Uber’s ‘flying cars’ could arrive in LA by 2020 — and here’s what it’ll be like to ride one

Uber’s “flying car” project Elevate came whizzing back into view today with a number of key announcements about where it will first appear, who will be working on it, and how this futuristic service will look when it ultimately takes off.

In a speech at the Web Summit in Lisbon today, Uber’s head of product Jeff Holden announced that the company is adding a third city, Los Angeles, to its list of places where it hopes to pilot its aerial taxi service by 2020. LA joins Dallas-Fort Worth and Dubai as cities announced to be working with Uber on the program.

Holden also said that Uber has signed a Space Act Agreement with NASA to create a brand-new air traffic control system to manage these low-flying, possibly autonomous aircraft. And to round it all out, Uber released a glossily produced video to demonstrate what using its aerial taxi service would look like from the perspective of a working mom who just wants to get home to her kids.

As you can see, it’s all very utopian. A passenger books the flight through her Uber app, and then ascends to a “skyport” on the roof of a nearby building. She badges through a turnstile using her smartphone — security is non-existent in this futuristic vision — and is briefly weighed to make sure she’s not too portly for Uber’s weight-conscious flying taxis.

Smiling agents wearing headsets, goggles, and Uber-branded vests lead her and several other passengers across the roof to their awaiting aircraft, which appears to be a plane-helicopter hybrid with fixed wings and tilt prop-rotors. Despite the presence of these whirling blades, no-one’s hair moves at all. During the flight, she looks out of the window with pity at all the poor souls stuck in traffic below, as she is whisked through the clouds to her gorgeous, perfect family waiting at home. The closing tagline: “Closer than you think.”

How much closer? Uber first introduced its plan to bring ride-sharing to the skies in a white paper last year, but the project still faces significant hurdles. The kind of aircraft Uber envisions shuttling passengers from rooftop to rooftop — electric, autonomous, with the ability to take off and land vertically (also known as VTOL, pronounced vee-tol) — don’t exist yet, nor does the infrastructure to support such a vehicle. Experts suggest that engineering and regulatory hindrances will likely prevent flying cars from ever taking off in a meaningful way.

Which is not to say flying cars aren’t having a moment. At least 19 companies are developing flying-car plans. These include legacy manufacturers like Boeing and Airbus, and small startups like Kitty Hawk, owned by Google founder Larry Page. Meanwhile, Uber has made significant strides in partnering with a handful of aircraft manufacturers, real estate firms, and regulators to better its chances of developing a fully functional, on-demand flying taxi service. It held a day-long conference on the project in Dallas in April. And Holden says more alliances, especially with manufacturers, will be announced in the future.

In an interview, Holden argued that even without a demonstrable product, Uber Elevate is indeed closer than many people think. “There’s been a great deal of progress that’s been hard to see from the outside, because a lot of this is just hard work at the drafting table,” he says. “We feel really good. It’s been a really interesting process getting our vehicle manufacturing partners aligned on performance specifications, so that they’re building vehicles that align with what we need to make Elevate successful. So lots of good progress there.”

Teaming up with NASA is a big deal for Uber. First, it allows the company to tout the approval of the highly regarded space agency to skeptics. It also codifies Uber’s participation in NASA’s uncrewed traffic management (UTM) project, which was first introduced in 2015 to regulate drone traffic. As The Verge’s Ben Popper wrote two years ago: “It’s an attempt to put an end to the Wild West atmosphere that has been the norm for uncrewed aerial systems (UAS) over the last five years, replacing it with a next-generation air traffic control system.”

Holden said that Uber wouldn’t have to wait for 2020 before it starts testing things out IRL. The company aims to begin operating a fleet of low-flying helicopters around Dallas-Fort Worth Airport — while working with air traffic controllers to not encroach on their flight paths — as a way to test NASA’s UTM system.

“NASA is very focused on getting UTM adoption and pressure-testing the framework and make sure it works correctly,” Holden said. “Uber is actually trying to put this new air traffic system into production.”

The agreement won’t involve any money transfers, but it will allow Uber and NASA to trade technology and expertise. The ride-hail company already poached Mark Moore, a NASA veteran and VTOL expert, to help run its Elevate project.

Shifting to LA, Holden said the decision to expand Uber’s flying taxi project to the city of perpetual gridlock was a natural one. “It’s one of the most congested cities in the world today,” he said. “They essentially have no mass transit infrastructure. This type of approach allows us to very inexpensively deploy a mass transit method that actually doesn’t make traffic worse.”

The city’s elected officials have signed off, though Uber says it will conduct community meetings to hear resident concerns about noise, pollution, and access. Much like it did in Dallas and Dubai, Uber has signed an agreement with a local landlord, Sandstone Properties, to develop rooftop launch pads for its VTOL aircraft. The company predicts a one-and-a-half hour car journey from LAX to the Staples Center could take less than 30 minutes using a combination of flying cars and regular cars.

“LA is the perfect testing ground for this new technology, and I look forward to seeing it grow in the coming years,” said Mayor Eric Garcetti in a statement provided by Uber.

The jury is out on whether an urban VTOL system would make an appreciable contribution to a next-generation transportation system, or whether it would simply be an escape hatch for the super rich to avoid street-level congestion. Holden argued that if the latter were true, Uber wouldn’t be pursuing this project.

“That’s not Uber’s MO,” he said. “If we’re doing this, you have to believe that we’re going to get the price very low.”

Holden predicts that fares will be so low, it will actually be cheaper to fly with Uber than own your own car. And if that sounds familiar, it’s because it's long been the company’s mission to bring about the end of personal car ownership. An aerial taxi service would just be another tool in the toolkit toward that end.

There are plenty of skeptics that say flying cars, especially electric-powered aircraft, aren’t worth pursuing. They wonder if the economics work, or if passengers would balk at getting on board a self-flying vehicle. “Obviously, I like flying things,” Elon Musk recently told Bloomberg. “But it’s difficult to imagine the flying car becoming a scalable solution.” He also said he’d be worried about hubcaps falling out of the sky and killing someone. But Holden dismissed Musk’s comment as “an off-the-cuff, random statement.”

“We’ve studied this carefully and we believe it is scalable,” Holden said. “We’ve done the hard work so we can build skyports, and can get the throughput operationally to move tens of thousands flights per day per city.”

When you step back and look at what Uber is proposing, it’s truly staggering. Tens of thousands of flights per day. Electric, autonomous aircraft buzzing from rooftop to rooftop. Trips costing as little as $20. It’s fairly blue-sky thinking, even for a company that regularly imbibes its own Kool-Aid. The runway isn’t clear yet, but Uber is convinced its path forward will be free of turbulence.

Recommended by Outbrain

Comments

What’s the difference between a "flying car" and a helicopter? Autonomy?

Also, love that in 2020 they are still using QR codes.

Why QR codes are bullet proof, and let you use printed paper as a backup. QR codes seem like a fine solution. Personally I’m spending tonight fighting Bluetooth pairing issues on a pair of Windows 10 PCs so I’m not sold on Bluetooth.

In theory this could all be done today with helicopters… And I believe that UBER will go that way for the MVP in 2020, so to boast freely it could be done, but with one or two routes.
Technically the underlying tech for the "flying car" would be different (electric, tilt rotor, no explosion/combustion fuel in case of falling), so not to be pestered with the already existing legislation (e.g.I believe in NY flight is forbidden for the existing aerial vehicles since 9/11, so we need a new class of vehicle that can go around this).
But yes… Flying car or electric helico… what’s in a name.

Pros: Cheaper, less moving parts and rotating masses, quieter, more maneuverable flying characteristics. Better yaw control when everything is working!

Cons: dynamically balanced, less powerful, needs lots of computers, vibration, pitching to move forward.

Once you get to osprey like drones with the swing arms, the complexity is enough to just make a traditional helo autonomous.

If flying cars are to scale, you can’t just fly people. Funny thing is LA has some other opptys for these things that this tech can scale there.

@2020 is two and a half years away. What makes you think there will be a replacement in that short a time?

I commuted between El Segundo and Downtown for a year. It never took 1 hr 20 min, more like 45 min on average.

I don’t think Uber has it together enough as a company to pull this off in a little over 2 years.

Too many companies are showing computer renderings of the future and people assume that means its JUST a few years away. I think the FAA alone will take a decade to test, approve and license autonomous flying vehicles the moment there is one ACTUALLY ready to fly, I mean they are still trying to figure out how to deal with drones let alone a new class of multi-passenger vehicles whizzing about in a dense urban environment. A federal agency doesn’t do anything "quickly", and especially not when human safety is a concern.

If there was even an actual working model of this vehicle in use today I would still say it was highly dubious to get everything in order to introduce a service by 2020, but I am calling this out as utter fake bullshit geared towards trying to entice investor interest at a time when Uber is crumbling apart internally and in public opinion and reputation.

this!

I love the idea, and think it will bring the cost of flying down when going for scale… but to be feasible…in the end.. .I doubt it.

Eh, I’d much rather them and everyone else focus on self-driving cars than this useless dream.

Not only will it not be feasible economically, but I’m sure people will also hate large drones flying above them all the damn time, and I’m not talking noise – those things will have to be 10 times safer than helicopters. Many cities straight-up ban those because of the danger, how many will be okay with having hundreds of vehicles flying constantly over high-density population centers?

They are not focused on this. They pay tech publications to write these things. Or maybe Uber writes them and just pays sites to publish it. They do this to keep the tech savvy public feeling positive about the company instead of asking why the drivers hate Uber and why Uber isn’t making money.

The 1h 20min example, is that extreme? In a way it’s strangely welcome if not, as in both cases public transit and cycling would both be marginally faster, if to varying extents something of a rigmarole in LA.

Current electric helicopters can fly for about 15 minutes. It is an incredibly energy-intensive way to travel for 10 miles. We would more likely be looking at the smog of Sao Paulo, where CEOs frequently use helicopters to avoid jams. Both cities have massive highways (some get to 18 lanes wide) deficient public transit and vituperative resistance to any attempts to make cycling for everyday purposes feel like less of a gauntlet. Or to stay in LA, maybe I should say it’ll be more like blade runner?

These are no more "flying cars" than the recent "hoverboards" have been actual hoverboards.

It looks like an plane to me.

Those bezels though…

To hell with Uber, I hope they choke on a pretzel and die.

Another great ride-sharing service for the Rich. The average Joe will not be able to afford frequent rides with it, that’s for sure; and even if they could, they would probably prefer waiting in traffic for an extra 15-20 min a day and spend the saved money on vacation flights rather than short duration Uber flights.

because this will be so economical everyone will use it. NOT.

this is the stupidest crap ever.

guess they will have to install landing pads everywhere or you will need a taxi or uber for the last part of your journey to the welfare line.

So many reasons to be cynical about this, but the dream is amazing. I wish them all the best.

Wonder how this will fair with The Boring Company….
(that solution breaks down if there’s an accident entering or exiting "the tunnels").

All the talk about autonomy, and no-one mentions the pilot in the video?

maybe they will be there for W&B?

If not a pilot, who was that random person sitting up front with the headset on? maybe there for peace of mind or just W&B?

He did have a kind of "I’m not actually doing anything useful, but I sure look good pretending to talk to ATC" kind of look.

This is nothing but a puff piece. Probably paid for by Uber.

—Person who didn’t even bother to skim the article.

Congratulations Uber on inventing the heliport!

It’s encouraging to see increasing amounts of healthy skepticism about this endless stream of journalism praising this company. It’s business model is predatory. And even with a predatory model, it still needs Saudi Princes to subsidize the rides. This is the place for THAT discussion to happen but the powers that be here seem more interested in science fiction advocacy.

Personal aircraft will only become possible after driverless technology in two dimensions has been perfected. Adding a third adds complications that may not be resolved for years.

View All Comments
Back to top ↑