grahaman27

Yeah it’s a disappointment, but not a lie. If you want x64 support on windows , you’ll just have to stay on developer preview for the one device that nobody uses that missed the windows 11 boat.

For what it’s worth, it’s the exact same story for WSLg, which arrived on windows 10 preview builds, but eventually only destined for windows 11 . Oh well.

This is exactly the problem. And 1 year later Qualcomm and Samsung have shown almost no interst competing with apple.

You follow it pretty closely? That’s cool. So you know a year ago they announced support if you were on the windows insider preview. Is that lying? And it’s lying to whom? The arm windows audience accounts for 0.000001% of windows users.

I know, because 1 year ago I used this on my Samsung Galaxy book s which I purchased just to test performance.

You are referring to using the Mac hypervisor, which wouldn’t be what this article is mentioning.

However newer parallels versions can run windows for arm on Mac, which should see good performance… But games would have to use this emulation layer.

Its literally the same user mode translation technique that Rosetta uses. The reason the m1 performs well emulating x64 is not because of Rosetta, it’s because they designed the m1 architecture to handle x86_64 translation efficiently.

So, windows 11 on m1 macs would enjoy the same fast emulation if windows for arm was installed. As for Qualcomm chips running windows for arm? They all suck.

PSA: this looks like the VM02WS keyboard with a razor logo stamped on it and 3x the price.

yeah they are as powerful*

*at lower frequency

I should have used astricks

To really answer your question, Leaked plans show 13th gen will do similar to what you are saying. E cores are about 1/4 the size and power (TDP) of P cores, 13th gen will have 24 core variations, leaning more heavily on the E cores (8P+16E)

If the last generation cores are just as powerful as the efficiency cores, why didn’t they just make a 64 core processor last generation?