Skip to main content
“Her market definition is so broad, so incomprehensible, it is, and I do not use this word lightly, absurd.”

Epic’s lead attorney on Google’s optimal market definition for this case, the one that Professor Tucker brought up and the judge was broadly skeptical of in court.

He’s pointing the jury to the very first question on their verdict form, where they get to decide if there’s a relevant antitrust market for this case. That’s important: if they choose that the market is anything other than Android app distribution and Android in-app payment solutions, Epic’s unlikely to win.