Apple’s new entry-level 13-inch MacBook Pro is an obvious upgrade

There’s a new entry-level MacBook Pro in town. An “entry-level pro” machine is a bit of an oxymoron, so the best way to look at this computer is to think of it as an upgrade to the mainstream MacBook Air — one that doesn’t command the extremely high price tags of the rest of Apple’s MacBook Pro lineup.

This particular model starts at $1,299 and replaces the entry-level MacBook Pro from 2017. It brings along a few new features and upgrades, most notably a much more capable processor and the ability to log in with your fingerprint. It’s a much better upgrade over the Air than the prior model, and I think it’s certainly worth the $200 premium you’ll pay to get it. For that price, you’ll get a faster, quieter, more powerful machine and I’d strongly recommend considering it if you’re looking at the MacBook Air.

But this is still a MacBook, and it comes with a lot of the baggage and bugbears that have plagued every new MacBook released since 2015. Primarily, it has the super low-profile “butterfly” keyboard, which has proven to be horribly unreliable over the years. Apple says this latest revision should be more reliable than before, but that’s impossible to confirm after a week of testing. At any rate, this brand-new computer is included in Apple’s Keyboard Service Program right from the get-go. That could either inspire confidence or concern, depending on how you look at it.

If you need to buy a new laptop this year and you want one with macOS, you’re going to have to live with the butterfly keyboard, as it’s the only option across the entire lineup. That makes the new entry-level Pro the best model for most people, as it has more power and provides a better overall experience than the Air for everyday tasks, but doesn’t cost nearly as much as Apple’s higher-end MacBook Pro models.

Apple’s MacBook Pro line has turned out to be one of the most controversial tech products of the past few years. Beyond the already-mentioned keyboard, the last major design revision ditched all ports save for USB-C and traded the standard row of function keys for the Touch Bar on the higher-end models. That last feature has now made it to the entry-level MacBook Pro, leaving only the MacBook Air with physical keys for brightness, volume, and escape in Apple’s lineup.

The base configuration of the MacBook Pro 13 comes with an 8th Gen Core i5 quad-core processor, 8GB of RAM, and 128GB of storage. I’d strongly recommend upgrading that storage to 256GB for $200 more, since it’s not possible to increase it after the fact. As an upgrade pick to the MacBook Air, it does mean spending quite a bit more over the very base model Air — but you’d be spending more to get that amount of storage on the Air anyway.

If you’re feeling extra spendy, upgrade the RAM to 16GB for yet another $200 more. Most people will be fine with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage, though the model I’ve been using for the past week does have 16GB of RAM and it’s worked very well in my tests. If your budget comes down to either larger storage or more RAM, however, go with the increased storage.

The new processor, which has a base clock speed of just 1.4GHz but can “turbo” up to 3.9GHz, has been stellar in my testing. Though its base speed is much lower than the old 2.3GHz dual-core chip in the prior version, it has no trouble handling everyday productivity work, including juggling multiple browser windows with many open tabs; simultaneously running apps like Word, Excel, Slack, email, and other typical programs used in a modern office environment; and switching between multiple virtual desktops frequently. The MacBook Pro gives you noticeably more headroom for this kind of multitasking work, so you don’t have to worry as much about opening that one extra app or browser tab that can slow down the MacBook Air.

The Core i5 processor can also easily edit photos in Apple Photos, Adobe Photoshop, or Lightroom, and if you occasionally need to do video editing, it can power through that, too. I don’t think there’s much benefit to spending $300 to upgrade to the slightly faster Core i7 chip in this model, as its performance advantage will likely be limited by the thermal constraints of the Pro’s thin design. (If you are buying a laptop primarily for video editing, however, I’d strongly recommend stepping up to the more expensive four USB port-equipped 13-inch or even better, 15-inch, MacBook Pro models, which have even more powerful processors and graphics card options designed specifically for that kind of work.)

Surprisingly, even with the same overall chassis design, the new MacBook Pro stays far cooler than the prior model, with temperatures hovering below 50 degrees Celsius the vast majority of the time. That means the fan (yes, singular, it only has one) almost never comes on — in fact, during my week of using the Pro for all of my work, the fan only spun up once while I was doing standard productivity tasks. That’s far better than the old dual-core model or the MacBook Air, whose fans will spin to a mighty roar with just a few Chrome tabs open. It’s not enough for me to say this is as quiet as a truly fanless computer — an import or export of RAW image files in Lightroom will certainly bring the fan to life — but it’s much more pleasant to work at than the other models that seem to be blowing air more often than they are not.

The Touch Bar, which replaces the standard row of function keys with a touchscreen strip, has been quite controversial since its launch, with many MacBook Pro customers lamenting the loss of physical keys for brightness, volume, and most importantly, the escape key. And while the Touch Bar’s design allows for more contextual flexibility than fixed keys, it seems that most people are just using it for the same things they used function row keys for before: adjusting volume, changing the brightness, and hitting the escape key.

Personally, I can take or leave the Touch Bar. I don’t find it that much harder to use in my everyday work to adjust the volume or brightness, and while I occasionally like the contextual options that pop up in different apps (especially the ability to shrink a YouTube video playing in Safari to picture-in-picture mode), I don’t think I’d miss the Touch Bar if it wasn’t there. I would miss Touch ID, however, as it’s a much easier way to log in to the computer with my fingerprint than typing out a password.

Of course, as I mentioned earlier, the most controversial thing about any new MacBook is its keyboard. The new entry-level MacBook Pro still has the extremely low-profile butterfly switch keyboard found on the prior model and every other MacBook you can buy right now, but it has been revised with the “new materials” and dust shield that Apple introduced in later iterations. This has the effect of making the keyboard slightly quieter to type on, but these changes are primarily to improve the reliability of the keyboard, so it’s less likely to succumb to stuck or doubling keys because a tiny piece of dust got lodged in the switch. I’m hesitant to say Apple has “fixed” this keyboard, but it has worked fine during my review period.

Aside from the very real reliability concerns, the low-profile keyboard is something you either viscerally hate to type on or don’t mind at all. I’m in the latter camp — I find the size and spacing of the keys very comfortable under my fingers and I don’t mind the low travel. I do appreciate that it is a little bit quieter than before, as well.

The trackpad is exactly the same as before, and it remains the best trackpad you can get on any 13-inch laptop. It’s enormous, silky smooth, and extremely responsive to multifinger swipes and gestures. Apple also has the best palm-rejection I’ve ever used, preventing the cursor from jumping around erratically when I’m typing.

Also the same as the outgoing entry-level Pro is the port selection: you get two Thunderbolt 3 USB-C ports on the left and a 3.5mm headphone jack on the right. You’ll need to use one of those ports to charge the computer, and unless you have a fleet of brand-new accessories that already have USB-C cables, you’ll need dongles and adapters to plug anything else into the other port. It’d be wise to budget for a few USB-C dongles or even a full-fledged hub when you purchase this computer. That’s the same number of ports you get on the MacBook Air and two short of what you get on higher-end MacBook Pro models.

Apple did appear to change the speakers in this model — they aren’t quite as full-sounding as before. I don’t think they are bad by any stretch, and they run laps around the speakers you get on most Windows computers, but they are noticeably tinnier sounding than on other MacBook Pro models.

Finally, while Apple claims this latest MacBook Pro can get up to 10 hours of battery life between charges, my experience with it has been closer to six and a half to seven hours. That’s a little less than I prefer — if I can’t get through a full eight-hour day with the brightness set to 50 percent and running my usual suite of a web browser, Slack, email, Tweetdeck, Word, Excel, and other productivity apps, I’m a little disappointed. Battery life was the same whether I used Safari or Chrome, as well, in case you were wondering if changing the browser makes a meaningful difference with this computer.

Overall, this latest entry-level MacBook Pro addresses some of the issues from the prior model, while still leaving the door wide open for improvement on others. This machine performs better, is quieter and cooler to the touch, and is overall more pleasant to use than the model it replaces or the current MacBook Air.

If you look at the entire MacBook lineup right now, you’ll find compromises aplenty. The Air is slightly underpowered, this Pro only has two USB ports, and even the higher-end models have faced complaints about their thermals, not to mention the high prices they command. But on the whole, I think this entry-level MacBook Pro is the ideal compromise for the vast majority of buyers: you get much better performance over the Air, while not having to spend nearly as much as the higher-end MacBook Pro models. Most people needing a laptop for school or productivity work will be well-served by this model. Unless you have particular and demanding needs, and you know who you are if you do, this model is more than capable of handling most anything thrown at it.

Hopefully this will be the last MacBook Pro where we have to worry about the keyboard breaking, as Apple is rumored to release a new design in the next year or so that utilizes an entirely new keyboard setup. But until that happens, if you’re looking to buy a new MacBook for school or work, this entry-level MacBook Pro is the one to get.

Vox Media has affiliate partnerships. These do not influence editorial content, though Vox Media may earn commissions for products purchased via affiliate links. For more information, see our ethics policy.

Comments

I agree that if you prefer to be in the MacOS world, this hits a lot of the right notes. It’s not the slowest, but it’s not the fastest. The base specs are just good enough to make you agonize over whether or not you should upgrade the RAM or the SSD. $1300 is a lot of money for a well-designed machine with market-average specs, so you really have to be buying this thing for the Apple experience.

Apple has historically redesigned the Macbooks in some capacity every 4 years though, so I’ll be waiting to see if the keyboard, bezels, and/or thermals get some love in 2020.

Exactly! If I am buying a laptop right now, I’ll go with the Chromebook options. But for Mac, this good enough. Port selection is fine, trackpad is good, screen is good, Touch ID is nice.. Touchbar not so nice, keyboard is workable but not that great.

It’s always kind of funny to me when people complain about Apple’s purchase prices without considering either resale value or quality (how long it will last).

quality (how long it will last)

Are you not aware of the quality problems with recent MacBooks?

I am. Every manufacturer has problems from time to time.

Have you heard of exploding batteries? Or foldables?

Exploding batteries? Do you mean like the Note 7 that Samsung rightfully recalled? or the Samsung Fold, which Samsung decided to retool and take off the market?

Your examples showcase a company that made a mistake and learned from them.

Apple? yeah, they still have the same butterfly keyboard switches, and the 4-year warranty to go with them. It’s not enough for them to actually retool the keyboard or develop something with a far lower failure rate.

Samsung is actually trying to make changes and listen to their customers. Apple still loves to hand-wave away anything that isn’t glowing reception as "a select few people".

And listen, While I am Windows guy, I used to absolutely adore the older MacBook pro keyboard and their trackpad, it was the golden standard for a long time (giving Lenevo a run for their money with their switches) so I am particularly perturbed when they made the switch to low-profile switches for absolutely no reason whatsoever.

If they just used the Air’s keyboard layout (i.e. NO TOUCHBAR) I’d be all-in on this.

I agree. Shame Apple axed the no-Touch Bar MacBook Pro.

I feel like Apple has such a hard time admitting that they have made mistakes since they are seen as iconic when it comes to design. If they just got over the ego and branding aspect of it we probably wouldn’t have to deal with awkward moments like this. Same thing that happened to the trash can mac pro, it took them so long to admit they were wrong and fix it. I am still waiting for them to fix the laptop design.

Honestly for most I’d recommend the Air, especially if you don’t like the Touch Bar (which I personally don’t.) The Verge has criticized the performance but I’ve been using the 2018 model since November and I’ve yet to run into any issues with it.

Granted our work flows are almost certainly different but I’ve edited six minute 1080p videos, done plenty of photo editing from both my phone and dedicated camera, and I usually have ~13 browser tabs open, Spotify, Spark (email,) Tweetbot, and Discord open. Somehow I’m not running into these same performance issues ¯\(ツ)

Granted some of this stuff is bound to be faster on the quad core base MBP, but you’re also saving $200, getting at least an extra hour of battery life, and you get an esc key with the benefits of Touch ID. At least from my own experience I really believe The Verge is overplaying the performance issues with the Air.

I wish there was a video on touchbar hate (or lack thereof). I don’t get it… I have the 2016 version of this device without the touchbar. Didn’t think I needed a "pro" device. But my neighbor is a DJ and producer. He loves the touchbar for his pro apps. And a lot of video producers seem to like it as well. So I feel the hate comes from consumers who won’t take the time to program the thing or from developer pros who actually used the function keys. I want to know if this general intuition about the audiences who do and don’t like the touch bar is correct. And I’d like to know what Apple could do to improve the experience, especially if just adding an escape key is all that’s necessary…

I’d probably be fine with the TouchBar if they added an Esc key to the left end. Just seems like a wasted opportunity. They’re able to put a physical TouchID button on the right side, why not a physical Esc key on the left? Not only does it make for poor usage, it’s asymmetrical.

There’s a rumor that the next macbook pro will have a physical escape button. Best of both worlds.

What are you trying to escape from? And why do you need a key to escape??

#confused

Not everyone produces music or edits videos, so I’m guessing people who dont fall into that category don’t like it. They should at least give me the option getting a mac book pro without one

I don’t produce music or edit videos, but I’m a big fan of the TouchBar. For me, it adds another level of simplicity, particularly when responding to dialogue options, or filing-out forms. It can be such a timesaver.

I’m curious to see whether the markets perception shifts one way or another with this new model. Until now the only laptops that had the Touch Bar were distinctly "pro-sumer" (if not outright pro/business) which no doubt attracts a certain audience. In the past it’s been Apples cheaper models that had the most mass market appeal and given we now have a MacBook Pro that is not too much more expensive than the base Air, and has other distinct benefits too it, we could see a lot more of the less technology demanding user base buying a Mac with the TouchBar, and for all we know that segment might respond differently to it.

Personally I don’t have one but would love it on a system. The base Pro is in my budget where the higher end models aren’t.

Solid update to the entry level MacBook Pro but I’ll wait until a redesign or the rumoured 12" ARM MacBook (which is most likely happening next year) before I upgrade. My biggest gripe with the Pro refresh is that Apple discontinued the no-Touch Bar MacBook Pro so now people will have to submit to using that abomination for the most basic tasks. No steps forward, two steps back.

For now, I’ll cherish my 2015 MacBook Pro.

It seems like a big miss that Apple discontinued their only passively cooled laptop. A step backward in their usual thinner-lighter-quieter mantra, so an ARM version would make the most sense. Could they have so much MB inventory to sell out that they’re taking a year off from an ultraportable laptop? I don’t think it makes much sense.

And I think, design-wise, the discontinued MB and the old MBA were their most iconic, and the new ones don’t really echo that meaningfully.

Meh, needs at least two more ports.

Dedicated magsafe power port, 2 USB A ports, 2 thunderbolt ports, 1 full size HDMI port, full travel keyboard, and 1 full size SD slot – core i5, 512GB, 8GB RAM — The macbook pro 13" late 2013 model bought for ~$1.3k USD brand new back then. Now look at what we’re considering a "good" deal from Apple.

That machine did not come with 512GB of storage and people absolutely complained about its keyboard’s travel. Take off the rose-tinted glasses.

It did come with 512gb storage…it’s what I’m still using right now. And the key travel is fantastic.

That’s a bit disingenuous, because while a variant did offer a 512/8 GB SSD/RAM, that model was $1.8k, not $1.3k.
https://everymac.com/systems/apple/macbook_pro/macbook-pro-retina-display-faq/differences-between-macbook-pro-retina-display-early-2013-late-2013.html

If we want to be very nitpicky, $1.8k in 2013 is worth $1,979 today, and today you can get a 512/8 GB SSD/RAM 13" MacBook Pro for… $1,999.
http://www.in2013dollars.com/us/inflation/2013?amount=1800

This.

To go further, always Apple could lower their prices, but RAM prices are not their fault, Intel’s great stagnation is not their fault, and replacing HDDs with SSDs is a huge performance win, and that comes with a price. We are getting a lot more laptop, even if it’s not always in ways that people appreciate (personally I was happy with screens 5 years ago and I couldn’t care less about smartphone cameras post iPhone 5 but YMMV).

View All Comments
Back to top ↑