Two years before the T-Mobile G1 introduced the world to Android, Google presented carriers with the "Google Phone — a device that looked a lot more like the portrait QWERTY Android prototype shown in early 2008.
At the time, Google bemoaned that "basic phone user interfaces and the ability to integrate as a 3rd party are still a barrier," telling T-Mobile that Mountain View's expertise combined with the carrier's unlimited data plan would be a win-win. (Of course, six years later, unlimited data plans are an endangered species.)
The designs have surfaced in Oracle's case against Google over Java, with Oracle's attorneys pointing out that Java is a frequent mention across the original slide deck: "Leverage Java for its existing base of developers. Build a useful app framework (not J2ME). Support J2ME apps in compatibility mode. Provide an opTMobileized JVM (Dalvik)," one slide reads.
Google emphasized even in 2006 that it wasn't trying to undermine carriers — at least, that was the message they were conveying to T-Mobile — pointing out that the phone would run T-Mobile's SIM and would be T-Mobile's bill every month. Google, meanwhile, would provide the hardware and the "integrated services." To quote the deck, "low acquisition cost, high end data customers." Driving customers to high-end data plans has become part and parcel of the smartphone revolution — carriers are always looking for higher average revenue per user (ARPU), a figure commonly cited in quarterly earnings reports.
Exact specs for those first concepts aren't detailed, but Google does spell out what it had in mind for the least common denominator across Android devices. An ARMv9 processor of at least 200MHz, GSM (3G preferred), 64MB of RAM and ROM, miniSD (yes, mini, not micro) external storage, a 2-megapixel camera with a dedicated shutter button, USB support, Bluetooth 1.2, and a QVGA display with at least 16-bit color support — a far cry from today's 720p screens. At that time, touchscreen support wasn't a requirement — in fact, the baseline specs required two soft menu keys, indicating that touchscreens weren't really in the plan at all. Optionally, phones could also include a QWERTY keyboard (as the G1 did), Bluetooth 2.0 + EDR, a "secondary display," Wi-Fi, GPS, and hardware graphics acceleration.
Back in 2006, Google had Android working on TI's OMAP850 processor "in three form factors," and functional apps included the dialer, home screen, messaging app, contacts, and an early example of Android's ubiquitous WebKit-based browser; implementations of Google Talk, Gmail, Calendar, MMS, "chat-based SMS" (presumably a threaded messaging app), and POP email were expected for Q3 of that same year. That's a lot of functionality considering that it would be another year and a half before we'd see the first Android prototypes on display.
All told, Google expected Android to be certified by carriers between June 1st and August 31st of 2007, at which point it'd be released to manufacturers. Of course, it wasn't until October of 2008 that the G1 hit shelves.
Comments
Mmmm, orange.
By JimJam707 on 04.25.12 2:05pm
I want one.
By jdog25 on 04.25.12 2:16pm
I wonder what the blue line in the middle is for??
By XavierMathews on 04.25.12 2:25pm
Space?
By OKJCGO on 04.25.12 2:41pm
Android is all stolen. The development environment from Sun, and the design originally from Blackberry (though quickly adapted to steal from Apple after the iPhone announcement).
By Chat on 04.25.12 9:42pm
is your real name Larry Ellison?
By mwc2 on 04.25.12 9:45pm
I hear a lot of whining in crying from this guy^^^
Get over it.
By tonysam1 on 04.25.12 9:48pm
Steve?? but I thought you were resting in peace?
By LAmDroid on 04.25.12 10:08pm
more like rolling in his grave.
android is just as stolen as IOS.
open your eyes chat’s
By Vellion on 04.25.12 10:51pm
oops.. a little rough on the landing there…
By VoxMediaUser597380 on 04.26.12 7:21am
And why do you care?
By Dansus on 04.25.12 10:53pm
I agree, there is a lot of shoddy work that has gone into Android and a lot of stolen UI work. Android will be radically changed to the point of “Samsung-level” usability after all the lawsuits are settled.
By The Splurge on 04.25.12 11:43pm
It would light up when Skynet became active.
By jdog25 on 04.25.12 3:01pm
You mean it isn’t? I’ve been stocking up for judgement day so long, the MREs are already expired. And now they make programs about it on Bravo and History…
It’s lonely having too much foresight.
By capnbob on 04.25.12 5:10pm
BWAHAHAHAHHA
“Do no evil”
Sparks flying
“Do… Know… Evillllllllllllll.. I am anduuuuuroid… .”
By VoxMediaUser597380 on 04.26.12 7:23am
Skynet is an actual thing(seriously look it up), that does, very much, what the movie Skynet does except it has no AI. With the advent of all these new drone contracts, I expect judgement day to be here in the next 100 years or so. = )
By avinash240 on 04.26.12 1:44pm
Since it wasn’t a touch screen phone it might have been the left/right scroll bar. Just my humble opinion.
By Fat Man Chew on 04.25.12 4:21pm
You’re correct. The BETA Androids available at the time were scrollable with multiple home screens as it is now. It’s logical that this was the scroll bar . Didn’t the iPhone have a huge impact though…
By BoardDWorld on 04.25.12 7:58pm
That’s the antenna. You put your thumb there and it drops the call. No wonder Jobs was pissed, another idea stolen.
By captain obvious on 04.25.12 4:49pm
Ha! Like it!
By GotMac? on 04.26.12 12:24am
search
By algeria on 04.25.12 7:00pm
It looks aweso… HAHAHAHA.
Sorry, I can’t do this, it’s too hilarious.
By inket on 04.25.12 2:28pm
I feel like you all forgot what phones looked like back then…
The G1 wasn’t exactly gorgeous. And that actually was produced and sold.
By Ghost650 on 04.25.12 2:41pm
But the original iPhone was, and so was the HTC Touch Diamond. Just because some phones were ugly didn’t make this good design.
By Joe Dombrowski on 04.25.12 2:49pm
Oh I know. I am just illustrating that the prospect of a device with this design being sold is not so far fetched.
By Ghost650 on 04.25.12 4:36pm