrhaging money — some reports put it at $1 billion a year — in its fierce battle with Didi Chuxing over the fastest growing ride-hail market in the world. This was good news for Lyft, Uber’s biggest competitor in the US, because the more Uber was focused on China, the less it could afford to worry about things here at home. But now Uber has solved its problem in China by allowing its operations there to be merged with Didi. And this could be really bad news for Lyft.

First of all, some analysts speculate that Uber’s deal with Didi actually gives it a small ownership stake in Lyft, since Didi invested $100 million in Lyft as part of a global partnership between the two companies (and two other Asian ride-hail apps, Grab and Ola) that was announced last December. “Uber will own a chunk of a chunk of Lyft,” Matt Levine writes in Bloomberg View, “in a big happy family of interlinked ride-sharing.”

Except things aren’t so happy in the rough-and-tumble world of ride-sharing. Uber and Lyft are locked in a no-holds-barred struggle to lock down as many customers as possible, with the assumption that most people could care less about the differences between the two and just want to use whichever is cheapest. As such, it’s been a race to the bottom, price-wise, and so far Uber is winning.

According to a recent analysis, Lyft only captured 5 percent of all black-car transactions in the second quarter of 2016, compared to Uber’s 72.5 percent. But over the last two years, Lyft has grown at a faster rate than Uber, 176 percent compared to 145 percent.

It’s unclear where the deal between Uber and Didi will leave Lyft. One of the outcomes of the partnership between Didi and Lyft was to enable Didi customers to seamlessly summon a car through Lyft’s app while traveling in the US, and vice-versa. That happened last April. But now that Uber and Didi are hopelessly intertwined — Uber has become one of Didi’s largest investors, and Didi gets a stake in Uber’s operations in the US — it’s difficult to see where this leads things for Lyft. Spokespersons for Uber, Didi, and Lyft did not respond to requests for comment.

“being number two in such a big market is an expensive proposition”

It’s more than just lost business. The Uber-Didi deal could pose a much more existential threat to Lyft, which so far has made the best out of being the Number Two ride-hailing app in the US.

“The China merger could even be a sign of things to come in the US since it's clear that being number two in such a big market is an expensive proposition,” said Harry Campbell, who blogs and records a podcast as The Rideshare Guy. “In the US, Lyft is in a tough spot since they're doing a fraction of the rides of Uber yet aren't making much headway in regards to market share.  Now that Uber doesn't need to worry about China, Uber will be able to put even more focus on their key markets like the US and maybe even force a Lyft merger or sale.”

If it comes to that, who would buy Lyft? The most obvious candidate is General Motors, which last year invested $500 million in the pink-mustachioed company for the purposes of developing a fleet of on-demand, self-driving cars. It was recently reported that those robot taxis will be tested on the road this year, thanks to GM’s recent acquisition of autonomous car startup Cruise Automation last March. Till then, the two companies are also working hand-in-glove on a car rental service targeted at Lyft drivers. If GM just bought Lyft, it could make things for both companies a lot easier.

Brian Solomon from Forbes asked this question last month, while noting that Lyft recently hired Qatalyst Partners to explore new investments — or a potential buyer. But Solomon also raises an excellent point: does GM really need to expose itself to Lyft’s losses? Now that Uber and Didi have called a cease fire, that question and many others are sure to rise to the surface in the months ahead.

Today’s Storystream

Feed refreshed 20 minutes ago Dimorphos didn’t even see it coming

J
External Link
Jess Weatherbed20 minutes ago
Won’t anyone think of the billionaires?

Forbes reports that rising inflation and falling stock prices have collectively cost members of the Forbes 400 US rich list $500 billion in 2022 with tech tycoons suffering the biggest losses.

Jeff Bezos (worth $151 billion) lost $50 billion, Google’s Larry Page and Sergey Brin (worth a collective $182b) lost almost $60b, Mark Zuckerberg (worth $57.7b) lost $76.8b, and Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey (worth $4.5b) lost $10.4b. Former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer (worth $83b) lost $13.5b while his ex-boss Bill Gates (worth $106b) lost $28b, albeit $20b of that via charity donations.


T
Thomas Ricker6:45 AM UTC
Check out this delightful DART Easter egg.

Just Google for “NASA DART.” You’re welcome.


Asian America learns how to hit back

The desperate, confused, righteous campaign to stop Asian hate

Esther WangSep 26
R
Twitter
Richard Lawler12:00 AM UTC
A direct strike at 14,000 mph.

The Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) scored a hit on the asteroid Dimorphos, but as Mary Beth Griggs explains, the real science work is just beginning.

Now planetary scientists will wait to see how the impact changed the asteroid’s orbit, and to download pictures from DART’s LICIACube satellite which had a front-row seat to the crash.


M
The Verge
We’re about an hour away from a space crash.

At 7:14PM ET, a NASA spacecraft is going to smash into an asteroid! Coverage of the collision — called the Double Asteroid Redirection Test — is now live.


E
Twitter
Emma RothSep 26
Missing classic Mario?

One fan, who goes by the name Metroid Mike 64 on Twitter, just built a full-on 2D Mario game inside Super Mario Maker 2 complete with 40 levels and eight worlds.

Looking at the gameplay shared on Twitter is enough to make me want to break out my SNES, or at least buy Super Mario Maker 2 so I can play this epic retro revamp.


R
External Link
Russell BrandomSep 26
The US might still force TikTok into a data security deal with Oracle.

The New York Times says the White House is still working on TikTok’s Trump-era data security deal, which has been in a weird limbo for nearly two years now. The terms are basically the same: Oracle plays babysitter but the app doesn’t get banned. Maybe it will happen now, though?


R
Youtube
Richard LawlerSep 26
Don’t miss this dive into Guillermo del Toro’s stop-motion Pinocchio flick.

Andrew Webster and Charles Pulliam-Moore covered Netflix’s Tudum reveals (yes, it’s going to keep using that brand name) over the weekend as the streamer showed off things that haven’t been canceled yet.

Beyond The Way of the Househusband season two news and timing information about two The Witcher projects, you should make time for this incredible behind-the-scenes video showing the process of making Pinocchio.


E
External Link
Emma RothSep 26
Netflix’s gaming bet gets even bigger.

Even though fewer than one percent of Netflix subscribers have tried its mobile games, Netflix just opened up another studio in Finland after acquiring the Helsinki-based Next Games earlier this year.

The former vice president of Zynga Games, Marko Lastikka, will serve as the studio director. His track record includes working on SimCity BuildIt for EA and FarmVille 3.


A
External Link
Vietnam’s EV aspirant is giving big Potemkin village vibes

Idle equipment, absent workers, deserted villages, an empty swimming pool. VinFast is Vietnam’s answer to Tesla, with the goal of making 1 million EVs in the next 5-6 years to sell to customers US, Canada and Europe. With these lofty goals, the company invited a bunch of social media influencers, as well as some auto journalists, on a “a four-day, multicity extravaganza” that seemed more weird than convincing, according to Bloomberg.


J
James VincentSep 26
Today, 39 years ago, the world didn’t end.

And it’s thanks to one man: Stanislav Petrov, a USSR military officer who, on September 26th, 1983, took the decision not to launch a retaliatory nuclear attack against the US. Petrov correctly guessed that satellite readings showing inbound nukes were faulty, and so likely saved the world from nuclear war. As journalist Tom Chivers put it on Twitter, “Happy Stanislav Petrov Day to those who celebrate!” Read more about Petrov’s life here.


Soviet Colonel who prevented 1983 nuclear response
Photo by Scott Peterson/Getty Images